in ,

Welcome to the Hellfire Club

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Via The American Conservative…


For once, I’m with New York Times writer Michelle Goldberg: Jeffrey Epstein is the ultimate symbol of plutocratic rot.

In her latest column, Goldberg interviews Vicky Ward, who covered the 2003 revelations of Epstein’s sex abuse for Vanity Fair. Ward’s editor, Graydon Carter, allegedly ran interference for the high-flying pervert, nixing her discussion with two women who claimed to have been assaulted by Epstein. “He’s sensitive about the young women,” Carter explained to Ward.

This appears to be something of a pattern. “What is so amazing to me is how his entire social circle knew about this and just blithely overlooked it,” Ward says of Epstein’s pederasty. “While praising his charm, brilliance and generous donations to Harvard, those [I] spoke to…all mentioned the girls as an aside.”

Back to Goldberg;

The Epstein case is first and foremost about the casual victimization of vulnerable girls. But it is also a political scandal, if not a partisan one. It reveals a deep corruption among mostly male elites across parties, and the way the very rich can often purchase impunity for even the most loathsome of crimes. If it were fiction, it would be both too sordid and too on-the-nose to be believable, like a season of “True Detective” penned by a doctrinaire Marxist.

Of course, Goldberg—being a Democrat—doesn’t want us to think of this as a partisan scandal. Yet Nancy Pelosi’s daughter conspicuously tweeted that it’s “quite likely that some of our faves are implicated.” We all know by now that President Bill Clinton was a frequent flyer on the Lolita Express, Epstein’s private jet, which ferried wealthy perverts from the United States to his island-sized rape dungeon off the coast of Saint Thomas.

Still, a few Republicans will almost certainly be implicated, too. Now, look: I voted for President Donald Trump in 2016. If I don’t vote for him in 2020, it will be because I’ve lost faith in the whole democratic process and have moved to a hole in the ground to live as a hobbit. Having said that, Trump is definitely tainted by Epstein. In a 2002 interview with New York Magazine, the president called him a “terrific guy.” “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do,” Trump said, “and many of them are on the younger side.”

Don’t pretend that’s an innocent remark. It’s like when Uncle Steve passes out face-down on the kitchen floor at the family Christmas party and Uncle Bill says, “I guess that one likes to drink.” We still love Uncle Steve, even if he does overdo it on the fire water. And our elites still love Epstein, even if he does rape little girls. None of us is perfect, after all.

This is how America is. This is how our ruling class works: Democrat, Republican, whatever. As the inimitable Matthew Walther points out, there’s a reason people believe in Pizzagate. The Hellfire Club is real. And for decades, we’ve emboldened them considerably.

Remember how Democrats and centrist Republicans mocked conservatives for making such a stink about Monica Lewinsky’s blue dress? The media elite competed to see who could appear the most unfazed by the fact that our sax-playing president was getting a bit on the side. “I mean, heh heh, I love my wife, but, heh, the 1950s called, man! They want their morality police back.”

Well, look where that got us. Two confirmed adulterers have occupied the White House in living memory; both are now under fire for cavorting with a child sex slaver on Orgy Island. Go ahead and act surprised, Renault.

*****

Surely I’m not the only one who noticed that the Epstein sex abuse timeline is nearly identical to the Catholic Church sex abuse timeline. Both investigations were initiated in the early 2000s. Both revealed that the exploitation of children was an open secret in the highest echelons of power. Both investigations were closed a few years later, though not resolved. We assumed justice would take its course, and slowly began to forget. And then within two years of each other, both scandals emerged again, more sordid than ever. And on both occasions, we realized that nothing had changed.

Whew. Now I get why people become communists. Not the new-wave, gender-fluid, pink-haired Trots, of course. Nor the new far Left, which condemns child predators like Epstein out one side of its mouth while demanding sympathy for pedophiles out the other.

No: I mean the old-fashioned, blue-collar, square-jawed Stalinists. I mean the guy with eight fingers and 12 kids who saw photos of the annual Manhattan debutantes’ ball, felt the rumble in his stomach, and figured he may as well eat the rich.

Of course, we know where that leads us. For two centuries, conservatives have tried to dampen the passions that led France to cannibalize herself circa 1789.

Nevertheless, those passions weren’t illegitimate—they were just misdirected. Only an Englishman like Edmund Burke could have referred to the reign of Louis XIV as “the age of chivalry.” Joseph de Maistre spoke for real French conservatives when he said the decadent, feckless aristocracy deserved to be guillotined. The problem is, Maistre argued, there was no one more suitable to succeed them.

Yes: those passions are legitimate. We should feel contempt for our leaders when we discover that two presidents cavorted with Epstein, almost certainly aware that he preyed on minors. We should feel disgust at the mere possibility that Pope Francis rehabilitated Theodore McCarrick. And we should be furious that these injustices haven’t even come close to being properly redressed.

This is how revolutions are born. America is reaching the point where, 200 years ago, a couple French peasants begin eyeing the Bastille. The question is, can conservatives channel that outrage into serious reform before it’s too late? Can we call out the fetid, decadent elites within our own ranks? Are we prepared to hold our own “faves” to account—even Trump himself? Alas, it’s only a matter of time until we find out.


Michael Warren Davis is associate editor of the Catholic Herald. Find him at www.michaelwarrendavis.com.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pierre Vaillant
Pierre Vaillant
July 11, 2019

Love this piece! The reality is what it is. But it takes guts to speak about it, instead of treating it like a mindless, tribalist drone.

padre
padre
July 11, 2019

I never had sexual relationship with that woman, Monica Lewinsky!And I am ready to bomb Yugoslavia to prove it!

Simple truths always trump elaborate lies
Simple truths always trump elaborate lies
Reply to  padre
July 11, 2019

Well, he did get a statue to himself in Pristina, not more than a block away from the sex slave exchange. Maybe coincidence, maybe not.

Mondo Cane
Mondo Cane
July 11, 2019

Seems to me that Epstein and the Podestas have mucho in common, although I think the Podestas may have even a few more screws loose..

Joe
Joe
July 11, 2019

Edmund Burke was an Irishman

Rt2dtwo
Rt2dtwo
Reply to  Joe
July 11, 2019

Anglo-Irish

Marco Polo
Marco Polo
Reply to  Rt2dtwo
July 13, 2019

They may be at each others’ throats on those islands but in America, they usually drink from the same poisoned chalise.

Davdi Robertson
Davdi Robertson
July 12, 2019

A pederast is a man who has sexual relations with a minor male. I believe Epstein could be called a libertine and a lecher. He may be something much, much worse.

Sherlock Holmes
Sherlock Holmes
Reply to  Davdi Robertson
July 12, 2019

Pedophile is the correct term……but you’re right, he’s something much worse. A pedophile blackmailing other pedophiles, and probably even worse beyond that. Who knows how many bodies could be buried on that island.. Once one’s moral compass needle has spun off its spline, it rarely knows when to stop.

Hmmm
Hmmm
Reply to  Sherlock Holmes
July 12, 2019

Buried bodies? Physical, metaphorical or both?

Erg
Erg
July 12, 2019

“For two centuries, conservatives have tried to dampen the passions that led France to cannibalize herself circa 1789” and lied about it nonstop. The real butchery began during the reaction when several hundred thousands of French persons were slaughtered by goons allied with the reactionairies. Odd isn’t that nobody EVER mentions that. A few thousand parasites got the haircut and ideologues are still whining about it.. but a hundred thousand workers, peasants, and lesser bourgeoise butchered and nobody blinks an eye. Is that perhaps because it’s other parasites doing the whining now? Or the stooges thereof, the would-be parasites?

Ray Miles
Ray Miles
Reply to  Erg
July 12, 2019

Wasn’t France under a naval blockade by the British at the time? Commercial warfare kills…

Platon
Platon
July 12, 2019

Isn’t the problem that there is no one in the capital of the Narco-Terrorist Piracy AKA the USA, clean enough to prosecute the others? Perhaps they should ALL be encouraged to off themselves, or We the Pimple… I mean People, will do it for them. By this time in the seizure of Russia by the Jewish Globalist Bolsheviks in 1917, the White Armies numbered in the millions and were fighting to get their country back. They did so for over two years and millions died, in the preamble to the great Holocaust of Christian Slavs which lasted from 1920 to… Read more »

Elena Xantopolous
Elena Xantopolous
Reply to  Platon
July 12, 2019

The Bolsheviks ended up backstabbing the other factions who fought the Monarchists; they showed them no mercy too, they bombed them with tox gas in the forests. They worked on two ideologies simultaneously: Bolshevism and Zionism, as a way to hedge.

StarryOrange
StarryOrange
July 13, 2019

” “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do,” Trump said, “and many of them are on the younger side.” Don’t pretend that’s an innocent remark.” ————————– That could well be interpreted as President (to be) Trump taking a disapproving swipe at J. Epstein. Given all the previous lies told about him (e. g., ‘Russia-gate.. a ‘conspiracy theory’ said to be promoted by M. Goldberg’s said-to-be-failing ‘newspaper’ (said to be now run by the same ‘gentleman’ who, while working in the U.K., was said to be responsible for covering-up for staggeringly reprehensible types like… Read more »

Derek Waters
Derek Waters
Reply to  StarryOrange
July 13, 2019

Given the fact that the Zionist Jewish Bankers bailed Trump out in the ’90s and kept him around as a salesman, you’ll be seriously disappointed by him.

Freeland Responds to Putin: Liberalism Will Prevail! (Nazis Will Help)

‘US$ is the only real currency!’ Trump demands banking regulation of bitcoin, Facebook’s Libra