The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
The fact that Romania, an EU member state, is running CIA torture sites is alarming, to say the least. What is even more worrying is that Romania has graduated from being a US torture prison, to becoming a full on NATO whipping boy, placing the country and its citizens in immediate danger, should Vicky Nuland and her neo-con crazies get the hot war with Russia they so eagerly desire.
Once again we see EU values and human rights in action…torturing some folks, while making the Romanian President and all his cronies insanely wealthy.
Via Sputnik News Agency…
In December 2014, the US Senate Intelligence Committee issued a study on the CIA’s detention and interrogation program, and found that the Agency tortured suspected terrorists in a brutal and mismanaged program that produced little valuable intelligence.
“What we have here with respect to Romania vis-à-vis the United States is what President Vladimir Putin calls a vassal state,” McGovern said on Wednesday.
Iliescu, McGovern argued, approved the CIA black sites because he was beholden to the United States and further motivated by cash infusions from the US Treasury.
“The riches go from my tax dollars to a guy like Iliescu and his secret service people. And what do we [United States] get out of it? We get to use some real estate to torture people,” McGovern said.
It would be interesting to investigate Iliescu’s Swiss bank account, McGovern suggested, and how the former Romanian President acquired his nice summer home on a lake.
McGovern found it hard to believe that Iliescu was oblivious to what was going on at the CIA black sites. If Iliescu did not know, McGovern claimed, it was only because he did not want to know.
“Sometimes world leaders prefer not to be told things that they’ll be able to deny knowing later,” McGovern explained. “It’s called ‘plausible deniability’.”