in ,

Boris Johnson has changed his mind on ‘reset’ with Russia

The UK Prime Minister has changed his mind on thawing relations with Russia, but should we be surprised?

Submitted by InfoBrics, authored by Johanna Ross, journalist based in Edinburgh, Scotland…

Recently Boris Johnson was quoted as saying he had ‘changed his mind’ on whether there could be a ‘reset’ in relations between Britain and Russia. Interviewed when on a visit to Estonia, he said that despite remaining an optimist and hoping for an improvement in bilateral relations, he found that the situation was ‘very, very disappointing’ and that there were ‘terrible problems’ that prevented cooperation between the two nations. He was in particular referring to, of course, the attempted murder of ex-double agent Sergei Skripal on the streets of Salisbury last year, which the UK has always blamed the Russian government for, despite the lack of evidence.

So should we be surprised by this? After all, Boris Johnson has in some ways maintained a more positive attitude towards Russia, despite being Foreign Secretary at the time of the Skripal case. He said back in 2017 that he was a ‘committed Russophile’ and that he wanted to see an improvement in relations with Russia, joking that he was the first ever Foreign Secretary to be called ‘Boris’. In an interview with Deutsche Welle he said that he loved Russia and that the UK had ‘no quarrel’ with the country. Even as recently as November this year he spoke quite sensibly on the topic of alleged Russian interference in UK elections, stating “There’s no evidence of that and you’ve got to be very careful… you simply can’t cast aspersions on everybody who comes from a certain country, just because of their nationality.”

As Mayor of London, Boris forged friendships and contacts within the Russian community, many of whom became wealthy donors to the Conservative party.  Sergei Nalobin, a Russian diplomat and son of a former KGB general, was one such member of the now defunct Conservative Friends of Russia, who once tweeted that he was a ‘good friend’ of Boris Johnson. And as recently as the day after the election, Johnson was at a party held by media guru Evgenii Lebedev, son of Alexander Lebedev, an ex-KGB agent. Indeed before the December election the Prime Minister was having to defend his delay of a controversial report into Russian interference in UK politics, as rumours began it had been suppressed due to details of substantial donations made by Russian oligarchs to his party. Lyubov Chernukhin, wife of Vladimir Chernukhin, paid £200,000 to the Conservative party in recent times, and in the past £160,000 for a tennis match with Johnson and £135,000 for a night with former Prime Minister Theresa May.

And yet, when it comes to policy towards Russia, Johnson has toed the establishment line.  He was criticised at the time of the Skripal case for accusing the Russian President Vladimir Putin for being personally responsible for the poisoning, without any concrete evidence.  He had said that the scientists at the UK’s chemical weapons centre at Porton Down assured him the ‘novichok’ had come from Russia. Later it emerged that Porton Down did not in fact ascertain that the poison had come from Russia, and it was established that Russia had ceased production of the substance long ago. He then asserted that only Russia had the motivation for targeting Skripal, as he was a defector, and yet as some have pointed out, the UK had equal motive. There are indeed many discrepancies in the UK version of events.

This is where Johnson’s Russia policy is laced with hypocrisy. For on the one hand, the country is treated as a pariah state, but on the other, he is more than willing to accept donations from wealthy individuals connected to the Kremlin. Indeed it is likely that if the UK had a similar trade relationship to the one it has with Saudi Arabia, its policy towards Russia would be quite different. One only has to look at the horrific murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi embassy in Istanbul, and its aftermath, to realise that UK foreign policy is very much determined by economic factors, not moral ones. Arms deals worth billions of pounds dictate that Britain will never do more than criticise the murder in passing, despite clear links to Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman and international condemnation of the Saudis and their human rights record. The UK court of appeal in fact ruled recently that British arms sales to Saudi Arabia are ‘unlawful’ because of their use in the Saudi onslaught of Yemen. And yet no such Cold War will be waged against the Saudi kingdom, which continues to be an ally of the US and UK in the Middle East.

So, no, we are not to be surprised at Johnson’s statement. British foreign policy towards Russia is consistent in its disdain and contempt for this Eurasian nation, which it has never really understood, or properly attempted to. As Winston Churchil once declared, Russia was a ‘riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma’.  We are no further forward today…

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

13 points
Upvote Downvote

12
Leave a Reply

avatar
8 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
Magilla GorillaPaul MartinOlivia KrothTerry RExiled in Ard Mhaca Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Gareth Armstrong
Guest
Gareth Armstrong

Corbyn was the only guy with a diplomatic stance toward Russia.
BOJO the clown is probably the second most horrific PM to have ever graced Britain, first being May.

Olivia Kroth
Guest

And will he REALLY deliver BREXIT? Wait and see, drink a cup of (English) tea …

ManintheMoon
Guest
ManintheMoon

Third. You are forgetting Bliar.

Theopilus
Guest
Theopilus

Boris is far too smart to believe all the neo-con nonsense about Russia but he needs at least apparently close relations with the US at least until we have sorted out relations with the EU by the end of 2020. And yes he really will deliver Brexit as promised – his political reputation depends on it and anyway it is what he believes in. Despite all that stuff about being a serial liar, he is no more of a liar than any other politician and he has a pretty good track record of delivering what he promises.

ManintheMoon
Guest
ManintheMoon

I am afraid you’re deluded. You don’t have to believe the neocons on Russia to go along with them. They don’t themselves (they hardly could, having set up Russiagate, the Skripals etc). These issues are just pretexts to fool the sheeple not to object to punishing Russia – to all of our costs – for upsetting Washington/Tel Aviv/London’s plasn in the Middle East and elsewhere). As for Brexit, Boris no more believes in it than he believes in marital fidelity. He admitted that he had two articles written – one pro one anti – on the eve of the Brexit… Read more »

Paul Martin
Guest
Paul Martin

Agreed. It seems more clear that bonds between certain nation states will help promote the formation of blocks which will constitute the new international partnerships in the next phase of global relations and trade. To the extant that these formations are still somewhat challenged by counter-moves on the part of globalist institutions, more care needs to be taken to indicate one’s “partners” as well as “antagonists”. Therefore, I think Boris is ostensibly distancing himself from Russia, not least for the sake of a stronger bond with US as a partner going forward. It is not clear whether UK will be… Read more »

ManintheMoon
Guest
ManintheMoon

The spooks have far too much on Johnson for this nakedly ambitious charlatan ever to dare the go against his masters on the matter of Russia.

Guy
Member
Guy

What,Boris changed his mind on realignment with Russia ? I don’t believe it , surely you are making this up . LOL

Exiled in Ard Mhaca
Guest
Exiled in Ard Mhaca

BoJo the clown is trying to walk on both sides of the street at the same time. Says one thing does the opposite. A liar for sure but no different to other occupants of 10 Downing Street.

Terry R
Guest
Terry R

Those wealthy Russians who have donated to the Conservative Party have no connection with the Kremlin, as claimed by this article.
“This is where Johnson’s Russia policy is laced with hypocrisy. For on the one hand, the country is treated as a pariah state, but on the other, he is more than willing to accept donations from wealthy individuals connected to the Kremlin. “

Olivia Kroth
Guest

British politicians in general are not trustworthy partners for Russia. It is no use trying to deal with the British Prime Ministers, Russia should just give up dealing with GB.

Magilla Gorilla
Guest
Magilla Gorilla

Boris Johnson has a mind?

Sounds like more fake news from state run BBC.

The Human Cost Of This Is Too Much

German politician: “Ami go home!”