FreeSpeechFan
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Two UK judges have ruled that Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 violates the UN charter on human rights.
Major Win for Free Speech in the UK
Exclusive video/written content for as little as £5 a month: https://www.lotuseaters.com/register Full Video: https://www.lotuseaters.com/the-podcast-of-the-lotus-eaters-29-18-12-20 Subscribe to our…https://youtu.be/THWKFqzg7qs
https://parler.com/post/f9b8583f58c34bc1b537242d55a2d445
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Harry Miller actually took his case to the high court where Mr Justice Knowles, Ruling in favor of Miller said. ”Freedom of Expression laws are not there to protect statements such as ‘Kittens are cute’ but they are there to protect unpleasant things. Its Utility lies in exposing people to things that they do want to hear”. ”We live in a pluralistic society where NONE OF US have a right to be offended by something that they hear”. The lower Courts in the U.K have a growing reputation around the World of being, less protective of freedoms of expression. Conviction… Read more »
“none of us HAS (not have) a right to be offended”.