in ,

US Nukes can be redeployed from Germany to Poland

In Germany, consideration has begun on replacing Tornado aircraft capable of carrying American B61 nuclear warheads. Alternatively, the F-18 and Eurofighter are considered. Defense Secretary Annegret Crump-Carrenbauer (CDU) has previously agreed with Pentagon chief Mark Esper to purchase 30 Boeing F / A-18F aircraft. The acquisition of 93 Airbus Eurofighter is also planned.

This gave rise to disputes in the ruling coalition of Germany over the redeployment of American nuclear weapons from the territory of the country. Representatives of the Social Democratic Party advocate the withdrawal of the arsenal, and the Christian Democratic Union (Angela Merkel) wants to leave the “nuclear umbrella.”

Given that Angela Merkel will soon leave politics, American politicians began to search for other options for deploying their nuclear bombs in Europe. An American diplomat, Georgette Mosbacher, working in Poland, came up with a provocative initiative. On her Twitter, she wrote: “If Germany wants to reduce nuclear weapons and weaken NATO, perhaps Poland, which pays a fair share, understands the risks and is on NATO’s eastern flank, could deploy these weapons on its territory”.

American nuclear weapons have been deployed in Germany since the 1950s. During the Cold War, the arsenal totaled up to 5,000 bombs. There are currently about 20 of them.

The Bundestag has been considering the withdrawal of US nuclear forces from the country since 2010. The most active supporters are the green and left-wing political parties. The position of the Social Democrats is unstable and changes periodically.

But now it was the representatives of the SDP that initiated the discussion about the need to refuse to deploy American nuclear aerial bombs in Germany. The head of the SDP faction, Rolf Mutzenich, said that the risks of escalation under US President Donald Trump have increased. He recalled that US authorities have revised the approach to nuclear weapons and made it clear that “it is necessary not only to deter, but also to wage wars.”

Last year, the Pentagon adopted the new Doctrine of Nuclear Operations, where noted on the opportunity to use nuclear weapons on a limited scale to change the course of conflicts using conventional weapons.

The SDP representatives motivate their proposals for the withdrawal of the American nuclear arsenal from the country by the low relyability of the United States as a partner. In particular, Rolf Mutzenich called Washington’s actions “unpredictable” and expressed doubt that in the event of a crisis the US authorities will heed the arguments of Germany. He was supported by the co-chair of the SDP, Norbert Walter-Boriance. He called for abandoning the replacement of Tornado with aircraft that could be equipped with nuclear weapons, and withdrawing from the alliance’s “joint nuclear missions” program.

However, Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, representing the SDP in the Bundestag, expressed the opposite opinion. He said that Germany’s refusal to deploy American nuclear weapons could undermine the country’s credibility with NATO. In addition, the politician said that US nuclear weapons give Germany additional weight in the negotiations on security issues within NATO.

In Poland, they are extremely positive about the deployment of American military bases on the territory of the country. What can not be said about the “nuclear umbrella”.

On the one hand, about five years ago, the Polish Ambassador to NATO, Tomasz Štatkowski (at that time he was the country’s Deputy Minister of Defense), announced the country’s desire to join NATO’s nuclear initiatives. However, last year, Foreign Minister Jacek Chaputovic in an interview with German Der Spiegel replied that “we don’t want this at all.”

It turns out that, on the one hand, the deployment of the US nuclear arsenal on its territory will increase the country’s credibility among NATO allies. On the other hand, this is a huge responsibility.

Poland recognizes nuclear guarantees from NATO and the United States as a basic element of European security, as well as NATO’s right to determine the location of nuclear weapons in the future, pledging to consistently fulfill its allied obligations.

Therefore, in the event of Germany’s refusal, Poland may be confronted with a fact.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BobValdez
BobValdez
May 21, 2020

Best way to paint a nuclear target on your country and population: have the seppo base nukes on your territory, right next to Russia.
Polish life expectancy if nato tries to attack Russia: 5 minutes.

Carlton Meyer
Carlton Meyer
May 21, 2020

Poland would be foolish to allow nukes on its territory. It may have them there already!

“The NATO Conquest of Eastern Europe”

peter mcloughlin
May 21, 2020

It could be a dangerous miscalculation for NATO to see current events as a re-run of the Cold War. Eventually every “victory” leads to defeat.
https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/

Mysteries Revealed
Mysteries Revealed
May 21, 2020

And some still wonder why Poland is the butt of so many dumbo jokes.

Stj
Stj
Reply to  Mysteries Revealed
May 22, 2020

When they made the movie Dumb and Dumber it was based on Poland.

WarpSpeed to Enlightenment
WarpSpeed to Enlightenment
Reply to  Stj
May 22, 2020

How many Poles does it take to screw in a nuke warhead?

Four. One to hold the warhead, two to rotate the missile and one to hold down that big red button in the control room marked ‘initiate 10 sec. countdown’ to lock the ratchet mechanism in place.

British COVID Release Timeline and China’s Criminal Response

Another day, another fail: Bloomberg MIXES UP hospital bed stats of Russia & OECD in attack on country’s Covid-19 response