The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
1 August 2026, posted by Eric Zuesse. (All of my recent articles can be seen here.)
——
https://theduran.com/ursulas-plan-to-remove-eu-veto-merzs-secret-plan-to-stop-afd/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-fj3G49Ru4
“Ursula’s Plan To Remove EU VETO. Merz’s Secret Plan To Stop AfD”
Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris, The Duran
00:00
>> CHRISTOFOROU: All right, Alexander. Let’s talk about
00:02
Germany and let’s talk about EU
00:05
sanctions or change in sanctions
00:07
policy according to what the Financial Times
00:10
is reporting.
00:11
The European Union is is finally done or
00:15
sticking about finally ending the the
00:17
big omnibus types of [sanctions] packages. So, we
00:20
got the 21. We may not get the 22 and
00:23
what they’re going to do is break up the
00:25
the big sanctions packages into smaller
00:29
bite-sized pieces, which can be easily
00:32
passed
00:33
and easily implemented and you won’t run
00:36
into parts of the big packages
00:39
being blocked by various member states
00:41
like in the instance of sanctions
00:42
package 21 where Greece said no to the
00:45
LNG shipping, Portugal said no to the
00:47
fisheries.
00:48
>> MERCOURIS: I think people need to understand what
00:50
this is all about. This is not Ursula
00:53
giving up on sanctions or wanting to
00:55
slacken the sanctions back pressure or
00:58
giving up on the sanctions offensive.
01:01
It’s Ursula beginning to understand that
01:04
even with Orban gone, opposition to
01:07
sanctions in Europe is actually growing
01:10
and that there are now increasing
01:12
numbers of member states that are
01:14
becoming recalcitrant and are starting
01:17
to say, “Well, sanctions are not
01:18
working.” What is now being proposed is
01:21
going to hit our own economic interests.
01:24
So, Greece didn’t like the last the 21st
01:27
sanctions package because of the way it
01:29
affected its shipping industry
01:33
and other countries were unhappy with
01:35
other things. The Austrians wanted to
01:37
keep Raiffeisen Bank staying in Russia.
01:40
They they they they they all fought back
01:44
to stop that. So, Ursula says, “Well,
01:46
how can I get all of these things that I
01:48
want? The
01:51
shipping package without the Greeks
01:54
vetoing closing down Raiffeisen without
01:57
the Austrians vetoing it, are the things
02:00
which others want to veto. How can I get
02:03
all of these things through?
02:05
Well,
02:06
I change the approach. I don’t call it
02:11
sanctions anymore.
02:14
>> [snorts]
02:14
>> I call it economic policy.
02:17
>> [clears throat]
02:17
>> So, I propose these economic decisions
02:23
as put these forward as economic
02:26
decisions.
02:28
These only require majority voting.
02:33
I can get majority voting on each part
02:37
of each one of these sanctions. I can
02:41
outvote the Greeks
02:43
on
02:44
shipping, on LNG cargos in Greek
02:49
ships. I can outvote the Austrians on
02:53
Raiffeisen Bank. I can outvote all of
02:56
the others because there’ll always be a
02:58
core of states who support me, and I can
03:01
play one off against the other, and I
03:03
can always get a combination which will
03:06
give me
03:07
majority voting. And that way, I will be
03:11
able to continue to get all my sanctions
03:15
passed. Now, of course, what this does
03:19
is that it completely throws out the
03:21
rule book. Uh they tried it by the way
03:23
last year. With In fact, they they did
03:26
not only try it, they did it with
03:28
confiscating Russian assets. You
03:30
remember they changed the rules on the
03:33
frozen Russian assets.
03:35
They said that instead of the
03:40
vote
03:41
>> They made it legal policy.
03:42
>> They made it, They made it, They made it
03:44
indefinite. They made it exactly. They
03:45
made it, They made it, They used again
03:48
qualified majority voting, to say that in
03:51
order for the assets to be unfrozen,
03:54
there has to be unanimity.
03:56
And they use a procedural vote, using
03:59
this kind of mechanism that Ursula is
04:02
now talking about in order to do that.
04:04
>> shifted it to like a legal
04:06
>> Yeah, they shifted it to the legal
04:07
architecture instead of a sanction.
04:09
>> Exactly.
04:10
>> And now, instead of sanctions
04:11
architecture, it’s going to be economic
04:13
architecture.
04:13
>> Economic, yeah. Okay.
04:14
>> So, she’s she is throwing away the rule
04:17
book.
04:18
I mean, that’s what she’s doing. She is
04:21
rewriting the rules so that she can go
04:24
on waging her economic sanctions war
04:27
against Russia.
04:29
I mean, the fact that more and more
04:31
countries oppose her,
04:34
Um, she still is going to press on and is
04:38
still going to do this. And of course,
04:42
what it’s also going to do is centralize
04:46
decision-making
04:48
even more
04:50
because the sanctions, the veto, which
04:53
was such an important part of
04:57
joining the European Union — countries
04:59
could always say, “Well, we’ll be able
05:01
to protect our sovereign rights
05:04
by exercising the veto.”
05:06
That’s essentially being taken from them,
05:09
because whenever a veto
05:11
is used, Ursula comes up with some other
05:15
way to do the same thing
05:18
and says that this other way, in this
05:21
other way, the veto doesn’t apply. If
05:24
you read this Financial Times article
05:27
carefully, that is exactly what Ursula
05:32
is doing. And this of course completely
05:35
changes
05:36
the entire
05:39
political structure, the whole legal
05:42
balance
05:43
of the European Union. I mean, instead
05:46
of it becoming, instead of it being a
05:49
union of sovereign states, it becomes
05:54
a single
05:55
overpowering,
05:58
overdominant
06:00
EU center
06:02
controlling
06:04
occasionally recalcitrant
06:08
provinces, which are all subject to the
06:11
rule of Brussels.
06:14
>> Yeah, why should the member states put
06:15
up with this, especially the smaller
06:16
member states? They’ve always wanted to
06:18
go the the route of of majority rather
06:21
than than the veto
06:23
route. They hate the veto thing. They
06:25
hate it. And they’ve said this. They’ve
06:27
said as much, that they want to go
06:28
majority, but rightly so, many EU member
06:31
states, especially the medium-sized
06:32
countries or the smaller countries,
06:34
they always push back on it. As they
06:36
should.
06:37
As they should.
06:37
Because if you go the majority
06:39
route, then then you’re going to have,
06:41
you know, this group of countries that
06:43
are all buddies and pals under under
06:45
Ursula’s control,
06:47
and they’re going to vote whatever they
06:48
want through.
06:49
Right? This block of seven or eight big
06:51
powerful countries. They’ll get whatever
06:53
they want all the time. But I mean, take
06:55
take the example of Greece and LNG.
06:58
Okay, so they so they do this this
06:59
bite-size package of of sanctions with
07:02
this one sanction economic policy, let’s
07:05
call it, and they pass the economic
07:07
policy that no country in the European
07:09
Union can export their LNG anywhere in
07:11
the world that’s Russian, anywhere in
07:14
the world.
07:15
Greece is effed.
07:17
The Greek shippers are screwed. They’re
07:19
going to lose all that business, global business, and
07:20
that’s the point that they were making.
07:22
We’re going to lose all the business,
07:24
not EU business, global business of our
07:26
LNG
07:28
to to to competing companies in other
07:31
countries. And and Greece said China.
07:32
The Chinese are going to just come in
07:34
next day
07:36
and take over all our routes.
07:38
All our exports
07:39
of LNG.
07:40
>> Yes.
07:42
>> That’s exactly what’s going to happen,
07:43
and the shippers know it and that’s
07:44
going to sink a country like Greece
07:47
which
07:47
it has its tourism and shipping. That’s
07:49
all it has left. I mean, there’s there’s
07:51
not much left.
07:52
>> Absolutely.
07:53
>> Yeah.
07:53
>> But you But you see, this is this is
07:55
where it becomes so
07:57
poisonous because I’m not sure that they
07:59
are in a position to object.
08:01
Because Ursula
08:04
and her allies control the central
08:06
institutions.
08:08
So,
08:09
um when the EU Council meets,
08:13
it’s the presidency of the council now
08:16
that sets the agenda. Of course, there
08:18
are
08:19
um countries that also hold the
08:21
presidency too and they can play a role.
08:24
But you know, they can they can find an
08:26
ally that holds the presidency. It sets
08:29
the agenda.
08:30
Um President Costa agrees. They say,
08:34
“Look, as an question of economic
08:36
policy, we are going to stop Greek ships
08:39
Greek ships from carrying Russian LNG
08:43
anywhere in the world.”
08:44
Greece says this is unacceptable.
08:47
Uh this can only be done through
08:49
sanctions.
08:51
The majority say, “Tough.
08:54
This is what we’ve decided. This is how
08:57
This is what is on the agenda in the
09:00
council.
09:01
We are going to support it.
09:04
And if you disagree,
09:06
well, your right is to go to the
09:09
European Court of Justice and make your
09:12
case there.”
09:13
>> Good luck.
09:14
>> That’s what they’re going to say. That’s
09:16
how this is going to work. This is the
09:20
snake pit
09:22
that the European Union has now become.
09:26
>> They went along with the first sanctions
09:28
package.
09:29
>> Yeah.
09:29
>> And now look where it’s going to take uh
09:31
take all these member states.
09:33
>> Exactly. Exactly.
09:35
>> medium-sized EU member states are going
09:37
to get completely screwed.
09:38
>> Exactly. Exactly. But aren’t you killing
09:41
you’re killing
09:43
the members of your own union? I mean,
09:45
you really are destroying them.
09:49
>> Well, you are.
09:50
You are you are
09:52
>> like that, though?
09:52
>> Well, you can’t
09:54
I mean, what you’re what you’re turning
09:55
this into is not the union that
09:57
everybody signed up to join. It is a
09:59
completely different creation. I mean,
10:02
it’s becoming increasingly unpopular. Um
10:05
soon, it’s not going to be just
10:07
unpopular, it’s going to be hated. I
10:09
mean, it already is hated in many cases,
10:11
but it’s going to be even more hated. I
10:13
mean, this contains within it the seeds
10:16
of its eventual collapse. I mean, we
10:19
need to understand that. But, the amount
10:22
of damage that’s going to be done on the
10:24
way is enormous. And you’re absolutely
10:26
right, all of the others went along with
10:29
this, including Orban, by the way.
10:32
>> Yes.
10:33
>> I mean, including Orban.
10:35
>> Exactly.
10:36
>> Good point.
10:37
>> They all went along with this. They all
10:39
let themselves be dragged along because
10:42
of the hysteria of the moment. And if
10:45
you stand up and oppose sanctions
10:49
against the Russians, that means that
10:51
you are on the Russian side. That means
10:54
you’re a traitor, and everybody was
10:56
frightened and intimidated and wasn’t
10:59
prepared to face up to this [despite all their main historical claim being lies, they stuck with it]. And we’re
11:01
not just seeing this happen play out in
11:03
Europe. It’s happening in a EU country
11:06
as well, in Germany. Because there are
11:08
now reports in the German media, and
11:10
they reached the British media as well,
11:14
that soon there are going to be
11:17
elections in two East German lander.
11:22
Um in two big East German states, Sax-
11:26
one of them is Sax- one of them is
11:27
Saxony, and another is Mecklenburg.
11:29
And there is a strong possibility that
11:32
the IFD will win elections in both and
11:35
win elections in both by a landslide
11:40
and be able to form a majority
11:44
government. Now, Germany is supposedly a
11:49
federal state. It is very decentralized.
11:53
A lot of the power in Germany is
11:56
supposed to be held by the lander, by
11:59
the states.
12:01
Well, Merz
12:03
is apparently privately calling these
12:07
states, if they elect AFD governments,
12:10
traitor states.
12:12
The Daily Telegraph article actually
12:15
uses that expression to describe them.
12:18
And he’s
12:20
spreading a story
12:22
that in the event of some kind of
12:25
military crisis involving the Russians,
12:28
these pro-Russian traitor states might
12:32
try to obstruct military movements
12:36
through Germany, through the land,
12:38
through their lands, through their
12:39
territories. So, he’s coming up
12:43
supposedly
12:45
with some kind of plan
12:48
to prevent them
12:50
from being able to do that.
12:52
Now, I don’t take any of this
12:55
story about this really being about
12:58
obstructing NATO troop movements in any
13:01
way seriously.
13:03
What you’re looking at is Merz
13:06
and the authorities in Berlin looking to
13:10
strip powers away
13:13
from states that vote
13:16
in AFD governments.
13:20
In other words,
13:23
trying obviously to isolate the AFD.
13:27
That goes without saying.
13:29
But in the process
13:31
tearing up
13:33
the
13:34
balance
13:36
the the balance of powers within
13:39
Germany.
13:40
Tearing up in effect the whole
13:43
conception
13:44
behind
13:46
the German constitution.
13:48
And instead of having a decentralized
13:51
federal state in Germany, which has
13:53
worked very well
13:54
ever since the federal
13:56
republic was established in the 1940s,
14:00
centralizing power in Berlin.
14:04
…
——
MY COMMENTS:
“How America Is Crushing Europe”, 27 September 2022
“The EU is Fraudulent”, 4 December 2022
All of this is being done to serve American billionaires, at the expense of publics everywhere.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s latest book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
