Grzegorz Ochman
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
his video is a real gem and is closely connected to one of the best videos I have previously posted:
This is the story of the FIVE STAR TRUST, based on a document that even the author, Ian Carroll, admits he cannot fully confirm — a point I want to emphasize. On the other hand, we must remember that the "real world" is often hidden from us. We have an official state that presents a narrative constituting the "world of the naive," and a deep state representing a truth hidden behind that curtain.
I want to highlight a specific moment from an episode of The Duran regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Alexander Mercouris made a shocked, astonished face upon realizing that Epstein was engaged in high-level diplomacy. Alexander asked something akin to, “Who? How? For whom?” This shock is understandable for those who believe in the "world of the naive" — people who trust history books and official state narratives. However, people like me — often labeled "conspiracy theorists" — understand that these official stories are merely a stage designed to hide the real world. We understood that people like Epstein existed long ago. We aren't shocked by these revelations because, while the details were hidden, we knew such figures were part of the machinery. Now, we are finally seeing glimpses of what we knew was there all along.
I personally dislike the education system because I believe it acts as a "societal filter," as Noam Chomsky and others have described. It serves to filter out independent thinkers and breed obedience. In the past, you could not achieve academic success if you undermined official dogmas like the JFK assassination or 9/11; questioning them resulted in being pushed out of "polite society." What makes me hopeful now is that things I have long believed to be true — such as the flaws in the official stories of JFK and 9/11, or the CIA’s role in the rise of ISIS — are slowly coming to light. They are finally being discussed, whereas before they were treated as sacred dogmas. Questioning them back then resulted in a social prosecution akin to religious persecution of the unfaithful.
Historically, facts could be suppressed because getting information out required publishing a book, which was easily controlled. Today, thanks to the internet, information cannot be so easily contained. While algorithms can still use bans and "shadow-banning" to suppress information, they cannot stop it entirely. This is why we see so much rhetoric about "fighting disinformation" and controlling the internet; the authorities are losing their grip on the narrative, threatening the "Kabuki theater" that defines the reality of the naive.
On a side note, I believe that "UFO" and "Flat Earth" stories are likely PSYOPS. Even though I find them to be nonsense, I still advocate for the right to speak about them. The moment we allow the state to "fight" Flat Earth theories, we establish a Ministry of Truth and give the state the power to decide our reality. If an idea is "bullshit," it should be discredited in the free market of ideas through debate.
For example, in Poland, we have laws forbidding the promotion of Nazi and Communist ideologies. I disagree with these laws. Although I have stated many times that I am not a Communist and I despise Nazism, I believe people should be allowed to promote these ideas. If they are wrong, they will lose in the free market of ideas.
Interestingly, there are Nazi sympathizers in The Duran community who spew horrible things. Although I have the power to delete their comments, I allow them to speak. Ironically, these same people often tell The Duran that they should not platform me. They suggest I should be silenced because of my "socialist" positions, yet they simultaneously complain about being silenced under the guise of "antisemitism." They believe views they dislike should be silenced, while their own should be protected—a blatant hypocrisy.
For instance, while I am certain the Holocaust happened, I believe the specific number of victims should be open to academic study and discussion. Currently, this is nearly impossible, as questioning the figures is viewed as an attempt to undermine Nazi crimes and is labeled "antisemitic." It is hypocritical for people to demand that the Holocaust numbers be studied while simultaneously demanding that all discussion of Communism be silenced.
The End of World War II and the Birth of the "Western Capitalist Empire of Evil"
Let us begin by discussing the video. A point I frequently write about, which is rarely discussed in mainstream circles, is that during World War II, Germany plundered the wealth of all of Europe while Japan plundered the wealth of all of Asia. Following the war, Allen Dulles brokered a secret peace between the Nazis and America, directly defying the wishes of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Roosevelt had instituted a policy of unconditional surrender, which stood in direct opposition to Dulles's plans for a separate peace.
Furthermore, this deal with Nazi criminals and monsters was also extended to criminals and monsters of the Japanese Empire. After the war, the wealth plundered from Europe and Asia was laundered with the assistance of the West. I have touched on this in previous posts, particularly in this one:
As a side note, for a long time, I wondered why the British killed Heinrich Himmler — an event for which there is significant evidence. As the main video attached to this post explains, Himmler was the primary figure responsible for securing wealth plundered by Germany to fund a future "Fourth Reich." This wealth was eventually used to rebuild West Germany, just as the Japanese plunder from Asia was used to rebuild post-war Japan. The British faced a dilemma because Himmler was receiving assistance from powerful Americans like Allen Dulles and the Rockefellers, as well as British interests like the Rothschilds and Western institutions like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
Hardly anyone discusses this secret peace or the role played by Western oligarchs, Western institutions which included even the Vatican which helped save and launder this stolen wealth. While I am well-versed in how the Nazis laundered their plunder, I am still learning the specifics of the Japanese side — though it is clear the same pattern emerged there.
At the end of World War II, instead of justice being served to these "criminal monsters," they were saved. Secret deals were made to help them launder their plundered wealth in exchange for a "cut" of that plunder and their cooperation in the fight against "Evil Communism." While I am not a Communist — and I particularly despise the early eras of Lenin and Stalin — we must remember who the West chose as allies. When you realize the West partnered with literal Nazi and Imperial Japanese war criminals, it justifies the label "Western Capitalist Empire of Evil."
Understanding what the Soviets were up against makes it difficult to determine which side was truly worse. For example, people often discuss the famine in Ukraine (the Holodomor). In my opinion, while it was a horrific event, it was likely not an intentional genocide. Yet, it is rarely compared to the famines in India caused by the British. I suspect people don't talk about the millions of Indians who starved to death because they were "brown people" rather than white Europeans. This is just one example that forces you to reconsider: while Communism had its evils, was our "wonderful West" actually worse?
FIVE STAR TRUST
39:28
When you see this on screen, just know that it is a transcribed version of those original FBI documents. I wanted you to be aware of what we’re seeing; it’s not just random text, but those specific documents transcribed.
The documents contain phrasing like this:
"Decisions were made by the Director, with implied approval of the Oval Office, to draft a blueprint and put into motion a plan by which the CIA could have as much funds as needed, when needed, without the knowledge of Congress."
This would accomplish a dual purpose: carrying out clandestine and covert operations without congressional clearance, and avoiding the necessity of requesting extra funds, thus never disclosing the workings of covert operations in progress or planned.
This is exactly what every intelligence agency wants: an endless supply of funds they don’t have to report, which they can use for whatever they want. That’s been the "Holy Grail" of intelligence agencies since the very first ones were formed. There is a long history of them acquiring and distributing funding in all sorts of clandestine ways. It is some of the most fascinating history you could ever learn about.
This plan explicitly involves five experts: General Edward Lansdale (we won’t get into the details here); William Colby, if you know your CIA history; George Bush Sr. (as in H.W., as in "Poppy" Bush—this is the story of how he got that nickname, which we’ll go into another time); Richard Armitage, his "gopher"; and Robert Ferrara, the "international man of mystery." This story gives off a lot of interesting vibes about Ferrara. We’ll read the part where he chops a man's testicles off and stuffs them down his throat another time, because now we’re going to zoom out a little bit.
The actual document reads in a very condensed narrative form. It requires a lot of context and extra research to understand everything they’re saying. It’s a little hard to piece together from the direct language, so I’ll do some translating for you.
The plan—meaning the plan to smuggle heroin in and out of Vietnam, sell it to American service members, and sell it internationally all around the world—was run by "our boys" in the CIA. The plan was to generate illegal drug money to help fund their new intelligence agency because they lacked sufficient official funding. That plan was in full force when the United States government encountered continued opposition from the Japanese ruling party regarding CIA-controlled people in power.
Bush personally picked an obscure party formed in 1955—bankrupt and with very little membership—to back a possible takeover of the government. However, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) needed a vast amount of funds to carry out their part; they had to "buy" the membership and the votes. It was decided to give this obscure party all the funds they needed. Before they finally achieved power, a sum of over 300 billion Japanese yen had been funneled to them. This was carried out by Lieutenant Colonel Ferrara, because he had a very special relationship with the first cousin of Emperor Hirohito, Prince Hiuko Watanabe. Thus, the Colonel had an open door to Japanese politicians and the Diet.
Just to give you context, this is what the document looks like in its original form. That paragraph effectively marks the start of "Operation Eagle 2," which over time evolved into what is referred to as the Japanese-Singapore-New Zealand-Kentucky connection. Today, we might add a little bit of Korea on the side.
What they are referring to is an era before the Vietnam War had really kicked off, when they were first getting their "drug-smuggling legs" underneath them. They were starting to accrue secret bank accounts because they had a massive amount of stolen loot from World War II. There’s always a lot of loot in war; we just don’t talk about it anymore because it’s not considered "kosher" or is generally frowned upon. A bunch of Nazi loot was floating around, and there were Nazis in the CIA even before Operation Paperclip. Then there’s the whole history with the Bush family—don’t look into Prescott Bush too hard.
Let's just say they had a lot to hide in secret bank accounts all around the world because the CIA was getting into clandestine operations early on. This book does a great job of summarizing the disjointed nature of the early CIA; there wasn’t a lot of leadership, a strong mandate, or a budget at first. But the "CIA boys" had huge plans. They started funding themselves through strong corporate ties, as the agency was founded by two of the most prominent corporate lawyers in the world: the Dulles brothers.
They were a complex web of power brokers with legal authority but no real official funding during the early Truman era. Over the first decade, they came up with creative ways to fund themselves and creative side projects abroad. One of the first was buying the elections in Italy right after World War II. That’s a separate story, where they sent bags of cash to Italy, handed them off to the Mafia, and the Mafia bought the election to ensure an "anti-communist democracy."
The same thing happened in Japan during the same era. This story describes how they were prodding the government of Japan, saying they needed to ensure Japan didn’t go Communist. When the Japanese asked how to manage that within a voting system, the response was essentially: "Take all this money and win."
Allegedly, George Bush and his team analyzed the political landscape and selected the Liberal Democratic Party—not for its democracy, but for its nationalism. Remember the nationalism that got that one guy thrown in prison for assassinating Japanese leaders and smuggling opium into China? The Yakuza guy? That kind of nationalism is fertile ground for intelligence agency coordination. That’s the kind of guy you can pass a bag of cash to; he’ll do what you ask, take a cut, and maybe cut some throats on the way—which keeps people in line and pushes back Communism.
By the time they had funded the LDP to the hilt, at least 300 billion Japanese yen had been rolled into the party.
In 1976, the handpicked new director of the agency was George Bush, who served only until 1977. This was not a peaceful time for the agency. During the 70s, Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka was caught with his "hand in the cookie jar," making money on the side in a scandal involving the Lockheed Aircraft Company. If you don’t know about the Lockheed Martin scandals of the 70s, it’s a rabbit hole of bribes, extortion, and kickbacks.
Tanaka was part of the group being funded by the CIA, and the agency got uncomfortable that the whole scheme might be exposed. That fear kicked off an operation to pull out of Japan, clean up the laundered funds, and move the money-laundering scheme somewhere else.
This story is insane and, at times, unbelievable. Richard Helms, who had formed a strong relationship with Baron Philippe de Rothschild (representing the Rothschild Empire), decided to stop Operation Eagle 2 and start another clandestine money-making operation outside of Japan. Baron de Rothschild later took complete control of the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), which features prominently in this story. From there, the Rothschilds entered the story as one of three partners in a money-laundering scheme for drug funds, arms smuggling funds, and black-budget bank accounts.
The story centers on one need: You are the CIA, performing clandestine operations worldwide, and each one needs a "black budget" and a secret bank account. Some are on the books, but many are not. For example, drug smuggling, selling weapons to sanctioned countries, or performing mind control on unwitting civilians—you need secret cash flows for those that don't appear on the agency ledger.
This quickly becomes a "spaghetti monster" of complexity. Because it’s compartmentalized, one person knows about their secret torture project and another knows about their smuggling operation, but they don’t know about each other. If one person gets shot, goes to prison, or defects, you end up with "hung" bank accounts filled with billions of dollars that no one knows how to access.
According to this story, Richard Helms realized this was a problem. He came up with a plan centered around the heroin smuggling and the Japan operation. They realized they had to get all these black-budget bank accounts into some sort of "networked" account to keep track of them without writing them in an official ledger or opening them in their own names.
To do this, you need a frontman—someone to open a bank account that can have sub-accounts all around the world joined into one trust. But that person must be a front so you maintain total control. You need to move money in and out freely for various jobs.
The story goes that they looked for a "middle-of-the-road," slightly scummy financial guy with a low profile—a "nobody" willing to color outside the lines for a cut of the dough. This was Marion "J.R." Horn Jr. He would be the front, and behind his name would be a network of bank accounts overseen by the Rothschilds, who would keep it safe and look the other way as the money flowed.
That system—the Five Star Trust—became the financial arm of Eagle 2. It was allegedly the same system used to launder money into Japan to fund the LDP. Out of that system and the LDP springs this "Moon Cult" (the Unification Church) with an infinite source of funding from the East. Sun Myung Moon was best friends with the criminals the CIA put in power there.
He formed an international "globalist" church that camouflaged itself within other religions—fake Buddhists, fake Christians, fake Baptists—to infiltrate society. The Moon Cult is a dark intelligence agency operation. When you connect the dots on where the LDP’s money came from, and these documents allege the Rothschilds were partners in that scheme, it gives you a different perspective on the "Judeo-Christian values" Moon was professing.
Today, that spiderweb seems to reach into organizations like the Falwell Center, Liberty University, and TPUSA. I’m not alleging that a secret CIA bank account literally provides all the funding for TPUSA; I’m saying the Moon Cult looks like an organization set up on top of infinite springs of money for intelligence agency purposes.
It reminds me of Dune. Frank Herbert wrote about a "religious intelligence agency" that spawns and seeds religions around the universe to take over cultures and control the masses. If you look at this Moon story and consider the idea that "all the world is a stage," what they are doing with Turning Point USA looks incredibly complex.
The Moon Cult was involved in everything: media, broadcasting, manufacturing guns, smuggling drugs, and running a sex cult. That is all one spiderweb of intel operations. It looks to me like we are halfway through the process of turning TPUSA into something similar. That is what Candace Owens has posited recently, and the more I look, the more I agree.
It looks like we are touching on the literal black-budget bank accounts that fund the global cabal. The Five Star Trust is a big part of it—a web that reaches through Japan and Korea into the United States.
People like me — who are often called "conspiracy theorists" — understand that there is a real world hidden behind the "world of the naive." We have always understood that systems like the one Ian Carroll describes exist. However, because this real world is the secret work of the deep state, hidden behind narratives crafted by the official state, we often lack the full picture.
Stories like that of Jeffrey Epstein provide glimpses of this world and confirm its existence, even if the details remain obscured. The story of the FIVE STAR TRUST feels legitimate to me because it correlates with other facts I have gathered. Yet, for those living in the "world of the naive," this isn't enough; they demand "concrete evidence" that is, by design, withheld from the public. Later, these same people who dismissed everything as a conspiracy theory find themselves completely baffled by cases like Epstein’s. They cannot explain him, whereas we are not surprised. We predicted the existence of operators like Epstein because they are a logical necessity of the system we describe.
The Jeffrey Epstein story is a perfect example and should serve as a permanent lesson: just because there is no immediate "concrete proof" of something does not mean it isn't true. In my opinion, people remain close-minded because of the education system, which I believe is deliberately designed to narrow the human mind. Did any "men of science" or esteemed scholars predict the existence of deep-state operators like Epstein? Did such figures fit into their academic understanding of the world?
People often misunderstand my criticism of education and scholars. They think I believe I am smarter than them, but that is not the case. I am not smarter; I am simply more open-minded. My mind has not been closed by the same educational filters. It baffles me that people far more intelligent than I am cannot see these things, but I believe it is because their education has trained them not to look.
This brings to mind the comedian Kurt Metzger, whose videos I have shared. While I don’t agree with everything he says — particularly when he leans too far into mysticism — I share his frustration. He perfectly expresses the exasperation of seeing the truth while those around you remain "under the spell" of the official narrative.
Okay. But the bottom line is it took me I'm not This is what why I'm really upset and I and I'm dressed like an idiot and doing this because I don't understand. I'm not that smart. I'll tell you my brain dick size. If you want to know my IQ, it's exactly 138. I've been tested twice. 138. Okay. So that's smart. It is not like any kind of genius. In fact, it's just smart enough to be dissatisfied but not fully grasp why, this is how I feel. But, by the way, IQ is horseshit. It's to know who's retarded and who's not. That's what the fuck IQ is for. So, like, don't even get hung up on that, racist. Uh, the point is, I'm not I'm not that fucking crazy smart, dude. For some reason, I'm just noticing some shit that any stupid motherfucker that takes a shit and owns a phone could find out. They're just not gonna.
I had my IQ tested in high school as part of a dyslexia evaluation; I scored a 140. Later, I tested myself again and scored a 138. Just like Kurt Metzger, I feel that while this is "smart," it isn't "genius" level. I don't believe I am smarter than the educated people and scholars I criticize. While Kurt says he simply doesn't understand why people fail to notice what is happening, I believe the reason is directly connected to the education system.
Schools train you to be ignorant with style [...] they prepare you to be a usable victim for a military industrial complex that needs manpower. As long as you're just smart enough to do a job and just dumb enough to swallow what they feed you, you're going to be alright [...] So I believe that schools mechanically and very specifically try and breed out any hint of creative thought in the kids that are coming up.
― Frank Zappa
I will end it here thanks to everyone who stuck with me until the end of my post. And, as always…
“Knowledge will make you be free.”
― Socrates
+
“Knowledge isn’t free. You have to pay attention.”
― Richard P. Feynman
=
“Freedom is not free, you need to pay attention.”
― Grzegorz Ochman
“Is any of it real? I mean, look at this. Look at it! A world built on fantasy! Synthetic emotions in the form of pills, psychological warfare in the form of advertising, mind-altering chemicals in the form of food, brainwashing seminars in the form of media, controlled isolated bubbles in the form of social networks. Real? You want to talk about reality? We haven’t lived in anything remotely close to it since the turn of the century. We turned it off, took out the batteries, snacked on a bag of GMOs while we tossed the remnants in the ever-expanding dumpster of the human condition. We live in branded houses trademarked by corporations built on bipolar numbers jumping up and down on digital displays, hypnotizing us into the biggest slumber mankind has ever seen. You have to dig pretty deep, kiddo, before you can find anything real. We live in a kingdom of bullshit, a kingdom you’ve lived in for far too long.”
― Mr. Robot
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
