Now Reading
Dem Primary, Sick People

Dem Primary, Sick People

  • These grotesque democrats are stressing how important health care is, but they don’t talk about mental health, they don’t talk about cancer, they don’t talk about viruses, they don’t talk about prosthetics.

Authored by Serban V.C. Enache via Hereticus Economicus:

On the subject of Health Care… None of these despicable democrats say that Insurance Companies DON’T produce a product or a service that treats illnesses or injuries. Insurance Companies DO NOT create wealth, they are wealth EXTRACTIVE.

These grotesque democrats are stressing how important health care is, but they don’t talk about mental health, they don’t talk about cancer, they don’t talk about viruses, they don’t talk about prosthetics – but the one thing they do talk about and talk about religiously is the “reproductive right and freedom” of women to kill fetuses irrespective of context. It’s not just about pregnancies as a result of rape, or if the pregnancy threatens the mother’s life, or if the fetus has life-threatening mutations [cases that Medicare For All should indeed cover], if you’ve been a dumb, careless, slut, the State is going to pay for the consequences of your hedonistic lifestyle, including late term abortion. What these sick liberals and sick progressives want is for the State to subsidize the consequences of hedonism, which is infanticide, in effect sponsoring the growth of the aforementioned phenomenons; and their wet dream is for the State to subsidize it at 100 percent.

The liberals and the progressives and the hypocritical pro-lifers before you’re born & anti-lifers once you’re out of the womb are demented to the extreme, and sadly, there is no cure in sight…

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

20
Leave a Reply

avatar
7 Comment threads
13 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
15 Comment authors
M4A MMTlizzie dwWhat about War & Pharma markups?M4A MMTTheCelotajs Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
jph
Guest
jph

“if you’ve been a dumb, careless, slut, the State is going to pay for the consequences of your hedonistic lifestyle, including late term abortion. What these sick liberals and sick progressives want is for the State to subsidize the consequences of hedonism, which is infanticide, in effect sponsoring the growth of the aforementioned phenomenons; and their wet dream is for the State to subsidize it at 100 percent.” Some neo-christian ideologue trying to force his views upon society?….Next we may expect the inquisition? Guess the author is a male misogynist describing women enjoying sex as ‘sluts’. Where does the Duran… Read more »

Chuck Norris Reborn
Guest
Chuck Norris Reborn

The author isn’t against abortion, he is against the State subsidizing abortions irrespective of context. It’s one thing to tolerate abortions, it’s one thing to subsidize abortion in certain cases [cases which the author mentioned], it’s another to subsidize it as part of a degenerative lifestyle. Sex takes two, yes – so both involved should seek the help of their friends and family to pay for an abortion, instead of having the State pay for it.

Snowflake's gonna strawman
Guest
Snowflake's gonna strawman

Re-read the article, snowflake, cuz you obviously missed the point and got triggered because the word “slut” was used. Many things in this world are enjoyable, drugs and alcohol are enjoyable too, but they have consequences. You want the state to subsidize booze and tobacco too? How about the state paying a dividend to individuals for having as much sex as possible? How about having the state subsidize 100% people’s sex changes willy nilly? Inquisition you say? I’ve never heard an inquisitor call out pro-lifers on their hypocrisy. Go vote for Killary so you can drop some more of those… Read more »

Pierre Vaillant
Guest
Pierre Vaillant

Enache writes that Medicare For All should cover the cost of abortion if the pregnancy is a result of rape, if it threatens the woman’s life, or if the baby carriers life-threatening malformations. And where did you get that he’s opposed to contraception?
http://hereticus-economicus.info/politely-debating-abortion-dream-on/
Personally, I don’t want my taxes being used to pay for people’s carelessness, both men and women. We had enough with Hollande cracking down on free speech.
Go enjoy the pleasures of sex AND the repercussions of it on YOUR OWN dime.

Elena Xantopolous
Guest
Elena Xantopolous

The next time you ejaculate into your gf’s vagina, either because the condom broke, or because you were too drunk to put one on, or because she forgot to take the pill, raise the money for the abortion from your friends and family, and don’t expect the state to bail you out just because you like having sex. Okay, honey?

lizzie dw
Guest
lizzie dw

If there are any female members of Congress who are of childbearing age I am sure that their health plan – which we pay for, as well as paying the salaries of these out-of-touch people – will pay for it. No questions asked and no problem when. We are being subjected to arguing with each other about something that need not be argued about if we had the same health plan as those parasites we elect and support. It is sickening that in this comment section people are making such pejorative remarks to each other. If we had the coverage… Read more »

Tom
Guest
Tom

Idiot!

BCD
Guest
BCD

Go ahead, rip the band-aid off and tell us how you feel! haha OUCH!
Well, on the plus side (according to ALL these democrats) they care about children from other countries, because they know what it is to be a Christian.

Pierre Vaillant
Guest
Pierre Vaillant

Some of the benefits of Medicare For All: Doctor/patient time doubled as doctor/insurance company time is eliminated. The doctor must discuss the diagnosis and options regarding drugs, treatments, and costs with the patient rather than an insurance company. Doubling the time doctors have available for patients increases capacity and service without increasing real costs. Total nominal cost is about 10% of GDP which is less than being spent today, so even when catastrophic costs are added the numbers are not financially disruptive and can easily be modified. Eliminates medical costs from businesses, removing price distortions and medical legacy costs. Eliminates… Read more »

Stunned at Sunset
Guest
Stunned at Sunset

People will call me crazy, I know but I’ve never witnessed anything like the debacle of the “Democrat Party” debates and know of no such tomfoolery in this country’s history. Usually, political debate follows a serious discussion of policy, diplomacy, and constructive administration lacking the loaded, propagandistic questions so prevalent during last night’s socialist fiasco. I’m sorry but I can’t imagine that people in public service can actually be this stupid. I seems to me that the air of ridiculousness was a staged event and that everyone was following a script. Anatoliy Golitsyn and James J. Angleton warned us that,… Read more »

Pierre Vaillant
Guest
Pierre Vaillant

If the social conservatives would have adopted a saner stance on economic policy, the decadent liberals wouldn’t be so prevalent as they are today. Also, the cultural revolution was financed heavily by the Deep State and Western oligarchs. The no-borders Left & no-borders Right have worked in tandem for more than a century to destroy nation states.
Read this long-ass article.
https://theduran.com/the-globalists-of-left-right/

Stunned at Sunset
Guest
Stunned at Sunset

I agree with you sentiments but Obama AND Bush were clearly “chosen golden boys” who worked to impose policies that reflected the goals and objectives of the International Communist Party. During that past eighty years, COMINTERM orchestrated the “stashing of cash” up to and including 10% of the GDP in each country either controlled or influenced by the Soviet Union creating their own “seed money” which, after the staged collapse of the Soviet Union under Mikhail Gorbachev, helped create their own “Oligarchs” surfacing in the “deep waters” of Western Financing as “Investment Bankers.” How much do any of us know… Read more »

Pierre Vaillant
Guest
Pierre Vaillant

I am not offended by people willing to have a rational debate, nor am I offended when people think differently than me. The wet dream of the globalists regarding eugenics and total control is to plummet world population levels to pre-industrial levels – which would require a genocide at planetary scale. They really don’t need profits [statements on a balance sheet] when they own most of the earth itself and all buildings on top of it and all the technology and all the politicians and, most importantly, the narrative. They are nostalgic to bring back feudalism. You mentioned Thomas Edison,… Read more »

Mondo Psycho
Guest
Mondo Psycho

Oh, I thought the title meant all the dems in the primary were sick people and that’s why they wanted free psychiatric care. I thought it was a great idea for both parties but……..Never mind.

Ellie Donald
Guest
Ellie Donald

M4A is a good policy, but with the Democrats’ instance of it covering abortions willy nilly, it makes it untenable for conservatives.
Plus, without control over the country’s immigration policy and borders, imagine how many migrants would set their sights for the US, if the Government implemented Medicare For All, Free College, and Employment Guarantees.

TheCelotajs
Guest
TheCelotajs

And they don’t talk about the cost it is going to cost the American Tax Payers either. Free Health Care for All is not free as they claim, someone has to pay for it and it won’t be just the rich either. It will end up everyone who is working even if they tax every rich person out there at 70 to 75% they are not going to come up with the cost of $3.26 Trillion Dollars per year with a low cost of $32.6 Trillion Dollars over 10 years. Someone is going to have to come up with the… Read more »

M4A MMT
Guest
M4A MMT

Medicare For All would cost less than what the Gov is actually paying now. Even the American Conservative wrote in favor M4A. M4A is NOT Socialism, neither is Obamacare, which was a crock policy. Socialism is when the State owns and manages something. The VA is an example of socialism. M4A is completely compatible with capitalism, since it puts money into people’s pockets for health care provision specifically, and the people decide where they’ll shop around for medical products and medical services. M4A eliminates the middle men, the private and state bureaucrats that stand between you and your doctor. Bernie… Read more »

What about War & Pharma markups?
Guest
What about War & Pharma markups?

What about all the so-called ‘Defence’ Budget hikes, what about all the wars and unlawful covert ops? Does the US government match that spending with new taxes or by increasing existing taxes? No. If you’re concerned with the costs of health care, why aren’t you outraged that your private system is cartelized, and people have to pay over 20 thousand percent markups on something that costs either a few cents or a few dollars to make? The US can afford medicare for all, it can deficit spend without problems, just like it did in the past, albeit for military purposes.

lizzie dw
Guest
lizzie dw

On the subject of health care, I am interested that we the people be allowed to join the health care plans that our elected and financially supported government representatives have. I am sure these plans cover mental health, cancer, viruses and prosthetics. And probably abortions whenever one wants one – are there any female members of Congress who are of childbearing age? – and probably tooth implants and cataract surgery and dermatological procedures for pre-cancerous growths and wrinkles. Since we are footing the bill for all those Congressional perks we are entitled to them.

M4A MMT
Guest
M4A MMT

“And probably abortions whenever one wants one” … “we are footing the bill for all those Congressional perks we are entitled to them” No, you’re not. Federal Gov programs aren’t financed from taxes, go read “Taxes for revenue are obsolete” by Beardsly Ruml, Chairman of the NY Fed, 1946. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/taxes-for-revenue-are-obs_b_542134 Having the state pay for abortions willy nilly is NOT part of public purpose. You’re NOT entitled to have the state pay for your irresponsible engagement in sexual activities. This is the same self-entitlement bs that the opulent use, jut because they pay more taxes in absolute figures compared to… Read more »

Copyright DRN Media PLC 2019. RSS: http://theduran.com/feed

Scroll To Top