Connect with us

Latest

News

North Korea slams “POLITICAL PROSTITUTE” Nikki Haley in new statement

North Korea accused Nikki Haley of being “stupid, foolish” and a “beginner diplomat”.

Published

on

7,188 Views

North Korea has released a statement slamming Nikki Haley for claiming North Korea is “begging for war”, a statement she made during the most recent UN Security Council debate on the Korea crisis.

Additionally, the statement criticises her personal inexperience and lack of comprehension of basis facts of international relations as well as offering a more broad criticism of US foreign policy.

Earlier, Haley revealed that Donald Trump offered her the position of Secretary of State although she turned it down before accepting Trump’s counter-offer to be US Ambassador to the United States.

READ MORE: Nikki Haley was offered Secretary of States job and turned it down

The North Korean statement appears to coincide with Haley’s shock revelation.

The entire statement from the DPRK is reproduced below:

“U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, a political prostitute, has kicked off a hysteric fit, exasperated by the DPRK’s nuclear weaponization that has reached its final phase.
At an urgent UN Security Council meeting on Sept. 4 she hurt the dignity of the supreme leadership of the DPRK, stunning the world public.

Her rubbish about “misuse of missile and nuclear weapon” and “begging for a war” is just a revelation of the ill-intended purpose to adopt a new toughest “sanctions resolution” with ease by describing the DPRK as a “provoker of war.”

As far as Nikki Haley is concerned, she is just a beginner in politics and diplomacy as she came under public criticism for her string of rubbish over the ballistic rocket launch of the DPRK in March last.

Not content with it, she fully revealed her bad blood toward the DPRK by slandering it over its non-existent “human rights issue” and crying out for taking a military option against it. She is crazily swishing her skirt, playing the flagship role in Trump administration’s hideous sanctions and pressure racket against the DPRK.

She became a laughing stock of the world public for her reckless tongue-lashing devoid of any elementary conception of reason. It seems that she is still ignorant of what disaster would be entailed by her stupidity.

So wretched is the plight of the U.S. which put forward such depraved woman and beginner diplomat as its representative in the UN arena.
She talked as if the DPRK were inviting a war while the U.S. wanted peace, asserting that there is a limit to the patience of the U.S. But with no rhetoric can the U.S. cover up its true colors as chieftain of aggression and war and wrecker of peace.

In actuality, the heavyweights of the U.S. are busy with arms selling.
South Korean media, commenting on a recent phone dialogue between Trump and the south Korean chief executive, disclosed that the U.S. president personally opted for pressurizing south Korea to buy U.S.-made weapons with the lifted limitation of the south Korean puppet army’s missile warhead weight as a momentum. This is not surprising.

It is just the U.S. which appeared with aggression and has grown corpulent through wars. It has ceaselessly ignited wars to seek regime change in the countries incurring its disfavor.
The U.S. escalating nuclear threats and blackmails pushed the DPRK to have access to nukes, and the world acknowledges that the DPRK’s access to nukes is a reasonable option to protect its vital rights and sovereignty.

Nothing will be more foolish than to think that the DPRK, a strong nuclear power, will remain passive toward that outrageous pressure aimed at crippling its “social system.”
Nikki should be careful with her tongue though she might be a blind fool.
The U.S. administration will have to pay a dear price for her tongue-lashing”.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Freethinking Влади́мир
Guest
Freethinking Влади́мир

NK is saying what the rest of us thinks about her.

Neil
Guest
Neil

You and I hate her viscerally, Vladimir, but just imagine how Assad and Un hate her!

Kaput
Member
Kaput

please, feeling sorry for her is nicer……………. she is definitly mentally unstable

Neil
Guest
Neil

You are right, Chevi, and I really shouldn’t comment when I’ve been drinking. Sorry everybody!
But they really hate her in NK! and that is understandable. I’ve never read any statement so angry at any individual diplomat.

Shahna
Guest

But they say it so colourfully – I especially like the swishing skirt.

SarahGJohnson
Guest
SarahGJohnson

my co-worker’s ex-wife makes $78 hourly on the laptop . She has been without work for seven months but last month her paycheck was $13355 just working on the laptop for a few hours. blog link

http://www.jobsclubproductperformance

✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹✹::::sn120

Brian De Paolo
Guest
Brian De Paolo

Every time I hear this lady talk, it seems that she just cannot find a handle on being diplomatic…its all accusations, false perceptions and bullying if she can….this is not a diplomat but an instructor….I though Hillary was bad….shes got a twin

Shahna
Guest

“beginner diplomat” …. :-)))

Tarciso Ribeiro
Guest
Tarciso Ribeiro

that’s right.

Lisa Karpova
Guest

Lady? That’s no lady. I’ve read that she’s a disgusting pig.

Wayne Blow
Guest
Wayne Blow

And I believe it!!!!!

Kaput
Member
Kaput

pig is too soft, she is a orca on celibacy vows

cap960
Guest
cap960

This lady…I see no “lady” in her.

Kaput
Member
Kaput

she looks as if she has run away from a mental institution lol

TimBob
Guest
TimBob

You got to hand it to her though, she’s a great story teller… Just a shame all her stories are fiction.

aorpheous
Guest
aorpheous

Anyone who has followed US foreign policy for sometime and particularly the US position as expressed by its ambassadors at the UN, knows they are Shameless blackmail, arrogance, and contempt for International law. Nimrata Randhawa’s predecessors, Samantha Powers, Susan Rice, John Bolton, and Madeleine Albright, were all the same shit the only difference being she is the only one who camevout of a waffle house. The syndicate of organized crime called US government, this collection of war criminals, thugs, mobsters racketeer and global tertorists ate the sole responsible for the Korean Peninsula crisis, NOT DPRK. NORTH KOREA, is absolutely both… Read more »

louis robert
Guest
louis robert

That most despicable creature Secretary of State?

George Carlin was absolutely right after all: that’s the best the Empire can do, “garbage in, garbage out”.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jpWrsEpWgrc

Shahna
Guest

That is excellent – thank you.

louis robert
Guest
louis robert

You’re too kind, Shahna. You want to drop a line to the immortal Carlin! I’m sure he’ll appreciate… 😇 🙏🏻

Wayne Blow
Guest
Wayne Blow

Carlin was so right on!!!!

ruca
Guest
ruca

Gotta love Carlin.

nshah
Guest
nshah

That’s just great.. tx.. hehehe

JPH
Guest
JPH

Insulting to honest prostitutes.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

lol!

Kaput
Member
Kaput

please remove …honest…….

Shahna
Guest

“Haley revealed that Donald Trump offered her the position of Secretary of State” ….. WTF?

I hadn’t actually realised that the US could be worse off than it currently is without employing an actual monkey for the job —- boy was I wrong.

Lisa Karpova
Guest

A monkey would do a much better job.

ruca
Guest
ruca

Yes because the shit flinging would at least be contained to one room, rather than across the planet.

Kaput
Member
Kaput

you just made me laugh…………………… nice

dago dingo
Guest
dago dingo

America has an Orangutan running it’s country, what would you expect. Actually, sorry, an insult to apes in general.

Lisa Karpova
Guest

Better an Orangutan than a certified demonic wicked witch who thought about making voodoo dolls of her opponents and sticking pins in them.

DenLilleAbe
Guest
DenLilleAbe

That is about the first time the North Koreans have made a statement that is perfectly true.

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

Try this;

PROPAGANDA | FULL ENGLISH VERSION (2012)

DenLilleAbe
Guest
DenLilleAbe

I will give it a go! 🙂
Yes , but not from NK. 🙂
But still true!

Shahna
Guest

“She became a laughing stock of the world public for her reckless tongue-lashing devoid of any elementary conception of reason.”

Well. All I can say there is – he’s 100% spot-on.
The entire planet sniggered at that : “North Korea wants war – America never wants war – but our country’s patience is limited” pure bullshìte gumf.

Getagrippse
Guest
Getagrippse

A total neo-con – her words are worthless

Shue
Guest
Shue

This warmongering scum’s real name was Nimrata Randhawa

dago dingo
Guest
dago dingo

How can America expect any human being living on planet earth with half a brain to take it seriously when it puts idiots such as this waffle house waitress in charge of it’s U.N mission??? Sorry, but your country ceased to have any credibility right after it dropped bombs on Nagasaki & Hiroshima. Just go away & die somewhere.

Kaput
Member
Kaput

better still, let her stay……….. she is doing just fine………….. damaging yankee ” we are the best ” lol

SFC Steven M Barry USA RET
Guest
SFC Steven M Barry USA RET

DPRK forgot to add, Waffle House Waitress.

santiago
Guest
santiago

ughh Nikki Haley the Sihk-Jew is a filthy creature. In a short time she has managed to be more contemptible than Samantha Power.

michael houston
Guest
michael houston

she must be one of those “crypto-zionist rednecks”having just fallen off the bus from israel….still dazed and wondering why all these people are staring at her…..what a classic gem….a paradigm of diplomatic sea sickness…..

Dot
Guest
Dot

She’s not a ‘beginner diplomat’. Anyone who has raised more than 2 children at once, in the same home learns diplomatic skills beyond the abilities of this creature. Parents start out as beginner diplomats and often become masters in no time if they actually give a squat. This mongrel doesn’t care about anything except herself.

aussie43
Guest
aussie43

The last sentence wasn’t necessary, otherwise OK.

José Antonio
Guest
José Antonio

Haley is a dangerous bitch. I wonder why Trump insisted so much in having her in his team. It seems that Trump’s moves suggest his stand is far from what he promised to do.

Kaput
Member
Kaput

lol this trash kido must stay put, I enjoy having a good laugh at the yankdome, the creep is just dong fine, keep it on at the theater, very good actress indeed. Shakespeare must contact her soon.

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

AIPAC loves her

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

Hugs a million to DPRK: calling a spade a spade.

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Thirty-one comments so far. I have been reading and re-reading the N. Korean statement. It is a gem worth savoring like a fine wine, slowly, calmly. It takes aim at Nikki Haley. Yes, she is foolish, yes, she is a fool. All the better. She reveals — against her will and intent, of course, but that is always the case with American hegemonic buffoonery — that the US has blown its powder. The UN Security Council is the *world* forum. And what does Nikki tell *the world*? They are begging for war… we don’t want war. So let us relish… Read more »

bluewater
Guest
bluewater

comment image

Abi Shah
Guest
Abi Shah

Nikki is like Haley’s comet first you see it then its gone in a flash..lmao

FlorianGeyer
Guest
FlorianGeyer

It is not unkind to say that the majority of US government senior officials , Top Military officers and Politicians should really be in jail or a lunatic asylum.

John R Balch Jr
Guest
John R Balch Jr

UN Ambassador Bubble Headed Neo-con Heartthrob Waffle House Waitress Nikki Haley is out for only her own self and what ever makes her think she looks good. She has absolutely no foreign policy experience or even knowledge of any foreign countries policies history culture or its people and just what they are or are not capable of doing.

Murray Smith
Guest
Murray Smith

I would have been much less generous than that.

Denis Patrick Gill
Guest
Denis Patrick Gill

This Indian woman is so desperate for the approval of her Jewish masters that she will do anything.

poetman
Guest
poetman

Nikki Haley needs to be fired NOW. She’s an embarrassment and a disgusting warmonger

Latest

New York Times hit piece on Trump and NATO exposes alliance as outdated and obsolete (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 61.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

RT CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle and The Duran’s Alex Christoforou take a quick look at the New York Times hit piece citing anonymous sources, with information that the U.S. President dared to question NATO’s viability.

Propaganda rag, the NYT, launched its latest presidential smear aimed at discrediting Trump and provoking the establishment, warmonger left into more impeachment – Twenty-fifth Amendment talking points.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via The American Conservative


The New York Times scored a serious scoop when it revealed on Monday that President Trump had questioned in governmental conversations—on more than one occasion, apparently—America’s membership in NATO. Unfortunately the paper then slipped into its typical mode of nostrum journalism. My Webster’s New World Dictionary defines “nostrum” as “quack medicine” entailing “exaggerated claims.” Here we had quack journalism executed in behalf of quack diplomacy.

The central exaggerated claim is contained in the first sentence, in which it is averred that NATO had “deterred Soviet and Russian aggression for 70 years.” This is wrong, as can be seen through just a spare amount of history.

True, NATO saved Europe from the menace of Russian Bolshevism. But it did so not over 70 years but over 40 years—from 1949 to 1989. That’s when the Soviet Union had 1.3 million Soviet and client-state troops poised on Western Europe’s doorstep, positioned for an invasion of Europe through the lowlands of Germany’s Fulda Gap.

How was this possible? It was possible because Joseph Stalin had pushed his armies farther and farther into the West as the German Wehrmacht collapsed at the end of World War II. In doing so, and in the process capturing nearly all of Eastern Europe, he ensured that the Soviets had no Western enemies within a thousand miles of Leningrad or within 1,200 miles of Moscow. This vast territory represented not only security for the Russian motherland (which enjoys no natural geographical barriers to deter invasion from the West) but also a potent staging area for an invasion of Western Europe.

The first deterrent against such an invasion, which Stalin would have promulgated had he thought he could get away with it, was America’s nuclear monopoly. By the time that was lost, NATO had emerged as a powerful and very necessary deterrent. The Soviets, concluding that the cost of an invasion was too high, defaulted to a strategy of undermining Western interests anywhere around the world where that was possible. The result was global tensions stirred up at various global trouble spots, most notably Korea and Vietnam.

But Europe was saved, and NATO was the key. It deserves our respect and even reverence for its profound success as a military alliance during a time of serious threat to the West.

But then the threat went away. Gone were the 1.3 million Soviet and client-state troops. Gone was Soviet domination of Eastern Europe. Indeed, gone, by 1991, was the Soviet Union itself, an artificial regime of brutal ideology superimposed upon the cultural entity of Mother Russia. It was a time for celebration.

But it was also a time to contemplate the precise nature of the change that had washed over the world and to ponder what that might mean for old institutions—including NATO, a defensive military alliance created to deter aggression from a menacing enemy to the east. Here’s where Western thinking went awry. Rather than accepting as a great benefit the favorable developments enhancing Western security—the Soviet military retreat, the territorial reversal, the Soviet demise—the West turned NATO into a territorial aggressor of its own, absorbing nations that had been part of the Soviet sphere of control and pushing right up to the Russian border. Now Leningrad (renamed St. Petersburg after the obliteration of the menace of Soviet communism) resides within a hundred miles of NATO military forces, while Moscow is merely 200 miles from Western troops.

Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has absorbed 13 nations, some on the Russian border, others bordering lands that had been part of Russia’s sphere of interest for centuries. This constitutes a policy of encirclement, which no nation can accept without protest or pushback. And if NATO were to absorb those lands of traditional Russian influence—particularly Ukraine and Georgia—that would constitute a major threat to Russian security, as Russian President Vladimir Putin has sought to emphasize to Western leaders for years.

So, no, NATO has not deterred Russian aggression for 70 years. It did so for 40 and has maintained a destabilizing posture toward Russia ever since. The problem here is the West’s inability to perceive how changed geopolitical circumstances might require a changed geopolitical strategy. The encirclement strategy has had plenty of critics—George Kennan before he died; academics John Mearsheimer, Stephen Walt, and Robert David English; former diplomat Jack Matlock; the editors of The Nation. But their voices have tended to get drowned out by the nostrum diplomacy and the nostrum journalism that supports it at every turn.

You can’t drown out Donald Trump because he’s president of the United States. And so he has to be traduced, ridiculed, dismissed, and marginalized. That’s what the Times story, by Julian Barnes and Helene Cooper, sought to do. Consider the lead, designed to emphasize just how outlandish Trump’s musings are before the reader even has a chance to absorb what he may have been thinking: “There are few things that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia desires more than the weakening of NATO, the military alliance among the United States, Europe and Canada that has deterred Soviet and Russian aggression for 70 years.” Translation: “Take that, Mr. President! You’re an idiot.”

Henry Kissinger had something interesting to say about Trump in a recent interview with the Financial Times. “I think Trump may be one of those figures in history,” said the former secretary of state, “who appears from time to time to mark the end of an era and to force it to give up its old pretenses.” One Western pretense about Russia, so ardently enforced by the likes of Julian Barnes and Helene Cooper (who, it may be safe to say, know less about world affairs and their history than Henry Kissinger), is that nothing really changed with the Soviet collapse and NATO had to turn aggressive in order to keep that menacing nation in its place.

Trump clearly doesn’t buy that pretense. He said during the campaign that NATO was obsolete. Then he backtracked, saying he only wanted other NATO members to pay their fair share of the cost of deterrence. He even confessed, after Hillary Clinton identified NATO as “the strongest military alliance in the history of the world,” that he only said NATO was obsolete because he didn’t know much about it. But he was learning—enough, it appears, to support as president Montenegro’s entry into NATO in 2017. Is Montenegro, with 5,332 square miles and some 620,000 citizens, really a crucial element in Europe’s desperate project to protect itself against Putin’s Russia?

We all know that Trump is a crude figure—not just in his disgusting discourse but in his fumbling efforts to execute political decisions. As a politician, he often seems like a doctor attempting to perform open-heart surgery while wearing mittens. His idle musings about leaving NATO are a case in point—an example of a politician who lacks the skill and finesse to nudge the country in necessary new directions.

But Kissinger has a point about the man. America and the world have changed, while the old ways of thinking have not kept pace. The pretenses of the old have blinded the status quo defenders into thinking nothing has changed. Trump, almost alone among contemporary American politicians, is asking questions to which the world needs new answers. NATO, in its current configuration and outlook, is a danger to peace, not a guarantor of it.


Robert W. Merry, longtime Washington journalist and publishing executive, is the author most recently of President McKinley: Architect of the American Century

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Nigel Farage To Back Another “Vote Leave” Campaign If UK Holds Second Brexit Referendum

Nigel Farage said Friday that he would be willing to wage another “Vote Leave” campaign, even if he needed to use another party as the “vehicle” for his opposition.

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


Pro-European MPs from various political parties are pushing back against claims made by Prime Minister Theresa May’s government that a second Brexit referendum – which supporters have branded as a “People’s Vote” on May’s deal – would take roughly 14 months to organize, according to RT.

But while support for a second vote grows, one of the most notorious proponents of the original “Vote Leave” campaign is hinting at a possible return to politics to try and fight the effort.

After abandoning UKIP, the party he helped create, late last year, Nigel Farage said Friday that he would be willing to wage another “Vote Leave” campaign, even if he needed to use another party as the “vehicle” for his opposition. Farage also pointed out that a delay of Brexit Day would likely put it after the European Parliament elections in May.

“I think, I fear that the House of Commons is going to effectively overturn that Brexit. To me, the most likely outcome of all of this is an extension of Article 50. There could be another referendum,” he told Sky News.

According to official government guidance shown to lawmakers on Wednesday, which was subsequently leaked to the Telegraph, as May tries to head off a push by ministers who see a second referendum as the best viable alternative to May’s deal – a position that’s becoming increasingly popular with Labour Party MPs.

“In order to inform the discussions, a very short paper set out in factual detail the number of months that would be required, this was illustrative only and our position of course is that there will be no second referendum,,” May said. The statement comes as May has been meeting with ministers and leaders from all parties to try to find a consensus deal that could potentially pass in the House of Commons.

The 14 month estimate is how long May and her government expect it would take to pass the primary legislation calling for the referendum (seven months), conduct the question testing with the election committee (12 weeks), pass secondary legislation (six weeks) and conduct the campaigns (16 weeks).

May has repeatedly insisted that a second referendum wouldn’t be feasible because it would require a lengthy delay of Brexit Day, and because it would set a dangerous precedent that wouldn’t offer any more clarity (if some MPs are unhappy with the outcome, couldn’t they just push for a third referendum?). A spokesperson for No. 10 Downing Street said the guidance was produced purely for the purpose of “illustrative discussion” and that the government continued to oppose another vote.

Meanwhile, a vote on May’s “Plan B”, expected to include a few minor alterations from the deal’s previous iteration, has been called for Jan. 29, prompting some MPs to accuse May of trying to run out the clock. May is expected to present the new deal on Monday.

Former Tory Attorney General and pro-remainer MP Dominic Grieve blasted May’s timetable as wrong and said that the government “must be aware of it themselves,” while former Justice Minister Dr Phillip Lee, who resigned his cabinet seat in June over May’s Brexit policy, denounced her warning as “nonsense.”

As May pieces together her revised deal, more MPs are urging her to drop her infamous “red lines” (Labour in particular would like to see the UK remain part of the Customs Union), but with no clear alternative to May’s plan emerging, a delay of Brexit Day is looking like a virtual certainty.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

The National Security Agency Is A Criminal Organization

The National Security Agency values being able to blackmail citizens and members of government at home and abroad more than preventing terrorist attacks.

Paul Craig Roberts

Published

on

Via Paul Craig Roberts…


Years before Edward Snowden provided documented proof that the National Security Agency was really a national insecurity agency as it was violating law and the US Constitution and spying indiscriminately on American citizens, William Binney, who designed and developed the NSA spy program revealed the illegal and unconstitutional spying. Binney turned whistleblower, because NSA was using the program to spy on Americans. As Binney was well known to the US Congress, he did not think he needed any NSA document to make his case. But what he found out was “Congress would never hear me because then they’d lose plausible deniability. That was really their key. They needed to have plausible deniability so they can continue this massive spying program because it gave them power over everybody in the world. Even the members of Congress had power against others [in Congress]; they had power on judges on the Supreme Court, the federal judges, all of them. That’s why they’re so afraid. Everybody’s afraid because all this data that’s about them, the central agencies — the intelligence agencies — they have it. And that’s why Senator Schumer warned President Trump earlier, a few months ago, that he shouldn’t attack the intelligence community because they’ve got six ways to Sunday to come at you. That’s because it’s like J. Edgar Hoover on super steroids. . . . it’s leverage against every member of parliament and every government in the world.”

To prevent whistle-blowing, NSA has “a program now called ‘see something, say something’ about your fellow workers. That’s what the Stasi did. That’s why I call [NSA] the new New Stasi Agency. They’re picking up all the techniques from the Stasi and the KGB and the Gestapo and the SS. They just aren’t getting violent yet that we know of — internally in the US, outside is another story.”

As Binney had no documents to give to the media, blowing the whistle had no consequence for NSA. This is the reason that Snowden released the documents that proved NSA to be violating both law and the Constitution, but the corrupt US media focused blame on Snowden as a “traitor” and not on NSA for its violations.

Whistleblowers are protected by federal law. Regardless, the corrupt US government tried to prosecute Binney for speaking out, but as he had taken no classified document, a case could not be fabricated against him.

Binney blames the NSA’s law-breaking on Dick “Darth” Cheney. He says NSA’s violations of law and Constitution are so extreme that they would have to have been cleared at the top of the government.

Binney describes the spy network, explains that it was supposed to operate only against foreign enemies, and that using it for universal spying so overloads the system with data that the system fails to discover many terrorist activities. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50932.htm

Apparently, the National Security Agency values being able to blackmail citizens and members of government at home and abroad more than preventing terrorist attacks.

Unfortunately for Americans, there are many Americans who blindly trust the government and provide the means, the misuse of which is used to enslave us. A large percentage of the work in science and technology serves not to free people but to enslave them. By now there is no excuse for scientists and engineers not to know this. Yet they persist in their construction of the means to destroy liberty.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending