in ,

How Global Capitalism Boosted Immunities

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The American Institute for Economic Research

From the beginning of this virus, political elites have used the language of war. The invisible enemy would be contained, suppressed, and beaten into submission. Then….it would go away.

The tactics would be travel bans, shutdowns, closures, mandatory human separation, and restrictions on breathing. The computer models proved it would work so surely it would – liberty, human rights, and freedom of association be damned.

We have all been used as non-player characters in a social experiment, untried in the whole history of humanity, and in ways that conflict with all values in which we previously believed as free societies.

No one in charge asks your opinion or mine. We are here merely to play our role in an agent-based model. It’s the gamification of despotism.

The dogma has kept unfolding in ever stranger ways, such as with utterly contemptible restrictions on bars and restaurants, and even the claim that choirs, wind instruments, and the pipe organ itself spreads disease. The American Guild of Organists has been forced to provide a long document justifying the existence of church music. The devastation in the arts community is palpable. The carnage is truly unfathomable. And getting worse: regulations on elevators will make America’s mighty skyscrapers unusable and pointless.

What if the entire paradigm is wrong? No book on cell and molecular biology that I’ve found mentions lockdowns and hiding as ways to beat a virus.

“For most viruses that attack humans,” says Cell and Molecular Biology for Dummies, “your only defenses are prevention and your own immune systems.” 

Strange isn’t it? Nothing about the awesome power of politicians to crush a virus. It should come as no surprise that the most comprehensive and global statistical analysis yet conducted concludes that “rapid border closures, full lockdowns, and wide-spread testing were not associated with COVID-19 mortality per million people” – which to say there is no evidence that any of this ghastly destruction saved lives.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

-2 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Ellis
July 28, 2020

What difference does it make, for is not this virus plague the very best way to start our war on global warming? Little to no production, no excessive consumption, and as we humans need nothing more than vegetarian food, clothing and shelter, may our global vacation never end.

John Ellis
July 28, 2020

As everyone in heaven desires to keep only enough for a comfortable life
and to pass the rest of their wealth down to a lower-class where it belongs,
what could be the purpose for all this misery?

John Ellis
Reply to  John Ellis
July 28, 2020

But surely, if the unlimited power and glory inherent in wealth is beyond the capacity of man to master, than only by experiencing the reality in it could we gain the willpower needed to overcome such a temptation so overpowering.

Pressure for sanctions against Turkey increases as tensions with Greece grow

Riga blames Moscow for destroying Latvian transit | The Baltic Word