Connect with us

RussiaFeed

News

SHOCKING: ‘Hero of Ukraine’ Nadia Savchenko now accuses Kiev for Maidan Snipers

Convicted for killing Russians, but after her revelation, now branded enemy of state

Published

on

0 Views

Nadia Savchenko, a former Ukrainian military pilot now a member of Ukrainian parliament has accused the highest echelons of the current Kiev regime of deploying snipers during those fateful days on the Maidan, to target both protestors and police.

I saw the current speaker of parliment bring snipers to the hotel, those people are in parliment now. The prosecuter general needed to become prosecuter so that his crimes against the Ukrainian people wouldn’t be investigated.

Said Savchenko in a video below – she is now accused by that same prosecutor general of attempting a terrorist attack. How very convenient for him, if his accuser is branded a terrorist.

Savchenko was previously sentenced to 23 years in jail in Russia for complicity in the murder of two Russian journalists, and later released as part of a prisoner exchange. She currently holds the highest national title Ukraine can bestow: Hero of Ukraine.

Once hailed as a Maidan Idol, a symbol of the so-called “Free Ukraine” against Russia, and given titles and platitudes in the western media as illustrious as being called “Ukraine’s Joan of Arc”, now she is branded an enemy of the state after her shocking revelations. She has been accused by the Ukrainian prosecutor general of planning a terrorist attack in parliament.

Savchenko being decorated by President Poroshenko after her release from Russia

Since her release, she has become a thorn in the side of Kiev and President Poroshenko [even the Washington post admitted it], because her Ukrainian nationalism distracts from his true goal: robbing Ukraine blind while the real nationalists are busy slaughtering innocent people, and fleeing to a western country of his choice.

While it was an open secret that since her release, and becoming a Ukrainian member of parliament, she has been problematic for the westernizing elite, her “War Hero”, and “Female Prisoner of War” status, made her politically untouchable.

That was until now, when the Maidan Maiden crossed the forbidden line: questioning what really went down on Maidan. Now her very life could be in danger.

It’s a strange world when Nadia Savchenko is speaking more truth than a Ukrainian president, but if you really understand what is happening in the country, it isn’t surprising. This is not the first time a former Ukrainian military member has accused the Kiev regime of crimes which corroborate the Russian position.

The fact that these increasingly scandalous revelations constantly pour out of the collapsing failed state in Kiev, where all factions battle each other, while the Russian account and position remain largely united and static is very telling.

We already covered how former soldier Alexander Medinsky came out and said rich westerners were hunting people in Donbass.

Former Ukrainian Soldier claims rich westerners paid top dollar to hunt humans in Donbass

Medinsky, however, was not nearly as high profile a Ukrainian as Savchenko, who gained international fame and praise even in the west. Savchenko is by far the most high profile Ukrainian nationalist and Maidan fighter to make these types of accusations, whereas name turned against nationalism and war, and became a pacifist, she is to this moment a member of parliament. This puts her amongst the highest-profile detractors from the Kiev regime. This makes her claims, that there were snipers provoking both sides on Maidan possibly even more credible than those of Medinsky.

She is now attacked NOT because she is Pro-Russian – far from it – she has Russian blood on her hands – but rather, she is, in fact, a true Ukrainian ultra-nationalist. The western powers which control the Kiev regime do not desire a strong Ukraine – certainly not a Pro-Russian one but not even a strong anti-Russian one – they don’t want a strong Ukrainian nation, but rather a Ukraine destroyed by nationalism.

That makes seem perplexing, as those following truth-based media are aware of the fact that Kiev is occupied by neo-Nazis and nationalists, and one may assume most of the government are nationalists. That is not quite true – the reality is there are two types of Anti-Russian personalities in Ukrainian politics:

  1. Real Ukrainian nationalists – like Savchenko and the lunatics of Azov battalion, Pravy Sektor, etc. These are the useful idiots who do the real fighting, but they serve other masters:
  2. Treasonous westernizing oligarchs – like President Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk, etc. They pretend to be nationalists for public support, but they don’t have a selfless bone in their body. They conly care for their piggy banks.

President Poroshenko and his ilk are not true nationalist Ukrainians, unlike Savchenko who would probably believe that dying and killing innocents for Ukraine will get her rewarded in paradise, (not unlike radical Islamic terrorists). Poroshenko and friends, on the other hand, would find death for Ukraine terrible. They can’t exactly rob Ukraine blind, and retire to private islands while the country burns, if they’re dead.

Savchenko and her kind may be deranged, but they are fanatically devoted to their vision of a nationalists Ukraine, but Poroshenko and his kind have NO intention of dying for Ukraine. They only support the war because it provides them with a good distraction for them to…you guessed it…rob the country blind.

It is these oligarchs who are most threatened by people like Savchenko. They love the nationalists – their useful idiots – when they’re fighting and gaining PR points for them, as Savchenko did, but they get nervous when they return and begin asking questions domestically. That is what Savchenko did, she grew a brain (if not a conscious) and essentially asked: “Hey, wait a minute…what were YOU people doing for Ukraine, while I was fighting, getting captured, and sitting in in a Russian jail.”

She also came to the revolutionary conclusion that killing Ukrainian citizens and turning Ukrainian cities to ruin doesn’t do much for the “glory of Ukraine”, and even less to fight Russia – who could capture Kiev in weeks if need be – but this war provides a perfect excuse for continuing the 1990’s-style national robbery and prostitution.

The Marketplace of Our Democracy – Glazunov

It remains to be seen what Savchenko actually believes, but it is possible even if she likely retains her Neo-Nazi beliefs, she may at least have enough sense to realize that those who rob the country are not their allies, and that the Western powers backing the Maidan regime care nothing for Ukraine, but are actually trying to divide and conquer the country she would claim to be willing to die for.

In conclusion, Savchenko’s shocking revelations are so much shocking because of the content themselves, as we already knew about the snipers, but the fact that it is coming from one of the highest profiles Ukrainian nationalists may signal the failed state in Kiev is on its last legs, and slowly but surely, the truth is revealed in the lands of old Kievan Rus’.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Latest

US confirms pullout from INF treaty, Moscow will respond if missiles placed in Europe – deputy FM

Moscow will respond to possible attempts to place short and intermediate range nuclear-capable missiles in Europe if the US decides to go on with this plan.

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT…


Washington has confirmed its decision to withdraw from the INF treaty is final, Russia’s deputy foreign minister said, adding that Moscow will ‘take measures’ if American missiles that threaten its security are placed in Europe.

“Washington publicly announced its plans to withdraw from the treaty (the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) already in October. Through the high-level bilateral channels it was confirmed to us that this decision was final and wasn’t an attempt to initiate dialogue,” Sergey Ryabkov told the Kommersant newspaper.

The Deputy FM said that Moscow will respond to possible attempts to place short and intermediate range nuclear-capable missiles in Europe if the US decides to go on with this plan.

“We’ll be forced to come up with effective compensating measures. I’d like to warn against pushing the situation towards the eruption of new ‘missile crises.’ I am convinced that no sane country could be interested in something like this,” he said.

Russia isn’t threatening anybody, but have the necessary strength and means to counter any aggressor.
Back in October, President Donald Trump warned that Washington was planning unilateral withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty because “Russia has not adhered to the agreement.” The US leader also promised that the country would keep boosting its nuclear arsenal until Russia and China “come to their senses.”

Earlier this month, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that Washington will suspend its obligations under the treaty within 60 days if Russia does not “return to compliance.”

Signed in late 1988, the INF agreement was considered a milestone in ending the arms race between the US and the USSR.

In recent years, Moscow and Washington have repeatedly accused each other of violating the INF deal. While the US has alleged that Russia has developed missiles prohibited by the treaty, Russia insists that the American anti-missile systems deployed in Eastern Europe can actually be used to launch intermediate-range cruise missiles.

The deputy FM said that Washington “never made a secret” of the fact that its INF treaty pullout “wasn’t so much about problems between the US and Russia, but about the desire of the Americans to get rid of all restrictions that were inconvenient for them.”

The US side expressed belief that the INF deal “significantly limits the US military’s capabilities to counter states with arsenals of medium-range and shorter-range ground-based missiles,” which threaten American interests, he said. “China, Iran and North Korea” were specifically mentioned by Washington, Ryabkov added.

“I don’t think that we’re talking about a new missile crisis, but the US plans are so far absolutely unclear,” Mikhail Khodarenok, retired colonel and military expert, told RT, reminding that the Americans have avoided any type of “meaningful discussion” with Moscow in regards to its INF deal pullout.

While “there’ll be no deployment of [US missiles] in Europe any time soon,” Moscow should expect that Washington would try to void other agreements with Russia as well, Khodarenok warned.

The INF deal “just stopped being beneficial for the US. Next up are all the other arms control treaties. There’ll be no resistance from the NATO allies [to US actions],” he said.

“The neocons who run Trump’s foreign policy never have liked arms reduction treaties,” former Pentagon official Michael Maloof told RT. “The new START treaty which comes up for renewal also could be in jeopardy.”

“The risk of a new nuclear buildup is really quite obvious” if the US withdrawals from the INF treaty, Dan Smith, the director of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, told RT.

“I think the relations between the great powers – the US and Russia as well as the US and China – are more difficult than they’ve been for a long time,” he added.

However, with Washington having indicated that it wants China to be part of the new deal, “there are still possibilities for negotiations and agreement,” according to Smith. Nonetheless, he warned that following this path will demand strong political will and tactical thinking from the leadership of all three countries.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Don’t Laugh : It’s Giving Putin What He Wants

The fact of the matter is that humorous lampooning of western establishment Russia narratives writes itself.

Caitlin Johnstone

Published

on

Authored by Caitlin Johnstone:


The BBC has published an article titled “How Putin’s Russia turned humour into a weapon” about the Kremlin’s latest addition to its horrifying deadly hybrid warfare arsenal: comedy.

The article is authored by Olga Robinson, whom the BBC, unhindered by any trace of self-awareness, has titled “Senior Journalist (Disinformation)”. Robinson demonstrates the qualifications and acumen which earned her that title by warning the BBC’s audience that the Kremlin has been using humor to dismiss and ridicule accusations that have been leveled against it by western governments, a “form of trolling” that she reports is designed to “deliberately lower the level of discussion”.

“Russia’s move towards using humour to influence its campaigns is a relatively recent phenomenon,” Robinson explains, without speculating as to why Russians might have suddenly begun laughing at their western accusers. She gives no consideration to the possibility that the tightly knit alliance of western nations who suddenly began hysterically shrieking about Russia two years ago have simply gotten much more ridiculous and easier to make fun of during that time.

Couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the emergence of a demented media environment wherein everything around the world from French protests to American culture wars to British discontent with the European Union gets blamed on Russia without any facts or evidence. Wherein BBC reporters now correct guests and caution them against voicing skepticism of anti-Russia narratives because the UK is in “an information war” with that nation. Wherein the same cable news Russiagate pundit can claim that both Rex Tillerson’s hiring and his later firing were the result of a Russian conspiracy to benefit the Kremlin. Wherein mainstream outlets can circulate blatantly false information about Julian Assange and unnamed “Russians” and then blame the falseness of that reporting on Russian disinformation. Wherein Pokemon Go, cutesy Facebook memes and $4,700 in Google ads are sincerely cited as methods by which Hillary Clinton’s $1.2 billion presidential campaign was outdone. Wherein conspiracy theories that Putin has infiltrated the highest levels of the US government have been blaring on mainstream headline news for two years with absolutely nothing to show for it to this day.

Nope, the only possibility is that the Kremlin suddenly figured out that humor is a thing.

The fact of the matter is that humorous lampooning of western establishment Russia narratives writes itself. The hypocrisy is so cartoonish, the emotions are so breathlessly over-the-top, the stories so riddled with plot holes and the agendas underlying them so glaringly obvious that they translate very easily into laughs. I myself recently authored a satire piece that a lot of people loved and which got picked up by numerous alternative media outlets, and all I did was write down all the various escalations this administration has made against Russia as though they were commands being given to Trump by Putin. It was extremely easy to write, and it was pretty damn funny if I do say so myself. And it didn’t take any Kremlin rubles or dezinformatsiya from St Petersburg to figure out how to write it.

“Ben Nimmo, an Atlantic Council researcher on Russian disinformation, told the BBC that attempts to create funny memes were part of the strategy as ‘disinformation for the information age’,” the article warns. Nimmo, ironically, is himself intimately involved with the British domestic disinformation firm Integrity Initiative, whose shady government-sponsored psyops against the Labour Party have sparked a national scandal that is likely far from reaching peak intensity.

“Most comedy programmes on Russian state television these days are anodyne affairs which either do not touch on political topics, or direct humour at the Kremlin’s perceived enemies abroad,” Robinson writes, which I found funny since I’d just recently read an excellent essay by Michael Tracey titled “Why has late night swapped laughs for lusting after Mueller?”

“If the late night ‘comedy’ of the Trump era has something resembling a ‘message,’ it’s that large segments of the nation’s liberal TV viewership are nervously tracking every Russia development with a passion that cannot be conducive to mental health – or for that matter, political efficacy,” Tracey writes, documenting numerous examples of the ways late night comedy now has audiences cheering for a US intelligence insider and Bush appointee instead of challenging power-serving media orthodoxies as programs like The Daily Show once did.

If you wanted the opposite of “anodyne affairs”, it would be comedians ridiculing the way all the establishment talking heads are manipulating their audiences into supporting the US intelligence community and FBI insiders. It would be excoriating the media environment in which unfathomably powerful world-dominating government agencies are subject to less scrutiny and criticism than a man trapped in an embassy who published inconvenient facts about those agencies. It certainly wouldn’t be the cast of Saturday Night Live singing “All I Want for Christmas Is You” to a framed portrait if Robert Mueller wearing a Santa hat. It doesn’t get much more anodyne than that.

Russia makes fun of western establishment narratives about it because those narratives are so incredibly easy to make fun of that they are essentially asking for it, and the nerdy way empire loyalists are suddenly crying victim about it is itself more comedy. When Guardian writer Carole Cadwalladr began insinuating that RT covering standard newsworthy people like Julian Assange and Nigel Farage was a conspiracy to “boost” those people for the advancement of Russian agendas instead of a news outlet doing the thing that news reporting is, RT rightly made fun of her for it. Cadwalladr reacted to RT’s mockery with a claim that she was a victim of “attacks”, instead of the recipient of perfectly justified ridicule for circulating an intensely moronic conspiracy theory.

Ah well. People are nuts and we’re hurtling toward a direct confrontation with a nuclear superpower. Sometimes there’s nothing else to do but laugh. As Wavy Gravy said, “Keep your sense of humor, my friend; if you don’t have a sense of humor it just isn’t funny anymore.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

EU’s ‘toothless’ response to creation of Kosovo army risks worsening the crisis – Moscow

Russia’s ambassador to the UN said that the EU could have and should have done more to stop the breakaway region from creating its own army.

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT…


The creation of Kosovo’s own 5,000-strong army is a threat to peace and security in a turbulent region and may lead to a new escalation, Russia’s UN envoy has warned, calling the EU’s lackluster response irresponsible.

Speaking at the UN Security Council emergency meeting on Kosovo, Russia’s ambassador to the UN Vassily Nebenzya said that the EU could have and should have done more to stop the breakaway region from creating its own army to replace its lightly armed emergency response force.

“The EU reaction to the decision by Pristina cannot be described as other than toothless. This irresponsible policy has crossed the line,” Nebenzya said, after the UNSC meeting on Monday.

The diplomat said the lack of decisive action on the part of the 28-member bloc was a “great disappointment,” adding that the EU seems to “have turned a blind eye on the illegal creation of Kosovo’s ‘army.’”

The law, approved by Kosovo lawmakers on Friday, paves the way for doubling the size of the current Kosovo Security Force and for turning it into a de facto army, with 5,000 soldiers and 3,000 reservists.

The move did not go down well even with Kosovo’s usual backers, with both NATO and the EU voicing their indignation. NATO’s General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg called the decision “ill-timed” and lamented that Kosovo’s authorities had ignored “the concerns expressed by NATO.”

The EU’s top diplomat, Federica Mogherini, has echoed those concerns, saying in a statement that the mandate of Kosovo’s forces “should only be changed through an inclusive and gradual process” in accordance with the state’s constitution.

The only nation to openly applaud the controversial move was the US, with its ambassador to Kosovo, Phillip Kosnett, saying that Washington “reaffirms its support” for the upgrade as it is “only natural for Kosovo as a sovereign, independent country” to have a full-fledged army.

The Kosovo MPs’ decision has drawn anger in the Serbian capital Belgrade and provoked a strong response from Moscow, which calledon the UN mission in Kosovo to demilitarize the area in accordance with UNSC resolution 1244, and to disband any armed units.

Nebenzya pointed out that the UN resolution does not allow any Kosovo Albanian military units to be present in the region’s territory. He accused Western countries, including members of the NATO-led international peacekeeping force (KFOR), of “condoning and supporting” the violation by Pristina of the resolution.

It is feared that the army, though a relatively small force, might inflame tensions in the region and impede attempts at reconciliation between Pristina and Belgrade. Serbia has warned that it might consider an armed intervention if the army becomes a threat to the 120,000-strong Serb minority in Kosovo.

“The advance of Kosovo’s army presents a threat to the peace and security in the region, which may lead to the recurrence of the armed conflict,” Nebenzya stated.

In addition to creating its own army, Kosovo in November hit Serbia with a 100 percent import tariff on goods, defying calls by the US and the EU to roll the measure back.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending