The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Eric Zuesse (blogs at https://theduran.com/author/eric-zuesse/)
The U.S. is becoming increasingly totalitarian, which means that it is becoming increasingly in violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The key clause there is the one barring censorship, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,” since that clause enables “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” even grievances “respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” so that its bar against censorship is its core, from which the remainder follows logically.
Today, I communicated to a prominent First Amendment lawyer, the following:
Would this be the most impactful First Amendment case?:
As you know, Section 230 (surviving from the illegal 1996 CDA) frees online publishers from being sued as offline publishers can be sued, for publishing information (especially political information) that is “objectionable” to an undefined someone, and for removing or refusing to publish information that the publisher “in good faith” considers to be “objectionable” (regardless of why). Unlike for offline publishers, all of the liability for online publishers is only upon the entity that had submitted such information (i.e., upon the author or author’s agent), not upon the publisher. Furthermore, Section 230 extends to online publishers the same right to censor whatever it wants to censor. The First Amendment has been, and is, interpreted as barring only censorship that is being done by the Government.
However, there now is an ever-spreading net of censorship (such as here and here), which some people fear is accelerating during the Presidential-campaign season; and, overtly it is being done only by non-Governmental entities, but there is extensive evidence that it is being encouraged by, coordinated with, and even being carrot-and-stick imposed by, the U.S. federal Government.
If we continue along this path, how can the outcome not inevitably be a totalitarian dictatorship in the United States?
Anyone who reads here who endorses this effort is hereby requested to post below a reader-comment writing the following: “I endorse this effort to rectify U.S. Constitutional law in this crucial respect.” That endorsement will remain on file here, and such individuals will be contacted via email in the event that a petition would be drawn up.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s latest book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.


Re: “U.S. Heading to Become a Totalitarian Dictatorship”
You got that right!!
If you mean to say “I endorse this effort to rectify U.S. Constitutional law in this crucial respect.” please say it.
i get paid $200+ per trick.
The ‘US’ IS a dictatorship.
So the EU! The EU Monstrosity has NO democratic legitimacy what so ever, NO european citizen has or was even allowed ever to vote for/against it. It is the product of a two stage Coup (Lisbon + Maastrich “Treaties”) they used those phony “Treaties” to circumvent bypass any form of “Democracy”. The so called EU Parliament is a total farce a Dog & Pony Show just for the pesky european plebs a democracy simulation, it has no political power to decide anything, all power comes from the illegitimate EU Junta (Commission + Council) NOBODY ever selected + elected the Junta… Read more »
Unrelated to Eric’s great article, but will state this, “constitutional law” has been irrelevant since 22 NOV 1963 when the US as founded ceased to exist. With the tragic death of Mr Lira — in part enabled by negligence by the Central Government of the former United States — the federal government once again proves that it has forsaken its people. And, from the “no state” project: “As such, allegiance to the state / former United States is meaningless. Allegiance is meaningless because the citizen pledges his or her allegiance to the State in return for representation by and protection from the… Read more »
The US has been a dictatorship for a long time. The Federal Government is a totalitarian regime which is appointed, not elected, and does not follow the Constitution in any way, shape, or form. It is only the standard of living, which keeps the US from revolution, but that standard of living is deteriorating quickly.
The US government is a pariah to the rest of the world, and to the American people. Every US politician is a traitor and deserves the rope…
“I endorse this effort to rectify U.S. Constitutional law in this crucial respect.”
Thank you!
PS: The Constitutional lawyer replied:
Thanks for your note. I’m rather ambivalent about Section 230 which was needed when adopted far more than now. I don’t view as censorship every decision by a social media entity not to carry some posted material. Editing is what every newspaper does as is simply selecting what to print. Social media is in many significant ways different but in others the same. So I think some decisions by social media not to carry everything posted—false statements about medicines, for example—but sometimes unfortunate.
“I endorse this effort to rectify U.S. Constitutional law in this crucial respect.” IMO, this type of censorship by the “Corporate” United States Federal Government, makes it clear that the corporate government we have had since 1871 basically dictates to these corporations such as what we saw during the PLandemic in 2020 and 2021. What needs to happen is to restore the Republic form of government established by the united States of America in 1776. The Declaration of Independence gives “the People” the right to abolish a destructive government and institute new government. This needs to happen ! Referring to… Read more »
Thanks for endorsing the U.S. Constitutions’s First Amendment despite a leading First Amendment lawyer accepting unquestioningly the U.S. Government’s now routinely ignoring it.
Your historical citations are profoundly relevant because they explain why the U.S. Constitution outlaws any legislation that contradicts it or that violates it (as so much legislation in the U.S. now does do).