in ,

Belgorod reckless stunt damages collective west narrative

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Belgorod reckless stunt damages collective west narrative
The Duran: Episode 1599

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

76 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alecto
Alecto
May 23, 2023

Sleazy and dishonest is exactly the right description of the West. Everyone can see what we are now!

Ayumu
Ayumu
Reply to  Alecto
May 23, 2023

We? You don’t seem sleazy and dishonest sir and therefore shouldn’t include yourself in the equation. 😉

Anna Cornelia
Anna Cornelia
May 24, 2023
Rate this article :
     

The US have farmed out all the really dirty stuff to the UK. I have seen videos today of British soldiers teaching Ukrainians to make IEDs for use in terrorist tactic campaigns. There are rumours that the British were involved in the Kerch bridge explosion and in the planning (if not execution) of the pipeline destruction. It’s all very nasty and shaming for most of the British electorate. We did not vote for our government to become involved in this – using our tax money – sending dirty weapons – causing radioactive pollution.

Carol
Carol
Reply to  Anna Cornelia
May 24, 2023

Tsar Nicholas II considered Britain to be the biggest threat to his country. We specialized in sabotage, smear campaigns, funding agitators, creating stories which were entirely fictional in order to collapse Russia – so no change there then in over 120 years.

Britain has some sort of entrenched “small man syndrome”, pathetic really.

Why I Believe that George W. Bush Should Be Tried & Executed

Why the U.S. Debt-Limit ‘Debate’ Is a Charade of ‘Democracy’