Piers Morgan Gets SCHOOLED Like A Child On Ukraine By Jeffrey Sachs!

Many have seen the latest interview Piers Morgan did with Jeffrey Sachs, and it is worth repeating Sachs’ eloquent answer to the globalist who is convinced that the US and the neoliberal world order has a right to dictate how other countries should organize. Jimmy Dore has an excellent take on this, and Sachs explains how the US and NATO wars of aggression started with the illegal bombing of Yugoslavia i 1999.

Transcript below the video

Jimmy Dore: Piers Morgan has a childlike understanding and he’s going to run into a guy who actually has a grown-ups understanding, an adult understanding of international news, and he’s going to educate him

And tip of the hat to Piers Morgan. He shuts up long enough to let Jeffrey Sachs explain to him exactly what’s going on with Ukraine.

Piers Morgan: Here we go, you seem very reliant on accepting Putin’s world view rather than perhaps the stark reality of the barbarism with which he’s executed this war.

Jeffrey Sachs: Yeah, maybe because I know too much about the United States. Because the first war in Europe after World War II was the US bombing of Belgrade for 78 days to change borders of a European State.

The idea was to break Serbia to create Kosovo as an enclave and then to install Bondsteel, which is the largest NATO base in the southwest Balkans. So the US started this under Clinton, that we will break the borders. We will illegally bomb another country. We didn’t have any UN authority. This was a, quote, NATO mission to do that.

Then I know the United States went to war repeatedly, illegally in what it did in Afghanistan, and then what it did in Iraq, and then what it did in Syria, which was the Obama Administration, especially Obama and Hillary Clinton tasking the CIA to overthrow Bashar al-Assad.

And then what it did with NATO illegally bombing Libya to topple Muamar Gaddafi, and then what it did in Kiev in February 2014.

I happened to see some of that with my own eyes. The US overthrew [Viktor] Yanukovich together with right-wing Ukrainian military forces. We overthrew a president, and what’s interesting by the way as we overthrew Yanukovich the day after the European Union representatives had reached an agreement with Yanukovich to have early elections, a government of national unity and a stand  down of both sides. That was agreed. The next thing that happens is the opposition says quoute unqoute, we don’t agree.

They stormed the government buildings, and they deposed Yanukovich, and within hours the United States says, yes, we support the new government. It didn’t say we had an agreement that’s unconstitutional what you did. So we overthrew a government contrary to a promise that the European Union had made.

And by the way, Russia, the United States and the EU were parties to that agreement, and the United States an hour afterwards backed the coup.

Okay, so everyone’s got a little bit to answer for. In 2015, the Russians did not say we want the Donbass back. They said, peace should come through negotiations.

And negotiations between the ethnic Russians in the east of Ukraine, and this new regime in Kiev led to the Minsk 2 agreement. The Minsk 2 agreement was voted by the UN Security Council unanimously. It was signed by the government of Ukraine it was guaranteed explicitly by Germany and France. And you know what and it’s been explained to me in person. It  was laughed at inside the US government.

This is after the UN Security Council unanimously accepted it. The Ukrainians said, we don’t want to give autonomy to the region, but that’s part of the treaty. The US told them, don’t worry about it.

Angela Merkel explained in Die Zeit in a notorious interview after the 2022 escalation. She said, oh, you know, we knew that Minsk 2 was just a holding pattern to give Ukraine time to build its strength.

No, Minsk 2 was a UN Security Council unanimously adopted treaty that was supposed to end the war.

So when it comes to who’s trustworthy, who to believe and so forth, I guess my problem, Piers, is I know the United States government. I know it very well. I don’t trust them for a moment.

I want these two sides actually to sit down in front of the whole world and say these are the terms. Then the world can judge because we could get on paper clearly for both sides of the world:

We’re not going to overthrow governments anymore. The United States needs to say, we accept this agreement. The United States needs to say Russia, we’re not stepping one foot further than whatever the boundary is actually reached, and NATO is not going to enlarge, and let’s put it for the whole world to see you know. Once in a while, treaties actually hold.

The Duran is a collaborative effort. Steve from the comment section:

That was excellent, thank you.
For a longer version of the interview, search YouTube for “Red Faced Piers Morgan ABUSED as Prof Jeffrey Sachs Obliterates him on Russia NATO War Putin Ukraine”.
In the part that followed Jimmy Dore’s clip, Piers proved that he is indeed impermeable to reason, as Jimmy was afraid he would be.

I didn’t find the red faced version, but here is the original:

________________

Kristian Kahrs describes himself as a former NATO aggressor and warmonger in Kosovo, turned into a warrior for peace, democracy, and freedom of speech. Kristian is a Norwegian living in Belgrade, Serbia, and there is more about him on his website ohrabrenje.com, the Serbian word for encouragement, where you can sign up for his newsletter. Also, follow Kristian on Gab, Telegram, VK, and his Duran Locals profile.

The Duran on Gab, Telegram, VK, and of course the vibrant community on theduran.locals.com.