in ,

Amy Barrett confirmation hearing highlight reel from day two

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

The radicals in the Senate Judiciary Committee failed in tarnishing Barrett.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tjoe
Tjoe
October 14, 2020

I’ve seen the inside of Catholicism and I sure as heck don’t want 7 Catholics and 2 Jewish for life appointments on the top court in the USA. Where are the 49% Protestants represented? NOT ON THE SUPREME COURT

Sue Rarick
Reply to  Tjoe
October 14, 2020

So because you are unable to think for yourself, you think everyone else is so hampered?
You would insist on perfectly matching demographics for the Supreme Court. The proper number of Blacks and Hispanics and Asians plus a perfect match of Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists. They are going to have to pack the court just to accommodate your perfect demographic world view.

Last edited 3 years ago by Sue Rarick
Tjoe
Tjoe
Reply to  Sue Rarick
October 14, 2020

Protestants are around 49% of the US, yet it is okay with you that not one justice of the 9 had that upbringing? You make the ad hominem attack that I similarly want a Muslim that comprises about 1.1% or other fringe religious upbringing, because I want ONE Protestant judge, not 7 Catholics. Go ask a pedo priest if Catholics are capable of separating there religion from the job…won’t happen.

Last edited 3 years ago by TJoes
Paul Martin
Paul Martin
Reply to  Tjoe
October 14, 2020

What’s in a category? Never forget — that Protestants as well as Catholics… just as Republicans as well as Democrats… just as neocons as well as neolibs… can be collaborationists. What kind of collaborationists am I taking about? Think of WWII France and the Vichy government. The French citizens who aided that government were called “collabos” and suffered the worst humiliations after the war was over. In the current case we are considering here, however, those who are truly moral people will never collaborate in service to tyrannical elites.

jasmoran
jasmoran
Reply to  Tjoe
October 14, 2020

I agree. The two jews need to go.

New American military camp in Lithuania

Food Prices Escalate as Wages Decline! Job Cuts and Reduced Hours Create Perfect Storm