in

Russia responds to America’s plan to win WW III.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Eric Zuesse

The U.S. Government no longer designs nuclear weapons to prevent WW III, but instead to win WW III.

Whereas both the Soviet Union and the United States used to design their strategy and weapons so as to prevent a Third World War so that neither side would win but both sides (and much of the world) would be destroyed as thousands of nuclear warheads would suddenly be exploding during a nuclear war which would be completed within around an hour or so, the U.S. Government has gradually shifted away from such a “M.A.D.” or “mutually assured destruction” meta-strategy, and been replacing it with the “Nuclear Primacy” U.S. meta-strategy, in which Russia will be totally destroyed but the U.S. will emerge afterward as being sufficiently strong so as to hold unchallengeable sway over the entire planet (which hegemony has been the actual goal of the U.S. Government ever since 25 July 1945).

On 3 May 2017, I headlined “America’s Top Scientists Confirm: U.S. Goal Now Is to Conquer Russia”, and linked to a report that had recently been issued by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, about “revolutionary new technologies that will vastly increase the targeting capability of the US ballistic missile arsenal. This increase in capability is astonishing — boosting the overall killing power of existing US ballistic missile forces by a factor of roughly three — and it creates exactly what one would expect to see, if a nuclear-armed state were planning to have the capacity to fight and win a nuclear war by disarming enemies with a surprise first strike.” I pointed out there that this new technology, called the “super-fuse”, was exactly in accord with the replacement of M.A.D. by Nuclear Primacy. After all, though the proponents of “Nuclear Primacy” didn’t say that this phrase related ONLY to America’s “Primacy” in a U.S.-v.-Russia nuclear war, the context always was clear that this was the intention, and that the phrase meant the exact opposite of (and strongly opposed) any conceivable nuclear “primacy” for Russia. So, “Nuclear Primacy” — a phrase that was introduced in 2006 in the most prestigious scholarly journals, and subsequently adhered-to by all U.S. foreign policies though never explicitly stated (and never publicly advocated) by the U.S. Government — is, in actuality, the new U.S. meta-strategy, the one that now exists.

Other new U.S. military technologies also were discussed in that Bulletin of Atomic Scientists article: for example: “Because of improvements in the killing power of US submarine-launched ballistic missiles, those submarines now patrol with more than three times the number of warheads needed to destroy the entire fleet of Russian land-based missiles in their silos.” Of course, if this is true, then Russians were in a terrifying situation, at least as recently as 2017.

Russia’s response to this challenge had actually started even earlier, by no later than U.S. President Barack Obama’s having grabbed control over the Government of Ukraine in February 2014. (And in this video is shown that video’s full smoking gun of his coup, and here is the transcript and explanation of that crucial smoking gun.) Ukraine is the country that has the nearest foreign border to The Kremlin in Moscow — only 353 miles from Moscow, a mere five minutes of missile-flight-time, away, from the Ukrainian city of Sumy. Ukraine’s having the border with the closest proximity to Russia’s central command (The Kremlin) is the main reason why Obama grabbed it (in accord with his Nuclear-Primacy policies).

Compare that 353 miles to the 1,131 miles from Washington DC that Cuba is and that terrified JFK so much during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis as to have made him willing to launch nuclear war against the Soviet Union if Khrushchev wouldn’t remove the missile sites that the Soviet Union was attempting to build in Cuba. Cuba is over three times farther away from DC than Ukraine is from The Kremlin, and the missiles at that time were far slower than they are today, but when America’s NATO finally rejected, on 7 January 2022, Russia’s demand that Ukraine NEVER be allowed to join NATO, what alternative did Russia have left, other than to reverse Obama’s coup of Ukraine and to do it as soon as possible?

In preparation for Russia’s “Special Military Operation,” Russia has been introducing new weapons systems that are specifically designed to prevent “Nuclear Primacy.” Among the main ones is the Sarmat ICBM, which is vastly the world’s most terrifying weapon, because it will be virtually impossible to detect and track, carrying dozens of precision-targeted huge nuclear bombs, unstoppable by any existing technology, and having a range of 18,000 kilometers or over 11,000 miles, which would cover the entire U.S. empire. Just a few Sarmats could destroy the entire U.S. empire, all of the U.S. and its vassal-nations (self-described as being ‘democracies’ and ‘independent nations’ — neither of which is true).

A Princeton University group of scholars has produced their estimate of how a WW III would proceed, which they label as “Plan A”, and their video-summary of it was posted to youtube on 6 September 2019. As-of now, it has had nearly 4 million views, and five thousand viewer-comments. It assumes that the war would proceed in gradual steps of mutual escalation and ignores that the U.S. regime no longer is following the M.A.D. meta-strategy — that the U.S. regime has replaced M.A.D. by their Nuclear Primacy meta-strategy. Consequently, the Princeton estimates appear to be highly unrealistic, and not, at all, to be describing the type of unprecedentedly brief war that a WW III in our era would entail. A WW III in our time would be predicated upon being initiated in a blitz-nuclear attack by the United States, such as a war that is driven by the Nuclear Primacy meta-strategy would be done: Nuclear Primacy means a war to decapitate Russia’s central command in its first strike and within a mere 10 minutes or (if from Ukraine) even less from that blitz-launch. How would a decapitated Russia be able to retaliate, at all? Only by means of a “dead hand” system, which would automatically launch whatever would survive of its retaliatory capacities after that first, decapitating, nuclear-blitz, attack. The Sarmat would be a part of that, unless the U.S. regime starts WW III before the Sarmats become emplaced. In the meantime, Russia’s main concern will be to maintain a current dead-hand capability so as to make certain that at least the U.S. and its main vassal-nations will be eliminated in the event that the Nuclear Primacy meta-strategy becomes launched before Russia’s dead-hand system becomes completely implemented.

The way that a WW III would most likely start has been shaped by the U.S. regime’s objective of not being blamed for the war despite being the first side to nuclearize it; and this objective requires that Russia must have initiated the conventional phase of the war that will have led up to that nuclear phase. For example: if Russia fails to achieve its objective of capturing and holding enough of Ukraine so as to increase that 353 miles to, say, 1,000 miles (or whatever would be their required minimum), then the U.S. might send forces to Ukraine in order to prevent Russia from achieving that objective; and if Russia then engages U.S. forces in direct combat, the U.S. might use that as their excuse to invade Russia, and, at some stage in that invasion, very suddenly, to blitz-nuclear attack The Kremlin, on the excuse that “the Russian regime doesn’t respond to anything but military force.” Then, the survivors of WW III will be able to be propagandized sufficiently to cast the blame onto Russia, and this will help to ease the U.S. regime’s successful take-over of the entire world (or what remains of it).

Already, it is a great propaganda-success on the part of America’s regime, that though they started the war in Ukraine by grabbing Ukraine in February 2014, Russia has gotten the blame for this war, when responding to that coup (which had started this war) eight years later, on 24 February 2022, with their “Special Military Operation.” In fact, most people now might think that Ukrainians always hated Russia’s Government and loved America’s Government, but even Western-sponsored polls of Ukrainians showed consistently that prior to Obama’s coup there, the vast majority of Ukrainians saw Russia as their friend; and America, NATO, and the EU, as their enemy; but that this reversed almost immediately, after the U.S. Government took over Ukraine, in 2014. In the propaganda-war, it’s almost as-if Russia hasn’t even entered the contest, at all.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
51 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
norecovery
norecovery
September 22, 2022

Homo Stupidus

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
Reply to  norecovery
September 23, 2022

Homo Judaicus

Vera Gottlieb
Vera Gottlieb
Reply to  Martin Donohoe
September 23, 2022

leave your religious bias out of this? No winners…all losers.

Tom
Tom
September 23, 2022

Its about the Heartland, Eurasia. The Great Game as Zbig called it. Thats it all about. The US hegemon neocons wants to control it but its slipping away to China, Russia and India. Even SouthAmerica and the Middle East are looking east. The neocons like Hillary Clinton e.o. want to use nukes to that goal but Russia never dismantled the USSR doomsday machine. It will be MAD to use nukes but the Beast needs meat. Lots of it.

jodi1
jodi1
September 23, 2022

What is this disgusting, racial bias of always needing to punish & humiliate Russia. As far as I can tell, its always the US UK or EU Nato forces that are constantly poking and prodding Russia. I dont see Russia trying to start a war with the US or with Nato. It is because of US & Nato’s constant belligerent games that Russia finally succumbed to a military operation in Ukraine.

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
Reply to  jodi1
September 23, 2022

Victoria Nuland (Jewess) hates Russia with a passion. She masterminded the 2014 Maidan coup.

Vera Gottlieb
Vera Gottlieb
Reply to  Martin Donohoe
September 23, 2022

I don’t think Nuland’s religion has anything to do with it. She follows instructions of the ‘masters’ who always think to know it all.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Vera Gottlieb
September 24, 2022

Nuland’s religion (Jewish) has everything to do with it WHO ARE RUNNING U.S. ? LESS THAN 2% OF AMERICAN CITICENS ARE JEW, SO WHAT THE HECK IS THIS ?!! Jews who Joe Biden has tapped for top roles in his administration 1) Doug Emhoff (JEW), Husband of Kamala Devil Harris 2) Janet Yellin (JEW), Secretary Treasury 3) Anthony Blinken (JEW), Secretary of State  4) Robert Klain (JEW), Chief of Staff 5) David Cohen (JEW), Deputy Director CIA 6) Merrick Garland (JEW), Attorney General 7) Alejandro Mayorkas (JEW), Secretary Homeland Security 8) Avril Haines (JEW), Director National Intelligence 9) Wendy Sherman… Read more »

Vera Gottlieb
Vera Gottlieb
Reply to  jodi1
September 23, 2022

You hit the nail right on the head. The problem with Western civilization…we ain’t as civilized as we want other cultures to believe. And I should also add: the white race – that thinks it is superior to all others and thus has the right to walk all over them.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Vera Gottlieb
September 24, 2022

There is simple reason why Whites ARE Superior race

More than 200 THOUSAND years advantage in evolution.

Human-evolution.jpg
platon
platon
September 23, 2022

Sounds about right and what else should one expect from the Talmudo satanist jews that control the West from the former the Ukraine to Ottawa today?

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 23, 2022

It’s not a “faith” it’s a RACE. An anti-White race.

Helga Fellay
Helga Fellay
Reply to  Martin Donohoe
September 23, 2022

It’s neither about faith nor about race. It’s about control.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 24, 2022

Nope, it’s Khazarian 1000+ year goal to imperialist dictatorship. Russia threw evil Khazars out exactly from there what Russia is now freeing. Donbas that was given back to Khazars by Bolsheviks Lenin, Trotsky and other Jews, was the Khazarian snake nest. Now they want it back. Forlorn hope. Khazar limestone fortresses of Sarkel and Tamatarkha falling in 965 and the Empire’s capital Atil being destroyed around 969, so complete was the loot of the city by the Russians that a contemporary wrote “no grape or raisin remained, not a leaf on a branch” 98% today’s Jews are Khazars. But who… Read more »

Bolshevik-jews.jpg
Vera Gottlieb
Vera Gottlieb
Reply to  Helga Fellay
September 23, 2022

Some ignorant people just can’t live without stirring up the shit.

Carol
Carol
Reply to  Martin Donohoe
September 23, 2022

A religious faith in not a race. Are all catholics or protestants a race? Having different coloured skin is not a race and so-called “racism” applies equally to people with paler skins as it does to people with darker skins. You only have to look at the hatred of the Russians or Slavs to realise, racism is just an excuse for hatred against other cultures or nationalities.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Carol
September 24, 2022

Russians nor Slavs aren’t racist. I have had pleasure and honor to do business, mostly heavy metal and wood products several years, so I believe I bit know them.

all-races-slavery.jpg
Vera Gottlieb
Vera Gottlieb
Reply to  Martin Donohoe
September 23, 2022

Stop your bullshit….

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 23, 2022

Blinken, Nuland, Sherman, Walensky, Garland, Soros, Kissinger, Adelson, Bourla, Fink, Blitzer, Spielberg, Shapiro, Streisand, you get the idea yet?

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 23, 2022

Oy vey….. it’s anudda Hawlakawst. Never forget the Six Billion.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Martin Donohoe
September 24, 2022

Before and after the “Holocaust”: Jewish population numbers in 1933 and 1948 ?!! For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely regarded as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population numbers. Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy of those numbers. Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and 1948 had to say about the world population of Jews. According to the World Almanac the world population of Jews increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German government under Adolf Hitler had… Read more »

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 23, 2022

Read “The Culture of Critique” by Dr Kevin MacDonald.

penrose
penrose
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 23, 2022

He probably is not a big fan of George Soros or Paul Wolfowitz. Neither am I. Conversly, Norman Finklestein and David Cole are not always appreciated by the Jewish Community. I like Finklestein’s mother’s observation: “There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth.” Kevin MacDonald is an evolutionary psychologist who studied Jews as an evolutionary group. Interesting indeed. Then there are the neocons. They form a fascinating subculture. And of course there is money, which Jews have been identified with from time to time. 🙂 And entertainment. Hollywood. And the Balfour Declaration. Some people… Read more »

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 24, 2022

90+% of that 0.01% just factually are Jews.

Author Eric has written many books, I see.

America’s Nazi Allies in Israel And Ukraine
By Eric Zuesse
24 July, 2014

I’m bit confused author Eric, your comments here feels like from defender of Jews, but your texts elsewhere tells a much different story, especially those about Israel. ?!

Israel ruled by Nazi-Jews, I agree, the same Khazars who did kill big number of REAL Jews, even far below that 6 Mil

Couple Israeli, 1 former and quite frankly 1 present rulers here with their kind words of America.

F-jews.jpg
Helga Fellay
Helga Fellay
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 23, 2022

I am not sure, but I guess he is referring to the dual citizens in control of our House and Senate. It’s not about hatred so much, but resentment that we are ruled by a foreign power.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Helga Fellay
September 24, 2022

Dual citizens in U.S. congress

Is it strange, I can find only 1 Republican and 1 independent, how’s so ?!

Dual-Citizens-in-Congress-Dual-cunts.jpg
Javi
Javi
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 23, 2022

It is extremely discouraging to see the amount of irrational anti-semitism on this side of the information war. I know people who were nothing like that before but have become jew haters after experiencing the covid regime. Some have passed me copies of the protocols of the Elders of Sion to try to convince me that the Jews have always been behind all the evil elite manipulations through history. I guess it is a comfortable position to take. First of all because you don‘t need to offer any rational arguments. If you don‘t agree with them, that‘s because you‘re a… Read more »

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Javi
September 24, 2022

“all the world‘s problems” – If I may amplify that a bit with someone else’s words.

I do agree that fully.

Mel-Gibsn_jews-have-started-all-wars.jpg
Last edited 5 days ago by Jarno P
Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
September 24, 2022

Maybe these author Eric ? WHO ARE RUNNING U.S. ? LESS THAN 2% OF AMERICAN CITICENS ARE JEW, SO WHAT THE HECK IS THIS ?!! Jews who Joe Biden has tapped for top roles in his administration 1) Doug Emhoff (JEW), Husband of Kamala Devil Harris 2) Janet Yellin (JEW), Secretary Treasury 3) Anthony Blinken (JEW), Secretary of State  4) Robert Klain (JEW), Chief of Staff 5) David Cohen (JEW), Deputy Director CIA 6) Merrick Garland (JEW), Attorney General 7) Alejandro Mayorkas (JEW), Secretary Homeland Security 8) Avril Haines (JEW), Director National Intelligence 9) Wendy Sherman (JEW), Deputy Secretary of… Read more »

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
Reply to  platon
September 23, 2022

They control Canberra too.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Martin Donohoe
September 24, 2022

How about that NWO/WEF BS ?

KLAUS SCHWAB IS JEW
GEORGE SOROS IS JEW
HENRY KISSINGER IS JEW
Swab’s advisor Yuval Noah and “her husband” Itzik Yahav are JEWS

Itzik-Yahav_Yuval-Noah-Harari.jpg
Vera Gottlieb
Vera Gottlieb
Reply to  platon
September 23, 2022

Leave your anti Semitism for another place, another time.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Vera Gottlieb
September 24, 2022

Why “anti-semitism” is so bad but Anti-White or even anti-America is not ?

What’s so special in Jews (yes I know the ‘story’) when by Bible they aren’t even the “Chosen People” but Christians are ?

Last edited 5 days ago by Jarno P
Carol
Carol
September 23, 2022

From the National Archive at KewTranscriptOPERATION UNTHINKABLE REPORT BY THE JOINT PLANNING STAFF We have examined Operation Unthinkable. As instructed, we have taken the following assumptions on which to base our examination: The undertaking has the full support of public opinion in the British Empire and the United States and consequently, the morale of British and American troops continues high. Great Britain and the United States have full assistance from the Polish armed forces and can count upon the use of German manpower and what remains of German industrial capacity. No credit is taken for assistance from the forces of… Read more »

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
September 23, 2022

Eric Zuesse…… Are you Jewish?

Martin Donohoe
Martin Donohoe
Reply to  Martin Donohoe
September 23, 2022

Jud Suess?

Ultrafart the Brave
Ultrafart the Brave
September 23, 2022

I have to agree with the author’s assessment of the Plan A narrative produced by Princeton. Seems the university boffins are trapped in a paradigm framed by Cold War thinking. The Kremlin (Putin himself, in fact) has quite some time ago stated that any attack against Russia would precipitate an immediate devastating response not only against opposing forces but also targeting the decision making centers responsible for such aggression. And Russia already has the unfettered means to accomplish just that, as well as unrivalled defensive technology to mitigate the extent of injury inflicted on Russia. So any nuclear war won’t… Read more »

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Ultrafart the Brave
September 24, 2022

The Russians called their incursion into Ukraine last February a “special military operation”. The description was accurate. It was not a “war” against the people of Ukraine. Russia could have completely knocked out the Zelensky regime with its air force in an afternoon, but it didn’t want to destroy the country’s vital infrastructure and cut off the future of the population, writes James Howard . The operation was designed to drive Ukrainian armed forces from their forward positions along the Donbas border, where they have been shelling, harassing and killing the Russian-speaking population for eight years — since the CIA-backed… Read more »

Ultrafart the Brave
Ultrafart the Brave
Reply to  Jarno P
September 24, 2022

Thanks for posting the truth.

Even Tucker Carlson is repeating the lie that Putin is making unprovoked threats to employ nuclear weapons, when the reality is precisely the opposite – Putin has simply responded to Western threats to nuke Russia by warning them that they will get the same in reply.

If Satan truly is the “Father of Lies” as Jesus said, then he’s got a mighty big family populating the crumbling American Empire right now.

Vera Gottlieb
Vera Gottlieb
September 23, 2022

America is totally delusional if it thinks it can win a nuclear war. No winners…all losers.

Jarno P
Jarno P
Reply to  Vera Gottlieb
September 24, 2022

True

THIS is What You Weren’t Told About the Fed

The Death Of Chris Kaba — Asking The Right Questions