Now Reading
Obama and GOP had plan to block Trump if he refused to concede in 2016

Obama and GOP had plan to block Trump if he refused to concede in 2016

Now we know why President Obama was so sure of himself when he said this:

The game was rigged, and not only with the Democrat Party apparatus, but with the Republicans as well.

A new report from Fox News on October 11th revealed some of the plan:

Former President Obama had a plan to validate the 2016 election in the event that then-candidate Donald Trump lost and challenged the results.

Obama administration officials told New York magazine that a bipartisan plan was in place just in time for the election to certify the results and reveal the intelligence community’s claims that Russian interference supported Trump’s candidacy.

“I will totally accept the result of this great and historic presidential election,” he said. “If I win.”

The plan to validate the election involved former secretaries of state Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. Former presidents and congressional Republicans also participated in the plan, the outlet reported.

Ben Rhodes, a former top aide of Obama, told the magazine that the administration feared Trump wouldn’t accept the election result had Hillary Clinton won.

“It wasn’t a hypothetical,” he said. “Trump was already saying it on the campaign trail.”

Jen Psaki, communications director for Obama, minimized the plan’s significance, saying it just one of a number of “red-teaming” discussions about the potential fallout following the 2016 election, including pro-Trump protests and political division.

She said that Obama’s unpopularity among “a portion of the population” meant there was a need for a plan to validate the election.

“For them, just having him say the election was legitimate was not going to be enough,” she said.

“I don’t think there is any indication to suggest that if that’s where things headed, [Trump] would accept it,” Psaki added. “He’s laying the groundwork for delegitimizing the process now — questioning our institutions, attacking their leadership. This is all fodder for his supporters to work with in the event that things go down a dark path for him.”

This is nothing less than a bombshell. Of course, the claims the Russian interference helped Mr. Trump actually win the presidency was the logical next step, perhaps bolstered by the Electoral College victory’s “conflict” with the popular vote numbers. This is the tool that has been employed with some success to hamstring the President, especially in regards to fixing the American policy towards Russia, which the Left and Globalist communities are desperate to keep in place.

The original piece in New York Magazine goes even farther, which is surprising.

In October 2016, senior staff in the Obama White House discussed what they should do if Hillary Clinton won the November election and Donald Trump refused to accept the result as legitimate. They had cause to be worried. At that time, Trump had openly speculated that the election might be “rigged.” During his final debate with Clinton on October 19, he said that his opponent “should never have been allowed to run” and declined to answer the question of whether he would concede. “I’ll keep you in suspense,” the Republican nominee said.

See Also

“It wasn’t a hypothetical,” Ben Rhodes, Obama’s senior aide and speechwriter, told Intelligencer. “Trump was already saying it on the campaign trail.”

The Obama White House plan, according to interviews with Rhodes and Jen Psaki, Obama’s communications director, called for congressional Republicans, former presidents, and former Cabinet-level officials including Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, to try and forestall a political crisis by validating the election result. In the event that Trump tried to dispute a Clinton victory, they would affirm the result as well as the conclusions reached by the U.S. intelligence community that Russian interference in the election sought to favor Trump, and not Clinton. Some Republicans were already aware of Russian interference from intelligence briefings given to leaders from both parties during the chaotic months before the election. “We wanted to handle the Russia information in a way that was as bipartisan as possible,” Rhodes said.

The existence of the postelection plan has not been previously reported. A July 2017 op-ed by Obama’s chief of staff, Denis McDonough, refers to Obama directing his staff to “prepare possible responses” to claims of Russian interference in the election.

Trump’s blurring of the lines between the illegal, the unfair, and the merely unfavorable has continued with his rhetoric around the ongoing probe into his campaign, which he has called a “hoax,” “one of the great scandals in the history of our country,” and “truly a cancer in our country.” He has described Robert Mueller’s investigation as “illegal” and a “Witch Hunt … in search of a crime … not allowed under the LAW!

The plan appears to still have legs even though President Trump won a clear electoral victory (if not a mandate), as the Democrats are largely believed to be planning to bring impeachment proceedings against the President should they win the House in the upcoming November 6 midterm elections. Now the same plan, or elements of it appear to be reference points at least in this plan, and former Obama Administration Communications Director Jen Psaki reflects on this with a sense of conviction that this point of view is actually correct:

Not that the question is entirely a retrospective one. Psaki also said she had doubts that Trump would go quietly if he were to be impeached. “I don’t think there is any indication to suggest that if that’s where things headed, he would accept it,” she said. “He’s laying the groundwork for delegitimizing the process now — questioning our institutions, attacking their leadership. This is all fodder for his supporters to work with in the event that things go down a dark path for him.”

Rhodes said he didn’t know how Trump would respond to impeachment. “It’s a really interesting question,” he said. “At a minimum, he could choose to implore his supporters not to accept the result. Given that 30 to 35 percent of the country believes whatever he says, and his enormous public megaphone, you could foresee a scenario where that would lead to a fairly worrisome political situation.”

This situation is not even subject to opinion reporting. It is madness, clear and simple, and it is madness spurred by the Left’s ardent desire to keep power, and to steer the United States and the world towards the Sorosian dream of a “one world” state, bereft of Christian or traditional family values. This was spoken strongly against by President Vladimir Putin in 2013 and since, which is why this group of people has fought so hard to keep Russia isolated and weakened (not that this is working), and it is also why this group of people is seeking the removal of Trump by any and all means necessary, by foul means now, since fair means could never possibly work.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
Marthajohn vieiraGeorge HartwellKassAdrian E. Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Adrian E.
Guest
Adrian E.

One should note that the same people who claimed that it was a danger to democracy that Trump might doubt the legitimacy of the elections when he looses, actively tried to sow doubt about the legitimacy of the elections after Trump had won.

Kass
Guest
Kass

Absolutely. The irony is that their concern was Trump not accepting a loss and here we have Hillary being the one who has been unable to accept her loss and as a result selfishly putting the whole country thru the scam of Russiagate rather than admit she ran a lousy campaign, and even worse, made sure the candidate who could have won, Bernie, wouldn’t have the chance to run.

john vieira
Guest

Trump should NOT have won. The entire political establishment was against him…Rhinos and Democrats and their lackeys in the mainstream media. Many still do not get it…the “woken” voter was anti status quo established by the last four/five administrations. Many never heard of the NWO, except the praises to same by people like G. w. Bush…but everybody felt it…it was as if people were going forward in reverse…and they were, and losing ground. Irrespective of the politician/party elected nothing would have changed. The “establishment” is tearing its’ hair out by the roots and will do anything to stop the reversal… Read more »

George Hartwell
Guest

What this discussion makes clear to me is that this is not normal political times. We are on a war footing. Anything is possible. Trump is elected but the military behind him see this as a ‘military operation’ to wrestle America free from control by other nations and other powers. In my mind this will have to eventually come down to removing the control of dual citizens from Israel and the full power of the Zionist power over USA. Goes back to the Fed legislation in 19??. Control of the political, educational, media aspects of America by globalist elites must… Read more »

Martha
Guest
Martha

Actually the war has been “on” for approximately 150 years; but it was incremental and people just didn’t want to see it. The Federal Reserve System was the coup d’grace and the assassination of President Kennedy was the coup d’etat.
Of course Europe had been completely taken over by the end of WWII with the toppling of the last Christian monarchies, etc.

Copyright DRN Media PLC 2019. RSS: http://theduran.com/feed