The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Pavlovka, Kherson and Sullivan’s quick win, negotiation strategy
The Duran: Episode 1429
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.


How will NATO/American troops operate in Ukraine if Russia takes out all of the infrastructure/weapon depots/interferes with the satellites/destroys the supply lines? Russia has an endless supply of diesel/well organised supply lines/fresh military units assembling outside Ukraine. And these NATO troops (and the American paratroopers) have no heavy artillery support unless it is shipped in from EU countries and those countries will not do that.
Horses? Mules? Flying camels (First bred by Saddam Hussein). The possibilities are endless.
If Russia is keeping 80% of its military power in reserve, why not double the troops and go for a quick end to the war? How about an explanation of the logic in this slow-motion war?
Mud. Russians are waiting for the first hard frost, so that their heavy artillery (tanks, missile launchers, supply lorries etc.) can move really fast without getting bogged down. And also attrition. Wear the Ukrainian manpower, weaponry, supplies, infrastructure down until there will be no effective response to fast moving opposition. Just my view.
Thank you. That’s what I really meant to say.
Trust the wisdom of Putin who knows exactly at which point victory can be gained with the least amount of collateral damage.