Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

News

Syria days away from annihilating ISIS on the battlefield: Here’s what comes next

Here’s what Syria must do in order to keep ISIS and like-minded terrorists down.

Published

on

8,532 Views

Mohammed Ibrahim Samra, the governor of Deir ez-Zor has stated that the Syrian Arab Army is 24 to 48 hours away from storming the gates of Deir ez-Zor city which for years has been besieged by ISIS.

Furthermore, Deir ez-Zor has subsumed the role as the major ISIS stronghold in Syria as fighters continue to flee the self-proclaimed ISIS capital of Raqqa.

While the United States and its Kurdish proxies who lead the SDF are struggling to break into Raqqa city, which is being held by approximately 2,000 ISIS terrorist fighters, Deir ez-Zor is now home to upwards of 20,000 terrorists who have arrived from liberated regions of both Iraq and Syria.

A Syrian soldier has stated,

“We carried out at dawn a successful raid against one of ISIS terrorists’ barricades in the direction of the Water Resources area through crawling and infiltrating it and throwing several bombs when we almost approached the area, killing all the terrorists at the site”.

Syria’s elite Tiger forces are now less than 3 kilometres from the city gates. With Russian Aerospace Forces consistently and successfully clearing the path for the Syrian Arab Army, the defeat of ISIS on the battle field is now a matter of when and not if and more specially, such a thing could be achieved before the end of September of this year.

The credit for the destruction of ISIS as a military unit will be legitimately earned by Syria, Russia, Iran,their volunteer partners and the Lebanese party Hezbollah.

But with the military phase of war against ISIS about to be won by Syria, the eventuality which must be planned for will be settling a peace that prevents terrorist incidents form isolated ISIS cells and lone-wolf adherents to the perverse ISIS ideology.

Syria should consider the following in order to avoid terrorism in the future.

1. Work with Russia to preserve Syria’s territorial integrity

Russia is the only party to the Syrian conflict which maintains either good or normal relations with all of the other parties including Syria’s allies: Iran, Hezbollah, Iraq as well as Syria’s adversaries: Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United States.

Interestingly, Russia’s relations with the US are worse than any of the aforementioned countries, but in spite of this, Russia continues to cooperate with the US on policing a de-escalation zone in south western Syria, along with Jordanian forces.

Russia has been unambiguous in its desire to see Syria’s territorial integrity preserved in the aftermath of the conflict.

In order to restore Syria’s territorial integrity, it will be necessary to secure a total withdrawal from the country of US and Turkish troops. Currently, US troops are mostly concentrated in north eastern Syria, with a few pockets remaining in the south near the Jordanian border, while Turkish forces and their proxies remain in Idlib and parts of Aleppo Governorate.

Russia’s increasingly good relationship with Turkey will prove extremely important in such matters. While Turkey has quietly dropped its support for anti-government terrorists in Syria and is primarily focusing on the legitimate threat posed to Turkish security by Kurdish forces in Syria, Turkey is still operating in Syria illegally and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has recently stated that he still does not have any plans to mend Syria’s broken relations with Ankara.

If there is to be a peaceful withdrawal of Turkish forces or some understanding between Damascus and Ankara on the Kurdish issue, it will almost certainly fall on Russia’s diplomats to be the go-between during such initial discussions. This could also theoretically pave the way for an eventually restoration of normal relations between Turkey and Syria.

In many ways, Turkey is more ready for dialogue with Damascus than Syria is with Ankara. The reason for this is that Turkey’s original illegal actions in Syria which saw Turkey,fighting beside, arming and training terrorists, was merely an attempt by Turkey to extend influence in the Arab world by choosing what at the time looked to be the winning side.

For Turkey it was not a matter of ideology, but a matter of material, political and territorial ambition cloaked in a wider ‘Muslim Brotherhood’ style militant Sunni ideology.

Now that Turkey is aware that it in fact chose the losing side, Ankara is scrambling to redefine itself as an anti-Kurdish force in Syria rather than an anti-Syrian one.

In respect of US forces, matters are more complicated. While the US has zero legal mandate to be in Syria, there is a danger that the US might try and attain one by stealth. This could be accomplished via the unilateral declaration of a Kurdish state like entity on Syrian soil.

Here, Russia has the ability to thrash out some sort of settlement between the Kurds and Damascus, one which might also include security guarantees for Turkey, all while avoiding the creation of a Kurdish entity in Syria.

If Russia was able to manage this, it would deprive the US of even the most tentative justifications for a continued illegal presence on Syrian soil. At such a point, the US might simply cut its loses and focus on Iraq, where in spite of an Iraqi government which is increasingly anti-American, the US still technically has a legal presence. This of course assumes that the US isn’t inexorably intent on exercising more long-term menacing plans in Syria.

In respect of Syria’s allies Iran and Hezbollah, Syria has every right to develop any kind of security and cooperation deal with them that it sees fit. The trouble here is that Israel has committed multiple acts of illegal aggression against Syria due to Syria’s alliance with Iran and Hezbollah. In recent weeks, leaders of the Israeli regime have promised more such strikes against Syria.

Here, Russia too has a unique ability to draft an agreement which in theory could assuage Israeli paranoia over Syria conducting legal partnerships on her own soil. That being said, this is a tall order, but one that Russia is uniquely placed to attempt to resolve, whereas no other country can realistically say that it is in such a position.

2. Sealing the borders 

Syria has already secured much of its borders with Lebanon, Jordan and in-part, Iraq. In order to prevent any influx of foreign terrorists in the future, it will be essential for Syria to totally secure its frontiers on all sides.

Here, Turkey and Israel present the biggest problems.

While Turkey has all but given up trying to influence events in the majority Arab territories of Syria, Turkey maintains a presence along self-proclaimed Kurdish regions which all border Turkey. Here, one must refer to the previous section in respect of Russia being a go-between in order to deliver messages from Damascus to Ankara.

Since Turkey shares the largest single border with Syria and also because after Iraq, Turkey is the most popular entry point for terrorists sneaking into Syria, it is essential that Syria seals this border, something which could also benefit Turkey as it would seal off pockets of Kurdish terrorism from linking up with their brethren in parts of southern and eastern Turkey.

Israel has illegally occupied the Syrian Golan Heights since 1967. While no nation, including even the United States, recognises the illegal occupation, the nuclear armed Israel will likely not vacate the territory without a large international effort forcing Tel Aviv to obey international law. Therefore, it will be crucial for Syria to constantly monitor this region in order to prevent any penetration of Syria’s de-facto frontiers in this region.

3. Policing extremism in Sunni majority regions 

While many of the terrorists who have attempted to destroy Syria sine 2011 are foreign, others are drawn from Sunni regions of the country. While the majority of all Syrians support the government, a violent minority of Sunnis have shown various degrees of loyalty to extremist Sunni supremacist ideologies which threaten the peace of the region and the wider world.

Since 1971, Syria has had one of the most professional security services in the region, the Idarat al-Mukhabarat al-Amma. It will be necessary for the Idarat al-Mukhabarat al-Amma to heavily police regions that are susceptible to populations being brainwashed by Sunni supremacist propaganda, mainly from Saudi Arabia and its allies.

Just as Syria crushed an insurgency by the Sunni extremist terrorist group Muslim Brotherhood in 1982, Syria today, must work to effectively eradicate any lingering traces of Wahhabism/Salafism/Takfirism in the country. Anything less will mean that Syria has won the important battles, but lost the wider war for survival.

This must be done in tandem with re-development programmes to invest in infrastructural development in all parts of Syria along with education and in some cases re-education programmes to promote secular, inclusive, multi-faith Ba’athist policies. Those who oppose such a settlement should be treated by Idarat al-Mukhabarat al-Amma as instantly suspicious individuals who are potential enemies of the peace.

Unless Syria works hard to police Sunni supremacists, such people could transform from ISIS on the battlefield, into dangerous lone-wolf terrorists who could turn Syria into a state in constant danger of Wahhabi attacks.

This must never be allowed to happen and the Idarat al-Mukhabarat al-Amma is the body which must be strengthened in order to produce a military like response to any potential disturbances.

Here, Iran can help with intelligence sharing and enhanced training techniques, although it will be crucial for any Iranian presence in policing matters to be done covertly so as not to make it appear that there is a Shi’a vendetta against violent Sunnis, something which plays into the hands of Saudi style propagandists.

Conclusion: 

If Syria can accomplish these three tasks in the aftermath of what looks to be a certain defeat for ISIS and their fellow travellers, Syria can not only return to peace, but can work with economic partnership throughout the world including China, to make Syria a model of recovery after years of suffering under foreign sponsored terrorist groups.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
1 Comment

1
Leave a Reply

avatar
11 Comment threads
41 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
19 Comment authors
tapatiosebySuzanne GiraudTim WebbShahna Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Voltaire
Guest
Voltaire

Excellent analysis, Adam… You say “Syria today, must work to effectively eradicate any lingering traces of Wahhabism/Salafism/Takfirism in the country….” This is the heart of the problem and it goes far beyiond Syria…. The Saudi (and Qatari) national sect, Wahhabism, if the poison that has been spe*read by Audi billions for over 40 years now… As you know, the United States deliberately used Saudi Wahhabism to radicalise the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan to attack the Russians (and non fanatical Afghans)…. in 1979…. This Wahhabi poison has now spread to the whole Middle and Far East and even into Europe… So the… Read more »

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

F/B regime change in its spiritual home, the United Snakes.

Dorthyredison
Guest
Dorthyredison

Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family!!!
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
>>>http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash370TopOne/GetPay$97/Hour..

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

“Dorothy” has exactly the same picture as “Mary Philips” and another female whose name I have forgotten, who always seem to manage to buy exactly the same car with the money they are earning.
If it sounds unbelievable, it probably is.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

They’re all probably the same offshore scammer/group of scammers. All it takes is a FB acccount>Disqus account>Adverts-as-comments = some ignorant readers out their money/personal information.
(my oldest daughter is a security guru at Microslop).

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Actually the “spiritual home” lies in Buckinghamshire and works on St. Swithins Lane in London…………Rothschild & Co. – the parent corporation of everything from the Federal Reserve (a PRIVATE bank) to your neighborhood title loan/check cashing shop (90% of which are owned by major banks – whose controlling shareholders are – the Rothschilds).

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

I’ll go with that.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

TY

Ronald
Guest
Ronald

Very well spoken , “This cannot be said often enough ” .
Now what can be done to neutralize those 40 years of Wahhabism / Salafistism / Takfirism , not only in Syria , but in every nation .

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Destroy the head of that snake – the predatory capitalists who profit from Wahhabism/Salafistism/Takfirism/Talmudism/Zionism/Nazism/Communism and the other related -isms. They are ALL tools in the capitalist kit.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Entirely correct. BUT……….the important regime changes are in Washington and in the eradication of predatory capitalism, as represented by the creature below (which also owns Washington and Riyadh)………………….
comment image

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Fascinating how Mr Burns looks exactly like this individual.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Jacob Rothschild has been the model for “Greedy Jew” for at least the last 40 years. He was the model for Mr. Burns.

Gavin Allen
Guest
Gavin Allen

“The credit for the destruction of ISIS as a military unit will be legitimately earned by Syria, Russia, Iran,their volunteer partners and the Lebanese party Hezbollah” – absolute nonsense. The YPG have done more than all of those put together. “While the United States and its Kurdish proxies who lead the SDF are struggling to break into Raqqa city” – pathetic garbage. SDF are doing a great job in Raqqa. And Kurdish forces are not US proxies. “the legitimate threat posed to Turkish security by Kurdish forces in Syria” – So, democracy in Syria is a “threat” to Turkey? You’re… Read more »

Avramijevdan
Guest
Avramijevdan

Your people and their leadership have choice. Continue carving Syria and continue using USAdistia for that purpose or calmly state you don’t intend carving Syria and you don’t intend controlling her borders with Turkey. In other words either join Syria, Russia and Iran or be ready for (yet another) rude awakening which will inevitably follow should you continue your work on a new a state against all involved states in the region.

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Mr. Allen, You sound like an antifa propagandist. Are you? — Whatever: Your ethnicity/identity politics diatribe serves to underscore why Syria, under any government, would not accept the imposition of a non-viable Kuridsh-state entity.

Screwloose
Guest
Screwloose

Looks like a JTRIGS troll.

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Please unravel. I am a bit acronym-challenged. My German Wikipedia tells me me: Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG), specializing in “dirty tricks” such as generating false information (fake news?) and denouncing adversaries with such. Is that your JTRIGS?

Screwloose
Guest
Screwloose

Yep; that’s them. A grubby little subdivision of the UK’s GCHQ. (‘Government Communications Headquarters’ in Cheltenham.)

They’re a tedious nuisance on many platforms – usually trying to defend the false narratives spun by the Nato lie-machine. Their desperate attempts to inject false facts into the MH-17 newsflow was both obvious and laughable.

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Tip my hat: you fish with finer meshed nets than I have. Such a pretentious name. Makes it sound as if they would have some professional standards. — Let’s see where Mr. Allen’s “trigger” is, if he has one: is he JTRIGS or is he made-in-usa antifa/transgender embed (horrible thought) with the SDF, or is there a joint venture?

I really liked the story about the Kurdish airforce.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

“Kurdish airforce”: good laugh, thank you.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

The Kurdish Air Force actually exists – thanks to a very sudden gift from Washington. I’m sure that there are Kurds who are allowed to wash the windshields on their American/Israeli flown planes – which invariably attacked SAA (Syrian) positions instead of the Zio/US/Saudi terrorists.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

Thank you for the update.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

YW

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Hasbarats are their twins…………
comment image

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Nah, just a hasbarat…………

Seán Murphy
Guest
Seán Murphy

What a load of deluded nonsense! Moron.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

bet it’s Yid

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

It is………their writing style betrays their training.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

I have always maintained that the destruction visited upon ISIS by the Kurdish Air Force has been wrongly attributed to the Russians, who as we know, are constantly inebriated, and incapable of climbing into an aeroplane, still less using it to drop bombs on terrorists.

Shahna
Guest

Psst. “Kurdish land” in Syria is SYRIA!
And yes they are US proxies – whether or not they remain so or remember they are SYRIANS is up to them.

People who take up arms against their own govt and use those arms to shoot fellow CIVILIANS are TERRORISTS. They don’t get a free ride just because they are Kurds.

YOU, Mister, are the imbecile!
The very idea that just the Kurds have done more to liberate Syria than Syria, Russia, Iran and Hezbollah combined is simply delusional.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Ah, little Gavin……….are you a hasbarat or simply a fool who adores Fox NoNews?

The Kurds are a TRIBE……EXF**KING-XACTLY AS THE JEWS ARE A TRIBE. Neither is a “nation” or anything resembling a nation. The Kurds are NOTHING but a political football of the Jews and their minions.

The Kurds have had NOTHING to do with the defeat of the Zio/US/Saud mercenary terrorists. That was 100% an accomplishment of Syria, Russia, Hezbollah and Iran.

seby
Guest
seby

wahhabism/salafism/takfirism (never to be written in upper case) will end when US imperialism ends.

Let’s hope for the sake of the planet, that day isn’t that far off.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

Sorry, but those diseases will end when the Zionist-Talmudic Disease is eradicated……….”ahhabism/salafism/takfirism” are mere spin-offs of the primary disease.

They existed long before the Rothschilds discovered their lust for oil/gas. But, mainstream Islam slapped them down whenever they became visible. The Rothschilds, however, found those minor diseases complimented the disease carried by Judaism.

seby
Guest
seby

How’s the weather today in tel aviv?

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

What are you talking about? I’m on the US Pacific coast and I would NEVER enter a Jew state.

seby
Guest
seby

The Palestinian people don’t have your luxury of choice. The iron heel of zionism has stepped on them for far too long now.

Yes, I am calling you an agent provocateur with your kindergarten political anulysis and armchair/keyboard activity. You’re a zionist’s wet dream. They need nutters like you to obfuscate things and pursue their evil designs.

It’s bad enough being called an anti-Semite for criticizing the racist, apartheid state of israel and its actions by people who cant tell the difference between a German and a nazi!

Good riddance. I don’t need to read your cointelpro farts.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

comment image

Tom Welsh
Guest
Tom Welsh

Good article! Thank you. I must say I disagree with this: “…Iraq, where in spite of an Iraqi government which is increasingly anti-American, the US still technically has a legal presence…” As far as I know, the USA does NOT have a legal presence in Iraq. Its current status is that of “occupying power”, but that status derives from the Second Gulf War which was itself completely illegal. There was no UN mandate for the invasion of Iraq, nor had Iraq declared war on the USA. Consequently, the US invasion of Iraq was a flagrant violation of the UN Charter… Read more »

Terry Ross
Guest
Terry Ross

To Ed: “This could be accomplished via the unilateral deceleration declaration of a Kurdish state like entity on Syrian soil.”

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Noticed these solecisms too, Terry!
My feeling is that Adam records his thoughts, and then a low-level operative types them out, hence the bizarre spelling mistakes and word changes.

Screwloose
Guest
Screwloose

Or is he using a glitch-ridden verbal transcription algorithm..?

A lot of the constantly-annoying typos are homophones or possibly auto-corrected misheard words – like the infamous ‘Basaltic Missiles’.

Either way; proper proof-reading is a necessity – or the fate of the Grauniad beckons…

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Tend to agree.
I’ve heard Adam speaking in interviews, and he is extremely compelling, and a joy to listen to, and very knowledgeable.
So it lets the side down if he allows these badly-written pieces to get to air.

Shahna
Guest

Then perhaps Mr Garrie should have his work proofread before publishing?
The errors make Mr Garrie look half literate…. not the typing pool.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

I am inclined to agree with you.

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Syria-Russia-Iran conflict with the US is just around the corner. In the context of US seizure of Russian diplomatic properties, US incapacity to accept the Iran deal, US targetting both China and Russia via N. Korea, US refusal to accept its having lost in Afghanistan, US determination to not only destabilize Venezuela but also to declare China’s and Russia’s involvment in South America a threat to US strategic interests (just wait, it’s coming), the US narrative about “cooperating” with Russia in Syria will likwise soon evaporate. “Cooperation” in the US narrative simply means not doing anything the Russians will not… Read more »

Shahna
Guest

“US targetting both China and Russia via N. Korea,”
————–
Haha – they think they are,
But those Yanks really should learn the Diplomatic Tango.
That one’s a threesome and they’re being taken for a ride.

7awmee7
Guest
7awmee7

Let me join you in this prayer for peace my dear DURAN. May President Putin win and the whole world will benefit peace including NKorea .

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

Adam, you forgot to mention the COMPLETE withdrawal of the US and its forces – regular AND paid mercenaries e.g. Blackwater etc from within the territory of Syria’s international borders….without which they will continue to OCCUPY Syria. This should be done under the auspices of the UN (I know…almost zero chance)

Shahna
Guest

Great!
Yanks, Yids and Flightless Birds – OUT!

James Johnson
Guest
James Johnson

Our war lords (US) have certainly made a wreck out of every one’s lives

Daisy Adler
Guest
Daisy Adler

Latest News:
A Russian warship in the Mediterranean Sea has fired a salvo of Kalibr cruise missiles at a group of jihadists stationed near the city of Deir ez-Zor in western Syria, the Russian military reported. Dozens of terrorists were eliminated, as well as ISIS command posts, a communications center, arms and ammunition depots were destroyed in the vicinity of Deir ez-Zor. The effectivenes of the missile strike was confirmed by UAV reconnaissance.

Latest

Pelosi tries to prevent State of the Union address because of shutdown

Nancy Pelosi advised Mr. Trump not to deliver a live State of the Union speech, but the reason may be because she is unwilling to be exposed.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi tried what is perhaps a new stunt in the ongoing government shutdown saga (we hesitate to call it a “crisis”). She requested that President Trump either reschedule his yearly State of the Union address or – and she said this literally – deliver it in writing to Congress on January 29th, the date the speech is scheduled to occur.

“Sadly, given the security concerns and unless government re-opens this week, I suggest that we work together to determine another suitable date after government has re-opened for this address or for you to consider delivering your State of the Union address in writing to the Congress on January 29th,” Pelosi wrote in a letter to Trump.

The letter, which can be seen directly by clicking the hyperlink above, tries to essentially make this request the President’s fault because he refuses to take “no wall” for an answer.

The motive behind this attempt is interesting. Politico covered this story originally, and this publication is pretty far to the left and definitely not a Trump fan oasis. Yet in a rare random feat of journalism, the Politico article does appear to give some of the real reason why the Speaker of the House did this.

Publicly, Democrats plan to argue that the parties need to focus on addressing the shutdown, now the longest in U.S. history. They’re also concerned about security staff working through a major national event without being paid.

“This shutdown is ridiculous and the people tasked with protecting him and protecting us are not getting a paycheck,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), the House Rules Committee chair. “So it’s inappropriate to carry on with business as usual.”

But privately, Democrats also don’t want to give Trump a major platform to blame them for the shutdown when Trump’s demand for billions in wall funding has been the main driver, according to a Democratic lawmaker close to leadership. Trump has tried to pin the blame on the shutdown on Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, but public polls shows the public largely blames the president.

The announcement comes as a group of bipartisan House lawmakers in the Problem Solvers Caucus is set to meet with Trump on Wednesday to discuss border security. Trump, frustrated by his inability to secure any additional money for his border wall, has tried to peel off moderate Democrat support as Pelosi and Schumer dig in.

But Democrats are rallying fellow members to stay together. Schumer attended a closed-door caucus meeting with House Democrats just as Pelosi made the announcement on the State of the Union address on Wednesday. Her message was to stay unified in their opposition.

Politico was able to bury this bold-typed point in the rhetoric that “public polls largely blame the president.” However this may not exactly be the case.

There are indications that the 26-day long standoff is going to go the President’s way. While this is admittedly speculative, there seem to be solid factors on the President’s side of the argument that the Democrats do not have. Some are factual, and many are emotional and rhetorical:

  • Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is standing firm, and has not wavered from the commitment to pass nothing that the President will not sign.
  • Some Democrat leaders are beginning to speak about border security – including the wall – as vital needs. This includes this representative from Southern California (!) Representative Katie Hill, who gave this interview on Fox News:

  • Where the argument is pragmatic and information-based, as Representative Hill notes, then the argument becomes quite compelling for a wall.
  • CNN turned down the opportunity to interview Dan Plante, a San Diego area TV reporter, about the border wall there because Mr. Plante said that the new wall that has been installed in that sector is hugely successful.
  • The level of information given by the Democrat opposition leaders, Pelosi and Chuck Schumer is essentially at the level of “no you can’t have it. Because!!” – in other words, septuagenarians acting like four-year olds. Really.
  • Talk show anchor Rush Limbaugh and his huge body of listeners are wildly in favor of the shutdown and everything the President is doing. It is very clear that the shutdown’s length is doing nothing to deter President Trump’s base. And as long as that holds true, he will not move a muscle.
  • President Trump is a businessman, not a politician. He is far more results-driven than the mainstream media can afford to admit. While they characterize him as insane, or a child, or throwing a tantrum, the President doesn’t really care. He knows what he wants, and he is prepared to be patient and wait the Democrats out.
  • The final sign we will offer on this list (though there are more) is that the Russia collusion narrative is back. When things go bad for the media on Trump, they try to pull out Russia. Maybe it is just a bad habit because it seems less and less effective each time it is tried.

The battle lines are tropes versus reality, and politics versus policy. It is too soon to be sure that this will go the President’s way and that the wall will go up, but patience and perseverance are beginning to expose cracks and weaknesses in the Democrat argument. Some of the US certainly does NOT care about a border wall. But those that do have not been shaken by all this – rather, they have been strengthened, plus they have facts on their side.

All the Pelosis and Schumers of the world can do is fret and complain and look like fools, and they seem to be doing exactly that.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Peak Stupidity: Deep State and mainstream media push ‘Trump is a spy’ nonsense (Video)

The Duran – News in Review – Episode 167.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the sheer stupidity of the entire ‘Trump is a Russian spy’ narrative being plastered all over the mainstream media, as neo-liberal shills and neocon war hawks continue to damage the Office of the United States President by insisting on pushing a made up story that a five year old child who waits for Santa Claus to bring Christmas gifts would have a hard time believing.

Meanwhile the real crime and real treason derived from a Comey-Clapper-Brennan Deep State plot to remove a democratically elected Trump from power, is being blacked out from the mainstream, neo-liberal news cycle.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

The Gateway Pundit lists the 35 times the FBI “deviated from standard practice” or committed crimes in an effort to exonerate Hillary Clinton and indict US President Donald Trump..


The FBI leadership under the Obama Administration took many actions that deviated from standard practice [i.e. were corrupt and criminal] in their efforts to exonerate Hillary from her crimes and then spy and frame candidate and then President Trump.  Today current members of the FBI are embarrassed to even turn on their TV’s as a result.

Time magazine of all places reported recently about the many efforts the FBI took related to Hillary exoneration and then the Trump framing.  These corrupt and criminal actions have taken a desperate toll on the current members of the FBI –

In normal times, the televisions are humming at the FBI’s 56 field offices nationwide, piping in the latest news as agents work their investigations. But these days, some agents say, the TVs are often off to avoid the crush of bad stories about the FBI itself. The bureau, which is used to making headlines for nabbing crooks, has been grabbing the spotlight for unwanted reasons: fired leaders, texts between lovers and, most of all, attacks by President Trump. “I don’t care what channel it’s on,” says Tom O’Connor, a veteran investigator in Washington who leads the FBI Agents Association. “All you hear is negative stuff about the FBI … It gets depressing.”

Of course the employees of the FBI are in a funk, their fearless and corrupt leaders, as well as leaders in Obama’s corrupt DOJ, went to extravagant links to exonerate the obvious criminal actions of Hillary Clinton, and then to do all they could to prevent candidate Trump from winning an election.  Then once the election was won by President Trump, they went to unheard of depths of deceit and corruption to attempt to remove him from office.

Here’s a list of the actions the Deep State FBI took in their recent criminal actions surrounding the 2016 Presidential election and since [the first 11 items are from the Time post noted above with comments in brackets] –

1 – Comey breached Justice Department protocols in a July 5, 2016, press conference when he criticized Hillary Clinton for using a private email server as Secretary of State even as he cleared her of any crimes
2 – Comey reopened the Clinton email probe less than two weeks before the election
3 – Andrew McCabe lied to the bureau’s internal investigations branch to cover up a leak he orchestrated about Clinton’s family foundation less than two weeks before the election and had lied for months about it
4 – FBI wasn’t adequately investigating “high-risk” employees who failed polygraph tests (but, in fact, putting them in charge of high-profile investigations, like Peter Strzok who failed his poly). In one instance, an FBI IT specialist with top-secret security clearance failed four polygraph tests and admitted to having created a fictitious Facebook account to communicate with a foreign national, but received no disciplinary action for that.
5 – The FBI’s miss of the Russian influence operation against the 2016 election, which went largely undetected for more than two years (The FBI had the chance to kill this Russian intrusion years before it reached crisis point in the election). Mueller’s Russia probe found that Moscow’s operation against the 2016 election first got under way in 2014, but the FBI failed to address it.
6 – The FBI was getting information it shouldn’t have had access to when it used controversial parts of the Patriot Act to obtain business records in terrorism and counterintelligence cases.
7 – The bureau missed the significance of the damaging 2015 hack of the DNC database [although others argue that the DNC was never hacked – due to the FBI’s lack of investigative process, we may never know what happened.] 8 – The bureau also sat on the disputed “dossier” prepared by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. [Which was then used for the entire case against Trump and anyone near him].
9 – The bureau’s decision to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was influenced by politics.
10 – Text messages between FBI special agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, which were critical of Trump.
11 – Comey broke with Justice Department rules and norms by assuming authority usually held by prosecutors and speaking in public about a case that did not produce criminal charges.
12 – Comey took copious notes and diligently informed others of all interactions with Trump while lying about having had any interactions with Obama, never taking notes or notifying anyone so even after having been warned of Mr. Steele’s motivations, even after having fired him for violating the rules, the FBI continued to seek his information—using Mr. Ohr as a back channel. This surely violates the FBI manual governing interaction with confidential human sources.
13 – FBI guidelines state that unverified information should not be submitted to the FISA court.
14 – They were passive, not proactive. The Obama administration “stood down” and watched these “activities” unravel. At worst, they possibly played a hand in creating circumstances to push the investigation forward into more serious stages that allowed for more intrusive techniques, such as spying. (The FBI is supposed to prevent crime, not watch it happen).
15 – John Brennan, James Clapper, Samantha Power, Loretta Lynch were all briefed by James Comey on the alleged Russian interference into the Trump campaign, yet the Trump campaign was left in the dark.
16 –FBI agents found Abedin deleting classified Clinton emails from her Yahoo account but failed to subpoena her devices. If they had, maybe they wouldn’t have had to reopen the case in 11th hour when NY agents found work emails on the laptop she shared with her perv husband.
17 – The FBI failed to notify Congress of the investigation into the Trump campaign for months rather than quarterly as was practice. [See Comey presentation to House Republicans in March 2017] 18 – The FBI did not pursue criminal charges when Clinton’s email archives were permanently deleted from her private server days after a subpoena for them was issued by a congressional committee investigating the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi.
19 – The IG found that the FBI and DOJ during the MidYearExam probe of Hillary Clinton email server “did not require any witnesses to testify before the grand jury,” despite at least 3 witnesses lying to FBI agents.
20 – “[T]he 
Midyear team did not obtain search warrants to examine the content of emails in Mills’s or Abedin’s private email accounts and did not seek to obtain any of the senior aides’ personal devices.”
21 – IG Report: Nobody was listed as a subject of this [Clinton email] investigation at any point in time (So neither Hillary nor her top aides were formally under investigation by FBI at any time in 2015-2016, but the agents handling the issue thought it was a criminal action).
22 – The IG report indicates a strong pro-Clinton/anti-Trump bias in FBI investigators of Midyear and Operation Russian Collusion but it still went on without personnel changes or actions against the corrupt investigative team.
23 – The IG report found: “The MYE Team did not seek to obtain every device, including those of Clinton’s senior aides, or the contents of every email account through which a classified email may have traversed.”
24 – Manafort interviewed twice before joining the Trump team. If he was guilty of anything why did they allow him to join the Trump team?
25 – In 2008, a questionable person on McCain’s POTUS campaign caught the attention of FBI counterintelligence, and the FBI privately approached McCain. That questionable person was quietly removed from Team McCain but this same sensitivity was not provided to the Trump team.
26 – The corrupt Obama FBI and DOJ used the “salacious and unverified” opposition research called the Steele dossier to open a counterintelligence investigation and obtain warrants but it wasn’t even verified and it was created by the opposition party [DNC]. [Multiple sources] 27 – Unprecedented leaking to the press: 13 different individuals at the FBI were feeding a journalist information.
28 – Dan Bongino asks the question: How did Halper go from being a CIA informant to an FBI informant? And he’s right. It is a DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD PRACTICE for law enforcement agencies to give up/share their asset.
29 – The “probable cause” arrest of George Papadopoulos is a deviation from the standard practice.
30 – Halper was a CHS (Confidential Human Source). FBI rules prohibit using a CHS to spy on Americans before an official investigation has been created.
31 -Stone and Caputo say they believe they were the targets of a setup by U.S. law enforcement officials hostile to Trump which was before an official investigation which again is a deviation from standard practice.
32 – The FBI interviewed Carter Page in March of 2016 about his Russian ties. Two months later, Comey is briefing the NSC about his concerns about Carter Page. Nothing of any note happened in those intervening months to cause a rise of concerns, so whatever concerns Comey had Comey had them before Page was hired on as an adviser. It was a DEVIATION FROM STANDARD PRACTICE for Comey to not have warned Trump about Page. Comey warns Obama instead who also takes no steps to warn Trump.
33 – Another deviation from the standard practice is to start an investigation without a crime.
34 – Planting the Isikoff article to be used in court to obtain a FISA warrant.
35 – Related to the FBI, it’s important to note that former DNI chief James Clapper limited the IC report for review to only 3 agencies rather than send the report out to all 17 agencies for review. This way he was able to control what was put into the report – another deviation from the standard practice.

This may only be a partial list of FBI abuses and actions taken with deviations from standard practice, if not clear cut crimes.  The gangsters who ran Obama’s FBI, from Mueller to Comey, are so corrupt, current and former agents are now embarrassed to be part of the once storied federal agency.  Quite frankly, it’s doubtful if the FBI can ever be trusted again!

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Trump’s wish to take the US out of NATO leaves NeoCons seething

The US President has seen the truth of the irrelevance of NATO, but there is enormous resistance to change.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

Tucker Carlson, Fox News and Russian and American news outlets alike have picked up the story that US President Donald Trump has on numerous occasions, opined that the United States would do well to depart from the North Atlantic Military Organization, or NATO.

This wish caused enormous fury and backlash from those opposed, which, oddly enough include both Democrats and Republicans. Their anger and alarm over this idea is such that the media networks through much of the US are alive with the idea of impeaching the President or bringing 25th Amendment proceedings against him for insanity!

Take a look:

Tucker Carlson, as usual, nailed it.

NATO was formed to make Western Europe secure in the face of a perceived Soviet threat. In 1991, the USSR collapsed and the threat of Ivan the Communist bad guy collapsed with it.

But 28 years later, NATO is still here. And, why?

Well, many “experts” continue to point at Russia as a threat, though after that statement no one seems honestly able to elucidate precisely how Russia would, in fact, threaten any nation, take over it, or conquer the world. Indeed, if anyone seems to understand the perversity of being in charge of the whole world, it seems to be Russia, as expressed by politician and LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky (see how this is so here).

Zhironovsky observed that China is the other nation that is running at full force, but viewing the problems the US is having with being the leader of the world, China stops short of trying to attain this position itself. The question becomes “What does a nation that rules the world actually do then?”

President Trump appears to be seeing the same question, or some similar variant based on the same theme. NATO serves no constructive purpose anymore. Despite the conflicts in Ukraine and Saudi Arabia and Yemen, Israel and Syria, there simply are no great threats in the world as it stands today. While there are certainly still wars, none of these wars represents an existential threat to the United States.

Why wouldn’t a US leader want out? In fact, there is further no existential threat to Europe from any present war, nor is there a threat from Russia itself. In fact, Russia has been entering into business relations with many European countries who wish to buy cheap and easily available Russian natural gas. Turkey purchased an S-400 antimissile system in addition to its US made Patriot battery.

There would seem to be very little in the way of concrete and reliable reasoning for the alliance to continue.

But the American Deep State and liberal establishment have come together to resist the US President in a truly furious manner, and it is revelatory of the hypocrisy of anti-Trump politics that American liberals, typically the “sing Kum-ba-yah peacenik” crowd, displays paroxysms of outrage and horror that NATO might be disbanded.

As the result of that, the American media is determined to choke off any possibility of one thinking, “well, what if we were to disband NATO?”

Why is this?

Simple. A lot of people make their living by preparing for the Russian “threat”, and it would mean the end of their work, the end of their money, and a great disruption in life. It does not matter that while this is true, these same people could conceivably apply their considerable skill sets to deal with real problems that face a world that no longer has a dipolar alignment, or to help prevent a real problem from arising from real situations, such as the recent and current Islamization of many European cities.

One of the great afflictions of American politics and policy has been that so much of it appears to be focused on “short term” or “no term” matters. We see this with the problems related to border security, the coming advent of AI-based automated processes that may furlough low-skilled workers in tremendous amounts in a short period of time. Rather than solve real problems, the elected representatives and media seem more content to oppose Donald Trump when he, as a businessman ought to do, makes a federal case out of what he sees on the horizon.

The Border Wall, for example, is a highly logical part of a properly handled set of immigration policies. But the very direct behavior of President Trump helped amplify the resentment the Democrats still hold against him for defeating Hillary Clinton in 2016, and so, the Democrats have effectively said “nuts!” to the needs of the nation and they take out their resentment on the nation by refusing to negotiate with the President about how to close the border.

NATO is another example. The alliance served its purpose. It is time for the alliance to end, or to be radically restructured in terms of new goals based in real, and not just flimsy rhetorical, needs.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending