Alex Christoforou
*****News Topic 161*****
Tucker Carlson offers criticism of Sidney Powell – ‘She refused to provide any evidence’
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/tucker-carlson-offers-criticism-of-sidney-powell-she-refused-to-provide-any-evidence/
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.
well tucker is walking a tight rope at fox but clearly he didn’t see the press conference yesterday with Rudy G and S. Powell where G directed the press to reams of evidence, even told them where to find it. What did the msm discuss afterwards ? his use of hair dye
Guliani and Powell also clearly explained why they couldn’t provide the evidence – i.e. that the court was the appropriate place and they did not want to help the other side cover up in advance. Many witnesses are rightfully scared of intimidation, while the lawyers are not computer experts and the evidence of Dominion Fraud needs to be given by witnesses who fully understand what went on. Tucker is doing himself no favours. He’s probably under pressure from the Murdochs to follow the Fox line of stepping back from – if not abandoning – Trump, as they suck up to… Read more »
Seriously it’s Simple math when you got the info She has you don’t want your enemies to know Specifics it makes to easy to to find alternatives to legitimize the wrong doing ! She is a real Professional and that the difference between her and punk journalists who want to be the first to break the news for social gossip And while am at it Alex you tend to say the say same thing in different ways for 4 minutes for intelligent people it very annoying and almost an insult !! Tell your lead make your point we don’t all… Read more »
Court of law doesn’t appreciate being forced by court of public opinion and only the latter counts in Powell’s strategy. Clear mistake from Tucker and this aspect was well covered during the press conference only an opening statement and so the rest will be handled within the court of law and no scoop for Tucker.
When Sidney Powell rambled on about the software being a Communist plot, she made me a little skeptical. I always suspected it to be more of a CIA type of plot. Such hyperbole probably made Tucker suspicious and want her to show some evidence.
I agree that it’s far more likely to be something the CIA uses in its “regime change” bag of tricks that it has brought back to the US for the same purpose. Whilst I think it’s poetic justice that the US gets the same treatment as the CIA’s targets, this election is just too important for the global wellbeing to allow them to have their way.
Once again the US Press thinks it makes all the decisions. I would have expected better from Tucker Carlson, but apparently he has the same hubris.
I saw a screen shot of the tallies where it caught Trump’s tally go down, and the exact same number of votes appear in Biden’s tally. That’s clearly vote switching. I can believe that it was not a manual switch and that the Dominion software was programmed to do that. Either way, if you can manipulate the tallies, then the election is not secure. I can’t remember whose program broke this fraud, but it was caught.
Yes, there’s plenty of evidence out there and Tuckers knows it. He does not need Trump’s lawyers to spell it out. They are there to win a court battle. The Press conference was just to warn the Press that they HAVE evidence and they should take note. The same pressitutes who repeated every false allegation over “Russiagate” without a scintilla of evidence. Whatever happens now, Republicans know the score.
Yes, Tucker is experiencing a case of sour grapes. Shame on him.
Is Tucker…
a) exercising his freedom to disagree with an issue or person publicly, thereby maintaining an appearance of independent reportage?
b) using this as a ruse to get more liberal Fox News minions on board with the truth of the electoral fraud, even while risking further division?
c) proceeding in a way that suggests top-down coercion… “you better, Carlson — or else”
d) none of the above
All of the above
Oh… does that mean we no longer have any realistic expectations for #Tucker2024 ?
This may just be a day of totally BS Ideals, But hope Tucker is not about to jump on the others side and going full leftists.
Protecting the evidence is the key before being presented in court.
Thank you. THAT is the only thing that many don’t seem to understand, especially Tucker… but I suspect those higher-ups at Fox are playing things out here…
Tucker’s mask is slipping. He is a legend in his own lunchtime. Many of his conservative viewers have left him. I’m one of them. Sidney has to defend the president against an international conspiracy and she has very little time. Tucker is in the tank.
I don’t find this extraordinary at all. For one, I think Tucker’s Ego has been hurt by having his invitation rejected. He should rise above that. What Ticker doesn’t seem to understand is that Powell thinks like a legal eagle, and what they must be good at is play the game by keeping their cards close to their chest. The evidence in question may be the ammunition needed to be presented in courts of law. No attorney displays his trump card in public before the very moment he has do if IN the court of law. Why give the opposition… Read more »
I think Tucker in 100% correct in challenging Powell to show her hand. If her claims are true there is no time to lose. And Powell is the one making the claims about a subject of monumental importance to every single person in this nation. Yet, when Tucker gives her an offer of nearly unlimited prime time TV in order to make her case to the nation she demurs? You’re right that something doesn’t add up. Meanwhile, maybe the Powell apologists here are correct in supposing that she doesn’t want her game plan exposed (presumably so the Clinton kill team… Read more »
Wonderful avatar…
Dead on the mark. I am VERY concerned by what I see Powell doing. I feel like what they are attempting to do is shift the PUBLIC narrative from “Trump was cheated” to The American electoral system is existentially corrupt.” This is a good play, but it feels very much like a “hail mary”. The evidence itself is probably not important, what concerns me, as so accurately laid oud by Lionel of LionelMedia over the last couple days is that the “evidence” is less important than the fact that the States control the electoral process, and its unlikely that the… Read more »
FWIW, I agree with everything Tucker says here, and I have had the very same sinking, sickening feeling in the pit of my stomach watching this unfold. I have listened to the Q-Anon style rap, I have watched one story after another collapse like an over-inflated balloon. I do understand that this may be sour grapes caused by her rejection, but he is FAR from the ONLY hard-core Trump supporter to be asking these questions, and the questions he is asking NEED to be asked. I am really not interested in the Q-Anon style hype and hysteria around this circus.… Read more »
Lin Woods said today he spent the whole day with Sydney Powell and saw all the evidence and said Trump will be the next President without a doubt.
Please don’t tell me Tucker is another WOKE lefty.