in ,

New Revelations Shed Light on the British Roots of the Deep State

Originally published on the Canadian Patriot Review

On February 4, 2021 an incredible array of original documents were published online anonymously featuring the largest array of evidence that British Intelligence, GCHQ and MI6 operating through a multitude of front organizations like Bellingcat and the Integrity Initiative have been working non-stop for over 6 years to undermine Syria, Russia and an array of other sovereign nation states. These documents can be found in full here.

For those who may not know, The Integrity Initiative is an anti-Russian propaganda outfit funded to the tune of $140 million by the British Foreign office.

The exposure of the British hand behind the scenes affords us a unique glimpse into the real historical forces undermining America’s true constitutional tradition throughout the 20th century, and also the organic formation of a world of sovereign republics from the 19th century to the present.

One of the biggest obstacles to seeing this modus operandi run by the British Empire is located in the belief in a mythology which has become embedded in the global psyche for over half a century and which we should do our best to free ourselves of.

Debunking the Myth of the “American Empire”

While there has been a long-standing narrative promoted for over 70 years that the British Empire disappeared after World War II having been replaced by the “American Empire”, it is the furthest thing from the truth. America, as constitutionally represented by its greatest presidents (who can unfortunately be identified by their early deaths while serving in office), were never colonialist and were always in favor of reining in British Institutions at home while fighting British colonial thinking abroad.

Franklin Roosevelt’s thirteen year-long battle with the Deep State, which he referred to as the “economic royalists who should have left America in 1776″, was defined in clear terms by his patriotic Vice-President Henry Wallace who warned of the emergence of a new Anglo-American fascism in 1944 when he said:

“Fascism in the postwar inevitably will push steadily for Anglo-Saxon imperialism and eventually for war with Russia. Already American fascists are talking and writing about this conflict and using it as an excuse for their internal hatreds and intolerances toward certain races, creeds and classes.”

The fact is that already in 1944, a policy of Anglo-Saxon imperialism had been promoted subversively by British-run think tanks known as the Round Table Movement and Fabian Society, and the seeds had already been laid for the anti-Russian cold war by those British-run American fascists. It is not a coincidence that this fascist Cold War policy was announced in a March 5, 1946 speech in Fulton, Missouri by none other than Round Table-follower Winston Churchill.

The Empire Strikes

When the Round Table Movement was created with funds from the Rhodes Trust in 1902, a new plan was laid out to create a new technocratic elite to manage the re-emergence of the new British Empire and crush the emergence of American-inspired nationalism globally. This organization would be staffed by generations of Rhodes Scholars who would receive their indoctrination in Oxford before being sent back to advance a “post-nation state” agenda in their respective countries.

As this agenda largely followed the mandate set out by Cecil Rhodes in his Seventh Will who said “Why should we not form a secret society with but one object: the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, and for the making of the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire?”

With the help of an anglophile, racist president in America, leading figures organizing these think tanks first advanced a program to create a “League of Nations” as the solution to the “nationalist problem” which humanity was told “caused” World War One. Nationalist forces in America rejected the idea that the constitution should be rendered obsolete and the plan for global governance failed. However that did not stop the Round Table Movement from trying again. Leading Round Table controller Lord Lothian (British Ambassador to the USA) complained of the “American problem” in 1918.

”There is a fundamentally different concept in regard to this question between Great Britain and the United States  as to the necessity of civilized control over politically backward peoples…. The inhabitants of Africa and parts of Asia have proved unable to govern themselves…. Yet America not only has no conception of this aspect of the problem but has been led to believe that the assumption of this kind of responsibility is iniquitous imperialism.

They take an attitude towards the problem of world government exactly analogous to the one they [earlier] took toward the problem of the world war. If they are slow in learning we shall be condemned to a period of strained relations between the various parts of the English-speaking world. [We must] get into the heads of Canadians and Americans that a share in the burden of world government is just as great and glorious a responsibility as participation in the war”.

A Chinese leader of the American-inspired republican revolution of 1911 named Sun Yat-sen warned of the likes of Lord Lothian and the League of Nations in 1924 when he said “The nations which are employing imperialism to conquer others and which are trying to maintain their own favored positions as sovereign lords of the whole world are advocating cosmopolitanism [aka: global governance/globalization -ed] and want the world to join them… Nationalism is that precious possession by which humanity maintains its existence. If nationalism decays, then when cosmopolitanism flourishes we will be unable to survive and will be eliminated”.

New Name. Same Beast

By 1919, the Round Table Movement changed its name to the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka: Chatham House) with the “Round Table” name relegated to its geopolitical periodical. In Canada and Australia, branches were created in 1928 under the rubrics of “Canadian and Australian Institutes for International Affairs” (CIIA, AIIA). However in America, where knowledge of the British Empire’s subversive role was more widely known, the name “American Institute for International Affairs” was still too delicate. Instead the name “Council on Foreign Relations” was chosen and was chartered in 1921.

Rhodes Scholar William Yandall Elliot surrounded by a few of his leading disciples: Sir Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski Samuel Huntington and Pierre Trudeau

Staffed with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians, the CFR (and its International Chatham House counterparts) dubbed themselves “independent think tanks” which interfaced with Rhodes Scholars and Fabians in academia, government and the private sector alike with the mission of advancing a foreign policy agenda that was in alignment with the British Empire’s dream of an Anglo-American “special relationship”. One such Rhodes Scholar was William Yandall Elliot, who played a major role mentoring Henry Kissinger and a generation of geo-politicians from Harvard, not the least of whom include Zbigniew Brzezinski, Pierre Elliot Trudeau and Samuel (Clash of Civilizations) Huntington.

The Round Table in Canada and the Coup Against FDR

In Canada, five leading Rhodes Scholars were busy creating the League of Social Reconstruction as a self-described “Fabian Society of Canada” in 1931 which was meant to be a fascist/technocratic answer to the chaos of “greedy nationalism” that supposedly caused the economic collapse of Black Friday in 1929. During the same time in America, a different path to fascism was taken by these networks during the early 1930s. This plan involved installing a General named Smedley Butler into power as a puppet dictator steered by the Anglo-American establishment. Luckily for America and the world, General Butler blew the whistle on the coup against Franklin Roosevelt at the last minute.

Kissinger’s British Takeover of America

Though it took a few assassinations throughout the post war years, Kissinger’s takeover of the State Department ushered in a new era of British occupation of American foreign policy, whereby the republic increasingly became the “Dumb Giant” acting as “American Brawn for the British brains” using Churchill’s words. While a nihilistic generation of youth were tuning in on LSD, and an old guard of patriots surrounding Wallace and Kennedy had fallen to the “red scare” witch hunt, geopolitical theory was fed like a sweet poison down the throat of a sleeping nation, replacing a policy of peace and “win-win cooperation” advanced by true nationalist patriots as FDR, Wallace and the Kennedys, with an imperial clone masquerading as a republic.

Sir Kissinger did nothing less than reveal his total allegiance to the British Empire on May 10, 1981 during a Chatham House conference in Britain when he described his relationship with the British Foreign office in the following terms: “The British were so matter-of-factly helpful that they became a participant in internal American deliberations, to a degree probably never practiced between sovereign nations… In my White House incarnation then, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department… It was symptomatic”.

During this period, Kissinger worked closely with CIA director George Bush Senior, who was later rewarded for his role in advancing the British-planned first war on Kuwait with a knighthood. This war set the stage for the second wave of Middle East wars beginning with the Anglo-Saudi orchestrated operation known as 9/11 and the ushering in of the new “post-nation state order” by Kissinger and Blair.

This was the era which was celebrated by both Kissinger and Bush in sundry places as “the New World Order”.

The Dystopic New World Order Threatened by a New Deal of the 21st Century

It is this dystopic geopolitical order which has been challenged by the Russia-China alliance which arose in earnest with Xi Jinping’s 2013 announcement of the Belt and Road Initiative as the Grand design for large scale infrastructure projects internationally and in September 2015 with Vladimir Putin’s intervention into Syria which defeated the Hobbesian regime change paradigm which poisoned the west.

It is this same British-run deep state which owns Robert Mueller, ran a four year color revolution in the USA against President Trump and who finally succeeded in their ambition with the election hoax of 2020. These forces who are pushing a “Great Feudal Reset” today can only be stopped by: 1) an FDR-style re-organization of the bankrupt banking system and 2) the unleashing of a global New Silk Road as the New Deal of the 21st Century.


Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , a BRI Expert on Tactical talk, is regular author with Strategic Culture, the Duran and Fort Russ and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation . Consider helping this process by making a donation to the RTF or becoming a Patreon supporter to the Canadian Patriot Review.

Help us grow. Support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Avatar
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Luka-The-K9
March 1, 2021

WOW!

Melissa S. Adams
Melissa S. Adams
Reply to  Luka-The-K9
March 1, 2021

Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relatives by doing jobs that only require you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $65000 to $70000 a month. I’ve started this job and earn a handsome income and now I am exchanging it with you, so you can do it too. You can check it out here…—–> https://bit.ly/3rgMKrL

ozymandias
ozymandias
March 1, 2021

I think Israel has far more influence on the American empire,Britain sometimes delude itself on its influence,the American empire does Not share power,but Israel does have strong influence,i mean who has created the the disastrious policies over the last 20yrs,with it’s project American century,and the destruction of seven countries in five years??,the answer is neo imperialistic jewish neocons,e.g.,the Kagans,,Bill Kristol,Paul Wolfawitz etc,the British empire is dead,all that remains of it is the City of London,which washes the the money of corrupt African dictators,Russian and Italian mafia,and South American drug Lords,the British and American empires have had their day,and as much… Read more »

Sheila Coombes
Sheila Coombes
March 1, 2021

What a load of utter tosh! America was never colonialist!!!! Ask Haitians how they feel about that statement, or citizens of the Phillippens or Hawaiians or Mexicans who once owned much of California, New Mexico, Nevada and Texas. While US President Andrew Jackson committed the atrocity of the ‘Trail of Tears’ and General Custer wasn’t exactly friendly to the natives whose land modern Americans stole. The US took British Pacific bases in payment for a few rust bucket ships to help with the conflict at Britian was fighting Nazi Germany practically alone at one stage. The US demanded repayment of… Read more »

Bob Hansen
Bob Hansen
Reply to  Sheila Coombes
March 1, 2021

Please read, Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War; and Trading With The Enemy, by Higham. Britain bailed out the U.S. after a recession in ~ 1894, and that was the ‘hook’ to hold the US closely in their grip, but it didn’t take much for the likes of JP Morgan to work with the Brits because he got the U.S. law courts to beat Teslas patent suit against Morgans use of the polyphase electric motor that Tesla had developed and which the British and U.S. were desperate to own. During the First War JP Morgan bank… Read more »

Sheila Coombes
Sheila Coombes
Reply to  Bob Hansen
March 3, 2021

It was the Treaty of Versailles that put the Germans under punitive sanctions, the most fervent supporter and the country that sanctioned this the most was the French who occupied the German industrial zone of the Rhur “The Occupation of the Ruhr (German: Ruhrbesetzung) was a period of military occupation of the Ruhr region of Germany by France and Belgium between 11 January 1923 and 25 August 1925. France and Belgium occupied the heavily industrialized Ruhr Valley in response to Germany defaulting on reparation payments dictated by the victorious powers after World War I in the Treaty of Versailles. Occupation of the Ruhr worsened the economic crisis in Germany,[1] and German civilians engaged in acts of passive resistance and civil disobedience, during which 130 were… Read more »

Ozymandias
Ozymandias
Reply to  Sheila Coombes
March 2, 2021

Your right on the money..

Sheila Coombes
Sheila Coombes
March 1, 2021

“For those who may not know, The Integrity Initiative is an anti-Russian propaganda outfit funded to the tune of $140 million by the British Foreign office.” Utter, absolute lie. It was funded to the tune of £2million. Washington NeoCons planted into the political sphere in Britain in 2004, mostly by way of the Henry Jackson Society founded by Devon Gaffney whose patrons include Paul Wolfowitz, Daniel Pearl and other key Washinton NeoCons, have infiltrated and persuaded some, not all thank goodness, in the British Foreign Office of the necessity to move away from the former Arabist line and toward a US/Israeli/anti Russian… Read more »

Ozymandias
Ozymandias
Reply to  Sheila Coombes
March 2, 2021

Well said ..

David Bowlas
David Bowlas
March 1, 2021

Unfortunately we have British politicians that don’t care about ordinary folk. They just follow orders that their masters in America tell them to do. We in Britain know that they are gutless, but they don’t care so long as we little folk keep paying taxes to pay their wages and subsidising their drinks in the House of Commons bar. While at the same time they give their tax avoiding mates Knighthoods.

Sheila Coombes
Sheila Coombes
Reply to  David Bowlas
March 3, 2021

Just watched the budget – I think there’s a fair bit in there that’s going to assist the British people and British business. I voted for Jeremy Corbyn but I have to admit that this government has come up with a public spending committment that far outweighs anything Corbyn suggested.

Sheila Coombes
Sheila Coombes
Reply to  David Bowlas
March 3, 2021

I do agree that we’re puppets of the US – perhaps too afraid not to be. Look how those who disobey the international school yard bullies end up! Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, let alone Venezuela – US ‘democracy’ forced on those who don’t toe the line. US controlled NATO bases on British soil came about after WWII when Eisenhower wanted US bases here but Churchill said no because we’d just had four years of fighting off a Nazi invader and the British public wouldn’t accept occupation by another entity, the US. So it was agreed that the air bases in the… Read more »

David Bowlas
David Bowlas
March 1, 2021

Oh forgot to say. How odd that the Russians chose to poison the Skripal’s just down the road from Britain’s chemical weapons facility.

Sheila Coombes
Sheila Coombes
Reply to  David Bowlas
March 3, 2021

Where the Pentagon is funding £17million of projects!

Sheila Coombes
Sheila Coombes
Reply to  David Bowlas
March 3, 2021

The Pentagon has spent at least $70 million on military experiments involving tests with deadly viruses and chemical agents at Porton Down – the UK military laboratory near the city of Salisbury. The secretive biological and chemical research facility is located just 13 km from where on 4th March former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found slumped on a bench following an alleged Novichok nerve agent poisoning.” Salisbury Nerve Agent Attack Reveals $70 Million Pentagon Program at Porton Down – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization

Biden’s Iran policy drifts towards disaster

UK: 2 Years Prison for Selling Food – No Vax, No Food (part 2)