in

NATO Declares Its Intent to Include All Countries

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Eric Zuesse

When a military alliance that is headed by the world’s most powerful country (America) makes public that it is hostile against (aiming to control) both of the other two most powerful countries (Russia and China), then it actually exists in order to conquer (include), ultimately, ALL countries, and to replace the United Nations — the current authoritative source of international law* — to replace the U.N. and its authorized agencies, by the U.S.-proposed “rules-based international order,” whose “rules” come not from FDR’s envisioned U.N., but instead come from the post-WW-II Deep State or Military-Industrial Complex, the billionaires who control the armaments and global extraction and media firms and the U.S. Government itself, which latter Government will become imposed upon the world (all countries except America) by the world’s most powerful country (America), which had created and leads that military alliance (NATO) and is now publicly aiming to conquer (control) the entire world.

This is what has actually just now happened. On April 6th, Al-Mayadeen Media Network, an independent Arab satellite news channel, bannered “NATO chief openly touts targeting China, cites Ukraine stance as excuse”, and reported that on April 5th, Jens Stoltenberg, NATO’s chief, said that (as they reported it):

NATO intends to deepen cooperation with its Asian allies responding to the impending “security challenge” coming from China, which refuses to condemn Russia’s military operation in Ukraine. 

Speaking during a press conference on Tuesday, Stoltenberg announced that the alliance will be hosting foreign ministers from NATO states in addition to Finland, Sweden, Georgia and the European Union. Asia-Pacific partners were invited as well, including Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea. He said that the current “security crisis” has “global implications.”

The ministers will be discussing new strategic concepts regarding the war in Ukraine in addition to, for the first time, dealing with China’s “growing influence and coercive policies on the global stage which pose a systemic challenge to our security and to our democracies.”

“We see that China has been unwilling to condemn Russia’s aggression and has joined Moscow in questioning the right of nations to choose their own path,” said Stoltenberg. The NATO general urged the member states, mostly liberal democracies, to stand up against “authoritarian powers.”

According to Freedom House, an organization funded by Washington, 5 of 30 NATO members are not considered to be completely democratic: Turkey, Albania, Hungary, Montenegro and North Macedonia.

Stoltenberg hopes that there will be enhanced cooperation between NATO and Asia-Pacific partners on “arms control, cyber, hybrid and technology.”

Beijing has made it increasingly clear that it will not impose sanctions on Russia and [will be] maintaining an independent stance on Ukraine, that it is not a party in the conflict and will be a force for peace and mediation if and when necessary. 

The crisis in Ukraine has now officially been globalized by the U.S. regime to encompass all nations; and, in effect, “You are either America’s ally, or else you are America’s enemy.”

Here is how the Nobel Peace Prize winner, U.S. President Barack Obama, stated this to America’s graduating cadets at ts elite military academy, West Point, on 28 May 2014, just three months after his successful coup to overthrow and replace Ukraine’s democratically elected President in February of that year, and at the time of the start of their attempted ethnic-cleansing program to eliminate the residents in areas of Ukraine where the voters had voted overwhelmingly (90% and more) for the just-recently Obama-overthrown democratically elected President of Ukraine:

The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come. … Russia’s aggression toward former Soviet states unnerves capitals in Europe, while China’s economic rise and military reach worries its neighbors. From Brazil to India, rising middle classes compete with us, and governments seek a greater say in global forums. … It will be your generation’s task to respond to this new world.

He was telling the military that America’s economic competition, against the BRICS nations, is a key matter for America’s military, and not only for America’s private corporations; that U.S. taxpayers fund America’s military at least partially in order to impose the wills and extend the wealth of the stockholders in America’s corporations abroad; and that the countries against which America is in economic competition are “dispensable” but America “is and remains the one indispensable nation.” This, supposedly, also authorizes America’s weapons and troops to fight against countries whose “governments seek a greater say in global forums.” In other words: Stop the growing economies from growing faster than America’s. There is another name for the American Government’s supremacist ideology. This term is “fascism.”

The reality, not talked about in public (since America isn’t a democracy), is that the United States Government propagandizes against foreign governments and then perpetrates sanctions, coups, and/or military invasions, against them, in order to impose the U.S. empire’s dictatorial stooges, and then to crush whatever democracy had existed there. This U.S. fascism didn’t happen only in Iran in 1953, Guatemala in 1954, and Chile in 1973, but it happens also today, long after the ‘anti-communist’ excuse for it had ended in 1991.

* The role of the U.N. in creating and enforcing international law is, unfortunately, fundamentally different from what had been the intention of the individual, U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who initially came up with the idea for that organization in 1941, and who then proposed its name, “the United Nations,” at the Dumbarton Oaks Conference, in 1944, near the end of WW II. His intention was to terminate all imperialisms, every single empire, and to replace the entire imperialistic international order, which had created BOTH World Wars — replace it by a democratic federal republic among ALL nations, such that no nation will any longer be an empire, nor be an empire’s vassal-nation (or ‘ally’). However, FDR died on 12 April 1945, and his immediate successor, Harry Truman, whose hero was his secretly neoconservative (i.e., U.S.-global-empire-aspiring) General Dwight Eisenhower, decided (following Eisenhower’s advice), on 25 July 1945, to ditch FDR’s U.N. plan, and Truman’s Administration therefore remade the design of the U.N. into what now exists — so weak that the U.S. Government’s objective now became for the U.S. Government itself to be enabled ultimately to dictate to the entire world what would effectively BE ‘international law’ — which, soon after the Soviet Union’s 1991 termination, started to become, ever-more-publicly, the “rules-based order” (or “rules-based international order”) increasingly replacing the United Nations altogether. 

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s next book (soon to be published) will be AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change. It’s about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

21 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim
Jim
April 6, 2022

I would reject the idea that the UN is “the” source of international law. The UN Charter is an expression of existing international rules. As for the idea of the US controlling the world, the fact that the US hasn’t descended into civil war yet is a constant surprise. NATO brought slavery to Libya, provoked Russia, it does not have legitimacy in the eyes of many. Without the UN we would be in a pre-WWI environment.

Ozymandias
Ozymandias
April 6, 2022

Is America a fascist state?? probably, people often confuse nazism and fascism.. True fascism is when the state and corporate interests work hand in hand, the fascist state of both Italy under Mussolini and Spain under Franco , are the extreme, but perfect example of this.. In ancient imperial Rome, the axe tied with a bundle of sticks, gave a powerful senate member or members, such as the triumpherant post the death of Caesar, absolute unchallenged power over the senate and the state, thus nullifying any other challenges in the senate.. The US style of fascism operates in much the… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by Ozymandias
Ozymandias
Ozymandias
Reply to  Ozymandias
April 6, 2022

The vast majority of land mass and it’s human populations, I.E.,India,Pakistan, Latin America, and many African countries, have Not condemned Russia for it’s actions in Ukraine.. They know it is an American /Western instigated war, and with the rise of the power of both Russia and China, there is No longer a reliance on western foreign aide, so can’t be easily bullied like they were two decades ago, with threats to cut them off, they have options,, hence why the empire has little use for the United Nations , and do Not have to cloak their aggressive behaviour with legitimacy..

Last edited 2 months ago by Ozymandias
Val
Val
April 6, 2022

NATO now represents a group stuck in a psychotic experiential loop with no ethics or credibility which should have been abandoned at the end of the ‘cold war’, instead of being converted into a control and manipulation function centered around projecting perceived power and control by insecure psychopaths.

Orion
Orion
April 6, 2022

The UN has already been replaced by the US “rules-based international order”. It has become a corrupted and ineffectual organisation. It has no credibility when most nations are bullied into voting in certain ways or else sanctions and other threats are placed on them. “You are either America’s ally, or else you are America’s enemy.” Isn`t that the glorification of autocracy in itself? So how does that tie up with their so called democracy and freedom? NATO should have been disbanded after the fall of the Soviet Union. There is no rational reason for its existence as a defensive force… Read more »

Mystery in Mariupol continues. NATO targets China. Hannity interviews Sean Penn. Update 1

The Great Game: New Psy ops in Ukraine, Failed Coups and World Government