Connect with us

Latest

News

Staff Picks

Why I support Donald Trump for President of the United States

For all his faults Donald Trump is the candidate of peace opposing Hillary Clinton who is the candidate who threatens World War.

Published

on

2,298 Views

Has the US election been rigged in Hillary Clinton’s favour as recent evidence has suggested? Perhaps

Has the mainstream media waged such a deceitful and rotten campaign against Donald Trump that they have already won the election for Hillary Clinton? Quite possibly.

Will Hillary Clinton be the most militant president in American history? Yes. Her record as Secretary of State is one covered in blood. Her policies of war upon war upon war may well plunge the world into a Third World War if indeed the war doesn’t begin prior to the inauguration of the next US president.

It is for these reasons that I give a full personal endorsement to Mr. Donald J. Trump, a candidate for peace in a time of war.

In times as serious as this, little else matters other than foreign policy. In the event of world war, the tax man will be as dead as the tax payer.  Bombs do not know race from colour from creed. The rhetoric in which one finds comfort and the rhetoric which one finds irksome will be equally silenced.

Hillary Clinton

The government of which Hillary Clinton has been a part, and the most hawkish part at that, is racing towards world war in Syria.

With America and her NATO allies including Turkey along with ISIS, Al Qaeda and their lookalikes on one side, and Syria and Russia on the other, the very terrorist groups who have brought death to the streets of Aleppo, Brussels, Baghdad, Paris, New York and  beyond, are helping one nuclear superpower to wage war upon another.

If Hillary Clinton gets elected, not only will this policy remain in place, but it will expand exponentially.

Look too at the company she keeps.  Just last week, Prince Turki al-Faisal of the kleptocratic, terrorist sponsoring, Islamic extremist exporting Saudi Arabia, jetted into America to tell Americans to vote for Clinton.

Can you just imagine Putin doing the same for Trump or anyone else?

Putin by the way hasn’t endorsed ANY US candidate and never would do. All he has ever said is that anyone who welcomes cooperation with Russia could only be viewed positively from a Russian perspective.

Hillary Clinton’s record shows that even amongst warmongers she has an unusually enthusiastic taste for death, no empathy for the dead, no measure, and no restraint.

A recent leaked conversation reveals that Hillary Clinton wanted to ‘drone’ Julian Assange whilst he is effectively imprisoned in the sovereign territory of Ecuador.

Assange is amongst the most important men of the last hundred years, a journalist who has risked his life to publish whistle-blower accounts which reveal that the Western establishment is not only as devious as many had suspected, but is in fact more devious than fathomable in one’s wildest dreams. 

Hillary Clinton’s violent outbursts against Assange prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that her relationship with the truth is a bit like her husband’s relationship with her; superficial and ultimately a sham.

Turning to Donald Trump one must ask the following:

When has a contending US presidential candidate campaigned on a platform arguing for reconciliation and cooperation with Russia? The closest one gets is Robert Taft, whose last attempt to gain the Presidency was in 1952.

When has a contending US presidential candidate campaigned on a platform opposed to willy-nilly interventions into others countries? If one considers Ross Perot a contender, than one could point to his last attempt to become president in 1996.

Donald Trump has segregated terrorists who threaten the lives of anyone they can get their hands on, from regimes who don’t want to do business with the likes of Obama, the Clintons and the Bushes.

Donald Trump has said clearly that the constant tide of war is not to the benefit of the ordinary American, and by extrapolation to people throughout the world.

Donald Trump has proved to be both patriotic and critical, something many would have thought impossible in America under previous regimes.

One must acknowledge that for every irrational critic of Trump, there are also rational ones. I would like to address the most widespread rational criticisms of Trump.

He may not mean what he says?

This could well be the case and if he doesn’t, I shall become his most unrelenting critic. However, I’m inclined to believe he does mean what he says.

Trump is a mainstream businessman. Ideology, let alone a wild ideology, does not build hotels, casinos and golf courses. Pragmatism, good sense and efficiency do.

Donald Trump’s foreign policy rhetoric is just that, pragmatic, sensible and efficient.

Unlike Hillary Clinton who has sold weapons of mass destruction, something which does require a touch of madness, Donald Trump has never made money on products which threaten world peace. I do not think he’s about to start now.

Hillary Clinton implies he’s some sort of traitor, he isn’t; he’s a trader and the shopping mall is preferable to the killing fields.

He isn’t Ron Paul

No he isn’t. Ron Paul would be the ideal candidate in many ways, but he’s not running and even when he ran he was massacred by the establishment early on.

This is another reason why Trump is important. Few people who don’t have independent wealth AND a large public profile could have pulled off an anti-establishment campaign and travelled this far with it.

If people find Trump garish or brash, the answer is this is a necessity of marketing. People in America who have never voted know who Donald Trump is; many who have voted still have never heard of Ron Paul.

He isn’t Bernie Sanders

Although Bernie Sanders does indeed have historically laudable anti-war credentials and is a deeply sincere man, he is finished.

His chance of achieving victory was stolen from him by Hillary Clinton’s ruthless, corrupt political machine.

Many accuse him of selling his soul to the DNC devil by endorsing Clinton. Maybe he did or maybe he feels frightened.

He is an old man, allow him to live his lattermost years in peace. 

He isn’t Vladimir Putin

True.

He has said some disturbing things about Iran

This is mere electioneering rhetoric designed to expose Obama’s secretive dealings with Iran, which included the undisclosed shipment of millions of dollars to Iran in cash.

Donald Trump is many things, but the man to invade Iran he is not.

He speaks off the cuff

Good. He is human. He has a sense of humour. He seems good company.

When the world is about to plunge into world war, none of this ought to matter, but if it still does. I say it’s better to have a man relaxed and improvised in his speech than someone who is stiff, insincere and totally inhuman.

There are only two realistic choices for US President and there is a larger policy gap between them than there has been in any two-horse US presidential race since 1972, if not since 1952.

All I am saying is give peace a chance. All I am saying is give Trump a chance.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Latest

Tape recorded evidence of Clinton-Ukraine meddling in US election surfaces (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 114.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

RT CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle and The Duran’s Alex Christoforou take a look at new evidence to surface from Ukraine that exposes a plot by the US Embassy in Kiev and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) to leak Paul Manafort’s corrupt dealings in the country, all for the benefit of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via Zerohedge


Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko has launched an investigation into the head of the Ukrainian National Anti-Corruption Bureau for allegedly attempting to help Hillary Clinton defeat Donald Trump during the 2016 US election by releasing damaging information about a “black ledger” of illegal business dealings by former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

The Hill’s John Solomon, Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko

“Today we will launch a criminal investigation about this and we will give legal assessment of this information,” Lutsenko said last week, according to The Hill

Lutsenko is probing a claim from a member of the Ukrainian parliament that the director of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), Artem Sytnyk, attempted to the benefit of the 2016 U.S. presidential election on behalf of Hillary Clinton.

A State Department spokesman told Hill.TV that officials aware of news reports regarding Sytnyk. –The Hill

“According to the member of parliament of Ukraine, he got the court decision that the NABU official conducted an illegal intrusion into the American election campaign,” said Lutsenko, speaking with The Hill’s John Solomon about the anti-corruption bureau chief, Artem Sytnyk.

“It means that we think Mr. Sytnyk, the NABU director, officially talked about criminal investigation with Mr. [Paul] Manafort, and at the same time, Mr. Sytnyk stressed that in such a way, he wanted to assist the campaign of Ms. Clinton,” Lutsenko continued.

Solomon asked Lutsenko about reports that a member of Ukraine’s parliament obtained a tape of the current head of the NABU saying that he was attempting to help Clinton win the 2016 presidential election, as well as connections that helped release the black-ledger files that exposed Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort‘s wrongdoing in Ukraine.

“This member of parliament even attached the audio tape where several men, one of which had a voice similar to the voice of Mr. Sytnyk, discussed the matter.” –The Hill

What The Hill doesn’t mention is that Sytnyk released Manafort’s Black Book with Ukrainian lawmaker Serhiy Leshchenko – discussed in great length by former Breitbart investigator Lee Stranahan, who has been closely monitoring this case.

Serhiy Leshchenko

T]he main spokesman for these accusations was Serhiy Leshchenko, a Ukrainian politician and journalist who works closely with both top Hillary Clinton donors George Soros and Victor Pinchuk, as well as to the US Embassy in Kyiv.

James Comey should be asked about this source that Leshchenko would not identify. Was the source someone connected to US government, either the State Department or the Department of Justice?

The New York Times should also explain why they didn’t mention that Leshchenko had direct connections to two of Hillary Clinton biggest financial backers. Victor Pinchuk, the largest donor to the Clinton Foundation at a staggering $8.6 million also happened to have paid for Leshchenko’s expenses to go to international conferences. George Soros, whose also founded the International Renaissance Foundationthat worked closely with Hillary Clinton’s State Department in Ukraine, also contributed at least $8 million to Hillary affiliated super PACs in the 2016 campaign cycle. –Lee Stranahan via Medium

Meanwhile, according to former Fusion GPS contractor Nellie Ohr, Leshchenko was a source for opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which commissioned the infamous Trump-Russia dossier.

Nellie Ohr, a former contractor for the Washington, D.C.-based Fusion GPS, testified on Oct. 19 that Serhiy Leshchenko, a former investigative journalist turned Ukrainian lawmaker, was a source for Fusion GPS during the 2016 campaign.

“I recall … they were mentioning someone named Serhiy Leshchenko, a Ukrainian,” Ohr said when asked who Fusion GPS’s sources were, according to portions of Ohr’s testimony confirmed by The Daily Caller News Foundation. –Daily Caller

Also absent from The Hill report is the fact that Leshchenko was convicted in December by a Kiev court of interfering in the 2016 US election.

A Kyiv court said that a Ukrainian lawmaker and a top anticorruption official’s decision in 2016 to publish documents linked to President Donald Trump’s then-campaign chairman amounted to interference in the U.S. presidential election.

The December 11 finding came in response to a complaint filed by another Ukrainian lawmaker, who alleged that Serhiy Leshchenko and Artem Sytnyk illegally released the documents in August 2016, showing payments by a Ukrainian political party to Trump’s then-campaign chairman, Paul Manafort.

The documents, excerpts from a secret ledger of payments by the Party of Regions, led to Manafort being fired by Trump’s election campaign.

The Kyiv court said that the documents published by Leshchenko and Sytnyk were part of an ongoing pretrial investigation in Ukraine into the operations of the pro-Russian Party of Regions. The party’s head had been President Viktor Yanukovych until he fled the country amid mass protests two years earlier.

-RadioFreeEurope/Radio Liberty (funded by the US govt.).

So while Lutsenko – Solomon’s guest and Ukrainian Prosecutor is currently going after Artem Sytnyk, it should be noted that Leshchenko was already found to have meddled in the 2016 US election.

Watch:

Meanwhile, you can also check out Stranahan’s take on Leshchenko being left out of the loop.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

‘I will take over as Brexit Party leader’: Nigel Farage back on the frontline

Nigel Farage says that if the UK takes part in European elections, he will lead his new Brexit Party.

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT


Former UKIP leader Nigel Farage has announced that he will lead his new Brexit Party into the European elections if UK MPs decide to delay Brexit beyond May 22.

Farage, who has ostensibly appointed himself leader, told various media, including the BBC and Sky News on Friday morning: “I will take over as leader of the Brexit Party and lead it into the European Elections.”

It comes after the Brexit Party’s leader, Catherine Blaiklock, quit over a series of alleged Islamophobic statements and retweets of far-right figures on social media.

It is not yet thought that Farage has officially been elected as leader, as the party does not, as yet, have a formal infrastructure to conduct such a vote.

The right-wing MEP vowed to put out a whole host of Brexit Party candidates if the UK participates in the upcoming EU elections in May, adding: “If we fight those elections, we will fight them on trust.”

On Thursday night, the EU agreed to PM May’s request for a delaying to Brexit beyond the March 29 deadline. Brussels announced two new exit dates depending on what happens next week in the UK parliament.

The UK will have to leave the bloc on April 12 unless British MPs agree to May’s Brexit deal. If the withdrawal agreement is passed by next week, EU leaders have agreed to grant an extension until May 22.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Baltics cannot rely on Germany any more

The matter is NATO today is not as strong as it is supposed to be. And it is not only because of leadership blunders.

The Duran

Published

on

Submitted by Adomas Abromaitis…

On March 29 Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia will celebrate 15 years of becoming NATO member states. The way to the alliance membership was not simple for newly born independent countries. They have reached great success in fulfilling many of NATO demands: they have considerably increased their defence expenditures, renewed armaments and increased the number of military personnel.

In turn, they get used to rely on more powerful member states, their advice, help and even decision making. All these 15 years they felt more or less safe because of proclaimed European NATO allies’ capabilities.

Unfortunately, now it is high time to doubt. The matter is NATO today is not as strong as it supposed to be. And it is not only because of leadership’s blunders. Every member state does a bit. As for the Baltic states, they are particularly vulnerable, because they fully depend on other NATO member states in their defence. Thus, Germany, Canada and Britain are leading nations of the NATO battle group stationed in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia respectively.

But the state of national armed forces in Germany, for example, raises doubts and makes it impossible not only defend the Baltics against Russia, but Germany itself.

It turned out, that Germany itself remains dissatisfied with its combat readiness and minister of defence’s ability to perform her duties. Things are so bad, that the military’s annual readiness report would be kept classified for the first time for “security reasons.”

“Apparently the readiness of the Bundeswehr is so bad that the public should not be allowed to know about it,” said Tobias Lindner, a Greens member who serves on the budget and defense committees.

Inspector General Eberhard Zorn said (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-arms/germany-not-satisfied-with-readiness-of-submarines-some-aircraft-idUSKBN1QS1G7) the average readiness of the country’s nearly 10,000 weapons systems stood at about 70 percent in 2018, which meant Germany was able to fulfill its military obligations despite increasing responsibilities.

No overall comparison figure was available for 2017, but last year’s report revealed readiness rates of under 50 percent for specific weapons such as the aging CH-53 heavy-lift helicopters and the Tornado fighter jets.

Zorn said this year’s report was more comprehensive and included details on five main weapons systems used by the cyber command, and eight arms critical for NATO’s high readiness task force, which Germany heads this year.

“The overall view allows such concrete conclusions about the current readiness of the Bundeswehr that knowledge by unauthorized individuals would harm the security interests of the Federal Republic of Germany,” he wrote.

Critics are sure of incompetence of the Federal Minister of Defence, Ursula von der Leyen. Though she has occupied the upper echelons of German politics for 14 years now — and shows no sign of success. This mother of seven, gynecologist by profession, by some miracle for a long time has been remaining in power, though has no trust even among German military elites. Despite numerous scandals she tries to manage the Armed Forces as a housewife does and, of course, the results are devastating for German military capabilities. The same statement could be easily apply for the Baltic States, which highly dependent on Germany in military sphere.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending