in ,

Nicola Sturgeon is leading her country out of lockdown, and out of the UK

The Scottish leader’s approach can be contrasted with the dysfunctional Westminster government…

Submitted by InfoBrics, authored by Johanna Ross, journalist based in Edinburgh, Scotland…

Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been voted the UK’s ‘most impressive’ politician according to a recent poll. The survey, carried out by Press Gazette, asked 2700 people who they thought was doing best at handling the current crisis. Sturgeon came out top, with 29% of the vote, ahead of Chancellor Rishi Sunak and Labour opposition leader Keir Starmer. The poll follows on from a recent Scottish Government survey which gave Nicola Sturgeon a rating of 84% for her slow and measured approach to lockdown. For in defiance of Westminster’s lifting of lockdown restrictions earlier this month, Scotland has until now kept them in place, only hinting recently that some may be lifted on 28th May.

The statistics regarding Sturgeon’s performance will not come as a surprise to many, given the contrast with her Westminster counterpart. Boris Johnson has faced a barrage of criticism in recent weeks over his handling of the coronavirus pandemic in Britain. And with the highest death rate in Europe, and second highest death toll in the world, it’s no surprise that questions are being raised. Yet the PM has of late, not provided the consistent, strong leadership required at this time. In contrast to his Scottish counterpart, who gives a daily briefing on the Covid-19 situation in Scotland, without fail; Boris Johnson has not given a press conference for days, and has not been seen in public for days, prompting #WhereisBoris to trend on Twitter.  The difference between the two leaders could not be greater; every time Boris puts a foot wrong, it boosts Sturgeon, and the case for Scottish independence.

Unlike the Scottish government, which has yet to make any change to the current social distancing guidelines, other than being able to leave home now twice a day for exercise – instead of once as previously stated – Boris Johnson announced last week that people from different households could now meet; that if required, workers could return to work, and that from 1st June some shops would reopen and some pupils would return to school. The messaging also changed – rather confusingly, from ‘Stay Home’ to ‘Stay Alert’ – with no-one quite clear as to what the latter actually means. The motivation for beginning to lift lockdown measures is no doubt, mainly, economic, with experts warning that the UK is headed for a recession like no other. But there are concerns that Johnson has acted too soon, as with the death toll rising to the virus every day, we could be faced with another ‘peak’ if we return to normality too soon.

For the reality is the virus is still with us, and is likely to remain with us for years to come. Boris Johnson himself gave the example of SARS, for which, he highlighted, a vaccine has not been found in the last 18 years. Although scientists across the globe are working tirelessly in a bid to discover a vaccine as soon as possible, there are no guarantees that they will succeed in the short term. The key in the meantime, will be testing – both for those infected with coronavirus and for immunity, with antibody testing. But the UK government has only recently started to take testing seriously. Early on in the pandemic it downplayed the importance of it, favouring ‘herd immunity ’instead.  This was in contrast to countries like China and South Korea that saw testing as a vital way of managing the crisis. Back then, Britain’s Chief Scientific Advisor, Sir Patrick Vallance, said ‘We think this virus is likely to be one that comes year on year, becomes like a seasonal virus. Communities will become immune to it and that’s going to be an important part of controlling this longer term. About 60% is the sort of figure you need to get herd immunity’.  Britain has paid dearly for this ‘laissez-faire approach.

The case against the UK government is building by the day. Aside from the overall death toll of 35, 341, it has been established that an additional 23,000 deaths took place this year in care homes. Far from putting a ‘protective ring’ around care homes as Health Minister Matt Hancock has said, the government has been accused of putting a ‘noose’ around them, with elderly patients effectively like sitting ducks in the wake of the pandemic. It has been observed that no real attempts were made to prevent the spread of coronavirus throughout Britain’s nursing homes, with patients regularly admitted into homes from hospital, without being tested for the virus. Recently it was even reported that Personal Protective Equipment originally intended for care homes was diverted to NHS hospitals. Justice Secretary Robert Buckland admitted on Wednesday that : “We needed to make a choice about testing, we did decide to focus upon the NHS.’

Choices indeed have been made. And increasingly, questions are being raised as to whether the right decisions have been taken – both before and during the pandemic. For at a time when the country is ‘clapping for carers’ every week, in a display of public support for NHS staff, the government is passing its immigration bill, targeting the very migrants who play such an important role in Britain’s health service. As MP Valerie Vaz put it: ‘With this immigration bill the government is effectively clapping them out of the country’. Indeed the harsh reality of Tory policy cannot be escaped during this pandemic. The under-funding of public services over the years, particularly the NHS, primarily by the Conservative government is manifesting itself during this crisis like at no other time.  We have entered an era where capitalism is under more strain than ever, where the only solution to this crisis comes from state interference – with the transport industry to care homes to universities all set to require substantial financial aid to survive. A different Britain will emerge from the pandemic.

As for Scotland, it must decide whether it wants to continue being at the receiving end of Tory policies which favour business over people, or whether it will finally carve out for itself a fairer society with welfare at the fore. With a resurgence of coronavirus potentially looming on the horizon, I know which society I’d prefer to live in…

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
janet merryweather
janet merryweather
May 21, 2020

strugeon is a fascist dctator – she can take the scots out of the uk if she wants and then rejoin – or try at least- to rejoin the Eu – good luck/riddance to bad rubbish – oh, and nicola, don’t forget the alex sammond meme – what a complete shit she is with her ‘marriage’ of convenience – hohoho

janet merryweather
janet merryweather
Reply to  janet merryweather
May 21, 2020

by the way, this article is bloody rubbish!

Tom Welsh
Tom Welsh
Reply to  janet merryweather
May 21, 2020

I think it must be a determined, if rather heavy-handed, attempt at humour.

Tom Welsh
Tom Welsh
May 21, 2020

“Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has been voted the UK’s ‘most impressive’ politician…”

Wow – talk about “damning with faint praise”.

That’s like being called “the world’s best chess-playing hamster”, “the UK’s tallest virus”, or maybe even “the US government’s wittiest member”.

j t
j t
Reply to  Tom Welsh
May 21, 2020

You’re right, Tom. The writer might as well have said, “Everyone that praised her for what she has down was most impressed by her.” Like saying that everyone that voted for her wanted her to win, or that she is Scotland’s favorite First Minister since the coronavirus plandemic began.

j t
j t
May 21, 2020

Well congratulations on proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the “investigative reporters” (what exactly did they investigate?–the totally controlled narratives of the MSM?) at InfoBrics are totally ignorant brainwashed tools. There was and never HAS been ANY scientific rationale in quarantining HEALTHY individuals because of a virus. EVER!! NONE!! The only people who needed protection from whatever it was “they” called/call “covid-19” (oooohhhhh…so scary!!), were the same persons that should ALWAYS be protected during the flu season, every year: the very old and otherwise unhealthy. The rest do MUCH better, ALWAYS, continuing normal activities and normal social contact,… Read more »

Intp1
Intp1
May 22, 2020

She wont take Scotland to Independence. Her job is to draw the support of Scots who like to talk about it but would never be bold enough to vote for it. She is deep state, establishment supported and paid off by.
Real cecessionists are burried at any cost. Ask Alex Salmond.

Israel and Iran face each other in cyberspace

Failures in Syria and Libya fuel coup speculations against Erdogan