The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
The time might come soon when Germans will finally recognize that what’s needed in order for them to have a thriving future is for them to marry their abundance of industries with Russia’s abundance of resources — energy, materials and agriculture — and finally to say (and say decisively) no, and a final “Goodbye,” to the constant demands from the United States for “regime-change in Moscow.” However, since Germany needs trade with Russia now far more than Russia needs trade with Germany, the Germans would be negotiating from the weaker position. On the other hand, the combination of Russia’s economy with Germany’s economy would reverse Germany’s downward trajectory, and thus would suddenly restore hope for a booming future German economy — something that currently appears to be almost impossible. Germany is in the more vulnerable economic position of the two right now, but Germany’s making the switch away from America and toward Russia would provide to Russia what it wants the most of all, which is an end to the Russia-hating American hegemony, and end to America’s NATO anti-Russian military alliance, and finally an opportunity for Russia to negotiate peacefully an end to the Cold War that America has been waging against Russia even after the Soviet Union and its communism ended in 1991. This would be a deal that would benefit Russians just as much as it would benefit Germans. It would transform the global future in a more positive way than has happened in centuries. And it now is more possible than has ever been the case since the end of WW II in 1945.
In my commentary yesterday, “Germany’s Deep State is located in Washington, NOT Berlin”, I stated, and provided evidence for, something that to many people is an obvious fact: Germany — which has 231 U.S. military bases (and you can count each one of them on that list) — is a vassal-nation of the U.S. empire, and therefore cannot make any decision in international relations that the U.S. Government (the empire’s headquarters) won’t allow it to make. That’s what it means for a country to be part of an empire but not the empire’s center: not the imperial nation. The vassal nation has no sovereignty, because it has yielded that up to its imperial master. Any empire is an international dictatorship. Germany cannot have democracy until it first restores its independence. And doing so would likewise restore its thriving economy, because the American empire is now set upon crushing it. If the time has not come for Germany to disobey America and restore its national sovereignty, it never will come.
That article also stated something which now is in the process of emerging as an obvious fact: that the U.S. is obstinately determined, in the late stages of its increasingly challenged (as in Vietnam, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, and, now, also Ukraine) empire, to extract from its vassal nations, and especially from the ones that are in Europe, as many manufacturing jobs, and as much else of those colonies’ economic wherewithall, as it can, and as fast as it can.
Once Germany has negotiated its deal with Russia, Germany will be able to demand the U.S. to get out — to end its military occupation of its land and restore Germany’s national sovereignty. It can’t do that now, but once the negotiations, which will have to take place in secret, produce a binding German-Russian agreement, Germany will have that freedom — which it has not had ever since the Versailles Treaty was signed in 1919. At long last, Germany will be able to become, again, a stable and peaceful sovereign nation, no longer a vassal nation. The peace-terms will be between Germany and Russia, and will weaken the U.S. empire of constant wars and coups and subversions, so that the world’s future will then clearly be led by the Eurasian Continent (no longer from the U.S. across the Atlantic), and this will be a new and better future for the entire world than has been, since 1900, the world’s recent past (including since post-WW-II, the period of The West’s subservience to the U.S. regime, which is an international police-state).
What Russia wants more than anything else is a stable peace. What Germany needs more than anything else is restoration of its sovereignty. That would be the deal. Both sides to it would come out ahead from it — as would the entire world. And it would peacefully lead to the end of the American empire. It would lead to a deal between Russia and NATO itself. It would lead to what Russia’s Vladimir Putin has been calling for since at least 2007. In that sense, Germany would be leading “The West” and doing it in an anti-imperialistic way (NOT in an imperialistic way like post-WW-II America and Hitler’s Germany imposed). It would be the glory of a new, EurAsian-oriented, Germany, which then would be part of a better world. It must happen. Why not now? And, if not now, then when? When? (Or will that instead be only if?)
Will Germany decide the world’s future? Or will America? Because, if America does, it will be World War, which will destroy the entire world. This is the choice, that is to be made.
One objection that I ran into regarding this argument is that “The about-face by Germany that you described would mean blowing up NATO and the EU, … and I can’t imagine that kind of complete EU-wide reversal to happen.”
However, the EU isn’t relevant to my argument, nor is any other country than Germany; and what I am proposing here entails ONLY that Germany kick out those tens of thousands of U.S. troops and reclaim those 231 U.S. military bases as being German territory, not area (and facilities) for occupation by a foreign power. If Germany can’t do this, then can it even POSSIBLY be a democracy? It wouldn’t have even any sovereignty at all. But this is solely a decision for Germans to make. Germany would be enough, France or any other NATO member wouldn’t need to be included in the breakaway from NATO; but after a few months of the economic harms that will now be coming to Germany — the rising unemployment and lowering wages, etc., while Germans will be freezing in January through March — MAYBE Germany will, at last, have a revolution and throw out America’s troops and retake those 231 bases in Germany. Russia’s Government needs be FAR MORE pro-active than it is; it needs to be publicly making proposals for a mutually attractive mutual-security and trading arrangement with Germany, BEFORE America TOTALLY destroys the German economy. Germany will be much safer WITH an agreement with Russia than WITHOUT, because without one, Germany will continue to be, as it is, mere targets for Russian missiles, and will be mere nuclear dust if America decides to launch a nuclear war (which is the U.S. regime’s current direction). Would one assume that America will target ITS missiles against Germany if Germany quits NATO? But that would be crazy! There’s no reason to expect that. If Germany quits NATO, it will simply doom NATO: NATO will then break up, and the American empire will fade out. Germans DO have the OPTION to quit NATO and kick out all those occupying foreign troops, but Russia FIRST needs to announce publicly the outlines of a mutual-security offer to the German people. Some things just can’t be hidden from the public — not even if all of America’s billionaires want to hide it. A publicly made offer from Russia needs to be announced BY RUSSIA; then, the private negotiations will begin even if all of America’s billionaires’ media and politicians oppose that offer. Would German politicians and media say no if the outlined offer is VERY attractive? The details will need to be worked out in private; but this will need to be both a broadly public but also detailed private operation to reach a public contractual agreement between Russia and Germany. Will Germany’s politicians say they can’t do that because the U.S. Government is opposed? That would be the end of their careers, because it would be admitting that Germany is a mere stooge-regime and that they themselves are mere U.S. stooges.
Russia’s Government needs to be much more pro-active. It has been entirely reactive, thus far. The pro-active part needs to be directed at Western publics so as to leave America’s Deep State no way out by means of their censorship and lies, such as they have always successfully done in the past. An outlined offer by Russia’s Government needs to be made, to Germany’s Government — a MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL offer: one whose mutual benefit is OBVIOUS.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.


The about-face by Germany that you described would mean blowing up NATO and the EU, both of which are US vassals as you pointed out. This in itself would be a tremendous political earthquake. Additionally, Germany’s ability to be a threat to US hegemony is time-limited: the more German businesses move to the US, the less the economic weight that Germany represents. In the extreme case that Germany is sucked dry, that weight will be close to zero. So for this about-face to happen, Germany should act fast enough to forestall the draining of its economy by the US. What… Read more »
It wouldn’t need to be “complete EU-wide reversal” but ONLY German reversal, because that would in itself suffice to reduce the EU so much, and would likely inspire others to depart the U.S. empire. Furthermore: eliminating NATO is far more important than eliminating the EU (which doesn’t even need to be done), and kicking out those 231 U.S. military bases would not ONLY inspire other NATO member-nations to quit the alliance but would, in itself, be traumatic for NATO. The only other NATO member-nation that might be comparably traumatic if it turns against NATO is Turkey, especially because it controls… Read more »
“ONLY German reversal” would mean Germany tearing itself away from similarly vassal EU countries/governments with which it is tightly integrated economically, politically, ideologically and militarily, and forging new ties with Russia while embedded in a sea of former allies turned new enemies. The government couldn’t survive the attempt, even if the political will to “secede” were there (but isn’t). The rest of the EU would be at Germany’s throat because those governments would also feel threatened. The pressure would be immense. The only case where I can imagine your scenario playing out is if Germany could act together with at… Read more »
Germany would be enough, France or any other NATO member wouldn’t need to be included in the breakaway from NATO; but after a few months of the economic harms that will now be coming to Germany — the rising unemployment and lowering wages, etc., while Germans will be freezing in January through March — MAYBE Germany will, at last, have a revolution and throw out America’s troops and retake those 231 bases in Germany. Russia’s Goovernment needs be FAR MORE pro-active than it is; it needs to be publicly making proposals for a mutually atttractive mutual-security and trading arrangement with… Read more »
I agree with your analysis of the status quo. I also agree with what you envisage as the new status after jumping over the line separating the two. But I just can’t imagine the jump. What it would require is: — Regime change in Germany and a totally new and very determined political pro-Russia stance with the population firmly behind it (con: it would take years to turn around the totally indoctrinated political class and the population, plus where is the political force that would lead it?) — Secret negotiations with Russia without the US getting wind of it (practically… Read more »
Germany needs to be friends with Russia… I wish they would stop this nonsense of allowing the non Democratically voted NATO and EU to exist… It is 2022 for F**ks sake and why cannot educated people get along… !!! I will never forget my first walking tour of Berlin a few years ago… and two English women dropped their jaws when the Bangladesh tour guide, with a very English accent informed us that the Catholic Church supported Hitler because they didn’t want Communism to take over… The ladies were in shock and I was glad to hear this story because… Read more »
Because of Steve’s comments, I have added to the end-part of this article. Thank you, Steve, for prompting me to clarify and amplify upon the argument that I am trying to present here.
Thank you for the kind words, Eric. I didn’t see this post when I answered a couple of minutes ago, I’ll read your updated article in a couple of hours.
I have read the updated article and I still think there’s a problem with the logic. You wrote: “If Germany can’t do this [kick out US troops and bases from Germany], then can it even POSSIBLY be a democracy? It wouldn’t have even any sovereignty at all.“ A country submitting to Washington’s geopolitical interests and sacrificing its own (cheap Russian energy) is, as I see it, NOT a sovereign country. It is a vassal state, as you said yourself. You can’t have both: a vassal Germany _and_ a sovereign Germany. Even if Germany wanted to defect, I don’t think it… Read more »
Regarding a previous essay: FYI If one looks at the Executive Schedule (see Executive Schedule-Wikipedia) which lists the ranks and numbers of employees in the Executive Branch of the U.S. Government one easily finds with the aid of basic addition that there are 588 existing positions in the Upper echelons of the Administration , ie. levels 1-5. (The President and Vice President are in another rank system.) Level 1 (21 employees) includes the actual Cabinet, Secretary of Commerce, Agriculture etc. Level 2 (53 employees) includes Deputy Secretaries et.al. Level 3 (125 employees) Undersecretaries, Level 4 (346 employees) Assistant Secretaries. Level… Read more »
Charles, please post that as a reply to the comment that you here are replying to, and that comment to which you are replying in it is:
https://theduran.com/germanys-deep-state-is-located-in-washington-not-berlin/#comments
Maybe that way, that person will be likelier to see it and respond to it.
I suspect that jarno knows full well that information as I have posted it twice previously in response to his 75% claim. This is the third time. He has not yet acknowledged my information. It seems jarno’s purpose is to repeat, what certainly appears to be misinformation, over and over, which would make perfect sense from a ‘goebbles’ doctrine’ perspective. I felt it important because your response of “stunning” lent credence, in my opinion, to what a reasonable amount of research on my part showed jarno’s claim to be fallacious. Taken in the history of his posts context, maliciously fallacious.
I did so yesterday. That post has not been acknowledged. I posted it again here to improve the chances that you would see it. Please see my additional comment below.
German – Russian cooperation should have started in 1871.