in ,

Trump’s tariffs threaten 200k jobs, senators say

Somehow, taxing goods which Americans buy is going to teach the Chinese to play more fairly

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

The Trump administration is intent upon following its course of action to the end no matter the cost. The promises Trump made on his campaign trail seem to be a large part of his guiding light as he navigates his tenure.

A part those commitments was that of bringing manufacturing jobs back to America, cutting the trade deficit, and putting America into a more equitable position on trade matters, if not, perhaps, even in a position that puts America in a competitively advantageous position.

Part of this plan is Trump’s tariffs regime, which, according to the rhetoric coming from the Trump admin, aims to tackle. But US senators are pushing back on Trump’s strategy, pointing out that it threatens more jobs than it saves or creates and stands to increase the cost of doing business, and therefore the cost of living, for average Americans.

.The South China Morning Post reports:

US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross was slammed by senators on Wednesday for pulling the US into a trade war that they said could spiral out of control and hurt Americans, as he tried to persuade them that Beijing had to be put under more pressure.

“Mister secretary, as you consider these tariffs, know that you are taxing American families,” said Utah Senator Orrin Hatch, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, of the tariffs and counter-tariffs that Washington and Beijing have placed on each other.

“You are putting American jobs at risk, and you are destroying markets, both foreign and domestic, for American businesses of all types, sorts and sizes.”

But Ross, speaking two days after US President Donald Trump announced that he was prepared to add tariffs to an additional US$400 billion of Chinese imports, said years of talks with China over US intellectual property concerns have failed to yield progress.

“The president feels and I agree that now is the time for action,” Ross said.

“And unless we make it more painful for them to continue those practices than to do otherwise, unless we put that kind of pressure on, it’s unlikely we will succeed.”

Pleading for an assortment of interests – from nail manufacturers in Missouri to cherry growers in Washington state – senators told Ross US trade policies are alienating allies and jeopardising US livelihoods.

Hatch said Trump’s threatened tariffs of 25 per cent on the auto sector would amount to a US$73 billion tax increase on American consumers and endanger 200,000 jobs and US$65 billion in annual auto exports.

Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa whose home state soybean growers are heavily dependent on exports to China, blasted the administration for pursuing “a government-run mercantilist economy as opposed to a free-market economy”.

The chorus of criticism amounted to a rare rebuke of a sitting president by the members of his own party.

Global markets have shuddered at the brinkmanship over trade between Beijing and Washington, especially after Trump’s threat of further tariffs on Monday, which would leave the door open to further retaliation by China.

Ross countered that in Trump’s view, the United States was already the loser in a long-standing trade war and was only now beginning to fight back.

He said that, despite the hue and cry, Trump’s aggressive moves had pushed US trading partners to combat harmful supply gluts in the metals trade.

“Suddenly Europe is enacting safeguards against steel dumping into Europe. They didn’t do much before,” he said. “Canada is taking action. Japan for the first time has created an enforcement body … to deal with the problem.”

“While they’re complaining bitterly about the tariffs, the fact is they’re starting to take the kind of action which if they had taken sooner would have prevented this crisis,” Ross said.

Grassley said Iowa soybean farmers had seen prices plummet just because of market uncertainty.

“Even if farmers don’t have to sell their physical crop right now, the sudden volatility in the market can increase the cost of hedging and in some cases require margin calls for those who are long in the market,” he said, calling on the White House to tone down threats that could provoke Chinese retaliation.

When asked what the administration would do to help cushion the blow for farmers, he said that was up to Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue.

“I am not familiar with all the tools the secretary–,” he said, before being swiftly interrupted by Colorado Democrat Michael Bennet.

“How can you not be familiar with them? You have come here and testified that is how you are going to solve the issue.”

However, when confronted with this, the US Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur Ross, simply responds back that some action has to be taken immediately, because China’s alleged theft of intellectual property is a matter that has not been solved by any other means up to date.

But somehow, taxing imports from China fixes that issue, in Ross’s mind. And, apparently, the downsides to imposing tariffs on Chinese goods get about as much attention as Trump gave to his initial strikes on Syria in 2017.What’s more, he doesn’t even perceive the implications of the measures that he lobbies for on the Senate floor. Somehow, taxing goods which Americans buy is going to teach the Chinese to play more fairly when it comes to intellectual property.



The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
September 5, 2018

Theft of intellectual property? Why don’t we bring that up with other countries, especially Israel which has stolen huge quantities of US intellectual property since the first disastrous “Free Trade ‘Agreement– The US Israeli Free Trade Agreement of 1984? Trump and members of his administration seem incapable ot thinking through the reactions of their decisions.

tibetan cowboy
tibetan cowboy
September 5, 2018

Both Ross and Trump are actually still Rothschild Inc. employees. Trump has been owned by Rothschild since 1982 when they bailed him out of devastating real estate bankruptcy with $1.5 billion. He and Ross do not work for the USA but Rothschild Inc. Ross left Rothschild after decades of employment to continue serving Rothschild as Trump’s Minder and babysitter for them, because Rothschild doesn’t trust Trump any farther than they can throw him. This is also why Trump is still operating 19 ISIS training bases in Syria to conquer it for their oil, the largest field of which is at… Read more »

John Mason
John Mason
September 5, 2018

Has nothing to do with ‘intellectual properties’, but with trade deficit caused by US policies that out sourced businesses to overseas hence a loss to US manufacturing and other enterprises. Can’t go around blaming others for your own mistakes, best is to try to come to an amicable, mature and sensible agreement, but once again the US has a habit of destroying agreements. Only solution seems to be for the US to lay down and get itself well and truly screwed; your turn now.

Russia concerned by US departure from UN Human Rights Council

Congress considers bill enabling litigation against OPEC