Grzegorz Ochman
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
First of all we don’t know how war is going on. I like Duran programs because they are very informative. But this talk about artillery shelling, if it’s true Ukraine is missing shells and Russia is winning in artillery, but at same time Ukraine is winning in Drones, and as Ukrainians are scared of Russian artillery, so are Russians are scared of Ukraine drones. Russia is probably winning but it’s not some Ukraine massacre, Russia is paying a lot for its gains. Military experts were sure Russia would win not because of equipment but because of the difference in population size. Simply put Russia has more population so more cannon fodder to throw.
Blinken and Nuland are not stupid, they just continued Bush’s and Condoleezza Rice’s international policies.
Rice: ”You want to change the structure of energy dependence. You want to depend more on the North America energy platform … to have pipelines that don’t go through Ukraine and Russia”
https://twitter.com/Statsmin/status/1574732976042409985/photo/1
If that was their goal they achieved their goal since Poland has a new pipeline that is not going through Ukraine and Russia. The Nord stream pipeline is destroyed and the official narrative says Putin=Hitler (pure evil) and we will not allow cooperation between Germany and Russia. So they achieved what Condoleezza Rice was dreaming about no matter if Russia would win or lose.
I hear questions all the time: why do they fight, why do they push Ukrainians if they know they will lose. Like Lindsey Graham said “we will defend Ukraine till the last Ukrainian”, we need to remember we will blame this conflict on Putin the more bloody it is, the more Ukrainians die, the more Ukraine gets destroyed the bigger blame we later get to put on Putin. So it’s no surprise they want Ukraine to fight so they straightened the narrative about evil Russia and Putin=Hitler bullshit.
Like I said, they started this conflict only because no matter which side wins they win because they secured the “change the structure of energy dependence”. Now they push Ukraine to fight even when they know they will lose because the more Ukraine suffers, the more of them die the bigger blame they put on Putin, at same time the more they secure that “change the structure of energy dependence”.
One thing I wonder about is the talks between Scholz and Biden. Scholz has to beg Biden to stop this, since what else can he do? What do you want him to do, stand and say: listen, everything we were saying to you so far was a big lie but that lie is screwing us now too, so this time we will tell you the truth. How do you plan for anyone to believe what they say next?
None even dare to touch subjects like questioning Nord Stream, Bucha massacre or speaking about Ukrainian Odessa massacre, in other words question the validity of claims about Putin’s illegal unprovoked invasion on weaker neighbors with the purpose of stealing their lands. That evil Putin and Germany would like to do energy deals – how could they, hahahahha. You see my point?
None care about Ukraine or even if Ukraine wins. If it wins, the US would not cry but if it lost the US still achieves its goal.
On the Duran it was said that the RAND Corporation stated the prolonged conflict is not good for the US. At the same time they heard that the US is telling Ukraine to go on the offensive, but they don’t understand. Now if you understand that they don’t care who wins and just want to prevent the prolonging of the conflict then it all makes sense. They just want Ukraine to go on an offensive to bleed out quicker and loose quicker to prevent a prolonged conflict.
The only thing they care about is for this conflict to be horrible and the narrative that will allow them to blame that horrible conflict on Putin which will prevent German and Russian cooperation. So do what Condoleezza Rice, George Friedman and Chomsky speak about.
“So the primordial interest of the United States over which for a century we fought wars like the First, Second and Cold wars, is about the relationship between Germany and Russia. Because united they are the only force that could threaten us and we must make sure that that doesn’t happen. Therefore it’s not an accident that General Hodges, who has been appointed in charge, is talking about pre-positioning troops in Romania Bulgaria Poland and the Baltics. This is the intermarium the Black Sea to the Baltic, what Pilsudski dreamed of, this is the solution for the United States. The issue to which we don’t have the answer is what will Germany do. So the real wild card in Europe is the United States. Not Ukraine but to the West and the Russians tried to figure out how to leverage Ukrainian away, but we don’t know the German position. Germany is in a very peculiar position, its former Chancellor Gerhart Schroeder is on the board of Gazprom. They have a very complex relationship with Russians. The Germans themselves don’t know what to do, they must export, the Russians can’t take up this German export. On the other hand if they lose the free trade zone, they need to build something different. For the United States the primordial fear is German technology and German capital, Russian natural resources, and Russian man power as the only combination that can for centuries scare the hell out of the United states. So how does this play out? Well the U.S has already put its cards on the table. It is the line from the Baltics to the Black Sea” – George Friedman.
“Well NATO is a us-run military force and it’s now becoming an international global US intervention force. The purpose of it, one purpose of it is to exactly as the quench questioner said to integrate Europe into the U.S. dominated military system. That’s what NATO was for in the first place. One goal of NATO from the very beginning was to block de Gaulle’s initiatives, to make sure that Europe would not move in an independent course…” – Noam Chomsky
In both examples we were talking about European independence which would probably have to include strong cooperation with Russia. The US is not afraid of the EU, it is afraid of the EU in cooperation with Russia. Now that the cooperation will be prevented because of this horrible conflict caused by this horrible bad Putin, hahahhahahaha. Do you see my point and state or affairs in reality?
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
“Ukraine is winning in Drones“, are you dreaming or told by biden ? This conflict to the west (read jews) is not any different than any other war, it’s to make money for jews.
This time they bet the wrong horse.
At this point, they are fighting to preserve the central banking ponzi scheme. They need to prevent Russia and China from creating an alternative system.
100% agree but you don’t know the full picture. China and Russia can’t destroy the Dollar because China got too much dollar and US federal government obligations. It’s a little complicated.
Russia’s dollar accounts were frozen. What happened? Nothing. China doesn’t really need its reserves, they have budget surplus year by year.
What matters is material output of economy.
Mao Zedong said power comes from the barrel of the gun. China can build more guns than whole imperialist bloc combined.
You don’t understand China and Saudis are the biggest US dollar and US obligation holders in the world. They don’t want to destroy dollars because the US owes them money because they hold those obligations and dollars. If the US defaults on dollars they will lose all that debt the US owns them and who will collect debt from the US? Regarding “China can build more guns than whole imperialist bloc combined.” China is scared of our military. Just check how many military bases the US has around China. But even more they are scared of our narrative, our brainwashing,… Read more »
Get a grip dude. Neither the Russian or Chinese population buy the western BS narrative.
?
Does not seem Americans wanted this type of prolonged war. They expected rapid Russian victory and wanted to support insurgents in occupied or pro Russia governed Ukraine. Russian stated goal was demilitarization which can be achieved by this type of war.
It would be of great value if a Polish speaker can translate the commentaries of general Skrzypczak. I sometimes encounter him being cited in alternative media. Seems he has a lot of insights. But I don’t understand Polish to listen full interviews.
I went to check Skrzypczak, don’t waste your time on this moron. He argues that Russia is losing because they fought in Bakhmut for 6 months and there is no breakthrough. According to him, since there is no blitzkrieg and no Russian columns of tanks moving on Kiev, Russia is losing and their plan failed. He is basically repeating Pentagon standpoints, talking about the Ukraine offensive taking back Krym and stupid shit like that. If you want real military analysis Scott Ritter and Douglas Macgregor are good sources.
This perspective is interesting, especially concerning the questions posed about Germany’s reactions. It is unclear whether the above quotes pre-date the destructions of the Nord Stream pipelines. I would speculate that the US underestimates the gravity of the harm caused by their initiative, and underestimates the level of anger within Germany concerning Chancellor Scholz’s subservience to the US towards the fate of their pipelines. I suspect that the next elections might be fiery and that any new leadership might reverse the US plans described above. In any event, once NS2 (at least) is repaired, the new German government would have… Read more »
“I suspect that the next elections might be fiery and that any new leadership might reverse the US plans described above. In any event, once NS2 (at least) is repaired, the new German government would have more options at its disposal.” Talk about Naïve! Germany is vassal state, and has been since the end of WW2. Foreign armies are still based on German soil, and a peace treaty has never been signed between the Allies and Germany. The so called German constitution (Grundgesetz or Basic Law) was written in 1948 under the guidance of the U.S. military occupation forces and… Read more »
I suspect that the next elections might be fiery and that any new leadership might reverse the US plans described above.” and I have a question: how do you imagine they do it? Let’s assume someone else wins the election in Germany. What do you plan then to do to achieve that? Open investigation in Nord Stream and Bucha or start talking about Odessa massacre, so in other words start real discussion about this war? How can you imagine that, how they are supposed to say everything we said till now was a lie? The issue is to change the… Read more »
But NATO has already lost! Their leaders will not see it, because if they do, they will fall!
Have they? Was winning in Ukraine even their goal? NATO was probably behind the Nord stream attacks. Purpose of this conflict was not Ukraine but destroying the economic connection between Russia and Germany that gave Germany too much leverage over the rest of the EU and threatened US dominance. Just to make you think a little about bigger picture I will mention you this again: Rice: ”You want to change the structure of energy dependence. You want to depend more on the North America energy platform … to have pipelines that don’t go through Ukraine and Russia” “go through Ukraine… Read more »