The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
From my friend, John Varoli, this new piece available on substack is very compelling and worth reading in full. He may be right, and in my view, whether he is or not, it is incumbent upon the American people to act, to melt the lines to the White House and to their Congressional representatives to make it clear to them that we, the people, will not stand for being victim to the warmongers’ desire for WW3 and nuclear annihilation. It is just that simple.

This weekend’s multiple terror attacks against civilian and military installations in Russia have CIA and Pentagon fingerprints all over them, which in turn means the White House finally gave the green light after months of hesitation. Don’t take my word for it, just look at what Trump said on May 27. (see his post above)
Late Saturday night, a bridge in the Bryansk Region was blown up, precisely timed to collapse and crush a speeding passenger train carrying many sleeping families. At least seven were killed and up to 100 severely injured.
On Sunday morning, drones were launched locally from tractor trailers to attack five air force bases across Russia, such as in Murmansk on the Arctic Ocean. The extent of the damage is not clear, but the operation’s daring and complexity leaves no doubt that U.S. planning, organization and satellite intelligence were crucial.
I’m not saying anything controversial. For months U.S. media have detailed how the CIA and Pentagon run the show in Kiev, whose military is entirely funded and armed by the U.S. and other NATO nations. Also, top White House officials such as Marco Rubio and General Kellogg have said the U.S. is fighting a “proxy war” against Russia.
Despite promises to end the war, Trump provides full support to Kiev in its effort to conquer and exterminate the people of Donbass and Crimea who over a decade ago voted to leave Ukraine after the central government in Kiev disintegrated amid the violent overthrow of the legitimate president.
So, how will Moscow react? One commentator referred to this weekend’s attack as ‘Pearl Harbor’ and many Russians want a devastating response. But the U.S. and other NATO members correctly calculated that Moscow doesn’t have ‘red lines’ and won’t take action against terrorist decision-making and logistic centers. Those centers are of course in Washington, London, Paris, Berlin and bases in Poland and Romania.
According to international law, Moscow has a right to strike any site that supports, facilitates and organizes terrorist attacks. Doing so, however, would trigger World War 3, and most likely a nuclear war. Moscow is aware of that, and hence acts responsibly, absorbing the loss of life and destruction to avoid the end of life on the planet. Putin is the only adult in a ‘geopolitical room’ of juvenile delinquents.
The situation is worse than most Americans realize. Every day, Kiev carries out terrorist attacks against Russian civilians, targeting residential neighborhoods with drones, artillery and HIMARS shelling, and anti-personnel mines. In the past three years, western-sponsored Ukrainian terrorist attacks have left over 6,000 Russian civilians dead (source: Russian Foreign Ministry).
The Russian response is to target military sites and critical infrastructure in Ukraine; but never the countries where decisions are made and operations planned. Moscow’s patience and restraint are extraordinary, but the West sees this as weakness, and hence, feels emboldened to commit more atrocities.

Russia’s caution doesn’t mean it’s losing; in fact, quite the opposite. The West’s widespread use of terrorism reveals desperation as its proxy army suffers tremendous losses and defeat on the battlefield. Facing a coalition of over 40 enemy countries (NATO plus Japan, South Korea, etc), Moscow has scored one of history’s greatest military victories by thwarting U.S.-led efforts to invade and destroy Russia.
Last summer’s invasion of the Kursk Region was not an ‘incursion’ — it was an operation that U.S. and other obsessed NATO leaders believed would lead to the collapse of the Russian state and overthrow of President Putin’s government. Remember, western leaders and generals are hostages to their own disinformation and propaganda, believing that Russia is weak and close to collapse.
Just look at the vast resources that NATO poured into the Kursk offensive. When considering both frontline and support forces, probably a few hundred thousand Ukrainian soldiers were involved in the Kursk invasion. In the end, over 75,000 were left dead in the fields after seven months of fighting. Soldiers from NATO countries, such as Poland, also fought, with locals saying they were the most vicious war criminals, executing and torturing civilians.
Russia proceeds cautiously and cleverly because it fights for survival against a far richer and larger enemy. The U.S.-led coalition has a total population of almost 1.5 billion, and their economies constitute about 50% of global GDP. Russia has a population of 145 million, with a global share of GDP no more than 5%.
Russia cannot risk a head-on clash with NATO. Instead, it needs to be a chess master, and pick apart, weaken and thwart NATO at every turn. And most importantly, do not take the bait of every provocative American/NATO-sponsored terrorist attack whose ultimate goal is to ignite World War 3.

The terrorist attacks of this past weekend prove beyond any doubt that Trump is willing to risk World War 3 and nuclear annihilation in order to further his agenda of ‘Make America Great Again’.
When was America ‘great’? The peak of American greatness was in the 1990s and early 2000s when it was the sole superpower; Russia was truly on the brink of collapse, and China was still only developing. To make America great again, Trump needs to subdue both Russia and China. Don’t believe any of Trump’s words about ending foreign wars and interventions. He is lying. The U.S. is neck-deep in the war against Russia, as well as wars in the Middle East, and tensions in East Asia.
As his presidency faces growing resistance at home, Trump needs a major foreign policy victory. Mesmerized by the lure of Russia’s vast natural riches — the planet’s largest — Trump risks falling into the same trap as western tyrants over the centuries who sought to subjugate and loot Russia.
Whether liberal or conservative, almost the entire ruling class in the West has become an apocalyptic death cult, eager for World War 3. People who consider themselves Christians such as Senator Lindsey Graham (Baptist) and Marco Rubio (Baptist/ Catholic) adhere to such extreme and violent beliefs that probably shock Satan.
Trump is not a peacemaker. He could stop the war in Ukraine today, simply by ending all support to Zelensky’s brutal totalitarian regime. But he fails to act. Because he doesn’t want to. With these recent terror attacks, Trump has crossed the Rubicon and fully gone over to the side of the Party of War in Washington.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

However, it is clearly the EU support, especially the UK and France, that is behind the attacks.
The odds against Russia are not the 10-1 that the author claims. China, while so far mainly a silent partner, is solidly behind Russia – and if war broke out between NATO and Russia, China knows that it would have to fight alongside Russia. Because if it allowed Russia to succumb, it would be next. They must, as Ben Franklin put it, “hang together or hang separately”.
Re: “Russia cannot risk a head-on clash with NATO.” Yes it can, as it has already destroyed a large portion of NATO’s hardware in the former Ukraine, which included a plethora of US billion + dollar Patriot Air Defense Systems. NATO is inferior in every way to the Russian Armed forces, which have by far the best missile technology in the world, and the most technically advanced air-force in the world. In a full on clash with NATO in Ukraine, NATO would be annihilated by the Russian armed forces, as most of NATO’s armaments were designed in the 1970s, 80s… Read more »