The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
The IMF decided last week that its current bailout program needed to be trashed because it could no longer achieve its stated goal of “helping” Greece recover to the point where it could return to private debt markets.
The IMF’s ‘revelation’ that its 6 years of austerity plan did much more harm than good, has ironically forced Athens to request a completely new IMF program. This requires IMF board approval, necessitating Wednesday’s IMF meeting…which delivered some potentially bad news to Greece, and Germany’s EU.
The Financial Times is reporting that the IMF may be ready to officially pull out of the whole Greek debt memorandum debacle, with this breaking story:
The International Monetary Fund’s board has been told Athens’ high debt levels and poor record of implementing reforms disqualify Greece from a third IMF bailout of the country, raising new questions over whether the institution will join the EU’s latest financial rescue.
The determination, presented by IMF staff at a two-hour board meeting Wednesday, means that while IMF staff will participate in bailout negotiations currently under way in Athens, the Fund will not decide whether to agree a new programme for months – potentially into next year.
That delay could have significant repercussions – particularly n Germany, where officials have long said it would be impossible to win Bundestag approval for the new €86bn bailout without the IMF on board.
According to a four-page “strictly confidential” summary of Wednesday’s board meeting obtained by the Financial Times, IMF negotiators will “participate in policy discussions” to ensure the eurozone’s new bailout “is consistent with what the Fund has in mind”.
But they “cannot reach staff level agreement at this stage.”
According to the summary, IMF staff concluded Greece no longer clears two of the four requirements in the IMF’s “exceptional access criteria” – the Fund framework that allows it to grant bailouts of larger-than-normal size.
Under the criteria, a bailout recipient must be able to prove it has the “institutional and political capacity” to implement economic reforms, and that “there is a high probability that the member’s public debt is sustainable in the medium term”.
Questions over the IMF’s role in the new €86 billion aid package came to a head this month when two consecutive “leaks” showed that according to an internal analysis of Greece’s debt sustainability, the Fund would not be able to participate in the new bailout unless EU creditors were willing to write down their portion of Greece’s debt.
This touched off a politically charged and explosive debate which pitted the IMF (and, by implication, the US) against Brussels (and, by implication, Berlin) on how to go about providing debt relief for the Greeks – the IMF pushed for haircuts, while Brussels favored “re-profiling.”
PM Alexis Tsipras has now called for a Syriza referendum on the bailout, a move which marks the culmination of weeks worth of political infighting. The fractious relationship between the PM and Syriza hardliners might well unsettle creditors and the IMF’s refusal to commit until the debt relief issue is solved only adds to the confusion.
Between Syriza’s internal problems and Europe’s indecisive stance on debt relief, it’s clear that neither of these conditions have been met, which throws the IMF’s participation into question because after all – and here’s the punchline – Lagarde has to “be mindful about the reputation of the Fund.”