Serban V.C. Enache
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Authored by Serban V.C. Enache via Hereticus Economicus:
Yesterday, Steven Crowder very easily and quickly proved how Youtube [aka. Google] is sabotaging Tulsi Gabbard with its search results. Gabbard’s channel appeared in the first Youtube results when accessing the website with a Spanish IP. But when Crowder switched to a USA IP address, Tulsi’s channel no longer came up in the results. Crowder’s team made the discovery by carefully monitoring the popular website, after their channel got demonetized back in June.
Crowder also dedicated an entire video on the subject of Google meddling in the US election by targeting Gabbard specifically. He’s not a fan of her political views, however, he supports free speech across the board.
“So that Friday, you search, [Tulsi’s] trending number one on Twitter. All of a sudden [snaps fingers] boom, valve is pinched, you can’t find her exclusively in the United States. You can if you’re in Germany; you can if you’re Spain. United States however – nothing.” Crowder pointed out that Tulsi’s channel appeared as normal by Sunday, after Hillary’s “Russian asset” smears made their way out of the news cycle.
Anticipating the standard Google denial response [that their search algorithm is tailored for each unique user], Steven Crowder questioned how a “feature” blocking or suppressing a US presidential candidate’s Youtube channel was a positive thing for user experience. “Could you please explain to me, your shareholders, and in all likelihood a congressional hearing why you believe it most appropriate in serving your audience to block the content of a United States presidential candidate exclusively in the country in which she is running?”
Tulsi Gabbard has a pending lawsuit against Google over suspension of her Google Ads account the night of her appearance on the 1st Dem Debate, when she was the most searched name on the platform. Thus far she hasn’t replied to Crowder’s discovery. She definitely should! Her campaign staff at the very least.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
As shown in this article, key Western countries have put in place a mechanism that is supposed to protect us from election meddling:
https://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-g7-rapid-response-mechanism.html
Given the anti-Russia bias that took root and has become pervasive in the West since 2014 and, in particular, since the Hillary Clinton loss in 2016 which is blamed on Russian-sourced disinformation, it is comforting to see that the unbiased leadership of the G7 is doing its best to ensure that those of us who live in vulnerable democracies are being protected from the efforts of Russia to destroy our way of life. (sarcasm intended)
Good points all around. The amount of politicizing every step of the election process is insane. It’s not about who you support anymore, it’s that everyone else is branded an extremist. Anyway, I was really sorry for how things ended in our last conversation. I would love to hear from you more any time in the future, sorry again for how I handled that. You have a lot of valuable insights and I really appreciate the things we were able to discuss. Thanks again, and hope things are well for you right now and if you want to discuss more… Read more »
In much the same way, you can find Solzhentisyn’s greatest work – 200 Years Together, A History of the Jews in Russia, 1775-1975, in France, in Russia, and perhaps in Germany but NOT in the Five Eyes + Israel (US/UK/AUS/NZ/CAN)