Connect with us

RussiaFeed

News

SHOCKING: ‘Hero of Ukraine’ Nadia Savchenko now accuses Kiev for Maidan Snipers

Convicted for killing Russians, but after her revelation, now branded enemy of state

Published

on

0 Views

Nadia Savchenko, a former Ukrainian military pilot now a member of Ukrainian parliament has accused the highest echelons of the current Kiev regime of deploying snipers during those fateful days on the Maidan, to target both protestors and police.

I saw the current speaker of parliment bring snipers to the hotel, those people are in parliment now. The prosecuter general needed to become prosecuter so that his crimes against the Ukrainian people wouldn’t be investigated.

Said Savchenko in a video below – she is now accused by that same prosecutor general of attempting a terrorist attack. How very convenient for him, if his accuser is branded a terrorist.

Savchenko was previously sentenced to 23 years in jail in Russia for complicity in the murder of two Russian journalists, and later released as part of a prisoner exchange. She currently holds the highest national title Ukraine can bestow: Hero of Ukraine.

Once hailed as a Maidan Idol, a symbol of the so-called “Free Ukraine” against Russia, and given titles and platitudes in the western media as illustrious as being called “Ukraine’s Joan of Arc”, now she is branded an enemy of the state after her shocking revelations. She has been accused by the Ukrainian prosecutor general of planning a terrorist attack in parliament.

Savchenko being decorated by President Poroshenko after her release from Russia

Since her release, she has become a thorn in the side of Kiev and President Poroshenko [even the Washington post admitted it], because her Ukrainian nationalism distracts from his true goal: robbing Ukraine blind while the real nationalists are busy slaughtering innocent people, and fleeing to a western country of his choice.

While it was an open secret that since her release, and becoming a Ukrainian member of parliament, she has been problematic for the westernizing elite, her “War Hero”, and “Female Prisoner of War” status, made her politically untouchable.

That was until now, when the Maidan Maiden crossed the forbidden line: questioning what really went down on Maidan. Now her very life could be in danger.

It’s a strange world when Nadia Savchenko is speaking more truth than a Ukrainian president, but if you really understand what is happening in the country, it isn’t surprising. This is not the first time a former Ukrainian military member has accused the Kiev regime of crimes which corroborate the Russian position.

The fact that these increasingly scandalous revelations constantly pour out of the collapsing failed state in Kiev, where all factions battle each other, while the Russian account and position remain largely united and static is very telling.

We already covered how former soldier Alexander Medinsky came out and said rich westerners were hunting people in Donbass.

Former Ukrainian Soldier claims rich westerners paid top dollar to hunt humans in Donbass

Medinsky, however, was not nearly as high profile a Ukrainian as Savchenko, who gained international fame and praise even in the west. Savchenko is by far the most high profile Ukrainian nationalist and Maidan fighter to make these types of accusations, whereas name turned against nationalism and war, and became a pacifist, she is to this moment a member of parliament. This puts her amongst the highest-profile detractors from the Kiev regime. This makes her claims, that there were snipers provoking both sides on Maidan possibly even more credible than those of Medinsky.

She is now attacked NOT because she is Pro-Russian – far from it – she has Russian blood on her hands – but rather, she is, in fact, a true Ukrainian ultra-nationalist. The western powers which control the Kiev regime do not desire a strong Ukraine – certainly not a Pro-Russian one but not even a strong anti-Russian one – they don’t want a strong Ukrainian nation, but rather a Ukraine destroyed by nationalism.

That makes seem perplexing, as those following truth-based media are aware of the fact that Kiev is occupied by neo-Nazis and nationalists, and one may assume most of the government are nationalists. That is not quite true – the reality is there are two types of Anti-Russian personalities in Ukrainian politics:

  1. Real Ukrainian nationalists – like Savchenko and the lunatics of Azov battalion, Pravy Sektor, etc. These are the useful idiots who do the real fighting, but they serve other masters:
  2. Treasonous westernizing oligarchs – like President Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, etc. They pretend to be nationalists for public support, but they don’t have a selfless bone in their body. They conly care for their piggy banks.

President Poroshenko and his ilk are not true nationalist Ukrainians, unlike Savchenko who would probably believe that dying and killing innocents for Ukraine will get her rewarded in paradise, (not unlike radical Islamic terrorists). Poroshenko and friends, on the other hand, would find death for Ukraine terrible. They can’t exactly rob Ukraine blind, and retire to private islands while the country burns, if they’re dead.

Savchenko and her kind may be deranged, but they are fanatically devoted to their vision of a nationalists Ukraine, but Poroshenko and his kind have NO intention of dying for Ukraine. They only support the war because it provides them with a good distraction for them to…you guessed it…rob the country blind.

It is these oligarchs who are most threatened by people like Savchenko. They love the nationalists – their useful idiots – when they’re fighting and gaining PR points for them, as Savchenko did, but they get nervous when they return and begin asking questions domestically. That is what Savchenko did, she grew a brain (if not a conscious) and essentially asked: “Hey, wait a minute…what were YOU people doing for Ukraine, while I was fighting, getting captured, and sitting in in a Russian jail.”

She also came to the revolutionary conclusion that killing Ukrainian citizens and turning Ukrainian cities to ruin doesn’t do much for the “glory of Ukraine”, and even less to fight Russia – who could capture Kiev in weeks if need be – but this war provides a perfect excuse for continuing the 1990’s-style national robbery and prostitution.

The Marketplace of Our Democracy – Glazunov

It remains to be seen what Savchenko actually believes, but it is possible even if she likely retains her Neo-Nazi beliefs, she may at least have enough sense to realize that those who rob the country are not their allies, and that the Western powers backing the Maidan regime care nothing for Ukraine, but are actually trying to divide and conquer the country she would claim to be willing to die for.

In conclusion, Savchenko’s shocking revelations are so much shocking because of the content themselves, as we already knew about the snipers, but the fact that it is coming from one of the highest profiles Ukrainian nationalists may signal the failed state in Kiev is on its last legs, and slowly but surely, the truth is revealed in the lands of old Kievan Rus’.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Latest

Ariel Cohen explains Washington’s latest foreign policy strategy [Video]

Excellent interview Ariel Cohen and Vladimir Solovyov reveals the forces at work in and behind American foreign policy.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

While the American people and press are pretty much complicit in reassuring the masses that America is the only “right” superpower on earth, and that Russia and China represent “enemy threats” for doing nothing more than existing and being successfully competitive in world markets, Russia Channel One got a stunner of a video interview with Ariel Cohen.

Who is Ariel Cohen? Wikipedia offers this information about him:

Ariel Cohen (born April 3, 1959 in Crimea in YaltaUSSR) is a political scientist focusing on political risk, international security and energy policy, and the rule of law.[1] Cohen currently serves as the Director of The Center for Energy, Natural Resources and Geopolitics (CENRG) at the Institute for Analysis of Global Security (IAGS). CENRG focuses on the nexus between energy, geopolitics and security, and natural resources and growth. He is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, within the Global Energy Center and the Dinu Patriciu Eurasia Center.[2] Until July 2014, Dr. Cohen was a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. He specializes in Russia/Eurasia, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East.

Cohen has testified before committees of the U.S. Congress, including the Senate and House Foreign Relations Committees, the House Armed Services Committee, the House Judiciary Committee and the Helsinki Commission.[4] He also served as a Policy Adviser with the National Institute for Public Policy’s Center for Deterrence Analysis.[5] In addition, Cohen has consulted for USAID, the World Bank and the Pentagon.[6][7]

Cohen is a frequent writer and commentator in the American and international media. He has appeared on CNN, NBC, CBS, FOX, C-SPAN, BBC-TV and Al Jazeera English, as well as Russian and Ukrainian national TV networks. He was a commentator on a Voice of America weekly radio and TV show for eight years. Currently, he is a Contributing Editor to the National Interest and a blogger for Voice of America. He has written guest columns for the New York TimesInternational Herald TribuneChristian Science Monitor, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times, EurasiaNet, Valdai Discussion Club,[8] and National Review Online. In Europe, Cohen’s analyses have appeared in Kommersant, Izvestiya, Hurriyet, the popular Russian website Ezhenedelny Zhurnal, and many others.[9][10]

Mr. Cohen came on Russian TV for a lengthy interview running about 17 minutes. This interview, shown in full below, is extremely instructive in illustrating the nature of the American foreign policy directives such as they are at this time.

We have seen evidence of this in recent statements by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo regarding Russia’s “invasion” of Ukraine, and an honestly unabashed bit of fear mongering about China’s company Huawei and its forthcoming 5G networks, which we will investigate in more detail in another piece. Both bits of rhetoric reflect a re-polished narrative that, paraphrased, says to the other world powers,

Either you do as we tell you, or you are our enemy. You are not even permitted to out-compete with us in business, let alone foreign relations. The world is ours and if you try to step out of place, you will be dealt with as an enemy power.

This is probably justified paranoia, because it is losing its place. Where the United Stated used to stand for opposition against tyranny in the world, it now acts as the tyrant, and even as a bully. Russia and China’s reaction might be seen as ignoring the bully and his bluster and just going about doing their own thing. It isn’t a fight, but it is treating the bully with contempt, as bullies indeed deserve.

Ariel Cohen rightly points out that there is a great deal of political inertia in the matter of allowing Russia and China to just do their own thing. The US appears to be acting paranoid about losing its place. His explanations appear very sound and very reasonable and factual. Far from some of the snark Vesti is often infamous for, this interview is so clear it is tragic that most Americans will never see it.

The tragedy for the US leadership that buys this strategy is that they appear to be blinded so much by their own passion that they cannot break free of it to save themselves.

This is not the first time that such events have happened to an empire. It happened in Rome; it happened for England; and it happened for the shorter-lived empires of Nazi Germany and ISIS. It happens every time that someone in power becomes afraid to lose it, and when the forces that propelled that rise to power no longer are present. The US is a superpower without a reason to be a superpower.

That can be very dangerous.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Even a Vacuous Mueller Report Won’t End ‘Russiagate’

Too many reputations and other interests are vested in the legend for it to vanish from American politics anytime soon.

Stephen Cohen

Published

on

Authored by Stephen Cohen via The Nation:


Russiagate allegations that the Kremlin has a subversive hold over President Trump, and even put him in the White House, have poisoned American political life for almost three years. Among other afflictions, it has inspired an array of media malpractices, virtually criminalized anti–Cold War thinking about Russia, and distorted the priorities of the Democratic Party. And this leaves aside the woeful impact Russiagate has had in Moscow—on its policymakers’ perception of the US as a reliable partner on mutually vital strategic issues and on Russian democrats who once looked to the American political system as one to be emulated, a loss of “illusions” I previously reported.

Contrary to many expectations, even if the Mueller report, said to be impending, finds, as did a Senate committee recently, “no direct evidence of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia,” Russiagate allegations are unlikely to dissipate in the near future and certainly not before the 2020 presidential election.

There are several reasons this is so, foremost among them the following:

  1. The story of a “Kremlin puppet” in the White House is so fabulous and unprecedented it is certain to become a tenacious political legend, as have others in American history despite the absence of any supporting evidence.
  2. The careers of many previously semi-obscure Democratic members of Congress have been greatly enhanced—if that is the right word—by their aggressive promotion of Russiagate. (Think, for example, of the ubiquitous media coverage and cable-television appearances awarded to Representatives Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and Maxine Walters, and to Senators Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal.) If Mueller fails to report “collusion” of real political substance, these and other Russiagate zealots, as well as their supporters in the media, will need to reinterpret run-of-the-mill (and bipartisan) financial corruption and mundane “contacts with Russia” as somehow treasonous. (The financial-corruption convictions of Paul Manafort, Mueller’s single “big win” to date, did not charge “collusion” and had to do mainly with Ukraine, not Russia.) Having done so already, there is every reason to think Democrats will politicize these charges again, if only for the sake of their own careers. Witness, for example, the scores of summonses promised by Jerrold Nadler, the new Democratic chair of the House Judiciary Committee.
  3. Still worse, the top Democratic congressional leadership evidently has concluded that promoting the new Cold War, of which Russiagate has become an integral part, is a winning issue in 2020. How else to explain Nancy Pelosi’s proposal—subsequently endorsed by the equally unstatesmanlike Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, and adopted—to invite the secretary general of NATO, a not-very-distinguished Norwegian politician named Jens Stoltenberg, to address a joint session of Congress? The honor was once bestowed on figures such as Winston Churchill and at the very least leaders of actual countries. Trump has reasonably questioned NATO’s mission and costs nearly 30 years after the Soviet Union disappeared, as did many Washington think tanks and pundits back in the 1990s. But for Pelosi and other Democratic leaders, there can be no such discussion, only valorization of NATO, even though the military alliance’s eastward expansion has brought the West to the brink of war with nuclear Russia. Anything Trump suggests must be opposed, regardless of the cost to US national security. Will the Democrats go to the country in 2020 as the party of investigations, subpoenas, Russophobia, and escalating cold war—and win?

Readers of my new book War With Russia?, which argues that there are no facts to support the foundational political allegations of Russiagate, may wonder how, then, Russiagate can continue to be such a major factor in our politics. As someone has recently pointed out, the Democrats and their media are now operating on the Liberty Valance principle: When the facts are murky or nonexistent, “print the legend.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Patriarch Bartholomew slaps down effort to solve Ukrainian Church crisis

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I has a problem.

In October last year, by his order, two schismatic churches and their leaders were “rehabilitated” and the schismatic churches were combined and relaunched as a new national church, ostensibly for the people of Ukraine.

However, everything about this action was wrong.

The Patriarch attempted to reinterpret Church history and assumed the power to take over the situation in Ukraine, when Orthodox Christian ecclesiology says that no bishop (even a Patriarch) is permitted to impose his will outside his own See. Ukraine was not the territory of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, nor has it been for hundreds of years.

The people he lifted into power – Filaret Denisenko and Makary Maletich, both were formerly out of communion with canonical Orthodoxy, and Filaret is notable for having a terrible record with his priests, a common-law wife (forbidden for a bishop) and most notably, Filaret was also anathematized by the Russian Church for his actions.

Thirdly, the new church has yet to go on record with any statement at all about how its formation serves the will of God. This is because it cannot do so. The Orthodox Church in Ukraine exists as an ultranationalist thumb in the eye of Russia, even to the point some people in the new community said “now we have our own God. We don’t need the Russian God.”

This is a very bad sentiment because in the Orthodox Church there is only one God, and he does not pick between nations because of national identity.

To date, none of the other fourteen universally recognized Local Orthodox Churches has accepted the new Church and none of the local Churches are in communion with the OCU (Orthodox Church in Ukraine). Everyone who has said anything at all about this matter has rejected communion with schismatics, though a few monasteries on Athos did allow services with these people.

In essence, at this time the Patriarch has a new church on his back that no one wants but him. His statements that the other local Churches, namely Russia, will have no choice but to accept the OCU have not been proven right so far.

In fact, the pressure is running in the opposite direction.

Patriarch John X of Antioch, the oldest Christian Church in continuous existence, received a letter from Patriarch Bartholomew in response to the request by many leaders of local Churches to hold a pan-Orthodox discussion to resolve the dispute in Ukraine. According to the Union of Orthodox Journalists, the letter amounted to a slap in the face, borne of Patriarch Bartholomew’s own petulance, arrogance, and pettiness (We have added emphasis):

In a letter to the Primate of the Antiochian Orthodox Church, Patriarch John X, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople declared that “he has good reasons” to refrain from a general Orthodox meeting on the Ukrainian church issue, reports the official website of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Patriarch Bartholomew called the discussion of the religious situation in Ukraine “useless” and reminded the Primate of the Antiochian Church of his refusal to participate in the Crete Council of 2016, which Constantinople had been prepar[ing] for a long time.

“After the four Orthodox Churches, from a church and theological point of view without a reason, refused to be present at the Ecumenical Sacred Council, for which there are no excuses, and your ancient Church was one of them, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has good reasons to refrain from such a meeting at the pan-Orthodox a level that will be useless since it will only lead to the agreement that the participants will disagree with each other,” wrote the Patriarch of Constantinople.

According to him, the autocephalous nature of the OCU became a reward for the Church of Ukraine, and the Phanar returned “to the fold of the canonical Church” the members of the UOC KP and the UAOC who were “unfairly” outside it. At the same time, Patriarch Bartholomew assures that he returned the schismatics to the bosom of Orthodoxy exclusively “following church traditions and canons.”

In other words, the Patriarch appears to be digging in. This situation is entirely wrong according to Church canons. The Patriarch is acting as though he has jurisdiction over all other Orthodox Churches, which is a position remarkably similar to that perceived by the Bishop of Rome prior to the Great Schism of 1054 which split the Roman Catholic Church apart from the other ancient Orthodox Patriarchates.

The result of that split was a slow disintegration of Christian integrity in the Roman Church, the eventual development of Protestantism and the present result of a severely degraded form of Christianity in the West, where the law of God is not considered at all, and one can essentially believe or act however they want and find a “church” that will back them up, or they will start their own.

The current actions of the Ecumenical Patriarch have caused concerns, even fears, of a new split in the Orthodox Church, and with the present geopolitical climate being strongly anti-Russian, there is a lot of thought that the United States is influencing and encouraging the split in order to isolate both Russia and its Orthodox Church, which is the largest and strongest in the world at this time.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending