Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

News

CONFIRMED: ISIS, the United States and SDF unite on the battle field against Syria and Russia

The Russian Defense Minsitry has released photos showing ISIS, the SDF and US special forces working side-by-side on the battlefield in Dier ez-Zor, Syria.

Published

on

11,087 Views

It has long been thought that the US proxy militia SDF is operating in collusion with ISIS in various parts of Syria. This has especially been the case in respect of Deir ez-Zor. In Deir ez-Zor, the Russian Defense Ministry has previously stated that the Syrian Arab Army and their allies are fired on most intensely from positions known to be held by the SDF.

Furthermore, Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov recently stated,

“SDF militants work to the same objectives as Daesh terrorists. Russian drones and intelligence have not recorded any confrontations between Daesh and the ‘third force’, SDF”.

He added that Russia will not hesitate to target SDF forces that threaten the battle field progress and personal safety of Russia’s allies, namely the Syrian Arab Army.

Russia will target US-backed fighters in Syria if provoked

Other reports surfaced of US military helicopters airlifting known ISIS commanders to safety as the Syrian Arab Army made its advance on the former ISIS stronghold of Deir ez-Zor. All of this has happened as the US is moving its proxy Kurdish led SDF forces from Raqqa to Deir ez-Zor, in a move that appears to be an attempt to stop Syrian forces from liberating their own country’s legally recognised territory.

Now, the Russian Defense Ministry has released a statement followed by 12 photos showing how SDF forces work alongside US special forces in ISIS controlled areas without facing any resistance from ISIS. Furthermore, none of the US or Kurdish led forces even take defensive positions which indicate that they are cooperating with ISIS rather than engaging in a perverse truce. In other words, the SDF, US special forces and ISIS move among each other in the same manner as allies do.

The following is the statement from the Russian Defense Ministry on the matter:

#US Special Operations Forces (#SOF) units enable US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (#SDF) units to smoothly advance through the ISIS formations.

Facing no resistance of the ISIS militants, the #SDF units are advancing along the left shore of the #Euphrates towards #Deir_ez_Zor.

The aerial photos made on September 8-12 over the ISIS locations recorded a large number of American #Hummer vehicles, which are in service with the #America‘s #SOF.

The shots clearly show the US SOF units located at strongholds that had been equipped by the ISIS terrorists. Though there is no evidence of assault, struggle or any US-led coalition airstrikes to drive out the militants.

Despite that the US strongholds being located in the ISIS areas, no screening patrol has been organized at them. This suggests that the#US_troops feel safe in terrorist controlled regions”.

This demonstrates that in spite of Donald Trump’s apparent wiliness to abandon the policy of aiding jihadist groups, not only has this policy not changed, but such a reality now includes full scale battlefield collusion with ISIS.

This also helps explain why in June of this year, SDF forces allowed ISIS terrorists to peacefully leave Raqqa and head towards Deir ez-Zor, a place which is now unquestionably the largest remaining ISIS stronghold in east of Libya.

But now, not only are US proxies allowing ISIS to peacefully retreat but they are visibly coalescing on the battle field. These realities also corroborate the story of SDF fighters being wounded in a Syrian led strike on known ISIS targets. As I wrote previously in The Duran, this is because SDF militants are fighting beside ISIS.

Russia shines light on the shady anti-Syrian coalition of the US, Kurds and jihadists

The fact of the matter is that, the Kurdish led SDF and ISIS now share the same strategic goals, in spite of apparent ideological differences. Both seek to aggressively and illegally prevent Syria from liberating her sovereignty territory and in so doing, both are challenging the territorial unity and integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic. Likewise, each group’s ideology is opposed to the Arabist Constitution of Syria, seeking instead to lay the ground work for sectarian ideologies in the areas they seek to illegally annex.

Most worryingly, both militant groups are clearly collaborating and colluding with each other and with the United States, in a proxy war against Syria and the interests and safety of her allies, including Russia and Iran.

What once was only partly clear, is now as clear as the following colour photographs from the Russian Defense Ministry. The SDF, ISIS and the United States are fighting on the same side of the conflict in Syria, it is the side of terrorism which seeks to destroy the secular, modern, pluralistic and independent Syrian Arab Republic.

This proves that the Hollywood actor Morgan Freeman was correct. The US and Russia are at war, albeit a proxy war which includes ISIS.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Voltaire
Guest
Voltaire

This is proof that the CIA is running a war against the Syrian Government, the Russians, Iranians and Hezbollah without the permission of the President of the United Strates….

And that the United States is worse than a rogue State….

It is a divided criminal State without a leader….

Behaving like a barbarian medieval war lord….

THE WORLD MUST UNUITE AGAINST THE ROGUE CRIMINAL UNITED STATES…

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

The US isn’t without a leader….it has a coward that can’t stand up to the deep state like he promised he could. They are using his ego to turn him into a monster. The US people elected him with a dim hope that he had balls….but he has none….is a coward that goes with his Generals that have prepared their entire lives for nothing but war….pushed by Israel. Trump is a sad Jew wannabe that mammon molds rather easily….unfortunately. He will probably be more famous than Hilter….he seems destined to start WW3 for Israel.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

The ruddy haired anti-Christ/Dajjal? First he needs to lose an eye…

fredd
Guest
fredd

The US people elected a figurehead

Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

I’ll preface this with, I’m not American and don’t have the same emotional investment in Trump as his voters would have: the last US president who courageously stood up to the deep state was assassinated. Calling Trump a coward for not following in JFK’s shoes is a bit harsh. Some say he is doing his best and doing some good; others say he was a puppet from the start. Difficult to tell. But, hasn’t he, with his chaotic, poker-style bluff and bullying, highlighted to more Americans that there is a problem with their governance? Whether he solves it or not,… Read more »

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

Trump is being turned by the deep state. He may be more dangerous than Hitler, just from the availability of nuke weapons. No, his “baby steps” mean nothing…without a government shakeup, and outing of the insiders that did 9/11, the problem is a festering cancer, not a spot on the skin. When corruption has overtaken the government, like it has in the USA….a baby step is nothing. Hearing Trump posit the government line on 9/11….after having said in the past the truth (that it was an inside job), he sickened me (yes…a coward). Would JFK be considered the quality of… Read more »

Pete Mangum
Guest
Pete Mangum

Make that HAS BEEN “turned by the deep state.” An arrogant boob like him never had a chance. Who but a preening imbecile would appoint to his cabinet the very people who not only hate him and actively campaigned against him (i.e. Nikki Haley) but actual Bush-Cheney era Neocons whose foreign policy leanings against Russia, China, Iran, China, Syria, et al are diametrically opposite of Trumps campaign stated goals of peace and diplomacy!? I honestly thought Trump could not be worse than the criminal and demonstrably unhinged Hillary Clinton. But I’m not so sure, now.

Pete Mangum
Guest
Pete Mangum

By threatening 3 of the most dangerous nuclear powers on earth (all at the same time and a move both unheard of and unprecedented in history) you’re assuming we’ll survive the nuclear holocaust he and his Neocon henchmen are dragging us into. Those “baby steps” will be our last if he and them aren’t reigned in…,and FAST!

Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

You’ve missed the point I was making.

Pete Mangum
Guest
Pete Mangum

not really. i got your point.

bluewater
Guest
bluewater

comment image
comment image comment image comment image

Daisy Adler
Guest
Daisy Adler

“This is proof that the CIA is running a war against the Syrian Government”

The proof was there, since the CIA operation in Benghazi in 2012, to ship Qaddaf’s seized weapons to Syria, via Turkey. That’s what “ambassador” Stevens and the CIA men were doing, when they were assassinated on September 11, 2012.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

Israel, the Artificial Zionist Squatter State is also running a war against the Syrian Government.
You calling that out, and your comments on this would be much appreciated:)

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

Hillary gave Stingers to the “good rebels” that turned them over to ISIS. Then they shot a US Chinook down with one (but didn’t arm it). The crew survived and traced the serial number to the illegal shipment by Hillary. They sent Amb. Stevens to try and get them back….big fail.

Since they had Stingers, it’s obvious why the US didn’t send in airborne reinforcements.

Wait until they get them around major world airports and planes start to drop. That is the real legacy of Hillary/Obomber.

american democracy
Guest
american democracy

it’s very simple: in the last 50years there is no war without american and there is no terrorists without american support..

santiago
Guest
santiago

Not true, The french and the brits have done their own things as well.

Marco Sansone
Guest
Marco Sansone

no doubt. you can find a war without uk and france but not without america. USA with 20-30 alies in 3 months won a war against irank and libian profesian army, in syria they trained some 30.000 soldiers who went directly on ISIS side and they bombed them, with 60 alies during 2years or even longer, but ISIS teritorry became only bigger and of course, nobody never saw not even a single photo of damage done by all those bombing but in irak they found parachutes, on ex-ISIS teritorry, dropped by those same planes. where goes us, uk goes with… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

The U.S has always been a criminal State. They were behind every WW but had Nuremberg to point the finger at Germany while their own War Crimes have STILL TODAY not been addressed. They had the Yugoslav War Crimes Tribunal (with Milosevic and others) solely to cover up THEIR own war crimes while accusing Serbia. .The President has no been a leader for a long time. Which is why, until that changes, I prefer Bernie Sanders where he currently is, IN the Senate with an open microphone, free to speak his mind when HE determines it useful and doesn’t respond… Read more »

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

“behind every WW”? Close, but it’s little more complex than that according to Docherty and Macgregor…

Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War

http://www.globalresearch.ca/hidden-history-the-secret-origins-of-the-first-world-war/5600090

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

This has been known for quite some time. Webster Tarpley published in the “executive intelligence review” EIR an expose about the Lord Palmerston network and King Edward the 7th. The plan to attack Serbia by the AU empire was finalized in 1913, all what was necessary was a spark. The “Young Bosnia” movement (as other “Young” movements) was financed by the Brits through the French masonic lodge of the orient .
*The destruction and maiming of everyone in continental Europe was the Imperial goal, to further British Imperial rule for centuries – pretty much like PNAC (don’t you think)*.

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

I’ve known about it for only a few years, and not at all about Webster Tarpley’s contribution here. This is in dire need of further distribution. Are there online sources that you can recommend?

Have you looked at Carroll Quigley’s work, Tragedy and Hope?

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

I think you can find it under
“Lord Palmerston’s Multicultural Human Zoo” – short read.
, there’s also a YouTube discussion – good stuff!!!
I still have questions about Quigley (his anglo american establishment is 1st rate).
My questions arise from the conclusion that historians write about what is presented to them and for what specific purposes.(I always doubt sources).

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

Thanks! I found it at archive.org and downloaded the pdf. There’s a lot of juicy stuff stored with it. Now I understand how Tarpley is extraordinarily well informed.

Yes, you’re absolutely right. To whose advantage is presenting certain evidence to a certain historian.

Pleasure meeting up with you!

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

Likewise,
I just checked YouTube

“Palmerstons Zoo Introduction Webster Tarpley”, he essentially dissects the British Imperial system .

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

Right!

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

FYI Webster Tarpley ia a conspiracy nutter.

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

Not all he says can be cast aside, albeit there is much speculation in modern historiography and in his as well (that’s the main criticism of him). His early work was sound especially who killed Aldo Moro? Unless, he was a disinfo agent from the start. Ivy league Princeton man (CIA/narrative control agent recruitment centers).

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Webster Tarpley is a Lyndon Larouche groupie…..Conspiracy disciples

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

Re: Lyndon Larouche groupie Webster Tarpley to “N,” December 2, 2009 My association with organizations in which LaRouche was prominent ended in 1997. Since then I have been attacked in public by him and his remaining supporters several times. Since 1997, I have had no relation whatsoever to LaRouche. Before 1997, I was President of the US Schiller Institute USA, and served on the EIR editorial board, and the US and European Executive Committees of the Labor Committee movement. LaRouche was jailed in 1989 for tax evasion and related infractions, but more basically for political reasons. In order to get… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Webster Tarpley was his disciple. He rambles and somehow people believe his ramblings divulge “wisdom” of some sort Americans, by and large are clueless on history, focus entirely on the wrong thing, and WHILE some may accept the fact that WW2 orthodoxy is false, they flock to anything that provides a different but equally false scenario. Not having grown up there they have no comprehension of their culture and their judgement is therefore based on a great deal of nonsensical writings. It may come as a surprise to you that Europeans are much better informed about American history than Americans… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

I get Global Newsletter and read that article, which is interesting but it avoids entirely what happened in 1870…..That is when 39 Independent German speaking Monarchies/Princedoms/Duchies decided to form a German EMPIRE. Good grief, the very nerve. See 39 small independent countries were no threat to anyone, but a united German EMPIRE???….The French immediately attacked the Kingdom of Prussia (now Poland) lost their shirt and were required (Versailles Treaty) to pay restitution to Prussia. In the meantime the King of Prussia became the Emperor of Germany. Britain was severely threatened by German Industry and wanted it stopped, so did France… Read more »

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

Thanks! I’ve read it before, but it’s an excellent report that can’t be recommended enough.

When did Washington tell Britain they were ready to fund a war against Germany? 1913?

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

WW1 and WW2 have a great deal in common. In BOTH the U.S. entered LATE.
In WW1 the British and French borrowed huge sums of money and where indebted and been under Washington’s control ever since. Woodrow Wilson’s attempt to create the League of Nations which would be under directions of the U.S. would thereby control the world. The chopping up of Germany is what let to WW2 again after the U.S. since 1938 engaged in provocation after provocation, actually committing War Crimes against Germany. Follow the money!
War is lucrative Peace is not.

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

With the capture of the presidency in 1912 with the election of Wilson by the bankster syndicate (complete with a minder living in the White House), the way was open to setting up the Federal Reserve to serve as conduit for loans to Britain and France to support the Great War and setting up a propaganda-police state to shepherd the people along. By profession FDR was a bankster, who was selected by more powerful banksters to continue both their domestic and foreign policies. Hoover, totally corrupt tool, had been used up. Retaining him would promote insurrection. The banksters felt betrayed… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

We had TWO Feds previously that were allowed to expire and whose charters were not renewed. Woodrow Wilson knew nothing about banking. But advisors evidently pointed out that it might become awfully handy when it came to funding war. So he created another one. Supposedly he was not happy with the Versailles Treaty and warned that it would not end well. FDR was not a banker, but a “half baked” lawyer who left law school without a degree but somehow managed to pass the bar (???) Hmmm..He came from a well known well-to-do family and entered into politics He was… Read more »

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

I never said that FDR printed his own money. I said Hitler did.

FDR was from a wealthy bankster family and sat on eight boards.

He took us off the gold standard, freeing up bankster manipulation.

There was a split in bankster ranks with the stronger faction not wanting another crash and deeper depression. Only by that was Glass Steagall able to get through.

Why didn’t the South assassinate Lincoln before it lost?

Other than that you’re telling a lot of truths about Lincoln everybody should know.

Yes, the odious Eli Wiesel made good money out of being a fraud.

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

I know that FDR did not print money…I probably meant Lincoln….sorry
The Roosevelts were not bankers but successful merchants…FDR worked for a Law office which he hated. He then went into politics. I dont know what boards he would have sat on. I believe Nixon took us off the Gold standard. Check it…
Lincoln information is widely available so beats me why the North has one rendition who Lincoln was and the South quite another….myths.
Look up JFK and Dr. Feelgood…

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

Whoops! You’re right about the gold standard. FDR just issued Executive Order 6102 that made it illegal for Americans to own gold

Take a look at this to see how reliably you gauge how it details FDR’s banking antecedents and his early work.

Roosevelts and Delanos

http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-fdr-ch1.html

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Tecumseh…..we ALWAYS need to ask “who is doing the talking here” And http://www.reformation.org is not a credible source. After reading one paragraph containing completely erroneous information I went to their site and I would not consider anything they say sound information on ANY subject. About 85% of what we read on the internet is BS. We need to be able to recognize between fact and fiction. There is enough on the internet on FDR to built a pretty good profile of the man. He was never involved in banking. The Delanos were related to the Roosevelt. FDR was a very… Read more »

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

Completely erroneous information?

What precisely, please?

Wall Street and FDR
By Antony C. Sutton
https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_FDR.pdf

Remember, that work not in line with establishment approved mythology is often forced to go to sites not well regarded by the establishment and others outside the establishment. Look at what the Zionist Jews did to Dorothy Thompson.

Look at 52:00 of this video to see how they destroyed Dorothy Thompson’s
career for telling the truth.
Alison Weir
The Hidden History of how America was Manipulated into creating the state of Israel-Lie

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Tecumseh, the subject was FDR and you used as your source the reformation site which is a nutter site. I am well familiar with Anthony C. Sutton as pertains to the funding of Hitler, but about Roosevelt banker background he is wrong. FDR was a half-assed attorney (never finished law school) and a lousy one as he hated the profession. In 1910 he went into local politics in New York State. There is NO credible history whatsoever that he was affiliated with or worked on Wall Street. The Roosevelts (hailing from the Netherlands) earned their family wealth in dry goods,… Read more »

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

Not my fault that you ducked the point that your establishment histories aren’t going to print what they are hiding from. Do a little investigation and find out that the Zionist establishment did exactly what Alison Weir says they did to Dorothy Thompson. It is relevant to how establishment money shuts down unpleasant truths and ritually defames those who push them. Yes, FDR’s mother was the daughter of Warren Delano who made his money at the opium trade, so there is not a good track record for ethical behavior in the family. Do you really believe that FDR was excluded… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

It is a well known habit by those unable to counter an argumant by changing the subject, in your case to Allison Weir. Not going there. You, however, are ducking my comment on your Reformation site which you use as a source. They are certifiable nutters Why would FDR be excluded from Wall Street? You claimed he was a Wall Street broker dealing in bonds which is patently false. So far you have made statements that are boogis and now ask me whether I believe what FDR might have thought regarding Hitler. My believe system does not include what FDR… Read more »

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

The point that the establishment performs ritual defamation on those revealing unwanted truths keeps getting past you. I apologize for presenting you such a complex evidence.

The Reformation site owners may be certifiable nutters, just like our ruling elite. But that doesn’t mean everything they publish is by certifiable nutters. You have to learn to think for yourself.

Sorry, you’ve proven absolutely nothing. You’ve just parroted back pieces of establishment approved narrative.

The evidence of what FDR did to cause WWII is condemning.

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

The point YOU seem to miss is that I survived WW2 and have lived in the US for 53 years….my husband was an elected official. My father was a journalist who provided his children with a healty dose of common sense to recognize facts from BS. I speak 3 languages fluently and know more about WW2 and the actors behind it and than you will ever know. FDR played a very dity role to get WW2 going, but it has nothing to do with your bogus claims. Your sources are flawed. History about WW2 can be found on IHR.org or… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Here are some historic articles with extensive lists of sources

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p125_Weber.html
http://historyarticles.com/undeclared-war/
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html
http://www.ihr.org/other/july09weber.html

What the world rejected:
http://ihr.org/other/what-the-world-rejected.html

New evidence
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n6p59_Michaels.html

Defamation is a powerful tool in any war. It is the preferred MO used by Washington……witness Allende (chile) Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, Gadaffi, Assad, Putin…etc.

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

Good list. I’ve read all but the new one, the last, and it does indeed add new evidence. Thank you.

(Note that Mark Weber is only occasionally full of shat stuff.)

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

If you had read them you would not be reading Webster Tarpley. Do you have a comprehension issue? Whether you like Mr. Weber or not is irrelevant. He has credible sources has original papers that back up his writings. Searching for literature that confirm YOUR thinking will not teach you anything. I have personal experiences Arthur Seyss-Inquart, an Austrian civilian was in charge of the Netherlands during WW2. We called him “Six and a Quart” This is getting repetitive as I have mentioned this now at least 50 times….This man discovered that unlike Germany which had a national healthcare system… Read more »

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

Sorry to dash your hopes, but Bernie was also for the war against Serbia, he broke off his friendship with Micheal Parenti after accusations that Bernie avoids foreign policy issues (because they are like neocon positions). Bernie would let the hawks rule on matters of foreign policy (just like Trump), for a few homeruns at the homefront. The Hague Tribunal for former Yugoslavia is a victors’ court established by NATO states with 1 purpose – punish Serbs for resisting (10-15 years were lost in eastward expansion), It’s financed mostly by George Soros and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Bernie Sanders avoids foreign policies because HIS interest are the US and its people…I was in Europe during the Yugo war and CNN showed horrific scenes of Kosovo all day long. And that brainwashing was suficient for me to wonder if Washington could stop this having no clue they’d started it. So if Bernie voted for it not having been properly advised I understand that. Research Dutchbat and Sreberniza and the hoax of 8 million dead Muslims. I was there at the time of Government hearings on that hoax. My daughter attended Molosevic’s trial. FYI the Nuremburg trials were a… Read more »

VeeNarian (Yerevan)
Guest
VeeNarian (Yerevan)

Looks like the IS cat is finally out of the bag, right into the arms of the US/EU/NATO/GCC/Israel/SDF gang.
But the Plebs of the gangster countries will NEVER know this shameful fact: while the Plebs are killed, murdered and bombed in their cities, candles lit, songs sung and lessons learnt, their shameful leaders collude and connoodle with the very same head-choppers in Syria.
Only RF and allies can end this nightmare and teach the terrorist gangs a lesson they will never forget.
GO GET THEM, BOYS! FOR THE WHOLE CIVILIZED WORLD!

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Details count here, and we — or at least I — do not know all the details of what is happening on the ground. What can be surmised is that the Russians (diplomatically and militarily) are hounding the Americans minute-by-minute, inch-for-inch. Lavrov — was it early this week or late last week? — told the Americans not to “spare Al Qaeda,” branded as such or as Al Nusra or HTS. In addition to events around Deir Ezzor, Al Qaeda launched a big offensive in Hama province, which temporarily drew off some SAA forces from Deir Ezzor, but the Russia aerospace… Read more »

colum
Guest
colum

Russian and Syrian Deplomacy is admirable and long may it continue, but I will say this. A few US POW’s would be an idea to royally embarass the bastards in Washington. Let us see if they can justify a loss of face either at the hands of the Syrians/Russians or at the hands of John Rambo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii5jR9uC1s0

Funny how art imitates life imitating art.

K Walker
Guest
K Walker

If this can be further substantiated as coming from our government, the people of the USA as well as the rest of the world have been horribly betrayed. Pardon us for hoping that the USA had backed down and Syria was on its way to ending the war. Sounds like a rogue operation is going on and the people of the USA should let the Trump administration know that we want our part in it stopped. Of course there may be other forces at work. The militant Kurds want their own state and territory and the USA seems to be… Read more »

Pertti Lantela
Guest
Pertti Lantela

When will the Average Canadian realize this? So I can be vindicated. I’ve been saying so since they showed up in their machine-gun turret Toyotas out of the Syrian desert without warning. When the pentagon called the Iraqis soldiers cowards for dropping their weapons and running, I guessed from day one they were USA backed. That and the fact that rebel training camps were operating for 5 years in Jordan and Turkey to that point. Can I loose the crazy conspiracy theorist handle Now? Fucking Canadians are about as smart as kneeling American football players

gragor11a
Guest
gragor11a

Well Bud, I was with you there until the last sentence. Way to blow a good comment.

Pertti Lantela
Guest
Pertti Lantela

Not one person has stood up for me. Hundreds of Canadian cowards , fools and psychos going along with the CIA/CSIS insanity…. 64% of Canadians supported Hillary for president only India has a more indoctrinated pink pussy hatted moron population. Here they are these women marching in their billions for the greatest mass murdering psychopath of the 21st century. Prove it, how smart are Canadians? They believe the MSM more than any other first world country, Indoctrinated feminazi morons….

Wayne Blow
Guest
Wayne Blow

From another Canadian to you, ease up, you sound just like another Don Trump, B.S. Like an idiot I actually was cheering for trumpet myself, didn’t read between the lines, he’s deranged, nut, and tin horned DICTATOR who is getting more out of control every day, he may pay the ultimate price soon !!!!

Guy
Member
Guy

Now exposed ,ISIS , IS , US ,CIA ,Mossad , all in collusion for all to see and getting the $hit kicked out of them . Your move now CIA and controllers.

Daisy Adler
Guest
Daisy Adler

US associated with ISIS. What a surprise (not). ISIS is US’ child.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

Israel associated with ISIS. What a surprise (not). Israel is US’ master.

Daisy Adler
Guest
Daisy Adler

Russia must bomb the ISIS area to bits. Too bad if Americans are embedded with terrorists.

hestroy
Guest
hestroy

Russia must bomb SDF! These Kurds are ordinary thieves!

dinesh
Guest
dinesh

Russians must do the same thing as what US and Israel do. That is to bomb their positions near Deir er Zor asap and without delays. Deep State is the worst enemy of this whole world and must be destroyed with delay and put US ,Israel and Saudi at notice..

Albano Pina
Guest
Albano Pina

What the Russian MOD is saying today, they already knew long ago. And I believe that the current scenario has been dully anticipated by the Russian Government. The profound change is the oficial accusation that the SDF is now a terrorist entity, along with the USA. Along the position taken against the dollar in the latest BRICs summit, this stays inches from a declaration of war, or a justification for direct war retaliation, and certainly prepares the ground for it. This is the real game changer, because assuming that aliance on the ground makes it politically irreversible. All that, along… Read more »

Norman
Guest
Norman

They have been giving you the runaround for quite some time now, with proof of their complicity only just out of your reach. Even now they will come up with a plausible, at least to them, reason for their presence there. You have however given them fair warning that you will retaliate should any of you be attacked again. Wipe that smirk off their faces. Permanently!

Melotte 22
Guest
Melotte 22

And all of these allies, ISIS, US, SDF are taking orders from Tel Aviv.

S.M. De Kuyper
Guest
S.M. De Kuyper

USA has become a movie, nothing else.

TravelAbout
Guest
TravelAbout

A VERY bad one at that.

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

People on many forums have severely criticized Russia for not bombing the sh#$ out of the US before this. Russia’s patience has yielded the fruit of UNDENIABLE proof of US & Co backing, financing and FIGHTING WITH ISIS and is visibly demonstrating this to the world. The US regime is completely left without a leg to stand on in ANY international forum. Syria and Russia NOW have complete reason backed by the UNSC resolutions on fighting ISIS, to fight openly with not only ISIS that is there but with ALL of their backers within the territory of Syria.

S.M. De Kuyper
Guest
S.M. De Kuyper

I thought Morgan Freeman was correct. Obama’s Presidential policy of lying publicly to his citizens has merely morphed to President Trump doing it by way of his Generals? This US policy puts it in the way of millions of men trying to save the sovereignty of a Syria. US soldiers have been placed by the US President, against beheader terrorists in order to criminally partition Syria. And this same President is pissed when professional game players diss him? No wonder Melanie went to Canada to praise the gameplayers up there!

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Morgan Freeman is not correct…..Way before Obama became President the neocon cabal with their PNAC planned to destroy Iraq/Libya/Syria/Lebanon and Iran, in 5 years…the Wolfowitz Doctrine. But THEN no one counted on that small Russian by the name of Vladimir Putin who would one day say “NO” Let us have PEACE!! And now the world is listening but not Hollywood, the Zionist den of propaganda and indoctrination. Of ALL the people to have made such a despicable video, Morgan Freeman would be the last to spring to mind. Listening to NOS Journaal will not get anyone smart fast. Did Obama… Read more »

Odidi
Guest
Odidi

No one in the world can refute this evidence of collusion between the US state and terrorists that have been terrorising their very own allies in Europe and Asia. There should been blanket worldwide condemnation and demands for War Crimes prosecution of the US Coalition and its allies in the Hague. The mendacity of euphemisms and cow-towing to crimes against humanity and the civilised world need to be acknowledged. Africa knows too well the consequences of this deceit and is vindicated.

louis robert
Guest
louis robert

“The US and Russia are at war…” — “Undeclared” total war!

Indeed they are and have been for quite a long time at that, all the way to Russia’s very borders… and within.

Time for citizens to think, analyse, write and above all act, accordingly.

Bill Lovell
Guest
Bill Lovell

The U.S. military complex runs the foreign policy. The presidents rarely know anything when they are elected, so the military says you run the day to day domestic stuff like health care, etc and will will tell you what we need to run our operations, since you have no idea what we’ve been doing for the last 50 years. This goes for all U.S. presidents, Obama included. You as president are no more than a front man.

Gary Wells
Guest
Gary Wells

The Syrian Ambassador to the UN should present this evidence showing the complicity of the US, SDF, and IS followed by an announcement from the Syrian government ordering US forces out of Syria within 48 hours, or less. The US must be told in no uncertain terms that failing to follow the order will result in immediate and dire consequences.

Wanda Gumm
Guest
Wanda Gumm

Is it possible Russia is surprised to learn that both ISIS and SDF are fighting alongside US? It’s a script right out of Hollywood. No doubt written during the Astana peace talks. Morgan was right. US is at war with Russia. And who knows Hollywood better than Morgan. ISIS plays the villian, giving US a reason to be in Syria, and SDF the legitimate opposition. While displaced Kurds are there to add a little humanitarian flavor to the stew. Confuse the enemy with appeals US is saving Syria from the barbarians. Then once it has taken or retaken the oil… Read more »

Great Expectations
Guest
Great Expectations

The US is morally bankrupt. Financial bankruptcy not far behind.

Pete Mangum
Guest
Pete Mangum

of course, none of this surprises any of the so called “alt news” (coined by the likes of Hillary Clinton, et al) who have correctly been insisting this has been the case all along. And, naturally, you won’t find any such mention of this in the US and/or ‘western’ mainstream “press.”

Isabella Jones
Guest
Isabella Jones

Well, we all “knew” that US was in cahoots with ISIS – in fact probably formed it – however, now we KNOW. There’s a difference between the deep down certainty based on lines of evidence only, and having the clear cut, unarguable evidence to hand. Any court of law, presented with this evidence in the charge against US as stated would simply have to produce a fiding of “Guilty”. For a long time now, about 10 years, President Vladimir Putin has been calling for “nations to join to fight against terrorists”. Now we see clearly why, and for what. All… Read more »

Gavin Allen
Guest
Gavin Allen

More laughably pathetic propaganda from Adam Garrie, who would have us believe that a left wing democratic feminist movement that advocates for direct democracy, polyethnic multiculturalism and the separation of religion from policits is allied with a right wing dictatorial patriarchal religiously motivated terrorist organisation. Time to lay off the captagon, Adam!

Helen B
Guest
Helen B

I thought you were referring to the democratic, polyethnic, multicultural, secular state of Syria there for a moment … and then I realised you meant the despotic aggressive United States …
Who’s on the captagon?

Latest

Schaeuble, Greece and the lessons learned from a failed GREXIT (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 117.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris examine a recent interview with the Financial Times given by Wolfgang Schäuble, where the former German Finance Minister, who was charged with finding a workable and sustainable solution to the Greek debt crisis, reveals that his plan for Greece to take a 10-year “timeout” from the eurozone (in order to devalue its currency and save its economy) was met with fierce resistance from Brussels hard liners, and Angela Merkel herself.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via FT

“Look where we’re sitting!” says Wolfgang Schäuble, gesturing at the Berlin panorama stretching out beneath us. It is his crisp retort to those who say that Europe is a failure, condemned to a slow demise by its own internal contradictions. “Walk through the Reichstag, the graffiti left by the Red Army soldiers, the images of a destroyed Berlin. Until 1990 the Berlin Wall ran just below where we are now!”

We are in Käfer, a restaurant on the rooftop of the Reichstag. The views are indeed stupendous: Berlin Cathedral and the TV Tower on Alexanderplatz loom through the mist. Both were once in communist East Berlin, cut off from where we are now by the wall. Now they’re landmarks of a single, undivided city. “Without European integration, without this incredible story, we wouldn’t have come close to this point,” he says. “That’s the crazy thing.”

As Angela Merkel’s finance minister from 2009 to 2017, Schäuble was at the heart of efforts to steer the eurozone through a period of unprecedented turbulence. But at home he is most associated with Germany’s postwar political journey, having not only negotiated the 1990 treaty unifying East and West Germany but also campaigned successfully for the capital to move from Bonn.

For a man who has done so much to put Berlin — and the Reichstag — back on the world-historical map, it is hard to imagine a more fitting lunch venue. With its open-plan kitchen and grey formica tables edged in chrome, Käfer has a cool, functional aesthetic that is typical of the city. On the wall hangs a sketch by artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude, who famously wrapped the Reichstag in silver fabric in 1995.

The restaurant has one other big advantage: it is easy to reach from Schäuble’s office. Now 76, he has been confined to a wheelchair since he was shot in an assassination attempt in 1990, and mobility is an issue. Aides say he tends to avoid restaurants if he can, especially at lunchtime.

As we take our places, we talk about Schäuble’s old dream — that German reunification would be a harbinger of European unity, a step on the road to a United States of Europe. That seems hopelessly out of reach in these days of Brexit, the gilets jaunes in France, Lega and the Five Star Movement in Italy.

Some blame Schäuble himself for that. He was, after all, the architect of austerity, a fiscal hawk whose policy prescriptions during the euro crisis caused untold hardship for millions of ordinary people, or so his critics say. He became a hate figure, especially in Greece. Posters in Athens in 2015 depicted him with a Hitler moustache below the words: “Wanted — for mass poverty and devastation”.

Schäuble rejects the criticism that austerity caused the rise of populism. “Higher spending doesn’t lead to greater contentment,” he says. The root cause lies in mass immigration, and the insecurities it has unleashed. “What European country doesn’t have this problem?” he asks. “Even Sweden. The poster child of openness and the willingness to help.”

But what of the accusation that he didn’t care enough about the suffering of the southern Europeans? Austerity divided the EU and spawned a real animus against Schäuble. I ask him how that makes him feel now. “Well I’m sad, because I played a part in all of that,” he says, wistfully. “And I think about how we could have done it differently.”

I glance at the menu — simple German classics with a contemporary twist. I’m drawn to the starters, such as Oldenburg duck pâté and the Müritz smoked trout. But true to his somewhat abstemious reputation, Schäuble has no interest in these and zeroes in on the entrées. He chooses Käfer’s signature veal meatballs, a Berlin classic. I go for the Arctic char and pumpkin.

Schäuble switches seamlessly back to the eurozone crisis. The original mistake was in trying to create a common currency without a “common economic, employment and social policy” for all eurozone member states. The fathers of the euro had decided that if they waited for political union to happen first they’d wait forever, he says.

Yet the prospects for greater political union are now worse than they have been in years. “The construction of the EU has proven to be questionable,” he says. “We should have taken the bigger steps towards integration earlier on, and now, because we can’t convince the member states to take them, they are unachievable.”

Greece was a particularly thorny problem. It should never have been admitted to the euro club in the first place, Schäuble says. But when its debt crisis first blew up, it should have taken a 10-year “timeout” from the eurozone — an idea he first floated with Giorgos Papakonstantinou, his Greek counterpart between 2009 and 2011. “I told him you need to be able to devalue your currency, you’re not competitive,” he says. The reforms required to repair the Greek economy were going to be “hard to achieve in a democracy”. “That’s why you need to leave the euro for a certain period. But everyone said there was no chance of that.”

The idea didn’t go away, though. Schäuble pushed for a temporary “Grexit” in 2015, during another round of the debt crisis. But Merkel and the other EU heads of government nixed the idea. He now reveals he thought about resigning over the issue. “On the morning the decision was made, [Merkel] said to me: ‘You’ll carry on?’ . . . But that was one of the instances where we were very close [to my stepping down].”

It is an extraordinary revelation, one that highlights just how rocky his relationship with Merkel has been over the years. Schäuble has been at her side from the start, an éminence grise who has helped to resolve many of the periodic crises of her 13 years as chancellor. But it was never plain sailing.

“There were a few really bad conflicts where she knew too that we were on the edge and I would have gone,” he says. “I always had to weigh up whether to go along with things, even though I knew it was the wrong thing to do, as was the case with Greece, or whether I should go.” But his sense of duty prevailed. “We didn’t always agree — but I was always loyal.”

That might have been the case when he was a serving minister, but since becoming speaker of parliament in late 2017 he has increasingly distanced himself from Merkel. Last year, when she announced she would not seek re-election as leader of the Christian Democratic Union, the party that has governed Germany for 50 of the past 70 years, Schäuble openly backed a candidate described by the Berlin press as the “anti-Merkel”. Friedrich Merz, a millionaire corporate lawyer who is the chairman of BlackRock Germany, had once led the CDU’s parliamentary group but lost out to Merkel in a power struggle in 2002, quitting politics a few years later. He has long been seen as one of the chancellor’s fiercest conservative critics — and is a good friend of Schäuble’s.

Ultimately, in a nail-biting election last December, Merkel’s favoured candidate, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, narrowly beat Merz. The woman universally known as “AKK” is in pole position to succeed Merkel as chancellor when her fourth and final term ends in 2021.

I ask Schäuble if it’s true that he had once again waged a battle against Merkel and once again lost. “I never went to war against Ms Merkel,” he says. “Everybody says that if I’m for Merz then I’m against Merkel. Why is that so? That’s nonsense.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

The conclusion of Russiagate, Part I – cold, hard reality

The full text of Attorney General William P Barr’s summary is here offered, with emphases on points for further analysis.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

The conclusion of the Russiagate investigation, led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, was a pivotal media watershed moment. Even at the time of this writing there is a great deal of what might be called “journalistic froth” as opinion makers and analysts jostle to make their takes on this known to the world. Passions are running very high in both the Democrat / anti-Trump camps, where the reactions range from despondency to determined rage to not swallow the gigantic red pill that the “no collusion with Russia” determination offers. In the pro-Trump camp, the mood is deserved relief, but many who support the President are also realists, and they know this conflict is not over.

Where the pivot will go and what all this means is something that will unfold, probably relatively quickly, over the next week or two. But we want to offer a starting point here from which to base further analysis. At this time, of course, there are few hard facts other than the fact that Robert Mueller III submitted his report to the US Attorney General, William Barr, who then wrote and released his own report to the public Sunday evening. We reproduce that report here in full, with some emphases added to points that we think will be relevant to forthcoming pieces on this topic.

The end of the Mueller investigation brings concerns, hopes and fears to many people, on topics such as:

  • Will President Trump now begin to normalize relations with President Putin at full speed?
  • In what direction will the Democrats pivot to continue their attacks against the President?
  • What does this finding to to the 2020 race?
  • What does this finding do to the credibility of the United States’ leadership establishment, both at home and abroad?
  • What can we learn about our nation and culture from this investigation?
  • How does a false narrative get maintained so easily for so long, and
  • What do we do, or what CAN we do to prevent this being repeated?

These questions and more will be addressed in forthcoming pieces. But for now, here is the full text of the letter written by Attorney General William Barr concerning the Russia collusion investigation.

Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:
As a supplement to the notification provided on Friday, March 22, 2019, I am writing today to advise you of the principal conclusions reached by Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller and to inform you about the status of my initial review of the report he has prepared.
The Special Counsel’s Report
On Friday, the Special Counsel submitted to me a “confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions” he has reached, as required by 28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c). This report is entitled “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Although my review is ongoing, I believe that it is in the public interest to describe the report and to summarize the principal conclusions reached by the Special Counsel and the results of his investigation.
The report explains that the Special Counsel and his staff thoroughly investigated allegations that members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, and others associated with it, conspired with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, or sought to obstruct the related federal investigations. In the report, the Special Counsel noted that, in completing his investigation, he employed 19 lawyers who were assisted by a team of approximately 40 FBI agents, intelligence forensic accountants, and other professional staff. The Special Counsel issued more than 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly 500 search warrants, obtained more than 230 orders for communication records, issued almost 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers, made 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence, and interviewed approximately 500 witnesses.
The Special Counsel obtained a number of indictments and convictions of individuals and entities in connection with his investigation, all of which have been publicly disclosed. During the course of his investigation, the Special Counsel also referred several matters to other offices for further action. The report does not recommend any further indictments, nor did the Special Counsel obtain any sealed indictments that have yet to be made public. Below, I summarize the principal conclusions set out in the Special Counsel’s report.
Russian Interference in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
The Special Counsel’s report is divided into two parts. The first describes the results of the Special Counsel’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The report outlines the Russian effort to influence the election and documents crimes committed by persons associated with the Russian government in connection with those efforts. The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel’s investigation was whether any Americans including individuals associated with the Trump campaign joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
The Special Counsel’s investigation determined that there were two main Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election. The first involved attempts by a Russian organization, the Internet Research Agency (IRA), to conduct disinformation and social media operations in the United States designed to sow social discord, eventually with the aim of interfering with the election. As noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts, although the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian nationals and entities in connection with these activities.
The second element involved the Russian government’s efforts to conduct computer hacking operations designed to gather and disseminate information to influence the election. The Special Counsel found that Russian government actors successfully hacked into computers and obtained emails from persons affiliated with the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations, and publicly disseminated those materials through various intermediaries, including WikiLeaks. Based on these activities, the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian military officers for conspiring to hack into computers in the United States for purposes of influencing the election. But as noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.
Obstruction of Justice.
The report’s second part addresses a number of actions by the President most of which have been the subject of public reporting that the Special Counsel investigated as potentially raising obstruction-of-justice concerns. After making a “thorough factual investigation” into these matters, the Special Counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department standards governing prosecution and declination decisions but ultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
The Special Counsel’s decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel’s office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special Counsel’s obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel’s final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.
In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that “the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference,” and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloguing the President’s actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department’s principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice offense.
Status of the Department’s Review
The relevant regulations contemplate that the Special Counsel’s report will be a “confidential report” to the Attorney General. See Office of Special Counsel, 64 Fed. Reg. 37,038, 37,040-41 (July 9, 1999). As I have previously stated, however, I am mindful of the public interest in this matter. For that reason, my goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel’s report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.
Based on my discussions with the Special Counsel and my initial review, it is apparent that the report contains material that is or could be subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure which imposes restrictions on the use and disclosure of information relating to “matter[s] occurring before grand jury.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B) Rule 6(e) generally limits disclosure of certain grand jury information in a criminal investigation and prosecution. Id. Disclosure of 6(e) material beyond the strict limits set forth in the rule is a crime in certain circumstances. See, e.g. 18 U.S.C. 401(3). This restriction protects the integrity of grand jury proceedings and ensures that the unique and invaluable investigative powers of a grand jury are used strictly for their intended criminal justice function.
Given these restrictions, the schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the 6(e) material that by law cannot be made public. I have requested the assistance of the Special Counsel in identifying all 6(e) information contained in the report as quickly as possible. Separately, I also must identify any information that could impact other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other offices. As soon as that process is complete, I will be in a position to move forward expeditiously in determining what can be released in light of applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.
* * *
As I observed in my initial notification, the Special Counsel regulations provide that “the Attorney General may determine that public release of” notifications to your respective Committees “would be in the public interest.” 28 C.F.R. § 600.9(c). I have so determined, and I will disclose this letter to the public after delivering it to you.
Sincerely,
William P. Barr
Attorney General

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

The consolidation of power of the global military industrial complex

Do Europeans support the notion that the countries of the EU be the nuclear war playground of the United States?

Richard Galustian

Published

on

Humanity faces two imminent existential threats: environmental catastrophe and nuclear war.

America has elected to completely ignore scientists warnings that we have 12 years to reverse an environmental disaster.

As far as nuclear obliteration, Trump announced that the US is withdrawing from the INF treaty, which eliminated short range missiles deployed in Western Europe, on Russia’s doorstep. It’s the equivalent of Russia placing nuclear missiles in Venezuela.

A provocation, which enables US supplied missiles to be launched, only a few minutes flight time to Moscow.

That, of course sharply increases the nuclear danger. Historically on both sides, attack warnings given by automated systems have often proved faulty in the past; that, if enacted upon, would have meant the end of life as we know it.

Anyone familiar with contemporary military history knows that it’s a virtual miracle that we have so far avoided nuclear war.

Politically within Europe, the attack on democracy is very clear. Unchallenged undemocratic institutions in Brussels exist that is, in the main, part of the problem of the UK BREXIT negotiations.

Why does the public readily accept wars, engineered by our morally bankrupt governments to create ‘regime change’ in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, the Ukraine and soon to be Venezuela followed by Nicaragua and Iran, with such a muted outcry?

That preemptive nuclear attacks are even thought of shows the insanity of Western leadership controlled by vested financial interests led by the Military/Security Industrial Complex and bankers. Those same interests created both ‘industrialised’ World Wars in the 20th Century.

Our governments do not listen to the people. When two million hit the streets of London before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, it made not an iota of difference to Tony Blair’s government.

Today, people’s apathy is notably caused by conditioning’, maybe better described as we’ve been ‘disciplined’ by MSM propaganda and family’s economic necessity to focus on their income, have made us so, due to our governments mismanagement of our economies.

Example, our university students are saddled with impossible to repay debt for a reason; to keep future generations ‘disciplined’.

No one has time or dare show any dissent especially given the Orwellian ‘newspeak’ environment that is created by ‘political correctness’.

Back to the subject of Russia phobia. The Western narrative against Russia is, in the main, the below:

* that Russia tried to murder the Skripals. Let the British government, who seem to be holding the Skripals against their will, prove they are not, by letting them be interviewed by the World’s Press.

* Ukraine – For over four years, the governments of NATO and the MSM have been waging the new cold war against Russia. This began with the ‘Maidan’ protests in Kyiv, Ukraine in early 2014 that culminated in the overthrow, universally acknowledged to have been engineered by the CIA, of Ukraine’s elected president and Parliament in February 2014. Putting in power an ultra neo-Nazi government, that in particular voiced hatred against all things Russian…and Jewish. Which MSM, TV news or newspapers, says so?

* That almost 100% of Crimea’s population are glad and grateful to be part of Russia. US, UK and EU says that is untrue, which is nonsense.

The demonisation of Russia is central to the multinational corporate interests that control our governments; the bankers protecting the steeply declining US Dollar, the institutions of the EU that are really controlled by Washington, who are preparing world public opinion to accept what the United States are now gearing up for, the “defence” of Europe.

At this point let us reflect on history by quoting one of America’s most distinguished soldiers, maybe of its entire history, General Smedley D. Butler, from his book ‘War is a Racket: The Antiwar Classic by America’s Most Decorated Soldier.’

“No one told these American soldiers that they might be shot down by bullets made by their own brothers here. No one told them that the ships on which they were going to cross might be torpedoed by submarines built with US patents.”

It is recommended to read more about General Smedley Butler, as he was the man chosen by US bankers and particularly the Bush family in the 1930s, to be the new fascist leader of the USA by overthrowing, in a coup, the then President Roosevelt during the period of Hitler’s rise to power. A coincidence one wonders. Butler was a true patriot; he bided his time then revealed the plot to both Congress and President Roosevelt. If you doubt this, it is suggested you research the subject.

We can stop the consolidation of power of the global military/security industrial complex, its war party associates, and specifically the US, UK and EU deep state political and financial elite that no doubt exists. We must elect new leaders, it’s that simple.

To quote Noam Chomsky “….power is always illegitimate, unless it proves itself to be legitimate. So the burden of proof is always on those who claim that some authoritarian hierarchic government is legitimate. If they can’t prove it, then it should be dismantled.”

Implicit in this statement is change by either elections or revolutions.

The French people have shown us when enough is enough by their persistent resistance to their government.

Do Europeans support the notion that the countries of the EU be the nuclear war playground of the United States?

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending