in

Russian embassy answers stupefyingly arrogant Guardian article planning post-Putin govt

Imagine if Russian newspapers routinely speculated on what new government Moscow should impose in the UK

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

(Sputnik) – The Russian Embassy in London has responded on its Twitter account to The Guardian journalist Natalie Nougayrede who wrote about unpredictable things that might happen in Russia “after Putin.”

“Great foreign policy planning after #Brexit,” Russian diplomats wrote, implying that the journalist should pay more attention to the future of her own country, especially given the UK’s decision to leave the European Union.

​In her article, Nougayrede described several scenarios in which she gave Western countries recommendations on “how to deal” with Moscow.

The journalist, for instance, tried to draw parallels between how she sees a future political situation in Russia and the dissolution of the USSR, implying that “unexpected” events may happen anytime.

This is not the first time that the Russian Embassy in the UK commented on Western mainstream media publications. In late November, it responded to an article by BBC journalist Nick Robinson, who claimed in his op-ed that Russian foreign language news services RT and Sputnik were “Vladimir Putin’s weapons” against the West.

“I am not arguing that those who backed Brexit or Scottish independence fell for a foreign plot. But we need to understand why the Kremlin might want to set up its own TV news network in London called RT, or Russia Today, and a news agency in Edinburgh called Sputnik,” Robinson wrote.

The Russian Embassy’s twitter account that has repeatedly made headlines over trolling Western politicians and reporters who claim that Russia is somehow responsible for all the problems in the world, couldn’t resist calling Robinson out on the flaw in his argument.

“Turning the anchor’s own dubious logic around on him, the Embassy asked whether maybe Moscow should consider the presence of Russian-language editions of the BBC and British news agency Reuters as a sign of Whitehall’s insidious plans,” Russian diplomats wrote on the embassy’s official Twitter account.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Russia’s Zakharova taunts West on its ‘successes’ in Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan

Hauntingly beautiful aerial shots of Russia’s mighty Don River (VIDEO)