SergeyAlexson
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Why those talking English?
A short statement about me. I am a westerner and live in a country that is founding member of NATO. I have always seen Russia/Soviet Union as a frendly to my country More than once The Soviet union saved our asses when we had a fight with the UK actually there are a lot of middle age and older people that see those things the same way. That was about me. This war did not start because of imperialistic ambitions. It started because of NATO expansions beyond a line that is aceptible for a great power . Any great power.… Read more »
Re: “The US wanted a war and as usual they got one. Then it is the question why. Russia had done nothing hostile to the US at all.” Nice discussion. The US is not satisfied with this state of affairs. The US is a Khazar controlled nation and they want worldwide hegemony. They feel it is their inalienable right to run the world. They do not tolerate anyone who is big enough and strong enough to challenge that. So Russia can be as peace loving and friendly as they want, but if they are a challenge to Khazar/American hegemony, they… Read more »
Russia had done nothing hostile to the US at all? I beg to differ. It successfully rolled back the US take-over of its resources in the 90ties. That was considered extremely hostile – by the US. They had already declared victory… the End of History. As long as the US controlled the Russian government, they saw no reason to break up the Russian Federation. Or rather, they saw no reason to speed up the dissolution of the Russian Federation. That, they considered inevitable. In the case of Russia, the US already considers it a hostile act that Russia is larger… Read more »
Thank you for the comment with so many thoughts embedded.
The threat from “future” western Hypersonic weapons upon Russian boarders coupled with naval subsurface first strike capability from upon a “potential weakened” Russia would have featured highly in the decision of Putin doing what he did. Why did the west not just allow Russia to join NATO, or negotiate a new European Security Framework taking these concerns into consideration. All the different provocations taken together suggest Putin had no other choice. NATO and the west have created this issue for their own reasons.
Re: “for their own reasons.”
Otherwise known as Khazar/American/Israeli worldwide hegemony.
Thank you both for your insights. I appreciate your honest recall as you experienced the relevant events of the past. Hope to hear from you again in the near future.