in ,

U.S. intel viewed Steele dossier as ‘highly politically sensitive’ and mostly uncorroborated

Declassified memo show intelligence community’s assessment in December 2016, two months after FBI had already used dossier to support FISA warrant.

Two months after the FBI used Christopher Steele’s dossier to support a warrant targeting the Trump campaign, U.S. intelligence officially declared his evidence was “highly politically sensitive,” minimally corroborated and not worthy of including in its analysis of Russian election interference, a newly declassified document shows.

The so-called Annex A of the official Russian election interference Intelligence Community Assessment was declassified this week by Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, providing the most definitive proof to date that the U.S. intelligence in December 2016 as President Obama was leaving office was wary of a dossier that was essential to the FBI probe into now-disproven Trump-Russia collusion.

“An FBI source, using both identified and unidentified sub sources, volunteered highly politically sensitive information from the summer to the fall of 2016 on Russian influence efforts aimed at the US presidential election. We have only limited corroboration of the source reporting in this case and did not use it to reach the analytic conclusions of the CIA/FBI/NSA assessment,” the appendix stated.

The intelligence community assessment also warned that Steele appeared to have leaked his information to the media just before Trump was elected Nov. 8, 2016.

“The source’s reporting appears to have been acquired by multiple western press organizations starting in October,” the annex stated.

The annex confirms Republicans’ long-held suspicions that the intelligence community saw the Steele dossier as suspect even as the FBI portrayed its allegations as verified to a FISA court starting in October 2016

Help us grow. Support The Duran on Patreon!


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Notify of
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 12, 2020

If the Republicans smelt a rat with this dossier from the start why didn’t they stand up and say so? With very few exceptions they have been quite content to let Trump take all the brickbats and they must have known that the whole scam was an elaborate plot to get him taken down. When that didn’t work, the Democrats tried again with Ukrainegate and once again the Republicans sat back and let the saga wind on. The cost to the taxpayer, the damage to the presidency and the prestige of their country was obviously of no account to them.… Read more »

The US admits they are to blame for the Syrian hunger

Days After Getting ‘Woke’ On Trump, Snapchat Refuses To Release Diversity Report Amid Racism Complaints