Germany’s Neocolonial Project for Europe and the European Coup d’État Against Germany: My Old Posts and Predictions

I watched a recent post on The Duran titled “Germany’s Unstoppable Industrial Decline,” and I’d like to point out that I predicted all of this. I apologize for the poor quality of my old posts, but here are two of them in which I made those predictions.

So called panic in the West and what in my opinion is going on with the war in Ukraine.

This post is from March 5, 2023, titled “So-called Panic in the West and What, in My Opinion, Is Going On With the War in Ukraine.” In it, I reference a very interesting video of Condoleezza Rice, which is the main video attached to the post.

Rice: ”You want to change the structure of energy dependence. You want to depend more on the North America energy platform … to have pipelines that don’t go through Ukraine and Russia”

It’s a very old video — at least 11 years old — and it was scraped from the internet. Only one version remains, and it’s very poor quality. If you try searching for it on YouTube, you won’t find it.

You also have this post.

My vision of the European Coup d’état against Germany.

From March 6, 2023, with the title “My Vision of the European Coup d’État Against Germany,” where I wrote:

“Like I said before, the purpose of it all was to destroy Germany’s grip on the EU which threatened the US. Germany’s hold over the EU came from the fact that it had become a cheap energy distribution hub for the whole Europe. They had many pipelines from Russia with cheap gas as an energy source and they used it as leverage against the whole of Europe. For example I wrote before that Germany abused other EU countries for its benefit and that is why the US was allowed to do this. In my opinion it is just my logical assumption that for example Germany regulated on purpose coal in such a way that it would not be worth using it and therefore to screw countries like Poland which has huge reserves of coal. They intentionally did the same thing with nuclear power overregulating it making it uncompetitive since the British and France were leading in that department. All that under the veil of global warming and climate change with the real purpose of removing alternatives for cheap gas from Russia as an energy source. Making them more depended on Germany’s hub of cheap gas from Russia as an energy source by making alternatives less competitive."

In The Duran program, they mentioned that Germany went too far into the Green Agenda, but what they didn’t understand is that, first of all, the Green Agenda was part of our Western neocolonial strategy, and it’s harming the Global South more than the West. This is best illustrated by this short video from Jimmy Dore.

Global warming — sorry, what we now call climate change — is part of our neocolonial strategy that harms the Global South. But that’s not the whole story. You may wonder why Germany pushed the Green Agenda so aggressively. Germany wanted to use this narrative to take control of Europe through its neocolonial program aimed at dominating the entire continent.

The goal was to undermine countries like Poland, which has large coal reserves, and to disadvantage countries like France and Britain by declaring nuclear energy “not green” and “not ecological,” because France and England were leaders in nuclear power. Nuclear energy wasn’t labeled non-ecological because it truly wasn’t ecological, but because it provided energy independence — something Germany didn’t want others to have.

Ironically, the “most ecological” and “greenest” form of energy, according to Germany, was Russian gas. Germany was importing it and wanted to make the whole of Europe dependent on it. Germany pushed the Green Agenda not because it believed in it, but because it hoped it would lead France, Britain, and others to shut down their nuclear and coal plants, forcing European countries to rely on Russian gas — a resource that Germany would import from Russia and then resell to the rest of Europe.

In this way, Germany would control Europe’s energy supply and secure the cheapest energy for itself, since the gas it sold to other countries would be more expensive than the gas it bought. Through controlling Europe’s energy supply and enjoying the lowest energy costs in the region, Germany aimed to secure its dominance and turn Europe into a German neocolony.

This is why Germany opposed and blocked any alternatives to Russian gas: because it wanted to maintain control over Europe’s energy sources. If gas were imported from, for example, the Middle East — outside German control — it would undermine Germany’s neocolonial plans. While importing gas from other sources would increase competition, lower prices, and improve energy security for Europe, it would reduce German profits and weaken the monopoly through which Germany sought to assert power.

For this neocolonial project to succeed, Germany had to ensure that all alternatives to Russian gas were blocked — such as potential pipelines from the Middle East — and that other energy options, like France’s nuclear power, were weakened. This is why Germany pushed the Green Agenda so aggressively: it made Russian gas appear to be the “greenest” option and made Europe increasingly dependent on gas that Germany controlled.

I wrote about all of this in my earlier posts. I even argued with a friend of mine who lives in Germany. He insisted I was wrong and that Germany would manage just fine. After more than a year, he admitted I had been right about Germany and that he had been wrong.

Now, for those who believe in man-made global warming—sorry, now called climate change—if you don’t believe me, perhaps you’ll listen to your prophet, Bill Gates. Here’s a short video from The Jimmy Dore Show.

1:34

"Here's what he says. There's a doomsday view of climate change that goes like this: In a few decades, cataclysmic climate change will decimate civilization. The evidence is all around us. Just look at all those heat waves and storms caused by rising global temperatures. Nothing matters more than limiting the rise of temperature."

He goes on to say, "Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong."

"Although climate change will have serious consequences, particularly for people in the poorest countries, it will not lead to humanity's demise."

"Uh-oh. Sounds like Bill Gates has a different plan to make money than off of climate change."

It's the same as with COVID - a short video on the Jimmy Dore Show.

2:38

"It wasn't until early February, when I was in a meeting, that experts at the foundation said, 'There's no way you know this. There's been too much travel without diagnosis for us to contain this.'"

"And then, at that point, we didn't really understand the fatality rate. You know, we didn't understand that it's a fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like the flu, although a bit different."

Jimmy later says.

3:19

"Isn't it weird that a pot-smoking comedian in his garage somehow knew that before Bill Gates, Mr. Vaccine, and the experts at the foundation?"

I wrote before about COVID, and I described how my father was completely taken in by the narrative, even threatening to disown me for not taking the vaccine because he told me I was “killing people” by refusing it. In my view, the COVID narrative is no different from the climate change narrative, yet people still accept it simply because “scientists say so,” without learning any lessons from the COVID situation.

Here you have Bill Gates — Mr. Vaccine — telling the truth about COVID and now about global warming. If you won’t believe pot-smoking comedians like Jimmy Dore or simple warehouse workers like me, then will you believe your “savior,” the genius who claims to fix the world, Bill Gates? I understood this long before Jimmy did, because I saw through many lies almost 20 years ago, and since then I have lived in what I consider the real world, while Jimmy only awakened to the truth after COVID.

I wrote that my awakening moment was around 2006 during the Iraq War, when I realized they were lying to us about it, and later when I found what I believe is the truth about 9/11, and then when I looked into the JFK assassination. Since that time, I have understood that the world most people live in is built on lies, and in my posts I have called it “the world of the naive.”

Because I understood the truth behind those lies — and because I am a nobody who doesn’t have to worry about respectability — I never ended up in that cage where people accept lies just to preserve their reputation or avoid being called conspiracy theorists. This allowed me to see more truth than others. This is why I was able to understand what was happening in Ukraine and what Germany was doing with its neocolonial project for Europe.

Now, if I am just a simple warehouse worker who sees the truth, do you think the people who own and control our world don’t understand it as well? That is why I wrote my recent post about not underestimating our enemies.

Whitney Webb the G.O.A.T. of deep state analysis — covering the deep state, the WEF, globalists, and neocons. If you think these people are stupid, you have already failed in your pursuit of truth.

If I knew COVID was nonsense, if I knew global warming (climate change) was nonsense, if I knew America killed 3,000 of its own citizens on 9/11, if I knew Kennedy was killed by the CIA on orders from Allen Dulles, and if I knew that all the drug epidemics in the U.S.— such as the heroin epidemic during Vietnam (with Golden Triangle drug production by the CIA), the crack epidemic during American interventions in South America (with Contras’ drug production by the CIA), or the more recent heroin epidemic during the Afghanistan intervention (with Al-Qaeda’s drug production by the CIA), and if I knew about the secret peace treaty between the Nazis and the West at the end of World War II (best described in Carl Oglesby’s article The Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt), along with many other lies most people believe, then if you think the people who own and control this world don’t know the truth, you are really naive.

The same goes for Ukraine. When I hear commentators saying that people in control in the West really believe that Ukraine is actually winning, I find it extremely naive. I referenced an article about the Pentagon leaks regarding the Ukrainian counteroffensive.

US feared Ukraine could fall 'well short' in spring counter-offensive, leaks reveal

'Top secret' document reportedly warned Kyiv faced shortfalls in troops and weaponry and suggested any gains would be modest

We heard NATO generals talking about how wonderful this offensive would be, how it would take Mariupol, and how it would cut off the land bridge to Crimea. I heard political commentators saying that the West actually believed this because the generals on TV said so and they insisted they would never lie to us, while I argued at the time that the Pentagon knew it would be a failure. Of course, they can’t admit they knew it would fail, so instead of telling the truth they used the euphemism “fall well short.”

I remember someone explaining this — unfortunately I can’t recall which commentator it was, so I can’t give proper credit — but the point was this: if they knew the offensive would fail, why push for it anyway? One commentator stated that it was because they wanted to scare Europe and push European countries to increase military spending, as well as bring more countries into NATO. Talking about how wonderfully Ukraine was doing and how weak Russia supposedly was would have gone against those goals.

After the failure of the offensive, they suddenly had the rationale and the narrative needed to motivate European countries to increase spending. And right after the failed counteroffensive, European states did agree to increase military spending, Sweden joined NATO, and Norway accepted the presence of NATO troops on its soil. So they knew the offensive would fail, but they pushed it because the failure allowed them to achieve their other goals.

Real decision-makers — the people who actually hold power — know very well what is happening; they are simply pragmatic, cynical, and Machiavellian. These people know the reality, but they cannot tell the truth. They cannot say that Ukraine is already lost, or that people are dying so that Russian resources remain tied down in Ukraine while our Western capitalist empire pursues other objectives around the globe. If we want Ukrainians to continue dying for our geopolitical goals, we can’t admit that Ukraine has already lost and that they are not dying for Ukraine, but for what I call our Western Capitalist Empire of Evil.

Europeans are not pushing this war because they believe Ukraine will win, but because they have received orders from Washington. The goal is not to protect and save Ukraine or defeat Russia. (They would be happy to destroy Russia, but even in their own documents they say this will likely fail and Ukraine will end up destroyed, as Brian Berletic explains.) The goal is to stretch Russia thin and bind its resources in Ukraine so that it will not be able to stop Western operations elsewhere — like toppling Syria and installing our Al-Qaeda McJihadists there.

It is difficult for the empire to intervene in Iran, Venezuela, or Nigeria because Russia has already sent some equipment to help Iran and Venezuela. Imagine how much more support Russia could provide if it didn’t need its military assets in Ukraine. If the war in Ukraine stopped, Western interventions in Iran, Venezuela, or Nigeria would become even harder. That is why, in my view, the war in Ukraine must continue — not because Ukraine matters to us, not because Ukraine is winning or has any chance of winning or defeating Russia, but because keeping the war alive increases our ability to intervene in Iran, Venezuela, Nigeria, or anywhere else we choose.

I will end this with the closing of another one of my posts from March 8, 2023, titled “Reality of the Conflict in Ukraine, in My Opinion, and What Germany Can Try to Do — A Reality Check.”

Reality of conflict in Ukraine in my opinion and what Germany can try to do so reality check.

Ukraine will not surrender, it will probably get destroyed so Germany and Russia can not make deals. The best thing is after all that Poland and the West will be called defenders of Ukraine and Ukrainians. We will literally do everything to destroy them and kill as many of them as possible and our narrative will speak about those wonderful people from the West who just wanted to help and save Ukraine. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Now for everyone who thinks that it’s crazy are people living in the world of the naïve. Destroying Ukraine will be just another on the list of achievements of our Western civilization. Now reality and morality check for you. We created ISIS, the radical Islamic state to steal Iraq’s resources. We created a radical Islamic state in Libya with open slaves markets to steal Libya’s resources, we created a radical Islamic organization in Afghanistan and we made Afghanistan the biggest exporter of opium in the world. Pushing Nazi ideology and destroying Ukraine will be just another on the list of achievements of our wonderful Western civilization.

 

Yes, but we in the West are the good guys, right?

Thanks to everyone who stuck with me until the end of my post. And, as always… 

“Knowledge will make you be free.”

― Socrates

+

“Knowledge isn’t free. You have to pay attention.”

― Richard P. Feynman

=

“Freedom is not free, you need to pay attention.”

― Grzegorz Ochman

WE LIVE IN KINGDOM OF BULL****, A KINGDOM YOU’VE LIVED IN FOR FAR TOO LONG!!!