RFK and the Gaza situation vindicate Whitney Webb’s skepticism of the Trump administration/Aaron Good: The U.S. is an evil mafia state.

Recently I wrote post in deafening Whitney Webb:

ATW Live on Monday 2/3/25 (Don’t pick sides, and if you don’t speak up, you are part of the problem!!!)

I have warned people about picking sides and looking for heroes. I shared a video based on Orwell’s work that warned about these same issues — something Whitney Webb is also highlighting. This was before the Trump-Gaza incident, which ultimately vindicated what I was writing.

People who believe Trump is some kind of genius who will only do good now have to engage in mental gymnastics, practically wrestling against logic, to justify his actions. All that talk about "America First" has now turned into "Israel First." The rhetoric of "no more war or international intervention" has shifted to "no more war or intervention — except when it benefits Israel."

Additionally, many people discussing the supposed end of USAID funding seem to forget that USAID was only suspended with certain exceptions:

"US suspends new funds for aid programs, except for Israel and Egypt. The Trump administration freezes new funding for the anti-HIV program and other health services but exempts key food programs." – Al Jazeera

Whitney Webb constantly warns that we should stop looking for heroes and believing that politicians will save us. For saying this, she was attacked, as I showed in my recent post. I try to warn people about the same thing — especially when it comes to believing that Trump, and most importantly, Elon Musk, will "do good."

Orwell warned about group bias long ago, using nationalism as an example. In the new video by Whitney Webb that I posted in this article, she highlights how "Make America Healthy Again" is, in reality, making America even more unhealthy. I wrote about this before - people forget that COVID and the vaccine rollout started during Trump’s presidency. Those who understand the corruption behind COVID and the vaccines blindly support Trump, forgetting that he was partially responsible. This is exactly the kind of group bias Orwell warned about.

Anyway, here is part of the transcript for those who still believe in Trump and his "Make America Healthy Again" agenda:

“I have to say first, before we get into it, I always see you going back and forth with people on X because I think people have a certain set of narratives about things. You like to say, "Look, I'm not a simp for any administration; I just bring you the facts. If that makes you uncomfortable, then I'm sorry about that." Do you want to address that?

Sure. Well, my focus tends to be on policy and policy agendas. Especially coming out of an electoral season, people tend to get very invested in individuals. Sometimes, they don’t necessarily stick to the policy agendas that were promoted on the campaign trail. Instead, they myopically focus on narratives around certain people at the expense of paying attention to the policies they ostensibly oppose.

For example, as it relates to mRNA technology, a lot of people who were previously vocal in opposing it have glossed over recent statements from figures like Larry Ellison, the CEO of Oracle, at the White House discussing personalized mRNA cancer vaccines. Many who railed against mRNA technology a year or two ago have been unusually silent about this. Of course, not everyone—but some—have seemingly chosen to avoid criticizing the incoming administration. However, there are some troubling signs regarding mRNA technology specifically.

If opposition to mRNA was a major reason for people supporting the "Make America Healthy Again" movement, which has been credited with much of Trump's recent electoral success, then it's important to recognize that policy agendas matter to voters. Focusing solely on individuals—believing that as long as a certain person is in office, everything will be fine—is misguided. In politics, a lot of deal-making, backpedaling, and compromises happen, sometimes at the expense of the very policy agendas voters cared about.

That’s why I focus on policies rather than politicians. We've seen this before—Obama was elevated as a figure of "hope and change," and to an extent, the same thing has happened with Trump. This idea of savior politics—where getting the "right" person in office means we can all sit back and "trust the plan"—is something I reject. It’s up to everyone to pay attention to policy agendas, and if harmful policies are being pushed, people need to speak out, no matter who is behind them. Making excuses for bad policies just because they come from a favored political figure is a mistake.

Personally, that stance has ruffled some feathers. Not cheerleading for certain figures has led to me being called a lot of names recently. But ultimately, I’m concerned about specific policy agendas, and my stance hasn’t changed. For years, I’ve focused on issues like the expansion of mass surveillance, the erosion of civil liberties, the imposition of technocracy, and the promotion of biotechnology marketed as "safe and effective" when, as we saw during COVID, it was neither.

As we’ll discuss today regarding Jim O’Neal, his big push is to eliminate efficacy testing for drugs and vaccines. That would be a huge gift to biotechnology companies producing mRNA-based products. Since this technology first emerged around 2010, it’s been known that you can either make these treatments safe but ineffective, or effective but incredibly toxic. By eliminating efficacy tests, these products could flood the market with little oversight. Given O’Neal’s background, it's unlikely there will be any restrictions preventing deceptive marketing of these treatments.

Moreover, there are ways to get mRNA into people’s bodies without direct mandates. This could involve collaboration with private insurance companies, integrating mRNA into the food supply (as is already happening with livestock), and other indirect means.

So, for those in the "MAGA" movement who are concerned about mRNA technology, it’s important to look at actual policy actions rather than just rhetoric. If avoiding mRNA exposure is a priority, then paying attention to policy decisions is crucial.”

“Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from the oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.”

― George Orwell, 1984

If you study history and the human mind, you will soon discover that we have been warned about all of this by many wise people throughout history. To quote Orwell again:

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

What we think about history and the world around us is controlled. Our younger generation does not learn from those great minds but instead is taught propaganda that perpetuates systems. This is exactly what Antonio Gramsci understood:

“Man is above all else mind, consciousness—that is, he is a product of history, not of nature.”

That’s why Orwell also said:

“The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.”

And Józef Piłsudski said:

“He who does not respect and value his past is not worthy of the respect of the present nor the right to a future.”

I would like to link another video, this time by Aaron Good, showing us that we don’t truly know our history:

27:37

“When are the Democrats, or anyone else in this country, going to stand up for human rights and take a stand against genocide? Have we learned nothing from history? Apparently, we haven’t.

I think it's in the Democrats' DNA, unfortunately. It goes back to the Teamsters, the Syndicate, and the corruption of the Democratic Party. People don’t understand what was happening in the postwar era and even in the pre-war years that led to labor becoming intertwined with organized crime. Organized crime, particularly through figures like Meyer Lansky, became deeply connected with Zionism and the Teamsters.

The Teamsters-Lansky connection, with Italian syndicates selling drugs and Lansky laundering the money, is a big part of this history. The U.S. operates more like a mafia state than we’d like to admit. A lot of the money from that era—drug money and casino profits, which were also fueled by drug-related money laundering—ended up in legitimate enterprises, including military contracts.

For example, look at the TFX fighter jet deal and General Dynamics, which was owned by Henry Crown, essentially linked to the Chicago Outfit—a Syndicate operation. The U.S. has always been tied to the mob. In 1945, Harry Truman secretly awarded Meyer Lansky the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

I recently read about a gangster named Paul Roland Jones, and this comes from Peter Dale Scott’s dense but incredible book Deep Politics and the Death of JFK. There was a sheriff in Dallas in 1946, right before Jack Ruby moved in, who was offered a bribe by a Syndicate figure. The gangster claimed that if the sheriff accepted the bribe and allowed the Syndicate to set up in Dallas, he could get Harry Truman to endorse his reelection.

This kind of corruption has been ingrained in the Democratic Party for a long time. When the Kennedys went after the Teamsters, some of it was likely motivated by an attempt to clean up that part of the Democratic Party. But they failed. Afterward, they erased the Teamsters from the narrative, along with Bobby Kennedy’s Enemy Within thesis about the Syndicate in the United States. Instead, they reduced everything to just "the Italian mafia" and ignored the broader corruption.

We’ve never really confronted this reality. I don’t think people understand how fundamentally corrupt American capitalism is. And once you expand that corruption globally in pursuit of empire, you end up with an oligarchy that holds more wealth and power than any group of people in human history.

But the world has changed. I feel like these oligarchs are dinosaurs now. When Marco Rubio says that America may no longer be a unipolar power but can still be part of a multipolar world of great powers, he’s really just reinforcing the idea that the U.S. will continue to operate like a mafia force in the Western Hemisphere. That’s one way to understand what’s happening.”

I have written and argued many times the same thing Aaron Good just said here: The U.S. Western capitalist empire is, in reality, the Empire of Evil. I do not believe in the God of the Bible because, in truth, the Bible is just a propaganda tool created by Rome. Its purpose was to use Jesus' concept of the afterlife to create so-called "slave morality," which I’ve explained before. Simply put, slave morality serves as a tool to pacify the population.

Creating the institution of the church went against Jesus' teachings, but his teachings were manipulated and distorted to create this "slave morality." The people in the church perpetuated this morality by telling the population, “Don’t rebel or fight your master, because your master will enjoy his wealth and power only briefly on earth. But if you serve him and allow him to exploit you, you will be rewarded with eternal life in heaven, while your master will be eternally punished in hell.” This is the core idea behind slave morality.

I am Polish, and in Poland, people are told that Pope John Paul II was a great man. I used to think so too, before I learned the truth about the world. Once I understood the truth about the creation of the church and the true teachings of Jesus, and later learned about how the Vatican and popes helped the Nazis and the CIA, my perspective changed.

Many people in Poland know Pope John Paul II worked with the CIA, and they think it was a good thing because he did it to fight against communism, which they view as bad. However, saying that communism is bad is a huge simplification. I have written some defenses of communism and for that I was criticized, as people are so brainwashed about it. However, it would take too long to discuss here, so I won’t go into it.

I write all of this because, while in Poland we are told Pope John Paul II was great, I no longer agree with that sentiment based on what I now know. While communism was bad, Pope John Paul II's alliance with the CIA - an organization that is close to the very definition of pure evil — cannot be justified. To fight evil communism, Pope John Paul II aligned with the CIA, which is associated with the mafia, murderers, pedophiles, drug dealers, and slave traders.

Once you understand what the CIA is and how the son of one of the Dallas brothers became a bishop, it becomes easier to understand the prevalence of pedophilia in the church. The Vatican Bank is a CIA bank that helps them launder money from crimes, while the institution of the church itself functioned much like Epstein's island before Epstein even bought his island.

So, our Western capitalist empire is built by people so evil that they are as close to Satan as one can get on earth, and our church works as part of this evil empire.

Meanwhile, almost no one knows about any of this.

“Knowledge will make you be free.”

― Socrates

+

“Knowledge isn't free. You have to pay attention.”

― Richard P. Feynman

=

“Freedom is not free, you need to pay attention.”

― Grzegorz Ochman

Most people didn’t pay enough attention, and because of that, they are not free. Part of this is what Huxley explained:

"The only difference between you and the children in the brave new world who are conditioned to hate flowers, beautiful things, and books in that way is that your conditioning is happening while you're wide awake—or are you? Is the current lifestyle of the consumer, in fact, a kind of waking dream?

What Huxley understands only too well is the conditions under what we might call late capitalism—in other words, the kind of neoliberal capitalist societies we live in now. What Huxley understood only too well was that in an economy defined by consumption, where advertising is the form of behavioral conditioning, everybody will be perfectly pacified as long as their needs and wants are conflated in their own minds.

That is very much the world we're living in. You don't need to be a Marxist to understand that you're a commodity fetishist. You don't need to feel that you've been conditioned to be conditioned.

I think that's the real genius of the dystopian future that Huxley summons up in Brave New World—there's no strife, there's no angst."

- Will Self

“What Huxley understood all too well was that in an economy defined by consumption, where advertising is the form of behavioral conditioning, everybody will be perfectly pacified as long as their needs and wants are conflated in their own minds.”

This means that if you mistake what you need for what you want, you will be infinitely distracted, since your wants can never truly be satisfied. This causes people to want to make a career, become famous, get rich, or gain power. But no matter how big a career you get, how famous you become, or how rich and powerful you get, it will never be enough. In this way, people spend their lives running on an infinite treadmill.

I am no one. I have no career, no fame, no wealth, or power, and because I didn’t chase any of that, I had time to understand the truth about the world. It’s not that I am somehow smarter than everyone else; it’s just that I had different priorities, which allowed me the time to figure it all out.

I could write infinitely about this, but this post is already long, so I will stop here. I have so much to say; I wish I could write a book about some of what I think and know. But unfortunately, while I am a very logical thinker, which allows me to find the truth, I have problems with reading, writing, and explaining things coherently. For example, I am able to somewhat coherently write these posts thanks to AI, which turns my word salad into something digestible.

Anyway, in the end, I would like to thank The Duran community for helping me on my journey to understanding things. It’s not that I am some kind of alpha and omega who knows everything. Part of why I know so much is because of this community. For example, when I started posting on The Duran, I knew about Christian Parenti, but I didn’t know about Michael Parenti, who is now one of my biggest idols. I was introduced to Michael Parenti by someone in this community through a comment on one of my posts. Another great example of knowledge I gained through this community is that I was introduced to the YouTube channel “Tales of the American Empire,” which is also a great source of information.

So, you are part of the reason why I know so much, and I cannot thank you enough for helping me on my journey to finding the truth. I will leave you with these three quotes:

“The challenge of modernity is to live without illusions and without becoming disillusioned. I’m a pessimist because of intelligence, but an optimist because of will.”― Antonio Gramsci

“There is no better breeding ground for the bacteria of falsehood and legend than the fear of truth and the lack of will.” ― Józef Piłsudski

“I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”
― Frank Herbert