in

What “Victory” and “Defeat” Would Mean in Ukraine’s War

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Eric Zuesse

In order to be able accurately to define “victory” in the war in Ukraine, the pre-requisite is to define whom the two sides are that wage this war. For example: when America fought in WW II, it was waging war in foreign battlefields and with its own troops and weapons, and even if America were to win in any of those battlefields, it still could have been defeated in WW II simply by Hitler’s winning WW II. Any given battlefield was only a part of the war itself; and that war, WW II, was not defined by any one of its many battlefields. There is a difference between a battlefield in which a war is being waged, versus the war that is being waged.

However: when America fought and still fights in Syria, it wages war on that battlefield against Syria, for regime-change in that nation; and ONLY by replacing Syria’s Government with one that the U.S. Government supports would America (and its allies in that war) “win” that war, in that battlefield (Syria), which is that war’s ONLY battlefield. In that instance, then, winning that battlefield is the same as winning the war there, by America and its allies, against that nation. America (unlike in WW II) does not wage this war against Syria by using its own troops and weapons but instead by hiring proxy armies — mainly separatist Kurds and Al Qaeda-led jihadists — in order to achieve there a regime-change that the U.S. Government approves of. Unless and until that is done, America will have lost the war that it is fighting in Syria. (Perhaps this is a reason why U.S. troops are not fully withdrawn from there though Syria’s Government has repeatedly ordered them to leave: America doesn’t want to lose in Syria, as it did lose in Afghanistan and in Vietnam.) However: the war in Syria is not between Syria’s Government and America’s proxy-armies there; it is instead a war between America and Syria, which is being waged by America in that battlefield, using foreign troops, to defeat Syria.

Similarly, the war in Ukraine is not a war between Ukraine versus Russia, but, in Ukraine’s case, Ukraine is only a proxy battlefield and proxy army on America’s side.

The war in Ukraine is a war that America initiated against Ukraine in February 2014 by America’s coup there that overthrew Ukraine’s democratically elected and neutralist Government and replaced it by a rabidly anti-Russian and pro-American one on Russia’s border in order ultimately to become able to place just 317 miles away from the Kremlin U.S. missiles which would be only a five-minute flight-time away from nuking Russia’s central command — far too little time in order for Russia’s central command to be able to verify that launch and then to launch its own retaliatory missiles.

For America to win that war, by Ukrainians, in the battlefield of Ukraine (i.e., by that proxy army, in that proxy battlefield against Russia) would be to checkmate Russia and so to transform Russia into another U.S. vassal-nation, regardless of what Russians might want — and this is what the U.S. regime demands: “regime-change in Russia.” That is America’s (and its ‘allies’ or vassal-nations’) goal there.

For Russia to win that war in the battlefields of Ukraine would be for Russia to defeat the U.S.-imposed government there and to establish in Ukraine not the neutralist Government that had been there before America’s take-over of Ukraine in 2014 but instead a Russian-imposed Government that will order all U.S.-and-allied troops and advisors — including from all of America’s vassal-nations and especially from NATO — out of the country, and close the door, seal Ukraine’s borders against all U.S. vassal-nations. That would mean telling all Ukrainians who want to leave for “The West” to go and never come back into Ukraine. At that time, Russia would invite the U.S. and its vassal-nations (or ‘allies’) to provide to any such Ukrainian any assistance, financial or otherwise, that the person might need in order to relocate into the U.S. empire. However, even if the U.S.-and-allied side refuse to provide any such assistance, the person must relocate and never come back — even if the person would then be stateless. Anyone who wishes to remain in Ukraine would be required to sign an oath of loyalty to the new, pro-Russian, Ukrainian Government. That would automatically entail the right to vote in the new Ukraine’s future elections.

The only alternative to there being a clear win of this war by either side would be for America to agree to Russia’s demand that America recognize the legitimacy of the then-existing line of separation between the two sides, and for Russia to relocate its own capital away from Moscow, to Novosibirsk (1,900 miles away from Ukraine) or some other city that would be far enough away from NATO so that America would not within the forseeable future any longer be able, at all realistically, to aspire to checkmate against, and grab control over, Russia. That would entail concessions by both sides, no win for either side. (Moving the capital to Novosibirsk would also place the capital near the center of Russia and within its Asian part — better suited for the future, nearer to China, Beijing being 1,865 miles away.) America would continue to be the world’s biggest threat to peace; the only way to stop that would be for Russia to win in Ukraine against America.

America is attempting to carry out the plan that Cecil Rhodes came up with in 1877, and that Harry Truman committed America to on 25 July 1945, and that GHW Bush, starting on 24 February 1990, committed America and its allies to continue at least until Russia becomes conquered. Barack Obama merely started the present phase of this Rhodesist plan, a phase that could produce a nuclear WW III and end everything, if Russia fails to achieve a clear win against the U.S. empire.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jarno P
Jarno P
December 3, 2022

Just think about it, are the Americans, American citizens, in your opinion such people that they want to conquer the whole world, or is there something much more sinister behind all that shit ? I WILL SAY, no, American people aren’t like that, and if I’m right (I ones thought I was wrong, but I was wrong), then we have to ask the question, who the hell then are behind that all shit ?!! We who have been waken up, we know for sure that all this is connected with one thing only, and the name of that ‘one thing’… Read more »

THE KHAZARS - The Empire of Evil.mp4_snapshot.jpg
Last edited 2 months ago by Jarno P
Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
December 3, 2022

And all but “of course not jews” hates Russia and are willing to do whatever it takes to destroy (try but won’t never succeed), and fight with other people’s money to keep European most corrupted country continuing same shit ?

“genetic analysis has debunked the theory that Jews derived from Khazars” – just don’t give me that bullshit.

I’m more and more convinced this author is Crypto-jew.

Is this also debunked, “The Khazars “converted” to Judaism” by “genetic analysis” ?

Those Khazarian fake jews have rewritten the history really badly !!

Last edited 2 months ago by Jarno P
charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
December 5, 2022

Professional linguists, who study languages in very meticulous ways have concluded that the Finnish language (Altiac-Ural ) is more closely related to the Khazar language (Altiac-Ural) than Yiddish (the language of Ashkenazi Jews) is related to the khazar language. The Yiddish language shows no relationship (Middle High German). jano is a Khazar and now that he has said so many bad things about khazars, thinking they were Jewish and not knowing that he is one, he is doing the typical double-down. But perhaps he is right about Khazars. As he is one and he is such a looser- well perhaps… Read more »

Helga Fellay
Helga Fellay
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
December 4, 2022

The ancestors of the Ashkenazi Jews are Khazars, from the former empire of Khazaria on the shores of the Caspian Sea, near Turkiye. The Khazars were heathens living between Jews on one side, and Muslims on the other (Turkiye), their emperor (or Kahn, of forgot what he was called) decided to join one of the two religions, and he decided for the Jews. He thus forced all Khazars to convert to Judaism. After the empire was conquered and the Khazars fle mostly to Russia, and Eastern Europe. The real Jews, the original 12 tribes, were also driven out of their… Read more »

charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
December 5, 2022

The comments you question are much more about hurting than helping

charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  Helga Fellay
December 5, 2022

The largest migration of ancient Israelis from the Middle Ease into Central Europe was through Italy not Iberia. These were freed and escaped Israelis that the Romans had captured and brought to Italy around the time of the fall of the Temple. The Kharzarian origin of Askanazis is only true for the descendants of the very small number of ancient Israeli who migrated to central Europe through the Caucasus as that group of Israelis had converts (eg. Khazars) and marriages (and rape) from that region Mark Twain visited ‘the Holy Land’ in the late 1800s and said it was desolate,… Read more »

charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  charles smith
December 5, 2022

From INNOCENTS ABROAD-Mark Twain  A desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds… a silent mournful expanse…. a desolation…. we never saw a human being on the whole route…. hardly a tree or shrub anywhere. Even the olive tree and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country.” In the 1900s there was a movemeny in Europe for land to be purchased in the Holy Land for Jewish emigration. That started the forced migration of Egyptians and Lebanese peasants into Israel to hold land to increase land prices.… Read more »

charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  Jarno P
December 5, 2022

In February of 1917 there were 20,000 Bolsheviks. In September of 1917 there were over 200,000. This increase took place in an environment of very limited means of communication and under the surveillance of secret police. It was a very popular revolution because feudal Russia of that time was a horribly cruel place for the poor- the vast majority. His statistics are fraught with his usual exaggerations and lies. Jarno’s insane rant about Khazars and Donbas leaves out the fact that troops loyal to The Ukrainian People’s Republic took over this region in 1918 and were socialists not Bolsheviks. It… Read more »

charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
December 5, 2022

You have touched on a subject, a well done article on which, will propel you to stardom. You would be doing a great service in publicizing the pernicious goebbels style continual repetition of misinformation, with no care for the fact that it is misinformation. A horrid ends justifies the means movement wherein the ends would be another crushing of the reputation of human beings, an abject insult to higher aspects of human existence, an enduring, disfiguring stain on those who permitted it.

Ukraine Donbass Crisis Deepens, Putin Eviscerates Scholz in Fiery Call, Biden Offers Talks but Without Ideas, Proposals

Why One Must Be Skeptical of News Videos