in ,

Hillary Clinton Ordered To Answer Additional Questions Under Oath About Private Email Server

Via Zerohedge


A federal judge has ordered Hillary Clinton to respond to further questions, under oath, about her private email server.

Following a lengthy Wednesday court hearing, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (who is also presiding over fmr. National Security adviser Michael Flynn’s case), ruled that Clinton has 30 days to answer two additional questions about her controversial email system in response to a lawsuit from Judicial Watch.

Hillary must answer the following questions by December 17 (via Judicial Watch)

  • Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.
  • During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

Sillivan rejected Clinton’s assertion of attorney-client privilege on the question over emails “in the State’s system,” however he did give Clinton a few victories:

The court refused Judicial Watch’s and media’s requests to unseal the deposition videos of Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills and other Clinton State Department officials. And it upheld Clinton’s objections to answering a question about why she refused to stop using her Blackberry despite warnings from State Department security personnel. Justice Department lawyers for the State Department defended Clinton’s refusal to answer certain questions and argued for the continued secrecy of the deposition videos. –Judicial Watch

Wednesday’s decision is the latest twist in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit targeting former Clinton deputy chief of staff, Huma Abedin. The case seeks records which authorized Abedin to conduct outside employment while also employed by the Department of State.

“A federal court ordered Hillary Clinton to answer more questions about her illicit email system – which is good news,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is shameful that Judicial Watch attorneys must continue to battle the State and Justice Departments, which still defend Hillary Clinton, for basic answers to our questions about Clinton’s email misconduct.”

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Help us grow. Support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tjoe
Tjoe
November 17, 2018

What we need are her emails from when she was first lady and helped set up Bill in the honey trap with the Jewess Monica and while we all watched the show, they slipped that “7 country in 5 year” regime change plan into the Pentagone. Then when she was NY Senator and could help with remote control planes and demolitions for the “motivating event”….Yep…she is there for all of it. The stuff in between is nothing compared to those times. This is another distraction from what was being hidden…instead focusing on the act “of which” server while SS.

john vieira
Reply to  Tjoe
November 18, 2018

Why does SS at the end of your post seem SO appropriate???

Gordon Logan
Gordon Logan
November 18, 2018

Her private server was a dead drop for the Russians and the Chinese. That’s the issue and Comet, Muller et al covered it up. If that isn’t worth life or the chair, I don’t know what is.

May Forces Brexit Betrayal to its Crisis Point

Zuckerberg Clings To Power While Sandberg Claims Ignorance After Damaging NYT Report