Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

Staff Picks

Big Brother George Soros’ web is unraveling

The attack on Donald Trump’s ‘travel ban’ Executive Order are part of a disinformation campaign at the centre of which is a network created by George Soros.

Gilbert Mercier

Published

on

3,221 Views

This article is republished with the permission of the author.  First published by News Junkie Post.

Unholy alliance: Soros and British Petroleum’s princes and sheikhs

The disinformation campaign about the so-called Muslim ban by the Trump administration has been orchestrated in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe by most mainstream media outlets, fake-left pseudo-independent news outlets, the leading social media platforms worldwide, as well as the search engines.

What the Trump administration did by issuing an executive order restricting visas for nationals of specific countries was not a random anti-Muslim racist measure but instead a security precaution to prevent terrorist attacks funded by a still very active globalist cabal spearheaded by the puppet master George Soros, his countless associates in politics, finance and media, as well as the ruling royal family of Saudi Arabia. This incredibly powerful global network, which some have called the New World Order shadow government, is unraveling from top to bottom. Perhaps the time has come to drag the giant globalist Hydra to the shore, and watch it die, cooked by the harsh rays of the sun.

Failure of globalist info-war: President Trump is winning hearts and minds in Muslim countries

The Trump administration’s executive order has apparently already paid off, by more than likely preventing a major terrorist attack on the stadium hosting the upcoming Super Bowl, which is the biggest yearly sporting event in the US. Several days ago, Rasheed Muhammad, a non-Arab ISIS commander was arrested at New York’s John F. Kennedy Airport. Hopefully a thorough questioning by the FBI, and perhaps other agencies, will produce the names of his associates in or still outside of the US, and most importantly the persons of interest who ordered and financed potential attacks. Overall, this amounts to good old-fashioned police work, and not any sort of anti-Muslim inclination of the Trump administration. Muslims all over the world are fully aware that the Obama administration was never their friend.

Axis of amorality: Soros, Saudi Arabia’s rulers, and the Zionist network    

A large majority of the public in Muslim countries does not buy the notion that President Donald Trump is anti-Muslim, and the US public opinion is quickly catching up with the very same notion.

Most Muslims worldwide already know about what I called a few years ago the unholy alliance of Saudi-Arabia and the Zionists. Islam is a religion of peace unless, of course, it follows Wahhabist or Salafist precepts of Sharia law. Those two brands of fundamentalist Islam have been generously sponsored by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and spread worldwide, including in the largely secular countries of Western Europe. This was done by building large mosques and hiring Imams to preach, indoctrinate, and often recruit European citizens with North-African, Turkish or Pakistani roots. Idle young men, with little work prospects in France, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, Bosnia, Kosovo and elsewhere have been the prime targets to become Jihadists. Very few of them are actually motivated to fight a so-called holy war in the name of Allah. What they become instead is a mercenary force: a well-trained and battle-hardened foreign legion that spreads chaos for the benefit of Saudi and Qatari princes and sheikhs. This has involved the support and active participation of all US administrations since 1980, or what I have called the 36-year era of the Bush-Clinton crime syndicate, which of course includes Clintonite extraordinaire, former President Barack Hussein Obama.

Nobel Peace prize winner Obama oversaw the dropping of 26,172 bombs in 2016

While the West’s pseudo-leftists, working mainly as propagandists for the globalist agenda, paint President Trump as an anti-Muslim racist aspiring to be Adolf Hitler — which is complete nonsense, since facts tell a different story — in an article published by the Council on Foreign Relations, Micah Zenko exposes the 2016 track record of the Obama administration’s bombing activities in seven Muslim countries. In total, the US military dropped 26,172 bombs in seven countries. The list has to be mentioned in full: in Syria 12,192 bombs were dropped; in Iraq 12,095; in Afghanistan 1,337; in Libya 496; in Yemen 35; in Somalia 14; and in Pakistan 3. These are all the bombs used by the US military through various delivery systems, including drones which was the Nobel Peace Prize laureate’s weapon of predilection. I don’t think the bleeding-heart liberals can still call their darling Obama a friend of Muslims and peace anymore, and vilify Mr. Trump.

Soros: Spider in chief  of the current Orwellian construct

George Soros, through his Open Society Foundation, which is a network of more than 100 foundations with offices in countless countries including Afghanistan, has his fingerprints all over the pseudo-spontaneous anti-Trump protests, not only in the US but also worldwide. Mr. Soros has operated for decades like a fastidious giant spider with toxic Messiah aspirations. His portfolio includes political assets in many countries as well as globalist organizations like the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank. Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy was a major Soros asset; the same goes for President Francois Hollande as well as IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde. Canada’s current Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, has embraced, on behalf of Soros, the anti-Trump and pseudo pro-Muslim protests. The globalist network of Soros and associates is still alive, but it has been under demolition since the defeat of one of George Soros’ pawns in the US election. Of course, the one who aspired to become the empress of Big Brother Soros’ Orwellian construct was the one and only Hillary Clinton.

Soros assets and fake-left galore

The problem for Soros, his associates, and their media and NGO affiliates is that he is bleeding money, and his global empire is crumbling like a castle made of sand. Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now! has long been fingered as a media Soros asset, the same goes for this fake left outlet’s usual guests, including Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, Naomi Klein, Glenn Greenwald, Jeremy Scahill, and Cornel West. Democracy Now! is hardly alone. The laundry list of Soros media and NGO assets is so long that it is hard to make it comprehensive. Worthy of mention, but in no particular order of importance, are NPR News, BBC News, The Guardian, Le Monde, and Huffington Post. Those with a veneer of real-independent left are harder to identify positively: examples are Alternet, CEPR, and TruthOut. They start out well enough, but they change their editorial line once Mr. Soros begins to finance them through his foundations or to insert some of his own people in them.

Soros has also invested heavily in human rights groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch. Petitions to impeach President Trump are being circulated worldwide by Change.org: yet another organization controlled by Soros. Change.org, together with Cause.com, Answer Coalition and MoveOn.org are the coordinators of the fake protests by women and against the supposed Muslim ban. Answer Coalition is so disconnected from reality that I am currently on its mailing list! Like most other petitions, these petitions from Soros-funded organizations are data fishing expeditions whose main purpose is to collect names and addresses.

For someone like Soros and his Saudi friends — who were able to finance the fake revolutions in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine, and come up with the ISIS project — it is quite trivial to engineer women’s marches worldwide, hire former gang members to be the muscle of Black Lives Matter, and get the agreement of a few key shareholders of social medial companies and search-engine companies to make “Muslim ban” a trending topic. It is unfortunate, but as the expression goes — in the lowest-common-denominator empire under the directive of its Minister of Truth — money talks, and it has a bullhorn. Without it, George Soros and his associates would not have controlled the Western news agenda, as they have, nearly every day for decades.

Time for justice and a coup de grace to the globalist Hydra

As far as the heads of the Bush-Clinton syndicate: judging by their body language at President Trump’s inauguration, it seems they are fully aware that they are looking at a losing hand. They appeared as though they were at a funeral, and possibly their only reason for being there was that they could not refuse to be present. In one particular photograph of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama, who was sitting in front of her, their facial expressions were grim, but what I noticed was the unusual position of their Secret Service security detail. Typically, agents look behind, in front, and to the sides of those they protect, and not directly at their charges. Might this represent some sort of soft house arrest? In my opinion, the possibility of a soft or violent coup against the Trump administration is completely ludicrous. Unfortunately for George Soros’ wimpy foot soldiers, the American people, that is, the majority who elected Mr. Trump and support him, care more about their Second-Amendment rights than their next latte or cappuccino.

Editor’s Notes: Gilbert Mercier is the author of The Orwellian Empire. Photograph four from the archive of US Department of State; photograph five World Economic Forum archive; photograph six and seven by Thomas Leuthard; and photograph nine by Dennis van Zuijlekom.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
1 Comment

1
Leave a Reply

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Cheryl Brandon Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Cheryl Brandon
Guest
Cheryl Brandon

SOROS GATE/ISRAHELL GATE/GLOBALISTGATE but, no Russia /Collusions thus far?????

Latest

Understanding the Holodomor and why Russia says nothing

A descendant of Holodomor victims takes the rest of us to school as to whether or not Russia needs to shoulder the blame.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

One of the charges that nationalist Ukrainians often lodge against their Russian neighbors is that the Russian government has never acknowledged or formally apologized to Ukraine for the “Holodomor” that took place in Ukraine in 1932-1933. This was a man-made famine that killed an estimated seven to 10 million Ukrainians , though higher estimates claim 12.5 million and lower ones now claim 3.3 million.

No matter what the total was, it amounts to a lot of people that starved to death. The charge that modern-day Russia ought to apologize for this event is usually met with silence, which further enrages those Ukrainians that believe that this issue must be resolved by the Russian acknowledgement of responsibility for it. Indeed, the prime charge of these Ukrainians is that the Russians committed a genocide against the Ukrainian people. This is a claim Russia denies.

To the outside observer who does not know this history of Russia and Ukraine’s relationship, and who does not know or understand the characteristics of the Soviet Union, this charge seems as simple and laid out as that of the Native Americans or the blacks demanding some sort of recompense or restitution for the damages inflicted on these societies through conquest and / or slavery. But we discovered someone who had family connections involved in the Holodomor, and who offers her own perspective, which is instructive in why perhaps the Russian Federation does not say anything about this situation.

Scene in Kharkiv with dead from the famine 1932-33 lying along the street.

The speaker is Anna Vinogradova, a Russian Israeli-American, who answered the question through Quora of “Why doesn’t Russia recognize the Holodomor as a genocide?” She openly admits that she speaks only for herself, but her answer is still instructive. We offer it here, with some corrections for the sake of smooth and understandable English:

I can’t speak for Russia and what it does and doesn’t recognize. I can speak for myself.

I am a great-granddaughter of a “Kulak” (кулак), or well-to-do peasant, who lived close to the Russia/Ukraine border.

The word “кулак” means “fist” in Russian, and it wasn’t a good thing for a person to be called by this label. A кулак was an exploiter of peasants and a class enemy of the new state of workers and poor peasants. In other words, while under Communism, to be called a кулак was to bring a death sentence upon yourself.

At some point, every rural class enemy, every peasant who wasn’t a member of a collective farm was eliminated one way or another.

Because Ukraine has very fertile land and the Ukrainian style of agriculture often favors individual farms as opposed to villages, there is no question that many, many Ukrainian peasants were considered class enemies like my great grandfather, and eliminated in class warfare.

I have no doubt that class warfare included starvation, among other things.

The catch? My great grandfather was an ethnic Russian living in Russia. What nationality were the communists who persecuted and eventually shot him? They were of every nationality there was (in the Soviet Union), and they were led by a Ukrainian, who was taking orders from a Georgian.

Now, tell me, why I, a descendant of an unjustly killed Russian peasant, need to apologize to the descendants of the Ukrainians who killed him on the orders of a Georgian?

What about the Russian, Kazakh golodomor (Russian rendering of the same famine)? What about the butchers, who came from all ethnicities? Can someone explain why it’s only okay to talk about Ukrainian victims and Russian persecutors? Why do we need to rewrite history decades later to convert that brutal class war into an ethnic war that it wasn’t?

Ethnic warfare did not start in Russia until after WWII, when some ethnicities were accused of collaboration with the Nazis and brutal group punishments were implemented. It was all based on class up to that time.

The communists of those years were fanatically internationalist. “Working people of all countries, unite!” was their slogan and they were fanatical about it.

As for the crimes of Communism, Russia has been healing this wound for decades, and Russia’s government has made its anticommunist position very clear.

This testimony is most instructive. First, it points out information that the charge of the Holodomor as “genocide!” neatly leaves out. In identifying the internationalist aspects of the Soviet Union, Ukraine further was not a country identified as somehow worthy of genocidal actions. Such a thought makes no sense, especially given the great importance of Ukraine as the “breadbasket” of the Soviet Union, which it was.

Secondly, it shows a very western-style of “divide to conquer” with a conveniently incendiary single-word propaganda tool that is no doubt able to excite any Ukrainian who may be neutral to slightly disaffected about Russia, and then after that, all Ukrainians are now victims of the mighty evil overlords in Moscow.

How convenient is this when the evil overlords in Kyiv don’t want their citizens to know what they are doing?

We saw this on Saturday – taken to a very high peak when President Petro Poroshenko announced the new leading “Hierarch” of the “Ukrainian National Church” and said not one single word about Christ, but only:

“This day will go down in history as the day of the creation of an autocephalous Orthodox church in Ukraine… This is the day of the creation of the church as an independent structure… What is this church? It is a church without Putin. It is a church without Kirill, without prayer for the Russian authorities and the Russian army.”

But as long as Russia is made the “problem”, millions of scandalized Ukrainians will not care what this new Church actually does or teaches, which means it is likely to teach just about anything.

Russia had its own Holodomor. The history of the event shows that this was a result of several factors – imposed socialist economics on a deeply individualized form of agrarian capitalism (bad for morale and worse for food production), really inane centralized planning of cropland use, and a governmental structure that really did not exist to serve the governed, but to impose an ideology on people who really were not all that interested in it.

Personal blame might well lay with Stalin, a Georgian, but the biggest source of the famine lay in the structures imposed under communism as a way of economic strategy. This is not Russia’s fault. It is the economic model that failed.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Mueller Finally Releases Heavily Redacted Key Flynn Memo On Eve Of Sentencing

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


Having initially snubbed Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order to release the original 302 report from the Michael Flynn interrogation in January 2017, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has finally produced the heavily redacted document, just hours before sentencing is due to be handed down.

The memo  – in full below – details then-national security adviser Michael Flynn’s interview with FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka, and shows Flynn was repeatedly asked about his contacts with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and in each instance, Flynn denied (or did not recall) any such conversations.

The agents had transcripts of Flynn’s phone calls to Russian Ambassador Kislyak, thus showing Flynn to be lying.

Flynn pleaded guilty guilty last December to lying to the FBI agents about those conversations with Kislyak.

The redactions in the document seem oddly placed but otherwise, there is nothing remarkable about the content…

Aside from perhaps Flynn’s incredulity at the media attention…

Flynn is set to be sentenced in that federal court on Tuesday.

Of course, as Christina Laila notes, the real crime is that Flynn was unmasked during his phone calls to Kislyak and his calls were illegally leaked by a senior Obama official to the Washington Post.

*  *  *

Full document below…

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Don’t Laugh : It’s Giving Putin What He Wants

The fact of the matter is that humorous lampooning of western establishment Russia narratives writes itself.

Caitlin Johnstone

Published

on

Authored by Caitlin Johnstone:


The BBC has published an article titled “How Putin’s Russia turned humour into a weapon” about the Kremlin’s latest addition to its horrifying deadly hybrid warfare arsenal: comedy.

The article is authored by Olga Robinson, whom the BBC, unhindered by any trace of self-awareness, has titled “Senior Journalist (Disinformation)”. Robinson demonstrates the qualifications and acumen which earned her that title by warning the BBC’s audience that the Kremlin has been using humor to dismiss and ridicule accusations that have been leveled against it by western governments, a “form of trolling” that she reports is designed to “deliberately lower the level of discussion”.

“Russia’s move towards using humour to influence its campaigns is a relatively recent phenomenon,” Robinson explains, without speculating as to why Russians might have suddenly begun laughing at their western accusers. She gives no consideration to the possibility that the tightly knit alliance of western nations who suddenly began hysterically shrieking about Russia two years ago have simply gotten much more ridiculous and easier to make fun of during that time.

Couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the emergence of a demented media environment wherein everything around the world from French protests to American culture wars to British discontent with the European Union gets blamed on Russia without any facts or evidence. Wherein BBC reporters now correct guests and caution them against voicing skepticism of anti-Russia narratives because the UK is in “an information war” with that nation. Wherein the same cable news Russiagate pundit can claim that both Rex Tillerson’s hiring and his later firing were the result of a Russian conspiracy to benefit the Kremlin. Wherein mainstream outlets can circulate blatantly false information about Julian Assange and unnamed “Russians” and then blame the falseness of that reporting on Russian disinformation. Wherein Pokemon Go, cutesy Facebook memes and $4,700 in Google ads are sincerely cited as methods by which Hillary Clinton’s $1.2 billion presidential campaign was outdone. Wherein conspiracy theories that Putin has infiltrated the highest levels of the US government have been blaring on mainstream headline news for two years with absolutely nothing to show for it to this day.

Nope, the only possibility is that the Kremlin suddenly figured out that humor is a thing.

The fact of the matter is that humorous lampooning of western establishment Russia narratives writes itself. The hypocrisy is so cartoonish, the emotions are so breathlessly over-the-top, the stories so riddled with plot holes and the agendas underlying them so glaringly obvious that they translate very easily into laughs. I myself recently authored a satire piece that a lot of people loved and which got picked up by numerous alternative media outlets, and all I did was write down all the various escalations this administration has made against Russia as though they were commands being given to Trump by Putin. It was extremely easy to write, and it was pretty damn funny if I do say so myself. And it didn’t take any Kremlin rubles or dezinformatsiya from St Petersburg to figure out how to write it.

“Ben Nimmo, an Atlantic Council researcher on Russian disinformation, told the BBC that attempts to create funny memes were part of the strategy as ‘disinformation for the information age’,” the article warns. Nimmo, ironically, is himself intimately involved with the British domestic disinformation firm Integrity Initiative, whose shady government-sponsored psyops against the Labour Party have sparked a national scandal that is likely far from reaching peak intensity.

“Most comedy programmes on Russian state television these days are anodyne affairs which either do not touch on political topics, or direct humour at the Kremlin’s perceived enemies abroad,” Robinson writes, which I found funny since I’d just recently read an excellent essay by Michael Tracey titled “Why has late night swapped laughs for lusting after Mueller?”

“If the late night ‘comedy’ of the Trump era has something resembling a ‘message,’ it’s that large segments of the nation’s liberal TV viewership are nervously tracking every Russia development with a passion that cannot be conducive to mental health – or for that matter, political efficacy,” Tracey writes, documenting numerous examples of the ways late night comedy now has audiences cheering for a US intelligence insider and Bush appointee instead of challenging power-serving media orthodoxies as programs like The Daily Show once did.

If you wanted the opposite of “anodyne affairs”, it would be comedians ridiculing the way all the establishment talking heads are manipulating their audiences into supporting the US intelligence community and FBI insiders. It would be excoriating the media environment in which unfathomably powerful world-dominating government agencies are subject to less scrutiny and criticism than a man trapped in an embassy who published inconvenient facts about those agencies. It certainly wouldn’t be the cast of Saturday Night Live singing “All I Want for Christmas Is You” to a framed portrait if Robert Mueller wearing a Santa hat. It doesn’t get much more anodyne than that.

Russia makes fun of western establishment narratives about it because those narratives are so incredibly easy to make fun of that they are essentially asking for it, and the nerdy way empire loyalists are suddenly crying victim about it is itself more comedy. When Guardian writer Carole Cadwalladr began insinuating that RT covering standard newsworthy people like Julian Assange and Nigel Farage was a conspiracy to “boost” those people for the advancement of Russian agendas instead of a news outlet doing the thing that news reporting is, RT rightly made fun of her for it. Cadwalladr reacted to RT’s mockery with a claim that she was a victim of “attacks”, instead of the recipient of perfectly justified ridicule for circulating an intensely moronic conspiracy theory.

Ah well. People are nuts and we’re hurtling toward a direct confrontation with a nuclear superpower. Sometimes there’s nothing else to do but laugh. As Wavy Gravy said, “Keep your sense of humor, my friend; if you don’t have a sense of humor it just isn’t funny anymore.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending