in ,

Lead Juror In Roger Stone Case Ran For Congress As A Democrat In 2012

A former Democratic congressional candidate came forward Wednesday as the foreperson on Roger Stone’s jury.

  • The foreperson on Roger Stone’s jury ran for Congress as a Democrat in 2012, it was revealed Wednesday. 
  • Tomeka Hart revealed her role on the jury in a Facebook post defending four prosecutors who quit the Stone case in protest over a revision to the Trump confidante’s recommended prison sentence. 
  • Hart’s social media activity shows she closely followed the special counsel’s Russia investigation, and frequently posted negative stories about President Donald Trump.

A former Democratic congressional candidate whose social media accounts are replete with criticism of President Donald Trump came forward Wednesday as the foreperson on the jury that convicted longtime GOP operative Roger Stone at a trial in November 2019.

According to multiple news reports, Tomeka Hart revealed her role on the jury in a Facebook post supporting the four prosecutors who withdrew from the Stone case Tuesday in protest over a revision in a sentencing recommendation for the GOP operative.

“I have kept my silence for months. Initially, it was for my safety. Then, I decided to remain silent out of fear of politicizing the matter,” Hart wrote on Facebook, adding: “But I can’t keep quiet any longer.”

CNN first reported Hart’s post but did not note that she was a Democrat. Commercial Appeal, a news outlet affiliated with USA Today that spoke to Hart, reported details of her professional background. Those details match up with the same person who ran for Congress in 2012. A Politico reporter who covered Stone’s trial identified Hart as a former congressional candidate.

Hart, who did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment, lost to incumbent Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen in the 2012 primary.

Hart’s social media accounts show she kept a close eye on developments in the special counsel’s investigation.

Her Twitter feed shows dozens of references to Trump, many of them links to negative stories about the Republican. In a Twitter post on Aug. 19, 2017, Hart quoted a tweet referring to Trump as the “#KlanPresident,” in an apparent reference to the KKK.

She also retweeted a post from CNN analyst Bakari Sellers criticizing Stone defenders who were upset over the circumstances of his arrest on Jan. 25, 2019. More than a dozen FBI agents raided Stone’s home in South Florida.

Stone, who was indicted Jan. 24, 2019, argued in the lead up to his trial that he would be unable to receive a fair trial in Washington, D.C., due to its left-leaning populace. He was convicted Nov. 15, 2019, on five counts of making false statements to Congress, one obstruction charge, and a witness tampering charge.

“I want to stand up for Aaron Zelinsky, Adam Jed, Michael Marando, and Jonathan Kravis — the prosecutors on the Roger Stone trial,” Hart wrote in her post, referring to the four prosecutors who resigned from the Stone case.

The government lawyers quit the Stone case after the Justice Department ordered a revision to the U.S. attorney’s office’s recommendation that Stone serve between 87 months and 108 months in prison on false statements and obstruction charges related to the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation.

Trump weighed in Tuesday, and said the recommendation was “disgraceful” and a “miscarriage of justice.”

Later on Tuesday, after the four prosecutors resigned, the U.S. attorney’s office recommended that Stone receive a prison sentence, but one “far less” than the 87-108 months that was initially proposed.

Prosecutors said in their revised filing that the initial recommendation was “excessive.”

“It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors,” Hart wrote on Facebook. “They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice,”

She said the prosecutors did a “masterful job” presenting their case.

“As foreperson, I made sure we went through every element, of every charge, matching the evidence presented in the case that led us to return a conviction of guilty on all 7 counts,” she wrote.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/02/12/roger-stone-jury-foreperson-democrat/

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

12
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
7 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
The Screen Gauge of JusticeWe were warnedjphDee Ceeoldandjaded Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Amateur Student of Human Behavior
Guest
Amateur Student of Human Behavior

It’s truly frightening how easily subconscious biases can twist one’s perceptions of reality when forged in a cauldron of group-think and media reinforcement.

oldandjaded
Member

And this is the foundation fascism is built on.

We were warned
Guest
We were warned

Fascism, Bolshevism, take your pick. It’s nice to know we Americans are an equal opportunity usurper of totalitarian ideological habit.

William H. Warrick III MD
Guest
William H. Warrick III MD

He needs a pardon. I hope Trump has the guts to do it because Stone did nothing wrong other than bragging. He wrote a good book about LBJ’s central role in the assassination of President Kennedy.

jph
Guest
jph

No this will probably result in invalidating the sentence after which the government will decide on a new trial if any. So pardon isn’t necessary because his conviction has become invalid.

Joe
Guest
Joe

Juries are supposed to be screened for bias. How did this one get through?

oldandjaded
Member

It sure wasn’t an “accident”.

jph
Guest
jph

Perjury and a judge known for the same bias.

The Screen Gauge of Justice
Guest
The Screen Gauge of Justice

It’s the sieve pan on the scales held by Lady Justice. A little noticed attribute.

oldandjaded
Member

Geez, kinda sounds like Tomeka Hart could be guilty of “Obstruction of Justice”? ROFL! Oh the IRONY!

jph
Guest
jph

In case of perjury this juror being a lawyer will probably be disbarred and may face prison.

Dee Cee
Member

When I served on jury duty I was told by the judge that I was not to read the news, go on Facebook or other social media sites, or engage in any conversations public or private that would lead to my becoming biased. Furthermore, if I spoke to anyone about any detail pertaining to the case, including my own spouse, and it was discovered, I would be charged with obstructing justice because of the potential for biasing other jurors and releasing protected information. How is this woman getting away with high profile news interviews WHILE she’s serving as head juror… Read more »

Crisis in Syrian Idlib Has Firmly Put Turkey Back into NATO’s Sphere

The Forgotten Judeo-Muslim-Christian Alliance and China’s Silk Road