Geopolitics — only the tip of the iceberg but since people are interested in it, here’s a deep dive into the topic.

– YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Personally, I’m more interested in even deeper matters, such as the structure of the deep state and the connections between different deep states. Geopolitics, in my view, is more of a surface-level subject. While geopolitics is just the tip of the iceberg, I focus more on the deeper truths that form the hidden core beneath the iceberg of lies and the zeitgeist we see on the surface.

Still, since many people are more interested in geopolitics, here’s some geopolitical analysis.

(By the way, in the comments, let me know if you’d like me to post more videos — even if I don’t have time to add my own analysis. I know most people don’t have the time (or the obsession) to spend all day listening to geopolitical analysts like I do. For every 30 videos I watch, I can share the 1 that’s most important and interesting, even without my commentary. I’d post more, but I work a full-time job and simply don’t have the time. Besides, I already spend too much time trying to make sense of what’s going on.)

23:49

I think the dynamic between the two parties is a team play with different roles. From my point of view, the transatlantic split is a myth. Nothing else. I think Washington, the Trump administration, managed to “Europeanize” this war.

In the spring of 2022, a secret file of the Rand Corporation was published. This was a file addressed to the CIA, the White House, and the administration. The experts at Rand wrote that to help the American economy, they could only see one way: they must force Europe, and especially Germany, to invest in the United States and to transfer economic and production facilities back to the United States. The only way to do that is to cut Germany away from the cheap Russian energy supplies. The only way to do that is to bring Germany into a position to support a war in Ukraine. From this point of view, for Washington, everything is working perfectly.

Now the Germans are in a position where they have to invest in the United States. See the last deal between Olaf von der Leyen and Donald Trump. They have to, they promise to invest millions and millions in the United States, to buy weapons from the United States, and to give up production facilities to the United States. This is exactly what the Rand Corporation wrote, and this is managed by transatlantically corrupted elites in Europe and especially in Germany.

Let’s take our Chancellor, Friedrich Merz. He’s a former employee of BlackRock, and he’s the representative of the financial industry of the United States and the military-industrial complex of the United States in Germany as a leader. He makes Germany a vassal of the United States with high risk. Or take the Vice Chancellor of Germany from the Social Democratic Party, Lars Klingbeil. He made an internship at the foundation of the SPD, the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Washington. He made internships there at American NGOs and with American members of Congress who were linked to the CIA. He is another man of the United States in Germany as Vice Chancellor. These people cannot represent the interests of the German people. It’s impossible.

The reason for that is long ago, in the year 2003, former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, French President Jacques Chirac, and Russian President Vladimir Putin refused to join the illegal attack of the United States and some other states against Iraq. This was a warning sign in Washington. Something like that should never, ever happen again. And so they tried to bring our academic elites to a transatlantic way of thinking. That works in our universities, in the churches, in the schools, in the so-called non-governmental organizations, which are mostly run or organized by the state, and in the state administration itself. We have a lot of people who made their careers in cooperation with transatlantic organizations. And today we have these transatlantic elites. We don’t have a German elite.

The second point is the reforms under Chancellor Schröder in the year 2002. According to these reforms, when German lenders sold their industrial shares, it was completely tax-free. The result was that German banks sold their industrial shares, financed structured papers, and made huge gains at the stock exchange. That brought Germany deeper into the financial crisis and opened the possibility for American hedge funds and financial investors to buy industrial shares in Germany. Today, we see a situation where not a single important company on the stock exchange in Frankfurt is without American influence. They have an influence on every company. That means our economy is not owned by Germans; it is owned by the United States, and so they can influence the whole process, the production process. We need a complete reform of that. That’s the point. We are sold out. We are a country completely sold out to the United States, a country of slaves, not only of vassals, but of slaves, because Washington managed to bring us into the position of a front state in the Ukraine war.

Everything that is done on the front lines—the missiles, the artillery—is managed by American soldiers in the German city of Wiesbaden. Everything. And so we are in the focus of Russian nuclear missiles because of that, and that was managed by the United States with the help of German politicians. So they sold out their own countries, and we are slaves of the United States in this war. That’s the point.

I wrote about this over two years ago in my posts on The Duran:

My vision of the European Coup d’état against Germany.

I understood what was happening even before this man from Germany did. As I’ve said before, Poland was the main node of this conflict. This is best illustrated by Radosław Sikorski switching from being a German deep-state agent under Merkel to becoming an American deep-state agent. I’ve quoted him before, but let me bring it up again:

You know, the Polish-American alliance is worthless. In fact, it’s harmful, because it gives Poland a false sense of security. […] Total bullshit. We’ll come into conflict with Germany and Russia, and we’ll think that everything is cool because we gave the Americans a blowjob. Suckers. Absolute suckers.
— Radosław Sikorski

This “giving a blowjob” remark, in my opinion, was directly tied to preparing for the conflict in Ukraine. What Sikorski didn’t realize was the power of the American narrative and manipulation. Without the Americans corrupting and taking control over Germany, Poland would have ended up in conflict with both Germany and Russia. But by corrupting German leaders, the Americans made their plan work.

In the beginning, Sikorski was still working as a German deep-state agent under Merkel. That’s why, during the Euromaidan coup d’état — while Victoria Nuland was engineering it for the American deep state and famously saying “Fuck the EU” in a leaked recording — Sikorski was trying to stop it on behalf of Merkel and the German deep state.

There is a famous recording of Sikorski threatening Euromaidan protesters, trying to block this American coup in Ukraine:

Mr. Sikorski, who was filmed warning an opposition leader that if he didn’t support the deal, ‘you’ll have martial law, you’ll have the army, and you will all be dead.

I wrote about this a long time ago. It was essentially a struggle between the European deep state under Merkel and the American deep state. As the author of the main video explains, during the second Iraq war, France, Germany, and Russia opposed it — and this deeply worried the Americans. The European deep state under Merkel was trying to make Europe independent from the United States by deepening cooperation with Russia, gaining access to cheap resources and cheap manpower.

As I’ve quoted many times, George Friedman himself has admitted that this scared the Americans. Here is the full lecture from which this quote is taken — I highly recommend watching it in its entirety.

1:08:10

Well, remember the structure of Europe. From St. Petersburg to Rostov, draw a line. To the west of it is the European Peninsula; to the east is Russia. No one has ever permanently occupied Russia, but Russia has always moved westward. Now it's just further east. The line, incidentally, is roughly the border of the Baltics, Belarus, and Ukraine.

The question on the table for the Russians is: will they retain a buffer zone that's at least neutral, or will the West penetrate so far into Ukraine that they're 70 miles away from Stalingrad and 300 miles away from Moscow? For Russia, the status of Ukraine is an existential threat, and the Russians cannot let go. For the United States, in the event that Russia holds on to Ukraine, where will it stop? Therefore, it's not an accident that General Hodges, who's been appointed to be blamed for all of this, is talking about prepositioning troops in Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, and the Baltics. This is the Intermarium, from the Black Sea to the Baltic, that Piłsudski dreamt of. This is the solution for the United States.

The issue to which we don't have the answer is: what will Germany do? So the real wild card in Europe is that as the United States builds this cordon sanitaire—not in Ukraine, but to the west—and the Russians try to figure out how to leverage the Ukrainians out, we don't know the German position. Germany is in a very peculiar position. Its former Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, is on the board of Gazprom. They have a very complex relationship with the Russians. The Germans themselves don't know what to do. They must export. The Russians can't take up the export. On the other hand, if they lose the free trade zone, they need to build something different.

For the United States, the primordial fear is Russian capital, I mean German technology and German capital, Russian natural resources, and Russian manpower. This is the only combination that has for centuries scared the hell out of the United States. So how does this play out? Well, the U.S. has already put cards on the table: it is the line from the Baltics to the Black Sea. For the Russians, their cards have always been on the table: they must have at least a neutral Ukraine, not a pro-Western Ukraine. But the outcome is another question.

Whoever can tell me what the Germans are going to do is going to tell me about the next 20 years of history, but unfortunately, the Germans haven't made up their mind. And this is the problem of Germany always: enormously economically powerful, geopolitically very fragile, and never quite knowing how to reconcile the two.

I don’t agree with George Friedman’s claim that Germany “didn’t know what to do.” They knew perfectly well what to do. The European deep state under Merkel wanted to build strong ties with Russia for cheap resources and cheap manpower, as mentioned in the quote, but they also wanted to establish deep ties with China as a market for European-made goods.

As Friedman himself said, “The Russians can’t take up the export.” While Russia couldn’t absorb European exports, China could. So the European deep state formed deep ties with Russia for cheap resources and labor, and deep ties with China to take in European exports. All of this alarmed the Americans, which is why they created a plan to stop it.

This all began with the second Iraq war, as the main video mentions. That invasion was carried out by the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. But what most people don’t realize is that there was also a “Coalition of the Willing” in Europe, which included Poland, Denmark, and the Netherlands. This is why I laugh when I hear people talk about “Europe” wanting the war in Ukraine. Germany needed Russia and China for its economic growth and independence from the United States. Any European leader who supports the war in Ukraine is simply an American puppet.

That’s why the analysis from people like Alex Krainer and Tom Luongo makes me laugh so much — they don’t understand anything. They believe America is the “good one,” completely ignoring the fact that during the second Iraq war, it was the United States and the United Kingdom that pushed for war, while Germany, France, and the rest of Europe opposed it. How do you explain that if America is the “good guy” and Europe is supposedly full of “horrible warmongers”?

America is the core of our Western capitalist “Empire of Evil,” and the British are their Trojan horse in Europe — as I’ve written before. I’ve also mentioned that my friend, after reading a book about Charles de Gaulle, told me that de Gaulle held the same opinion, calling the British an American Trojan horse in Europe. That’s why he opposed Britain joining the precursors of the European Union.

I’ve also argued that the City of London is not at the core of this Western capitalist empire, as Alex Krainer claims. The real core lies in New York City, through corporations like Sullivan & Cromwell — a firm not many people know about, but which still plays a crucial role. For example, many talk about Peter Thiel nowadays, but few mention that he began his career working for Sullivan & Cromwell. This same firm created the famous Dulles brothers — the true power behind the Western capitalist “Empire of Evil” — and now helps create new deep-state figures like Peter Thiel.

I explained the story of this empire’s true core in one of my earlier posts:

MUST WATCH!!! How the world really works and who controls it: Sullivan & Cromwell, Allen Dulles, the origin of the world order, and the neocons.

To back my point about America being behind all of this — right after my interview with the German journalist on Dialogue Works (the main video attached to this post), there was another interview with C. Johnson and Col. Larry Wilkerson. In it, Col. Wilkerson says the exact same thing. I’ve already quoted one of my previous posts where he explicitly states that it’s America orchestrating this.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

1:16:10 

After listening to the German journalist that you interviewed this morning and a couple of other people, one in Munich and one in Stuttgart, I think there's a lot of pressure from certain leaders, but the pressure washes off Donald Trump's back. He doesn't listen to it; he doesn't say a word. Basically, I think the journalist is right about those being, what did he say? He used a really brilliant term, "trans-Atlanticized" or something like that. His term about propaganda media is absolutely accurate, but what he doesn't know is we've been buying that media since 2002 through USAID and other CIA mechanisms. It's never the agency doing it, or they rarely do it. We've been buying those editors, we've been buying those journalists. So they are putting out our propaganda in European media.

It's the same thing we did in Chile in a very small way. Not for Chile and not for Allende, but we bought up all the media that counted in Chile and we put in that media editors and journalists who just went on and on about how terrible a communist Allende was. We learned how to do these things, but we don't do them directly anymore. We use "liberal democratic institutions" to do it, like USAID, like IRI, like NDI, like all these institutions that are selling "liberal democracy." What they're selling is the propaganda of the United States.

When you see European leaders warmongering, they are not acting as Europeans — they are American agents doing America’s bidding. European elites have worked for American corporations and NGOs, and many were educated in American brainwashing seminars called “universities.” That is how we ended up with European elites controlled by our Western capitalist Empire of Evil, led by America. As the German in the main video put it, they are “transatlantically corrupted.”

I’ve also written that, in reality, all of this is partially Germany’s own fault. Germany flew too close to the sun and got burned. The American coup d’état against Germany could only succeed because Germany had been oppressing the rest of Europe. That oppression drove other European countries to side with America against Germany, helping Washington carry out the coup.

For example, Germany’s “green agenda” declared nuclear power “non-ecological” while branding Russian gas as the most ecological energy source. Why? Because France and the UK were leaders in nuclear power, and Germany wanted to undermine them while making Europe dependent on Russian gas — gas that Germany would distribute. This gave Berlin both leverage over Europe and the cheapest energy costs, securing a huge economic advantage.

Before the war in Ukraine, no one talked about France — it was irrelevant in discussions about Europe’s future. The question was always framed as “What will Germany do?” as if Germany were the only country that mattered. France didn’t like that. Now, with France’s resurgence and growing relevance, which is why Paris supports the Americans.

Similarly, Norway is now the biggest supplier of gas to Europe, with pipelines running through Denmark. They weren’t happy about Germany selling cheaper Russian gas, which cut into their profits — hence Denmark and Norway also support the Americans.

Then there’s Eastern Europe, including my own Poland. Germany deliberately kept our economies suppressed to ensure we remained a source of cheap labor — in effect, obedient servants to Germany. This is why Eastern Europeans, including Poland, support the Americans.

If Germany had not tried to suppress France’s role in Europe, or undermine British and French nuclear energy development, those countries might not support Washington. If Germany had accommodated Norway and Denmark’s gas interests, they might not support Washington. If Germany hadn’t economically suppressed Eastern Europeans like Poland, we might not support Washington.

Germany managed to anger nearly every other European country — and only because of that was this coup d’état against Germany possible. If Berlin had worked to make Europe independent while also making it interdependent and united in solidarity, instead of turning it into Germany’s neo-colonial project for German benefit alone, the Americans would never have gotten the support they needed.

So yes, Germany is partially to blame. They wanted Europe to be independent, but only under their control and for their benefit — at the expense of other Europeans. America, meanwhile, only wanted Europe to remain under American control; they didn’t care who ran the EU or who benefited most, as long as Europe stayed subservient. That is why some European countries have backed the American coup d’état against Germany.

Finally, I want to touch on the AfD, because I think there are many misinterpretations. I’ve heard people say the AfD is pro-Russian and anti-war, which in my opinion is wrong. I even remember when The Duran claimed that — and I was writing in the comments that they were wrong. Fortunately, they later interviewed an AfD member, which confirmed my view.

EU isolation and escalation w/ Christine Anderson (Live)

27:48

During a summit at the UN, possibly in 2018 or 2019, Donald Trump, who was the sitting president of the United States at the time, told Germany that they were making themselves dependent on Russian gas. The representatives of the German government were present and laughed at him, thinking it was a ridiculous statement. They believed they were making themselves independent from Russian gas. As it turned out, he was right, but they laughed at him because they viewed him as an idiot who couldn't possibly be right.

This AfD member claims that Trump was right to protest Germany buying cheap gas from Russia. Trump represented the American deep state, while Merkel represented the European deep state. As I’ve explained before, Merkel wanted to build close ties with Russia to secure cheap resources like gas, and at the same time, strengthen ties with China to secure a market for European exports. The American deep state opposed this plan.

So, which side is the AfD taking? They are taking the side of the American deep state. The AfD does not want an independent Europe — they are one of the biggest tools of the American deep state. Their only role is to bring economic neoliberalism to Europe, destroying the only truly good thing we still have: our social welfare systems and social contract.

Simply put, they want to turn Europe into America — with its massive wealth inequality, its privatization of everything for the benefit of corporations at the expense of the people, and its transformation into a corporatocracy. They also want to increase military spending, just as America demands from Europe, so that European forces can later be used in American wars.

The AfD is not your friend. The AfD is not a “good” force. The AfD will not save Germany. They believe China is a “horrible communist state” and that America is a land flowing with milk and honey — a kind of wonderland. And because of this worldview, they want to reshape Europe to be more like America.

A German guest in his previous interview on Dialogue Works said something interesting about the AfD.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

50:45 

The AfD also wants peace with Russia, but it will invest more in the military-industrial complex. It is not a full peace party. It wants peace and a deal with Russia, but they want to invest more money into the military sector. It is a NATO party, so it is not my party. I think the AfD will be transformed step by step by the NATO forces inside the party, and the peace forces inside the AfD will lose ground. At the end of the show, after the next elections in four years at the country level, we will see a coalition of the Christian Democrats and the AfD, and the show will go on.

I agree with his assessment. First, the AfD role will be to privatize everything, dismantle welfare, and turn Germany into a corporatocracy like America — with full financialization and militarization. They will do it by forming a union with the CDU on Christian ideological grounds, then they will push for war against the “unholy” Russians and Muslims based on ideology and religion.

America is a country where most people believe in angels and are driven by ideology. The AfD wants to make Germany the same so it can start helping Americans wage wars on ideological grounds. If people like those in the AfD come to power, Europe will lose its welfare, its economy will be fully based on financialization and militarization, and its population will become stupefied and driven solely by ideology. That ideology will then be used to motivate the people to go to war. This is the worst thing that can happen to Germany and Europe — and it is coming, thanks to the American narrative and manipulation.

The current immigration crisis in Europe is designed to push people in this direction — toward exactly what the AfD is promoting. Normally, you could never convince people to vote to remove their own welfare and make themselves more ideology-driven. So how do you achieve it? By engineering a migrant crisis: importing the worst elements from certain Arab countries to increase hatred toward those people, while at the same time designing welfare policies so they appear to benefit these disliked immigrants more than native citizens. This makes the public turn against welfare itself.

Instead of fixing welfare to serve citizens properly, they deliberately create a system that breeds resentment. This is dialectical manipulation: you design specific conditions to create the reaction you want. If you can’t make people directly support something — like abolishing welfare — you create the conditions that will make them demand it themselves.

It is no accident that welfare is designed to appear as though it benefits immigrants more than citizens. People would never vote to get rid of their own welfare, but if it seems like the hated “other” benefits more, they will. This is the manipulation almost no one sees. It’s not about openly ordering people to do something to achieve your goal — it’s about creating conditions in which people choose to do exactly what you wanted from the start.

In this post, I originally planned to address three “nodes” connected to the moves of our Western capitalist Empire of Evil. But focusing on the first node — Ukraine — has already made this post too long to cover the other two. I may write about them later. I truly wish I had more time to write, but my full-time job leaves me little opportunity.

Thanks to everyone who stuck with me until the end of my post. And, as always… 

“Knowledge will make you be free.”

― Socrates

+

“Knowledge isn’t free. You have to pay attention.”

― Richard P. Feynman

=

“Freedom is not free, you need to pay attention.”

― Grzegorz Ochman

Please pay enough attention, or we will all be screwed. God bless you all.

“In foreign policy, our field of action lies in the East – that’s where we can be strong. It is senseless for Poland to get too eagerly involved in Western foreign relations, because over there nothing else awaits us except crawling up the West’s ass… and being shat on while in there.”

― Józef Piłsudski

“The West is filthy/rotten.”

― Józef Piłsudski

“At that time, Polish socialist pamphlets first fell into my hands—Młot's "Who Lives on What" and Liebknecht's "In Defense of the Truth." I liked them much more and found them more convincing than the "Narodnaya Volya" publications I had read so far. Therefore, I decided to learn more about socialism itself and read the first volume of Marx's Capital in Russian. I can't say that this reading made an impression on me. Although the Russian influence was small, it still managed to wreak some anarchistic havoc in my head. Marx's abstract logic and the domination of a commodity over a human being did not suit my brain. In any case, this reading significantly deepened my views on society, and I began to unconsciously succumb to the influence of Marx's logically constructed concept.”

― Józef Piłsudski

“From afar, Bolshevism appears to the poor and oppressed as a hope for a better tomorrow, (…) yet up close it turns out to be the denial of the socialist idea.”

― Józef Piłsudski

“No healthy society will tolerate an economy run by bandits supported by authorities and authorities supported by bandits without active resistance. If we are such a society, we should get rid of such masters.”

― Józef Piłsudski

"And I stand to fight, as before, against the primary evil of the state (world): the rule of unruly parties and factions over Poland (world), the forgetting of intangible values, and the remembering of nothing but money and personal gain."

― Józef Piłsudski

“Our blood has soaked into one land, a land equally dear to both sides, equally beloved by both. (…) May God, merciful toward our sins, forgive us and turn away His punishing hand, and may we stand ready for our work that strengthens and renews our land.”

― Józef Piłsudski