in ,

Identity of Schiff’s “whistleblower” leaks out. Deep ties to Nuland, Biden, Rice & Brennan (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 356.

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the Real Clear Investigations (RCI) released a detailed examination of evidence that seems to support much of the speculation as to the real identity of the whistleblower that got the impeachment ball rolling after President Trump’s now-infamous “Ukraine call.”

Ciaramella worked for disgraced former CIA Director John Brennan, and his name has been whispered for weeks that he was indeed the Schiff protected “whistleblower”.

Trump officials are fairly confident that it’s him, and that the MSM has known it is Ciaramella for a while now, but has curiously not leaked his name, or reported on this story.


Support Free Speech:
Subscribe to The Duran on YouTube – Find us on BitChute.

The Duran Audio Podcast:
Follow on Soundcloud – Subscribe on iTunes.


Via NOQ Report…

The purpose of being a “whistleblower” is to expose wrongdoing perpetrated by people in power whose actions are being concealed from the public, oversight officials, and/or law enforcement. It is never to be used for political gain, whether personal or on behalf of others. It is also not supposed to be used as a ploy against one’s political opponents or the political opponents of those with whom the whistleblower is attached.

In other words, blowing the whistle is not supposed to be weaponized for political purposes, but if it turns out CIA operative Eric Ciaramella is the Ukraine whistleblower, his report can only be viewed as an attempted political assassination. We know this because he has been actively involved in multiple attempts to take down the President even before he was elected. He is the “Deep State” pawn many on the right have condemned, a pawn who has reported multiple instances of the President’s “wrongdoings” which invariably turned out to be false.

If anyone can be less credible than Adam Schiff, it’s Eric Ciaramella. When other news outlets pointed out the whistleblower was a Democrat, I shrugged. No big deal. A person’s allegiance to an opposing party does not eliminate credibility in and of itself. But when it was revealed that he worked for former Vice President Joe Biden, his credibility started slipping away, even in the eyes of skeptics like me. Now, we’re learning he has a long history of attempts to expose President Trump, including getting fired from the NSC for leaking information to the press. His attachments to John Brennan, Adam Schiff, Susan Rice, and others who have worked against the President is the cherry on top of the obliteration of his credibility.

The more we learn about him, the easier it is to understand why Democrats have pulled back on having him as part of the impeachment inquiry at all in spite of his whistleblower complaint being the catalyst for the whole debacle.

How ‘Whistleblower’ May Be Outed: Ties to Biden, Brennan, Schiff’s Staff, Etc.

The official added that it soon became clear among NSC staff that Ciaramella opposed the new Republican president’s foreign policies. “My recollection of Eric is that he was very smart and very passionate, particularly about Ukraine and Russia. That was his thing – Ukraine,” he said. “He didn’t exactly hide his passion with respect to what he thought was the right thing to do with Ukraine and Russia, and his views were at odds with the president’s policies.”

“So I wouldn’t be surprised if he was the whistleblower,” the official said.

In May 2017, Ciaramella went “outside his chain of command,” according to a former NSC co-worker, to send an email alerting another agency that Trump happened to hold a meeting with Russian diplomats in the Oval Office the day after firing Comey, who led the Trump-Russia investigation. The email also noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin had phoned the president a week earlier.

It’s clear Democrats want to distance their inquiry (and themselves) from Ciaramella because he represents and unambiguous demonstration of the political motivations behind the Obama administration’s initial investigation into Russian collusion, the Mueller investigation, and now the impeachment inquiry. Moving forward on impeachment based on the word of Ciaramella is like initiating a study to prove tobacco is healthy because of a report presented by Philip Morris.

CDN wrote up an interesting piece on Ciaramello:

Eric Ciaramella, Schiff’s ‘whistleblower

Eric Ciaramella was a CIA analyst and expert on Ukraine and Russia. He was detailed to the Obama White House NSC as Director of Baltic and Eastern European Affairs including Ukraine. Ciaramella was a known Susan Rice protege. He is said to have traveled to Ukraine with Vice President Joe Biden twice.

He was a close associate of State Department anti-Trump partisan Victoria Nuland. Ciaramella was involved in the 2016 correspondence about the $1 billion dollar loan guarantee Biden held up until prosecutor Victor Shokin was fired.

Ciaramella was said to be traveling with Biden on that trip.

He was certainly in the loop on all things Ukraine. Including disinformation on Paul Manafort and Trump passed to Victoria Nuland by Ukrainian sources. Clinton donor Victor Pinchuk sent Ukrainian Member of Parliament Olga Bielkova to meet with Ciaramella. One day before Bielkova also met with infamous John McCain aide David Kramer.

Ciaramello is not confirmed as the whistleblower, but all circumstantial evidence points squarely at him. We may never hear the official word on it because doing so would paint the Democrats’ impeachment narrative as one built like a house of cards.

The sheer fact the alleged whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, had attempted on multiple occasions to frame the President is enough to destroy the entire impeachment narrative. This is the boy who cried wolf every chance he got.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Help us grow. Support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Polish Troll Farm
Polish Troll Farm
November 2, 2019

All that practice from destabilizing foreign governments has finally turned useful on the home front.

lizzie dw
lizzie dw
November 2, 2019

I think Eric Ciaramella’s name is being closely guarded by msm and everybody else because he is a Confidential Informant (CI) who was involved with the Mueller dossier. He may be “Charlie” mentioned Strzyk/Page texts. Per Dan Bongino.

oldandjaded
Reply to  lizzie dw
November 2, 2019

“who was involved with the Mueller dossier”
Oh well, now THAT gives him credibility….ROFLMAO!

Democracy Dies with Deadheads
Democracy Dies with Deadheads
Reply to  oldandjaded
November 4, 2019

Read the mainstream press, accept the opposite as truth. You’ll never go wrong.

Gordian Snake Pit
Gordian Snake Pit
Reply to  Democracy Dies with Deadheads
November 4, 2019

I glanced at the cover of The Economist, saw Putin wrestling with a ball of snakes and immediately thought that was an excellent depiction of American politics/journalism.

Andreea Bellari
Andreea Bellari
November 2, 2019

Bernie Sanders and The Squad are for impeachment.

Empire, Republic or Dystopia
Empire, Republic or Dystopia
Reply to  Andreea Bellari
November 2, 2019

You can hardly say Trump is a peach of a president but to impeach him on such faulty grounds (when it’s Obama’s Ukraine, Libya and Syria maleficence that should have landed him and a dozen or so of his team in the Hague), invokes the purest form of disgust.

Andreea Bellari
Andreea Bellari
Reply to  Empire, Republic or Dystopia
November 3, 2019

I second that!

Dystopian Bliss
Dystopian Bliss
Reply to  Andreea Bellari
November 4, 2019

I third your second and by the way, who’s on first?

Joel Walbertq
Joel Walbertq
November 3, 2019

So we got a demon possessed madman and his low-T mangina ‘asset’ running this fraud? Oh geez, what is anybody worried about? I look at this ‘guy’ I now know why They don’t want Their witness confronted. Not a good look when your ‘blower’ (whistle AND otherwise) starts crying on C-Span during testimony. And this manlet most certainly would.

Emily Litella
Emily Litella
Reply to  Joel Walbertq
November 4, 2019

So many demon-possessed madmen in American politics. You’ll have to be more specific.

If you meant Bugsy Bug-eye Schiff then OK, never mind.
PS: could he pos. be some android the DNC and Epstein’s ‘donations’ to MIT cooked up?

Joel Walbert
Joel Walbert
Reply to  Emily Litella
November 4, 2019

Haha touche. You may be onto something with the android thing though. Now that you got me thinking about that, def more machine than demon looking.

John Ellis
John Ellis
November 3, 2019

As the 25% most wealthy keep the 50% working poor so miserable that they refuse to vote, as this causes the 25% most wealthy to win all elections, why are we wasting time talking about fake democracy when we should be organizing a real Revolution?

Platon
Platon
Reply to  John Ellis
November 3, 2019

Not so much a ‘revolution’ as cell-based and internally well-organized death squads.
We know who the criminals are.

Aesop
Aesop
November 3, 2019

A man is known by the company he keeps. ‘Nuff said.

Platon
Platon
November 3, 2019

Scum, scummier , scummiest.
The Ukraine is now a euphemism for the plague, with anal warts.
How is it that the Bolshevik Jews are now in power in Washington?
We have seen all this before, during the demolition and looting, by genocide, of the Russian Christian Empire 1917 – 2000.

Trevor Noah Asks Hillary: "How Did You Kill Jeffrey Epstein?"

Rage With The Machine? 90's Resistance Band Reunites To Do Establishment Bidding In 2020