in

How the U.S. Is Collapsing

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Eric Zuesse (blogs at https://theduran.com/author/eric-zuesse/)

The U.S. has the most unequal, or aristocratic and anti-democratic, distribution of wealth, of all of the major economies — and this is now set (on account of tax-law changes that started in 1986) to become vastly worse and what one leading legal scholar is already predicting to create “the New Feudalism” in which America will be competing with the worst of the old forms of feudalism: permanent institutionalized and legalized castes, at the top of which, it will be practically indistinguishable from that of the titled “Nobility,” which the American Revolution had been revolting against and overthrew. Polling shows that today’s Americans place very low priority upon reversing this trend, which is now becoming a flood that drowns-out any real hope of a restoration of some degree of democracy in this country. Whereas Democrats care somewhat about this matter, Republicans care very little about it. In any case, the U.S. is already the most economically unequal of the world’s leading economies.

On 9 January 2020, Pew Research Center headlined “Most Americans Say There Is Too Much Economic Inequality in the U.S., but Fewer Than Half Call It a Top Priority: Democrats and Republicans differ on whether addressing economic inequality requires major changes to the economic system”. It showed that, “Income inequality in the U.S. is rising … and it is the highest among G-7 countries.” “Since 1981, the incomes of the top 5% of earners have increased faster than the incomes of other families.” 41% of Republicns and 78% of Democrats agreed with “There’s too much economic inequality in the U.S.” The reason why the Republican figure was lower is that middle and upper income Republicans didn’t think that the problem “requires major changes,” and most Republicans are in those two income-categories. However, 63% of low-income Republicans DID think it “requires major changes.” By contrast: among Democrats, 72% of lower-income ones did, and an even higher percentage of each of the other two income-categories did: 74% of middle-income, and 79% of upper-income, Democrats, did.

In January 2018, Deutsche Bank produced an 81-page report, “US Income and Wealth Inequality”, whose Page 10 was headlined “Income inequality very high in the United States” and it showed a chart comparing the U.S. with all 33 of its allies including in EU, NATO, AUKUS, and also Israel. The only one that had nearly as much inequality as America was Turkey. And it’s soaring in U.S., so it’s leaving all the others even farther behind in the inequality sweepstakes: the most aristocratic oountry, by far, is America.

In December 2022, Eric Kades headlined in the Connecticut Law Review, “A New Feudalism: Selfish Genes, Great Wealth, and the Rise of the Dynastic Family Trust (DFT)”. Here are excerpts (links were added to it by myself, for purposes of clarity, and documentation:

Today’s record levels of economic inequality are infecting our future as the top 0.01% bequeath vast wealth to their descendants. With the death of the Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP), this inequality has the potential to harden social class lines — not just for a generation or two, but forever. Although it may sound implausible, interviews with estate lawyers serving very high-net-worth clients reveal that some members of the wealthiest tier of testators are already exploiting the RAP’s elimination, along with a tax loophole, to establish dynasty trusts that will financially empower their bloodline as long as it continues. Recent work in evolutionary biology reveals a universal and powerful human drive for high-status descendants — a drive for “quality” progeny so powerful that it appears to trump the usual desire to maximize quantity of offspring. Coupled with the long history of dynastic family wealth in England, this science suggests that today’s wealthiest testators will utilize powerful modern legal institutions (e.g., well-developed laws of contract and trust; deep and efficient capital markets) to forge a new sort of trust that I dub a Dynastic Family Trust (DFT). DFTs will be larded with innovative provisions leveraging a founder’s wealth to maximize descendants’ status for generation after generation. For those fearing the pernicious effects of concentrated wealth on democracy and equal opportunity, the rise of the DFT is alarming. Fortunately, there is a very easy fix: simply reinstate the Rule Against Perpetuities. Given a race-to-the-bottom dynamic among the states, national legislation is necessary. …

VII. CONCLUSION

The overarching worry is that DFTs raise the specter of a New Feudalism in twenty-first-century America. Under “the old” feudalism, a small circle of dynastic families ruled medieval England for centuries. Without the modern tools of sophisticated trust law and liquid wealth, they nonetheless preserved their privileged status via the rudimentary but effective institutions of primogeniture, the fee tail, and preventing subdivision of the family’s land—the essence of power in the feudal economy and polity.240 Although no single factor undid their pervasive social hegemony, one critical development was the imposition of the RAP and the concomitant evisceration of fee tails. This marked the beginning of the end of the dynastic family wealth birthed by English feudalism.241 To this day the RAP remains the law of England242 and prevents the alarming prospects of a New Feudalism, built on DFTs, in the homeland of the Old Feudalism.

The rash and perverse abolition of the RAP has put the contemporary United States on a very different footing. … It is  supremely ironic that a nation ideologically founded in large part on rejection of the significant remnants of (the old) feudalism in eighteenth-century England now stands at the precipice of a New Feudalism that could never arise in the England of today. At present, little stands between the United States and the instantiation of a perpetual nobility completely at odds with the nation’s founding principles.

How much attention did the U.S. ‘news’-media pay to that landmark study? Did you know, before you read it here, that there was any such thing as the “Rule Against Perpetuities” and that it had been what broke the back of feudalism in ancient England? And did you know that increasingly ever since 1986, America has reverted to this ancient feudal system that locked-in status on the basis of birth, locked it in, in perpetuity, for all future generations of the ’Nobility’ (though without any aristocratic titles to go along with it, so that the U.S. regime can still pretend not to BE an aristocracy)?

The U.S. is increasingly becoming the world’s stand-out model of dictatorship, locked-in, by caste. It’s increasingly winner-take-all, and keep-it-forever.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

11 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bob Valdez
Bob Valdez
July 29, 2023

Arse-tralia is headed in the same direction.

penrose
penrose
July 29, 2023

The Divided States of America (DSA) needs to split up. The Monolithic Monstrosity known as the USA has done enough damage and warrants being closed down. The Mississippi River and the Mason Dixon Line will yield 4 quadrants to start. Would not hurt to end with 6 – 8 pieces.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 29, 2023

The article is about the U.S. and its future. The comment is about the U.S. and its future.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 29, 2023

The article is pointing out problems. The comment is dealing with solutions. You certainly can deal with solutions too. For example, you might describe how the American people can take control of their government away from AIPAC (American Israeli Political Action Committee).

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 29, 2023

No, I did not down vote you. 🙂

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 29, 2023

I think there are many Americans who do not wish to have their lives ruled and ruined by the D.C. swamp cesspool.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 29, 2023

How about this. Take all Americans with assets over 10 Million, confiscate their wealth, and put them in prison on a diet of bread and water.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  penrose
July 29, 2023

That, of course, is sarcasm. But bringing excess wealth under control is not a bad idea, especially when it is speculative wealth and contributes nothing to the well being of a healthy society.

George Soros is a prime example.

Ayumu
Ayumu
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 30, 2023

I’m not sure why you choose to approach your patrons in this manner (snarkcastic, I’ll call it.) It’s unbecoming and probably the reason for some of the dvs.

I’ll still say keep up the good work fellow truth-seeker since there’s so few of us out here. But while I don’t have to like you personally to support your quest for truth, I’m not so sure about everyone else. I’m worried you’ll lose readership and therefore potential exposure, seriously.

Cheers

Ayumu
Ayumu
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 30, 2023

I’ve been around here a while and wasn’t referring to just this incident, but I understand your point completely. I’m not sure your ideal version of blog will work out the way you prefer though and might just end up pushing people away. As a reader I don’t think it’s a problem when others go off topic (this is how it is on many sites I use) since by the time I get here in the chat I’ve already read the article and can just move on anyway. It also never hurts to have readers hanging around this site for… Read more »

Last edited 8 months ago by Ayumu
Ayumu
Ayumu
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 30, 2023

I’m a reader, I don’t mind. I’m here for the article first and foremost. Based on the upvotes/downvotes of your readers I don’t think they mind either.

Last edited 8 months ago by Ayumu
penrose
penrose
Reply to  penrose
July 29, 2023

I am aware that the War Monger and War Criminal Abe Lincoln would not approve of splitting up the good old USA.

Time
Time
July 29, 2023

Name the Jew, Eric.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
July 29, 2023

You might start with AIPAC (American Israeli Political Action Committee).
Then look at individual neocons. For example, Paul Wolfowitz.

Ayumu
Ayumu
Reply to  penrose
July 30, 2023

You guys ask too much sometimes imho. How about giving him a break from time-to-time eh, he’s only one man and can only do/read/know so much and is bound to be wrong once in a while, like all of us. Folks around here seem to cudgel him everytime he gets something wrong or doesn’t see it the same way. This doesn’t give me the impression that people are actually looking for solutions, it seems like many folks are just looking for a fight.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Ayumu
July 30, 2023

The problem is not what he knows, which is a lot, it’s what is being ignored and deliberately avoided. That’s called an agenda. Talking about America without addressing the Jewish role is like discussing a trip to the moon without mentioning rockets. Eric knows good and well what the situation is. He’s a smart guy.

Ayumu
Ayumu
Reply to  penrose
July 30, 2023

You seem to know enough to write up a small book on the subject. You should consider submitting something here.

Tom Welsh
Tom Welsh
July 29, 2023

“And strong belief in opportunity and upward mobility is the explanation that is often given for Americans’ high tolerance for inequality. The majority of Americans surveyed believe that they will be above mean income in the future (even though that is a mathematical impossibility)”.

– Carol Graham and Soumya Chattopadhyay (cited by Barbara Ehrenreich, “Smile or Die”, p180)

George Wrigley
George Wrigley
Reply to  Tom Welsh
July 30, 2023

I figured out a long time ago that the average American is an uneducated moron. It is very easy to steal the wealth from morons.

Tom
Tom
July 29, 2023

Say it out loud Eric Zuesse. You dont even mentioned the FED once. Blabla but no substance. The no1 policy of the FED (and ECB) has always been driving down wages to prevent the rising of a middle class and enrich their Wallstreet buddy’s. Feudalism in the shape of the rentier class that wants quick profits and no investments. The rentier class wants feudalism to return.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Tom
July 29, 2023

Very informative comment. Succint and precise analysis. Thank you!

penrose
penrose
July 29, 2023

Alexis de Tocqueville was a French writer who wrote about Democracy in America almost 200 years ago. It’s still relevant today.

FT, Ukraine artillery advantage over Russia. Hersh, US Crimea Bridge. Elensky, greetings earth. U/1

Ukraine-NATO Plan B. Russia-Africa success. West MSM, Africa summit failure. Ursula peace prize. U/1