in ,

Say NO to another lockdown.

A second national lockdown would be a complete and utter catastrophe for our country. We have reached the point now where the cure has become worse than the disease itself.

5 8 votes
Article Rating
Help us grow. Support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ugh...
Ugh...
September 21, 2020

Yeah, I am sure businesses would enjoy being shut down again for a second year. People are really dropping like flies too. The mask saved the world… Humanity would have gone extinct without it.

BobValdez
BobValdez
September 21, 2020

He was doing just fine, until the bullshit about Sars-Cov-2 “escaping from China”. It was prevailent LONG before it came to notice in Wuhan, as it actually came from the us.

SteveK9
SteveK9
Reply to  BobValdez
September 21, 2020

Could be, but much more likely to have been engineered in Wuhan, as part of the ‘gain of function’ experiments that had been going on there for years. These experiments were also being conducted in the US at UNC and Fort Detrick, although there were halted. But experiments producing pathogens very similar to SARS-Cov-2 were definitely occurring in Wuhan. And the outbreak began there. There is a book by a respected Italian Scientist, Professor Tritto, titled ‘China Covid-19, the Chimera that Changed the World’, that details what he believes the path leading to SARS-Cov-2 was, and recently a Chinese ‘whistleblower’… Read more »

SteveK9
SteveK9
Reply to  SteveK9
September 21, 2020

I could add that Luc Montagnier, Nobel Laureate and the discoverer of the HIV, also believes this is a construct from the Wuhan lab. He thinks they were trying to engineer an HIV vaccine … one possibility anyway.

Last edited 1 month ago by SteveK9
Paul Martin
Paul Martin
Reply to  SteveK9
September 21, 2020

Yes, it is much better to call it a “pathogen” than a “virus” — especially since the whole notion of whether viruses have ever existed has been coming under scrutiny once again — and this time around, from intelligent people with a good amount of fighting sense in them (such as Andrew Kaufman). Almost everything surrounding human disease is better satisfied with terrain theory (toxins) than germ theory (invading and replicating microbes), so eventually Antoine Bechamp will yet succeed in his work on that over Louis Pasteur’s false rise to prominence simply because he offered expedient (read: unethical) means for… Read more »

SteveK9
SteveK9
September 21, 2020

Even Nigel doesn’t fully understand the meaninglessness of ‘cases’ as currently defined.

Smoking Eagle
Smoking Eagle
September 21, 2020

The UK should have done a whole lot better in coping with the virus. Great Britain has the advantage of being an island so it should have been able to easily close its sea and air borders to keep potentially infected people out, and to prevent Britons from vacationing abroad and bringing infections back home, while it managed the infections within. Just about all island and also almost-island nations from Australia and New Zealand to Iceland, Greenland, Falkland Islands, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and the Caribbean islands, have comparatively very low infection and death rates. The UK should… Read more »

Ozymandias
Ozymandias
Reply to  Smoking Eagle
September 22, 2020

Your right,it was the borders Not being closed played a huge part in the virus being transmitted..p.s. do we really want to go back to people fighting over the last frozen chicken and loo rolls,,No lock downs plz.

On Roosevelt and Stalin: What Revisionist Historians Want Us to Forget

New law in Australia aims to squash “conspiracy theorists”