The Duran
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Kharkov, Palmyra and constraints of a ‘special military operation’
The Duran: Episode 1375
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
President Putin should now let the military hold the reigns, he is a good politician, and I can see why wants to take a softly softly approach ( unlike the yanks shock and awe )but there is a time for a more stronger hand, and this debacle is just such a a time. I served in the military and know how politicians can muddy the waterm time now for some reality, give the men who know what is needed the go ahead and get the job done.
Alex, can I suggest: once you’ve made the same point two or three times, it’s time to stop talking about it.
Which “Alex” are you addressing? (Of course, it applies to both of them, which isn’t unusual for presenters in a video — and is one reason I much refer articles instead — but this question still stands: Which one?)
Alex C, their names are on display in the video…
I agree, Alex C does this a lot, he tends to ask one question, then adds a 2bd, 3rd and even a 4th, he needs to keep it simple and stop trying too hard.
Alex I feel you are in error in this approach to comparing Palmyra and Kharkhov. I am fully relaxed with the Russian approach. If the Ukies take vengeance they will forever be reviled as Amalekites. Zhlulvsky(?) needs to be careful to shoot any soldier who even thinks about misbehaviour. Morale is never an issue or can to be used to shake God’s battleaxe – Russia. Relax guys. You are missing the mark by miles.