in ,

Trump’s India Visit Was Aimed Against China but Produced No Results

India Is Not Willing to Go Directly Against China

Submitted by InfoBrics, authored by Paul Antonopoulos, Research Fellow at the Center for Syncretic Studies…

During U.S. President Donald Trump’s visit to India on Monday and Tuesday, he was led to a packed cricket stadium with about 100,000 people in Ahmedabad, the capital of Gujarat, the home of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Although many viewed this visit from the trade perspective, we cannot overlook that this visit is also part of Trump’s hostilities with China. Due to the complex situation in Sino-U.S. relations, Trump went to India with intentions of encouraging the country’s leadership to participate in certain projects to undermine China. Although India is a potential competitor of China, India says it is adhering to a balanced policy despite its friction with China. With these frictions existing, it is still not enough to consider India an opponent of China.

Trump has not swayed India to be openly adversarial to China, however his intentions would have been to at least demonstrate that he has identified India into his umbrella of states to oppose China. The president’s visit took place in the hope of signing a trade agreement with India. In the end, both leaders did not agree on a much talked-about trade agreement where Trump was hoping to sign a deal that would help bridge the $25.2 billion trade deficit with India. Therefore, the U.S. still has aspirations and needs in this regard, but Washington is clearly unable to meet its needs.

This comes as the U.S. is currently facing the problem of a large number of job backflows and too many imports of Indian products will conflict with the domestic problems of the U.S. Although its domestic economy is facing difficulties, it is unlikely that India would want to become adversarial with China as the East Asian country is its second largest trading partner. India has to maintain its balanced policy with Beijing and Washington as it announced only days ago that the U.S. was once against India’s largest trading partner.

China’s growing influence is prompting the U.S. to more actively build its own Indo-Pacific strategy. Essentially, Washington is seeking partners to more actively restrict China as it rises in economic and military stature. But in the eyes of Trump, India is just a useful tool to implement this strategy and pressure China and its Belt and Road Initiative. India’s participation in the Indo-Pacific strategy was initially essential to oppose the Belt and Road Initiative. However, New Delhi hopes the Indo-Pacific strategy is an alternative to the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative and an opportunity for its own economic development independent of China in the hope of fulfilling its potential of becoming a Great Power on its own terms.

Initially India was enthusiastic for the U.S. strategy, this enthusiasm has now waned. India found that although it has common interests with the U.S. in balancing China, there were too many differences, especially revolving around trade. India’s current concern is not to curb China and other issues, but how to improve its domestic economy. Washington wants India to be a bridgehead in the region, however, India is currently governed by Hindutva nationalists, and they are very cautious with foreign ideologies, particularly those with an Anglo basis. In addition, the Indo-Pacific strategy does not have a known economic policy and structure as rather it is aimed at pressurizing China – a stark difference with the Belt and Road Initiative.

The constant threat of closing their markets and forcing India to buy something is not the best strategy to achieve results. In the political field, this is not the basis for long-term cooperation, especially if Trump wants India to be a bulwark against China. Trump did not sign any large-scale trade agreements during his visit while India needs a mutually beneficial trading partner like China. The problem remains unresolved, and there are too many trade gaps, making it difficult to make up for even with the expected use of military transactions. Although Trump did not explicitly mention China during his trip to India, he did indirectly mention China.

“During our visit we discussed the importance of a secure 5G wireless network and the need for this emerging technology to be a tool for freedom, progress, prosperity, not to do anything with where it could be even conceived as a conduit for suppression and censorship,” Trump said in a press briefing after his meeting with Modi. Trump has been urging countries not to use 5G equipment from China’s Huawei telecommunications company on the unfounded allegations that it could be used to spy on other countries, something that Huawei has repeatedly denied.

So, there is little doubt that Trump visited India hoping to consolidate and strengthen the country as part of his anti-China bloc, something that never eventuated in India’s approaching significantly closer to the U.S.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

15 points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Olivia Kroth
February 26, 2020

I believe that Trump’s visit to India was supposed to go against China and Russia. The author is right! This produced absolutely no results because India will not go against China and Russia. All three countries are allies in BRICS: BRAZIL – RUSSIA – INDIA – CHINA – SOUTH AFRICA. These countries trade with each other by using their own currencies. India is part of this deal. It trades weapons with Russia in Indian rupees and Russian roubles.

Citizenfitz
Citizenfitz
Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 27, 2020

Americas friends have more to fear from it than amercas enemies do.

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  Citizenfitz
February 27, 2020

I think both have to fear a lot from the US, their foes and friends alike. It is good to stay away from them as far as possible. However, as we all know, “if you do not come to democracy, democracy will come to you” (with US bombs, sanctions and torture)!

terryindorset
terryindorset
Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 27, 2020

another way to say that is ‘if you do not come to war, war will come to you’ courtesy of Yankeedoodleland……as ever, the bully is on the march.

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  terryindorset
February 27, 2020

Yes, “Yankeedoodleland”, that sounds so playful and silly, but I do not see anything playful about this big brother bully at all.

DannyC
DannyC
February 26, 2020

India minds its own business and is focused on itself and its tensions with Pakistan. Its not interested in playing games to counter China or to punish Russia and Iran for not bending the knee. They know theyre a major power at this point and they stay out of these conflicts. Its not in their best interest to take sides

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  DannyC
February 26, 2020

Yes, and this is a very wise attitude. I visited India several times and was always impressed by the culture and refined way of life that these people lead. So different from the West!

Olivia Kroth
February 27, 2020

THE JAPAN TIMES: Nice memories and photo ops but no trade deal for Trump in India NEW DELHI – U.S. President Donald Trump failed Tuesday to strike a trade deal with India at the end of a visit big on photo opportunities but short on substance and overshadowed by deadly riots. U.S.-Indian trade relations have worsened in recent years as Trump’s “America First” aim of reducing deficits has collided with the “Make in India” mantra of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. While minor compared to his battle with China, Trump has imposed tariffs on Indian steel and aluminum and suspended duty-free… Read more »

Olivia Kroth
February 27, 2020

FOREIGN POLICY: The U.S. president departs New Delhi without delivering on an “incredible” trade deal despite years of high-level negotiations. — BY RAVI AGRAWAL | FEBRUARY 25, 2020 Two Images, Two Indias It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. On Tuesday, New Delhi presented a tale of two cities. One set of images broadcast to the world showed U.S. President Donald Trump with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi—a glitzy meeting of the leaders of the world’s two largest democracies. Another set of images, getting less attention, showed Hindu mobs attacking people who were protesting the… Read more »

Turkey’s Request for U.S. Patriot Missiles to Pressure Russia In Syria Will Not Work

Craig Murray’s Report on Day 2 of Assange’s Show-Trial