Connect with us

Latest

News

He said it! Donald Trump accuses Hillary Clinton of seeking World War 3

Donald Trump is a man of many words, but last week he uttered the most important sentence of his political life.

Published

on

1,025 Views

He stated the following:

“You’re going to end up in World War Three over Syria if we listen to Hillary Clinton,” Mr Trump said. “You’re not fighting Syria any more, you’re fighting Syria, Russia and Iran, all right?”

And there we have it, he said the words that millions around the world implicitly know to be correct, but for a major US presidential candidate to utter them, speaks volumes. In the parallel universe that is western mainstream media, Trump’s pre-political ‘pussy’ quote is worthy of note. Yet for those living in the parallel universe where people acknowledge being closer to world war than at any time since 1962, it is Trump’s warning of Hillary Clinton’s eagerness to militarily engage Russia, Iran, Syria and others, simultaneously, that will be the most difficult to forget.

Many people have complained that the rhetoric of the current US presidential campaign has sunk to new lows. In many ways this is true, but for all the nasty rhetoric, there has been an opening up of free speech whereby both candidates have felt the ability to say what they truly feel.

Because of this we know that for Hillary Clinton, Russia is to blame for all of her personal troubles and all of America and the world’s ills. For Trump, Hillary Clinton should be jailed for her overt corruption and that a vote for her is nothing short of a referendum endorsing a third world war. This is quite powerful stuff by the standards of any country, let alone America, whose political debates are often subdued and overly referential, even by the standards of the western world.

As I’ve stated previously, Trump is the peace candidate, something that to recent voters of either the Republican or Democratic Party may seem anathema to the trends of recent history. But the Republicans have a long traditional of peaceful non-intervention. What domestically is referred to (often condescendingly) as ‘America first’ ought to be translated as ‘peace first’ in a more international dialect.

I’ve said so before on television and now I shall commit it to writing. Unless the election is even more rigged than I realise, and I frankly believe it is quite rigged indeed, Donald Trump will win. There is a massive movement of people in America so tired of war, so fed up with globalism, so sick to death of the Orwellian lexicon of the political class, that those who had turned their backs on politics are being brought into the fold by Donald Trump.

The people who the electoral surveys ignore (not that many can be trusted anyway), the marginalised people, the decent people, the people of all backgrounds sense something. In this sense it is a bit like the Brexit vote that no expert, no bookmaker and no politician expected, including many of those who campaign for the vote whether Boris Johnson or Nigel Farage.

But there is a big difference. Brexit was never truly about war versus peace. There was, I’m sorry to say, an ignominious quality to the campaign, not least because of the intellectual dwarfism of David Cameron, who initiated the referendum. By contrast, for all of the ludicrousness surrounding the US election, something highly profound is at stake; the very survival of the world.

Hillary Clinton’s desire is to drown the world in blood and line her pockets with gold. If she wins, the only hope in hell that the world has, is that cooler heads in Washington ultimately prevail. The odds of this happening given the presence of people like Ashton Carter, are not favourable.

Donald Trump is promising the opposite. He is promising the avoidance of world war and as a bonus he just may unite with Russia against Islamic terrorism.

Those who vote for Hillary Clinton as a protest vote will have every ounce of blood that she intends to spill on their hands. May they be damned for it. Anyone with a conscience must vote for Trump. Yes I understand that Jill Stein is an honourable woman and that Gary Johnson for all his idiocy is not a warmonger. But the only real choice is between Clinton and Trump.

Prior to the beginning of the World War of 1914, Edward Lord Grey said, “The lamps are going out all over Europe, we shall not see them lit again in our life-time”. If Hillary Clinton wins, replace the word Europe for ‘the world’ and you’ll have an idea of what is to come.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Latest

EU leaders dictate Brexit terms to Theresa May (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 115.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss how EU leaders have agreed on a plan to delay the the Article 50 process which effectively postpones Brexit beyond the 29 March deadline.

The UK will now be offered a delay until the 22nd of May, only if MPs approve Theresa May’s withdrawal deal next week. If MPs do not approve May’s negotiated deal, then the EU will support a short delay until the 12th of April, allowing the UK extra time to get the deal passed or to “indicate a way forward”.

UK PM Theresa May said there was now a “clear choice” facing MPs, who could vote for a third time on her deal next week.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Theresa May outlines four Brexit options, via Politico

In a letter to MPs, U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May set out the four options she believes the country has in light of Thursday’s decision by EU leaders to extend the Brexit deadline beyond next Friday.

The U.K. is faced with a four-way choice, May wrote late Friday.

The government could revoke Article 50 — which May called a betrayal of the Brexit vote; leave without a deal on April 12; pass her deal in a vote next week; or, “if it appears that there is not sufficient support” for a vote on her deal in parliament next week or if it is rejected for a third time, she could ask for an extension beyond April 12.

But this would require for the U.K. taking part in European elections in May, which the prime minister said “would be wrong.”

May wrote that she’s hoping for the deal to pass, allowing the U.K. to leave the EU “in an orderly way,” adding “I still believe there is a majority in the House for that course of action.”

“I hope we can all agree that we are now at the moment of decision,” she wrote.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

US media suffers panic attack after Mueller fails to deliver on much-anticipated Trump indictment

Internet mogul Kim Dotcom said it all: “Mueller – The name that ended all mainstream media credibility.”

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT


Important pundits and news networks have served up an impressive display of denials, evasions and on-air strokes after learning that Robert Mueller has ended his probe without issuing a single collusion-related indictment.

The Special Counsel delivered his final report to Attorney General William Barr for review on Friday, with the Justice Department confirming that there will be no further indictments related to the probe. The news dealt a devastating blow to the sensational prophesies of journalists, analysts and entire news networks, who for nearly two years reported ad nauseam that President Donald Trump and his inner circle were just days away from being carted off to prison for conspiring with the Kremlin to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

Showing true integrity, journalists and television anchors took to Twitter and the airwaves on Friday night to acknowledge that the media severely misreported Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia, as well as what Mueller’s probe was likely to find. They are, after all, true professionals.

“How could they let Trump off the hook?” an inconsolable Chris Matthews asked NBC reporter Ken Dilanian during a segment on CNN’s ‘Hardball’.

Dilanian tried to comfort the CNN host with some of his signature NBC punditry.

“My only conclusion is that the president transmitted to Mueller that he would take the Fifth. He would never talk to him and therefore, Mueller decided it wasn’t worth the subpoena fight,” he expertly mused.

Actually, there were several Serious Journalists who used their unsurpassed analytical abilities to conjure up a reason why Mueller didn’t throw the book at Trump, even though the president is clearly a Putin puppet.

“It’s certainly possible that Trump may emerge from this better than many anticipated. However! Consensus has been that Mueller would follow DOJ rules and not indict a sitting president. I.e. it’s also possible his report could be very bad for Trump, despite ‘no more indictments,'” concluded Mark Follman, national affairs editor at Mother Jones, who presumably, and very sadly, was not being facetious.

Revered news organs were quick to artfully modify their expectations regarding Mueller’s findings.

“What is collusion and why is Robert Mueller unlikely to mention it in his report on Trump and Russia?” a Newsweek headline asked following Friday’s tragic announcement.

Three months earlier, Newsweek had meticulously documented all the terrible “collusion” committed by Donald Trump and his inner circle.

But perhaps the most sobering reactions to the no-indictment news came from those who seemed completely unfazed by the fact that Mueller’s investigation, aimed at uncovering a criminal conspiracy between Trump and the Kremlin, ended without digging up a single case of “collusion.”

The denials, evasions and bizarre hot takes are made even more poignant by the fact that just days ago, there was still serious talk about Trump’s entire family being hauled off to prison.

“You can’t blame MSNBC viewers for being confused. They largely kept dissenters from their Trump/Russia spy tale off the air for 2 years. As recently as 2 weeks ago, they had @JohnBrennan strongly suggesting Mueller would indict Trump family members on collusion as his last act,” journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted.

While the Mueller report has yet to be released to the public, the lack of indictments makes it clear that whatever was found, nothing came close to the vast criminal conspiracy alleged by virtually the entire American media establishment.

“You have been lied to for 2 years by the MSM. No Russian collusion by Trump or anyone else. Who lied? Head of the CIA, NSA,FBI,DOJ, every pundit every anchor. All lies,” wrote conservative activist Chuck Woolery.

Internet mogul Kim Dotcom was more blunt, but said it all: “Mueller – The name that ended all mainstream media credibility.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Canadian Lawmaker Accuses Trudeau Of Being A “Fake Feminist” (Video)

Rempel segued to Trudeau’s push to quash an investigation into allegations that he once groped a young journalist early in his political career

Published

on

Via Zerohedge

Canada’s feminist-in-chief Justin Trudeau wants to support and empower women…but his support stops at the point where said women start creating problems for his political agenda.

That was the criticism levied against the prime minister on Friday by a conservative lawmaker, who took the PM to task for “muzzling strong, principled women” during a debate in the House of Commons.

“He asked for strong women, and this is what they look like!” said conservative MP Michelle Rempel, referring to the former justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould, who has accused Trudeau and his cronies of pushing her out of the cabinet after she refused to grant a deferred prosecution agreement to a Quebec-based engineering firm.

She then accused Trudeau of being a “fake feminist”.

“That’s not what a feminist looks like…Every day that he refuses to allow the attorney general to testify and tell her story is another day he’s a fake feminist!”

Trudeau was so taken aback by Rempel’s tirade, that he apparently forgot which language he should respond in.

But Rempel wasn’t finished. She then segued to Trudeau’s push to quash an investigation into allegations that he once groped a young journalist early in his political career. This from a man who once objected to the continued use of the word “mankind” (suggesting we use “peoplekind” instead).

The conservative opposition then tried to summon Wilson-Raybould to appear before the Commons for another hearing (during her last appearance, she shared her account of how the PM and employees in the PM’s office and privy council barraged her with demands that she quash the government’s pursuit of SNC-Lavalin over charges that the firm bribed Libyan government officials). Wilson-Raybould left the Trudeau cabinet after she was abruptly moved to a different ministerial post – a move that was widely seen as a demotion.

Trudeau has acknowledged that he put in a good word on the firm’s behalf with Wilson-Raybould, but insists that he always maintained the final decision on the case was hers and hers alone.

Fortunately for Canadians who agree with Rempel, it’s very possible that Trudeau – who has so far resisted calls to resign – won’t be in power much longer, as the scandal has cost Trudeau’s liberals the lead in the polls for the October election.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending