In addition to withdrawing from the 2015 UNSC Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on Iran’s nuclear development program, brokered under the Obama administration, much to the dismay of each of the other signatories, the Trump admin is now looking to create an international ‘coalition’ against Iran, modeled after the 75 member coalition to defeat ISIS.
Washington repeats its accusations against Iran, which were both spurious and manifold, using them as the basis for seeking this new multinational opposition to Iran.
France 24 reports:
WASHINGTON (AFP) –
Washington wants to build a global “coalition” against the Tehran regime and its “destabilizing activities,” the State Department said on Thursday, after pulling out from the Iran nuclear accord to the anger of US allies.
The plan is to be detailed on Monday by the top United States diplomat, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in his first major foreign policy address since taking office in April.
“The US will be working hard to put together a coalition,” State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert told reporters.
The aim is to “bring together a lot of countries from around the world with the specific goal of looking at the Iranian regime through a more realistic lens” which would include “all of its destabilizing activities that aren’t just a threat to the region but are a threat to the broader world,” she said.
Nauert added that the coalition will not be “anti-Iran” because the US stands “firmly behind” the country’s people, in contrast to the regime and its “bad actions.”
She evoked a comparison with the US-led international coalition against the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq.
Begun in 2014, that coalition now counts as members 75 countries or institutions and intervened militarily against the jihadists, although only a minority of coalition members have conducted most of that military action, which has left the extremists nearly defeated on that battlefield.
Nauert did not say whether the proposed coalition against Iran’s regime would have a military component.
She said the State Department received on Monday about 200 foreign diplomats to explain to them President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the nuclear accord, and the next steps.
In a breakthrough that ended a 12-year standoff over Western fears that Iran was developing a nuclear bomb, the administration of former president Barack Obama and other major powers reached the accord with Iran in 2015.
It lifted punishing international sanctions in return for Iran’s agreement to freeze its nuclear effort.
Withdrawing from the deal last week, Trump called for a new agreement with deeper restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program as well as curbs on its ballistic missiles and its backing for militant groups across the Middle East.
Along with Iran the other signatories of the 2015 deal — France, Britain, Germany, China and Russia — strongly criticized the US withdrawal.
On Thursday the European Union said it will begin moves to block the effect of reimposed US sanctions on Iran as efforts to preserve the nuclear deal deepened a transatlantic rift.
Asked about the potential willingness of European nations to join the proposed new coalition, Nauert said many US allies “fully understand” and are “not turning a blind eye” to Iran’s actions.
With many of Washington’s European allies in a bad form with Washington over Iran, due to Trump’s withdrawal from the JCPOA and reimposition of economic sanctions, they can still count on the support of the Gulf States and Israel, which would welcome conflict with Iran, and who have already initiated military hostilities against it.
This further cements Washington’s bold push to continue with its anti-Tehran foreign policy, in spite of international condemnation thereof, including that of each of the other members of the UNSC, demonstrating to the world that Washington feels no regret for the collateral damage, diplomatic and actual, that it stands to wreak with this policy. Washington is moving forward, whether the EU, Russia, and China, like it or not, and whether it makes good sense, or not.