in ,

This guy is saying the same thing as Youtuber “Eyes Wide Open ” so it’s a story of the real world, a world I have lived in since I was 16 years old and a world about which almost no one knows about

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

7:49

“You know and that’s how the world runs. It’s all about resources, all the rest of it is all PR for the Proles” Just like Orwell said.

“In reality very little was known about the proles. It was not necessary to know much. So long as they continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance. Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern. They were born, they grew up in the gutters, they went to work at twelve, they passed through a brief blossoming-period of beauty and sexual desire, they married at twenty, they were middle-aged at thirty, they died, for the most part, at sixty. Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbours, films, football, beer, and above all, gambling, filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult. A few agents of the Thought Police moved always among them, spreading false rumours and marking down and eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous; but no attempt was made to indoctrinate them with the ideology of the Party. It was not desirable that the proles should have strong political feelings. All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary to make them accept longer working-hours or shorter rations. And even when they became discontented, as they sometimes did, their discontent led nowhere, because being without general ideas, they could only focus it on petty specific grievances. The larger evils invariably escaped their notice.” -Orwell 1984

“Well the book’s thesis is essentially that when formal Empire collapsed in the 50s and 60s that the investors, the corporations, the people that have been in control through a formal Empire, i.e., garrisons of troops in the country where you can just take out a leader, it expropriates your assets or does something you don’t like, when that collapsed they needed to create a new international supranational governance system which went above the heads of national governments, which were increasingly falling into the hands of Liberation  movements. So they had to create this supranational system as you said it sounds tin foil hat stuff but..” But it’s true!

“…that either 1956 Nasser in Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal, France, Israel and Britain invaded; you’re not allowed to do that either you can’t take control.”

 

John Perkins “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” Extended Interview 2008

“Torrijos kept his family together, he said: “I’m probably next but it’s okay because I’ve done what I came here to do. I renegotiated the canal, that the canal will now be in our hands.” He just finished negotiating the treaty with Jimmy Carter. “So I’ve accomplished what I need to accomplish. I’m ready to die. If that’s what it’s going to take.” And he had dreams about an airplane crash in June of that same year. Just a couple of months later he had an airplane crash. There’s no question that it was executed by CIA sponsored jackals was a pass-off over radio. There’s a tremendous amount of evidence that one of the security guards, one of the Torrijos’s security guards, handed him at the last moment as he was getting on the plane a small tape recorder that contained a bomb.“

 

This is the legacy of our Western civilization. Killing people who wanted to help their people because like Chomsky said:

“US power and violence has also been there to take you down as quickly as it can if countries tried to pursue the path of independent development, what’s called in US planning circles “radical nationalism” or “economic nationalism” or sometimes even “excessive development.” That’s not to be permitted in the current period of globalization…”

“So Gaddafi met a similar fate. Gaddafi had led the most successful country on the continent of Africa, everybody had healthcare, everybody had housing, everybody had education, everybody had everything. And he wanted to get away from the U.S, he wanted to start a currency for Africa and you can’t do that. And they got him and they said he was oppressing his people and he was going to kill all these people in his own country, so we had to go free them. What we did was, we handed the country over to terrorists and now they have open slave markets and it’s a failed State.”

How and Why They Silenced Him…Africa’s Last Hope.

 

 

“What he’s talking about is that they talk about woke politics and identity politics because they don’t want you to talk about the economic issues that are ruining everybody. So they want you to get hating half the country and keeping your ire for your neighbor instead of putting your interests of joining with your neighbor and putting your ire on the oligarchy.

 

John Perkins “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” Extended Interview 2008

“What we’d like to say, the American people like to say, the American press likes to say: “O… is those corrupt leaders.”. We don’t ask who corrupted them? Leaders are not corrupt, they are corrupted, somebody does it. We say: “oh you know tribal warfare”, well who’s creating the tribal warfare? It’s been to the advantage of the British, the French, the Dutch, the Germans whoever happened to be there, now us. To foster this kind of instability, this antagonism, the antagonism between Muslims and Christians and Jews. This goes on and on…”

16.00

“That was a big boo-boo that Trump made when he revealed that there was a deep state that actually controlled things and that’s when they tried to make him seem like he was crazy for saying that. But Chuck Schumer actually revealed the truth about that statement when he told Rachel Maddow on National Television that Trump is being very dumb to mess with the intelligence agencies and she said: why? and he said: because they have six ways to Sunday to get back at you. That’s the leader of the democratic party telling a news person on national television that the President should watch his p’s and q’s around the CIA and the FBI that they’re the ones who actually do run things and that he better not tell people that they actually run things because telling that will make them fuck with him and boy they did they did Russia gate for four straight years.”

True story of Trump “akin to a toddler with a hammer going through the living room hitting stuff” this is how the real world looks like.

17:59
“As I mentioned, BP extracted 15 billion pounds worth of Iraqi oil after the British Invasion. The head of MI6 from 2009 to 2014 the year after he left MI6 joined the board of BP. It gets better he was also Britain’s first special representative to Iraq after the invasion, he was appointed by Tony Blair and then he earns 1.1 million. We titled it up from the annual reports from BP since he became part of the board in 2015.”

THE HISTORY OF THE CIA: The OSS and the Birth of American Intelligence [Pt. 1]


23:17
“.. honestly it’s almost like a revolving door. Often this metaphor is used, that you know somebody from the private sector will come into the intelligence agencies or into the Pentagon and they will still have their former clients best interests in mind. It’s just natural, I mean a lot of these people continue to be shareholders, they continue to have deep intimate relationships with the people on those boards. So it would make sense that they would continue to have sympathies for those former clients and of course you know the Dulles Brothers knew that the war was going to end eventually, especially Allen and that he might have to go back and work for Sullivan and Cromwell.”

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

17 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
charles smith
charles smith
June 7, 2023

Put the case that all that was said is true. If the “corporations” didn’t have to spend the money and resources that they do in covert and hostile takeovers and were able to contribute that amount to the welfare of the rest of the world, how much better would the world be? I am not advocating this, as I believe in local control of local resources and do not trust in the holistic orientation of corporations and do not believe that the military-industrial-congressional complex is ready to let itself be dissolved, but, perhaps this is what real fascists think of.

Last edited 10 months ago by charles smith
penrose
penrose
Reply to  charles smith
June 7, 2023

RE: “the welfare of the rest of the world”

What is “the welfare of the rest of the world”? Feeding hungry people so we can overpopulate the planet. Providing them with “more stuff” so we can pollute the planet ad infinitum? Fill the oceans with plastic? Cut down the rain forests for more farms? We need to be careful what we wish for.

Here is a quick summary: The “Green Revolution” was one of the biggest disasters man has ever devised.

charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  penrose
June 7, 2023

How about environmental cleanup, forest recovery, endangered/threatened species protection, realistic improved energy production, practical education, population control which the people support? I’m sure you can think of other positive programs to add.

charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  charles smith
June 7, 2023

However, I am interested in why some contributors thought negatively of what I posted and would like your suppositions. One person gave an uptick very soon after I posted this. Is it because they do not believe that there are significant costs in hostile takeovers which could be used beneficially? Is it because I am not advocating fascism? These two concepts are all I remarked about.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  charles smith
June 7, 2023

Positive things can be done, but one important maxim is neglected far too often: “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  charles smith
June 7, 2023

As well as: “The road to hell is paved with good intentions”

guil cafe
guil cafe
Reply to  penrose
June 9, 2023

Correct. The “Green Revolution” was created through fossil-fueled deforestation/environmental destruction, mechanized agriculture, petrochemical fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides, unnatural processed food additives, & finally, GMO crops with non-reproducible seeds.

Luke Anson
Luke Anson
Reply to  charles smith
June 7, 2023

“If the “corporations” didn’t have to spend the money and resources that they do in covert and hostile takeovers and were able to contribute that amount to the welfare of the rest of the world, how much better would the world be?” They don’t spend “much needed money” doing those things, they invest in them and buy them for profit. Mergers don’t make them poorer or they wouldn’t do it would they. They aren’t philanthropists, nobody who says they are ever is. Almost all that do are in fact the precise opposite. How on earth you arrived at this conclusion… Read more »

Last edited 10 months ago by Luke Anson
charles smith
charles smith
Reply to  Luke Anson
June 7, 2023

Where do I say that they are being philanthropists? I clearly stated that I “do not trust in the holistic orientation of corporations”. I said nothing like the “leaders of Apple and Google are desperately trying to make the world a better place”. For corporations to “able to contribute that amount to the welfare of the rest of the world” would mean that they do not have to spend that on hostilities. Why do they need to finance hostilities? Because they do not represent the best interests of those they are hostile against. That does not mean that it is… Read more »

Last edited 10 months ago by charles smith
Luke Anson
Luke Anson
Reply to  charles smith
June 7, 2023

No one is forcing people to behave like this. This brand of greedy, hyper-speculative capitalism isn’t dictating behaviour, merely justifying it as the preferable norm; to make the most amount of money possible. Who doesn’t want to make the most amount of money possible, no matter the “cost”?

zleo99
zleo99
June 7, 2023

This is when one realises that whichever God one credits with “making the World, Universe, Everything, MUST be an asshole. The Christian God (other religions’ Gods as well?), who is supposed to be all-powerful AND our “loving Father” must be an asshole/doesn’t exist/would be fired for doing such a crap job. Which means Jesus was sent because he was sent by a different God who saw our predicaments, and felt sorry for us humans. He sent Jesus to give us the rules to live by in order to give ourselves the chance, and best probability, of living a good, as… Read more »

Luke Anson
Luke Anson
Reply to  zleo99
June 7, 2023

Lol we have to learn from assholes! From the best and the worst of all that they have to offer.

The Shift in Global Oil Power: Discover Who is Really in Control

One WEIRD Loophole Allows Companies To Hide Secrets – FASAB56