in ,

Yamashita’s Gold and the CIA

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

During World War II, Japan’s Emperor Hirohito directed the looting of the national treasures in 13 nations his army had conquered. This included the wealth of Britain, Netherlands, and France, which had moved some of their gold to Asian colonies for safety. What happened to these treasures, estimated at around 100 billion in 1945 dollars? This loot was combined with treasure seized from the Germans to create a vast slush fund called the Black Eagle Trust, which was used to finance clandestine activities of the CIA. These funds allowed the creation of a huge organized crime syndicate in Asia that supplement their funds via drug and arms trafficking, and government contract and bank fraud.

___________________________________________

“Protecting the American Opium Trade”; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbMtlSCjLcc

“The Empire Enters the Cocaine Trade”; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMmeImFzYRk

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

-1 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric Zuesse
January 22, 2022

Your video cites as a major source the Seagraves’ 2003 book, Gold Warriors, but that book is 100% allegations and 0% documentation — entirely without footnotes to any sources, and just no sources cited in it at all, but to be accepted 100% on faith. Although it is well written, I cannot use it as a source or refer to it as being a work of history instead of as being largely fictitious or merely an interesting novel. I don’t think that you should, either. I don’t want my credibility to rest on ‘sources’ such as that. Why do you?

Eric Zuesse
Reply to  G2mil
January 24, 2022

That’s ad-hominem about the book’s author; and on that basis you consider him to be trustworthy on the thousands of allegations he makes that have no documentation. I don’t cite anyone as being trustworthy on anything unless I can see the evidence. If a supposed non-fiction book supplies no evidence it is a novel, not a history, as far as I am concerned. Your defense of ad-hominem and willingness to go without any ad-rem is discrediting to your own allegations, so that an ad-hominem against what you yourself allege becomes based entirely upon ad-rem; namely, your willingness to be entirely… Read more »

Will RT Fire Max Keiser?

“The unrest in Kazakhstan is a threat for both Russia and China” interview with Ararat Kostanian